Bladder cancer hunting: A microfluidic paper-based analytical device.

Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, and it is becoming a prevalent malignancy. Most of the regular clinical examinations are prompt evaluations with cystoscopy, renal function testing, which require high-precision instrument, well-trained operators, and high cost. In this study, a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (µPAD) was fabricated to detect nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) and bladder cancer antigen (BTA) from the urine samples. Urine samples were collected from 11 bladder cancer patients and 10 well-beings as experiment and control groups, respectively, to verify the working efficiency of µPAD. A remarkable checkout efficiency of up to 90.91% was found from the results. Meanwhile, this method is feasible for home-based self-detection from urine samples within 10 min for the total process, which provides a new way for quick, economical, and convenient tumor diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, and drug response.

An ensemble approach of urine sediment image analysis and NMP22 test for detection of bladder cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the second most common urological cancer in Korean males. Current diagnostic tools for bladder cancer include cystoscopy (an upper tract study), urine cytology, and nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test. In this study, we evaluated the detection rate of atypical/malignant urothelial cells in urinary sediment images when flagged for positive NMP22 test. METHODS: NMP22 was measured by NMP22 BladderChek Test (Abbott Laboratories) and urine chemical and sediment analysis were performed by fully automated cobas 6500 urine analyzer (Roche Diagnostics). Specimens that met the manual microscopic examination (MME) criteria were then subjected to an on-screen review of images. We subsequently reviewed sediment images and examined under the microscopy for the flagged cases. RESULTS: Of the 1217 patients, 345 (28.3%) had positive NMP22 results, whereas 872 (71.7%) had negative results. Out of the positive results, 154 (12.7%) were positive and 191 (15.7%) weakly positive for NMP22. Screened review of flagged specimens (ie, positive NMP22 result) with sediment imaging analysis revealed that suspicious urothelial carcinoma cells were detected in only two cases (0.8%). In the NMP22 negative flagged cases, the suspicious neoplastic cells were not found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the NMP22 test should be added to the flagging criteria for MME to improve diagnostic accuracy. The combination of urine sediment imaging analysis and NMP22 test can significantly assist technicians in the review of specimens.

A label-free immunosensor for the detection of nuclear matrix protein-22 based on a chrysanthemum-like Co-MOFs/CuAu NWs nanocomposite.

In this study, a new, simple, and label-free electrochemical immunosensor was presented for the detection of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP-22). In order to accurately monitor very small amounts of NMP-22, it was advantageous to use highly efficient nanomaterials as signals. For this reason, we synthesized a chrysanthemum-like nanocomposite (Co-MOFs/CuAu NWs), using Co-based metal-organic frameworks (Co-MOFs) as carriers and copper gold nanowires (CuAu NWs) wrapped around their surface, which was applied for modifying a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The Co-MOFs/CuAu NWs possessed outstanding catalytic capabilities, which served as signal materials and simultaneously carried the anti-NMP-22 antibody (Ab). When different concentrations of the NMP-22 antigen (Ag) were specifically attached to the immunosensor, the current responses decreased by varying degrees. The designed biosensor used the principle to establish a linear regression equation and achieve an accurate quantification of NMP-22. After optimization, the NMP-22 sensor exhibited a good linear response over a concentration range from 0.1 pg mL-1 to 1 ng mL-1, with a lower detection limit of 33 fg mL-1 (based on S/N = 3). The proposed biosensor demonstrated the advantages of ultra-sensitivity, high specificity and acceptable reproducibility, suggesting that the proposed strategy has the potential for the quantification of NMP-22 in human urine samples. Moreover, the novel nanocomposite Co-MOFs/CuAu NWs are promising materials for electrochemical sensors to detect other biomolecules.

Investigation of Urinary Sestrin2 in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disease seriously threatening individual health, which results in serious complications such as hypertension and stroke. These complications are associated with oxidative stress triggered by intermittent hypoxia in OSA. Sestrin2 is a crucial factor involved in oxidative stress. The goal of this study was to investigate if a relationship exists between OSA and Sestrin2. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 71 subjects, and 16 patients of them with severe OSA completed 4 weeks of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy. We measured and compared the concentration of Sestrin2 in the urine of all subjects, as well as the changes between before and after nCPAP treatment. Additionally, the correlation between Sestrin2 and sleep parameters was analyzed, and the multiple linear regression analysis with stepwise selection was performed to explore the relationship between Sestrin2 and various factors. RESULTS: A total of 71 subjects were enrolled and divided into two groups: OSA group (n = 41), control group (n = 30). The level of urinary Sestrin2 in OSA patients was significantly higher than that of the control group, and increased with the severity of OSA, while it reduced after nCPAP treatment. Additionally, Sestrin2 was positively correlated with apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index, oxygen saturation < 90% percentage of recording time spent (PRTS) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), while negatively correlated with the lowest oxygen saturation. Importantly, Sestrin2 was independently associated with AHI, oxygen saturation < 90% PRTS and HDL. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary Sestrin2 is involved in OSA, and is a paramount marker of OSA severity.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of urinary collagens in primary human bladder cancer.

Collagen type 4 alpha 1 (COL4A1) and collagen type 13 alpha 1 (COL13A1) produced by urothelial cancer cells support the vital oncogenic property of tumor invasion. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic capability of COL4A1 and COL13A1 in voided urine and compared the observed values with those of fragments of cytokeratin-19 (CYFRA21-1), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP-22), and voided urine cytology in bladder cancer (BCa). We collected voided urine samples from 154 patients newly diagnosed with BCa, before surgery and from 61 control subjects. Protein levels of COL4A1, COL13A1, CYFRA21-1, and NMP-22 in urine supernatants were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Urine levels of COL4A1, COL13A1, the combined values of COL4A1 and COL13A1 (COL4A1 + COL13A1), and CYFRA21-1 were significantly elevated in urine from patients with BCa compared to the controls. Among these biomarkers, the optimal cut-off value of COL4A1 + COL13A1 at 1.33 ng/mL resulted in 57.4%, 83.7%, 56.1%, 80.7%, and 91.7% sensitivity for low-grade tumors, high-grade tumors, Ta, T1, and muscle invasive disease, respectively. We evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative urine levels in 130 non-muscle invasive BCa samples after the initial transurethral surgery. A high urinary COL4A1 + COL13A1 was found to be an independent risk factor for intravesical recurrence. Although these data need to be externally validated, urinary COL4A1 and COL13A1 could be a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for BCa. This easy-to-use urinary signature identifies a subgroup of patients with a high probability of recurrence and progression in non-muscle invasive and muscle invasive BCa.

Clinical Decision Making in Surveillance of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: The Evolving Roles of Urinary Cytology and Molecular Markers.

Cystoscopy and urine cytology are the gold-standard tests for detection of recurrent disease during follow-up in patients with a history of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). High associated costs, as well as side effects, have driven the desire for inexpensive, noninvasive, accurate, and easy-to-use urine markers to detect bladder cancer recurrence. While many urine markers have been developed, very few have been clinically implemented. In this article, we discuss the requirements for development and validation of urine markers and the factors that hamper their clinical implementation. We also review current surveillance guidelines for NMIBC and provide an overview of approved urine markers for the detection and surveillance of NMIBC.

Urinary UBC Rapid and NMP22 Test for Bladder Cancer Surveillance in Comparison to Urinary Cytology: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study.

Background: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is associated with high rates of recurrence, resulting in frequent follow-up cystoscopies. We evaluated the use of two point-of-care tests - the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) and urinary bladder cancer antigen (UBC) Rapid - compared to routine follow-up in patients with a previous history of NMIBC. Methods: 31 patients with cystoscopy-verified active bladder cancer, and 44 follow-up patients without disease as confirmed by cystoscopy were prospectively enrolled. All urine samples were analyzed by voided urine and bladder washing cytology, NMP22 and UBC rapid test (qualitatively and quantitatively). The best cutoff (highest Youden index; ≥6.7 ng/ml) for the quantitative UBC was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Voided urine and barbotage cytology resulted in a sensitivity of 25.8% and 32.3%, and a specificity of 100% and 100%, while the NMP22 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 12.9% and 100%, respectively. The qualitative and quantitative UBC Rapid revealed a sensitivity of 61.3% and 64.5%, with a specificity of 77.3% and 81.8%. Barbotage cytology and qualitative UBC test proved to be the best dual combination with the highest overall sensitivity (77.4%). In contrast to barbotage cytology alone, sensitivity increased from 21.4% to 50% for detecting low-grade tumors, and from 43.8% to 100% for high-grade cancers, but reducing specificity from 100% to 77.3%. Conclusion: Compared to urinary cytology, UBC tests alone as well as UBC tests in combination with bladder washing cytology revealed higher sensitivities in detecting low- and high-grade tumors, but at the expense of a lower specificity. Thus, currently cystoscopy cannot be replaced by any of the evaluated methods.

Diagnostic significance of microRNAs as novel biomarkers for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of ten articles.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have revealed the importance of microRNAs' (miRNAs) function as biomarkers in diagnosing human bladder cancer (BC). However, the results are discordant. Consequently, the possibility of miRNAs to be BC biomarkers was summarized in this meta-analysis. METHODS: In this study, the relevant articles were systematically searched from CBM, PubMed, EMBASE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The bivariate model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic parameters and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve in this meta-analysis, thereby estimating the whole predictive performance. STATA software was used during the whole analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies from 10 articles, including 1556 cases and 1347 controls, were explored in this meta-analysis. In short, the pooled sensitivity, area under the SROC curve, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.72 (95%CI 0.66-0.76), 0.80 (0.77-0.84), 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 3.0 (2.4-3.8), 8 (5.0-12.0), and 0.37 (0.30-0.46) respectively. Additionally, sub-group and meta-regression analyses revealed that there were significant differences between ethnicity, miRNA profiling, and specimen sub-groups. These results suggested that Asian population-based studies, multiple-miRNA profiling, and blood-based assays might yield a higher diagnostic accuracy than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that miRNAs, particularly multiple miRNAs in the blood, might be novel, useful biomarkers with relatively high sensitivity and specificity and can be used for the diagnosis of BC. However, further prospective studies with more samples should be performed for further validation.

BLCA-4 and UBC combined detection for early diagnosis of bladder cancer.

The objective of the present study was to report the clinical significance of bladder cancer specific nuclear matrix protein 4 (BLCA-4) and urinary bladder cancer (UBC) on early diagnosis of bladder cancers. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect BLCA-4 and UBC of 56 bladder cancer patients and 26 patients with urinary tract benign diseases, serving as controls. Urine exfoliated cell test was performed, and then the significance of BLCA-4 and UBC on the diagnosis of bladder cancers was analyzed. The sensitivity of BLCA-4 and UBC of the bladder cancer patients was significantly higher than that of the urine exfoliated cell test (P less than 0.05). The difference of BLCA-4 and UBC was not significant (P >0.05). The difference of BLCA-4 and UBC in the tumors with different gradings and stagings was not significant (P >0.05). Combined detection of BLCA-4 and UBC could improve the diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of bladder cancers with the advantages of high maneuverability, repeatability and objective results.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urinary biomarkers may be a useful alternative or adjunct to cystoscopy for diagnosis of bladder cancer. PURPOSE: To systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of urinary biomarkers for diagnosis of bladder cancer in adults who have signs or symptoms of the disease or are undergoing surveillance for recurrent disease. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE (January 1990 through June 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: 57 studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative or qualitative nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22), qualitative or quantitative bladder tumor antigen (BTA), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), fluorescent immunohistochemistry (ImmunoCyt [Scimedx]), and Cxbladder (Pacific Edge Diagnostics USA) using cystoscopy and histopathology as the reference standard met inclusion criteria. Case-control studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual extraction and quality assessment of individual studies. Overall strength of evidence (SOE) was also assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across biomarkers, sensitivities ranged from 0.57 to 0.82 and specificities ranged from 0.74 to 0.88. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 2.52 to 5.53, and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.21 to 0.48 (moderate SOE for quantitative NMP22, qualitative BTA, FISH, and ImmunoCyt; low SOE for others). For some biomarkers, sensitivity was higher for initial diagnosis of bladder cancer than for diagnosis of recurrence. Sensitivity increased with higher tumor stage or grade. Studies that directly compared the accuracy of quantitative NMP22 and qualitative BTA found no differences in diagnostic accuracy (moderate SOE); head-to-head studies of other biomarkers were limited. Urinary biomarkers plus cytologic evaluation were more sensitive than biomarkers alone but missed about 10% of bladder cancer cases. LIMITATION: Restricted to English-language studies; no search for studies published only as abstracts; statistical heterogeneity present in most analyses; few studies for qualitative NMP22, quantitative BTA, and Cxbladder; and methodological shortcomings in almost all studies. CONCLUSION: Urinary biomarkers miss a substantial proportion of patients with bladder cancer and are subject to false-positive results in others. Accuracy is poor for low-stage and low-grade tumors. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014013284).

Phlda3, a urine-detectable protein, causes p53 accumulation in renal tubular cells injured by cisplatin.

Measurable indicators of renal injury are required for the assessment of kidney function after toxicant challenge. In our previous study, pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 3 (Phlda3) was a most greatly up-regulated molecule downstream from p53, culminating with kidney tubular injury. This study investigated the positive feedforward effect of Phlda3 on p53 in an effort to explain the largest increase of Phlda3 in injured tubules and the potential of its urine excretion. qRT-PCR assays confirmed a rapid and substantial increase in Phlda3 messenger RNA (mRNA) in the kidney cortex of mice treated with a single dose of cisplatin. Cisplatin overexpression of Phlda3 was verified by gene set analyses of three different microarray databases. In the immunohistochemistry, Phlda3 staining intensities were augmented in the tubules as kidney injury worsened. Moreover, the urinary content of Phlda3 was increased after cisplatin treatment, as were those of other kidney injury markers (Kim-1 and Timp-1). By contrast, cisplatin failed to increase Phlda3 mRNA in the liver despite hepatocyte necrosis and ensuing increases in serum transaminase activities. In NRK52E tubular cells, siRNA knockdown of Phlda3 enhanced the ability of cisplatin to increase p-Mdm2 presumably via Akt, enforcing the interaction between Mdm2 and p53. Consistently, a deficiency in Phlda3 abrogated p53 increase by cisplatin, indicating that Phlda3 promotes p53 accumulation. Phlda3 overexpression had the opposite effect. In addition, treatment with cyclosporine A or CdCl2, other nephrotoxicants, increased Phlda3 mRNA and protein levels in NRK52E cells, as did cisplatin treatment. Overall, Phlda3 may cause p53 accumulation through a feedforward pathway, facilitating tubular injury and its urine excretion.

[Diagnostic significance of protein NMP22 in bladder cancer]. / Znaczenie diagnostyczne bialka NