Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 139(3): 1149-57, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27036251

RESUMEN

Killer whale acoustic behavior has been extensively investigated; however, most studies have focused on pulsed calls and whistles. This study reports the production of low-frequency signals by killer whales at frequencies below 300 Hz. Recordings were made in Iceland and Norway when killer whales were observed feeding on herring and no other marine mammal species were nearby. Low-frequency sounds were identified in Iceland and ranged in duration between 0.14 and 2.77 s and in frequency between 50 and 270 Hz, well below the previously reported lower limit for killer whale tonal sounds of 500 Hz. Low-frequency sounds appeared to be produced close in time to tail slaps, which are indicative of feeding attempts, suggesting that these sounds may be related to a feeding context. However, their precise function is unknown, and they could be the by-product of a non-vocal behavior rather than a vocal signal deliberately produced by the whales. Although killer whales in Norway exhibit similar feeding behavior, this sound has not been detected in recordings from Norway to date. This study suggests that, like other delphinids, killer whales produce low-frequency sounds, but further studies will be required to understand whether similar sounds exist in other killer whale populations.


Asunto(s)
Vocalización Animal/clasificación , Orca/clasificación , Orca/fisiología , Acústica , Animales , Océano Atlántico , Conducta Alimentaria , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Espectrografía del Sonido , Factores de Tiempo
2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 139(5): 2697, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27250163

RESUMEN

As part of a long-term research program, Cook Inlet beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) presence was acoustically monitored with two types of acoustic sensors utilized in tandem in moorings deployed year-round: an ecological acoustic recorder (EAR) and a cetacean and porpoise detector (C-POD). The EAR was used primarily to record the calls, whistles, and buzzes produced by belugas and killer whales (Orcinus orca). The C-POD was used to log and classify echolocation clicks from belugas, killer whales, and porpoises. This paper describes mooring packages that maximized the chances of successful long-term data collection in the particularly challenging Cook Inlet environment, and presents an analytical comparison of odontocete detections obtained by the collocated EAR and C-POD instruments from two mooring locations in the upper inlet. Results from this study illustrate a significant improvement in detecting beluga and killer whale presence when the different acoustic signals detected by EARs and C-PODs are considered together. Further, results from concurrent porpoise detections indicating prey competition and feeding interference with beluga, and porpoise displacement due to ice formation are described.


Asunto(s)
Acústica/instrumentación , Ballena Beluga/fisiología , Ecolocación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/instrumentación , Transductores , Vocalización Animal , Alaska , Animales , Ballena Beluga/clasificación , Ecolocación/clasificación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Océanos y Mares , Marsopas/clasificación , Marsopas/fisiología , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de Tiempo , Vocalización Animal/clasificación , Orca/clasificación , Orca/fisiología
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 135(2): 953-62, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25234903

RESUMEN

Vocal communication is a primary communication method of killer and pilot whales, and is used for transmitting a broad range of messages and information for short and long distance. The large variation in call types of these species makes it challenging to categorize them. In this study, sounds recorded by audio sensors carried by ten killer whales and eight pilot whales close to the coasts of Norway, Iceland, and the Bahamas were analyzed using computer methods and citizen scientists as part of the Whale FM project. Results show that the computer analysis automatically separated the killer whales into Icelandic and Norwegian whales, and the pilot whales were separated into Norwegian long-finned and Bahamas short-finned pilot whales, showing that at least some whales from these two locations have different acoustic repertoires that can be sensed by the computer analysis. The citizen science analysis was also able to separate the whales to locations by their sounds, but the separation was somewhat less accurate compared to the computer method.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Colaboración de las Masas , Minería de Datos/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/clasificación , Vocalización Animal , Orca/fisiología , Calderón/fisiología , Acústica , Animales , Ecosistema , Movimiento (Física) , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Sonido , Espectrografía del Sonido , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de Tiempo , Orca/clasificación , Orca/psicología , Calderón/clasificación , Calderón/psicología
4.
Genome Res ; 20(7): 908-16, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20413674

RESUMEN

Killer whales (Orcinus orca) currently comprise a single, cosmopolitan species with a diverse diet. However, studies over the last 30 yr have revealed populations of sympatric "ecotypes" with discrete prey preferences, morphology, and behaviors. Although these ecotypes avoid social interactions and are not known to interbreed, genetic studies to date have found extremely low levels of diversity in the mitochondrial control region, and few clear phylogeographic patterns worldwide. This low level of diversity is likely due to low mitochondrial mutation rates that are common to cetaceans. Using killer whales as a case study, we have developed a method to readily sequence, assemble, and analyze complete mitochondrial genomes from large numbers of samples to more accurately assess phylogeography and estimate divergence times. This represents an important tool for wildlife management, not only for killer whales but for many marine taxa. We used high-throughput sequencing to survey whole mitochondrial genome variation of 139 samples from the North Pacific, North Atlantic, and southern oceans. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that each of the known ecotypes represents a strongly supported clade with divergence times ranging from approximately 150,000 to 700,000 yr ago. We recommend that three named ecotypes be elevated to full species, and that the remaining types be recognized as subspecies pending additional data. Establishing appropriate taxonomic designations will greatly aid in understanding the ecological impacts and conservation needs of these important marine predators. We predict that phylogeographic mitogenomics will become an important tool for improved statistical phylogeography and more precise estimates of divergence times.


Asunto(s)
Genoma Mitocondrial/genética , Orca/clasificación , Orca/genética , Animales , Secuencia de Bases , Especiación Genética , Variación Genética/fisiología , Geografía , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Océanos y Mares , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Homología de Secuencia de Ácido Nucleico , Especificidad de la Especie
5.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 134(5): 3513-21, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24180762

RESUMEN

To study delphinid near surface movements and behavior, two L-shaped hydrophone arrays and one vertical hydrophone line array were deployed at shallow depths (<125 m) from the floating instrument platform R/P FLIP, moored northwest of San Clemente Island in the Southern California Bight. A three-dimensional propagation-model based passive acoustic tracking method was developed and used to track a group of five offshore killer whales (Orcinus orca) using their emitted clicks. In addition, killer whale pulsed calls and high-frequency modulated (HFM) signals were localized using other standard techniques. Based on these tracks sound source levels for the killer whales were estimated. The peak to peak source levels for echolocation clicks vary between 170-205 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m, for HFM calls between 185-193 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m, and for pulsed calls between 146-158 dB re 1 µPa @ 1 m.


Asunto(s)
Acústica/instrumentación , Ecolocación/clasificación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/instrumentación , Oceanografía/instrumentación , Transductores , Vocalización Animal/clasificación , Orca/clasificación , Orca/fisiología , Animales , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Oceanografía/métodos , Océanos y Mares , Densidad de Población , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Espectrografía del Sonido , Especificidad de la Especie , Natación , Factores de Tiempo
6.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 134(5): 3486-95, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24180759

RESUMEN

Using moored autonomous acoustic recorders to detect and record the vocalizations of social odonotocetes to determine their occurrence patterns is a non-invasive tool in the study of these species in remote locations. Acoustic recorders were deployed in seven locations on the continental shelf of the U.S. west coast from Cape Flattery, WA to Pt. Reyes, CA to detect and record endangered southern resident killer whales between January and June of 2006-2011. Detection rates of these whales were greater in 2009 and 2011 than in 2006-2008, were most common in the month of March, and occurred with the greatest frequency off the Columbia River and Westport, which was likely related to the presence of their most commonly consumed prey, Chinook salmon. The observed patterns of annual and monthly killer whale occurrence may be related to run strength and run timing, respectively, for spring Chinook returning to the Columbia River, the largest run in this region at this time of year. Acoustic recorders provided a unique, long-term, dataset that will be important to inform future consideration of Critical Habitat designation for this U.S. Endangered Species Act listed species.


Asunto(s)
Acústica , Especies en Peligro de Extinción , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Oceanografía/métodos , Vocalización Animal/clasificación , Orca/clasificación , Orca/fisiología , Acústica/instrumentación , Animales , Conducta Animal , Monitoreo del Ambiente/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Oceanografía/instrumentación , Océanos y Mares , Densidad de Población , Dinámica Poblacional , Conducta Predatoria , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Espectrografía del Sonido , Natación , Factores de Tiempo , Transductores
9.
Nature ; 446(7135): 492, 2007 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17392763
11.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc ; 88(1): 62-80, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22882545

RESUMEN

Killer whales, Orcinus orca, are top predators occupying key ecological roles in a variety of ecosystems and are one of the most widely distributed mammals on the planet. In consequence, there has been significant interest in understanding their basic biology and ecology. Long-term studies of Northern Hemisphere killer whales, particularly in the eastern North Pacific (ENP), have identified three ecologically distinct communities or ecotypes in that region. The success of these prominent ENP studies has led to similar efforts at clarifying the role of killer whale ecology in other regions, including Antarctica. In the Southern Hemisphere, killer whales present a range of behavioural, social and morphological characteristics to biologists, who often interpret this as evidence to categorize individuals or groups, and draw general ecological conclusions about these super-predators. Morphologically distinct forms (Type A, B, C, and D) occur in the Southern Ocean and studies of these different forms are often presented in conjunction with evidence for specialised ecology and behaviours. Here we review current knowledge of killer whale ecology and ecotyping globally and present a synthesis of existing knowledge. In particular, we highlight the complexity of killer whale ecology in the Southern Hemisphere and examine this in the context of comparatively well-studied Northern Hemisphere populations. We suggest that assigning erroneous or prefatory ecotypic status in the Southern Hemisphere could be detrimental to subsequent killer whale studies, because unsubstantiated characteristics may be assumed as a result of such classification. On this basis, we also recommend that ecotypic status classification for Southern Ocean killer whale morphotypes be reserved until more evidence-based ecological and taxonomic data are obtained.


Asunto(s)
Ecosistema , Orca/clasificación , Orca/fisiología , Animales , Demografía , Conducta Alimentaria , Modelos Biológicos , Conducta Social , Orca/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda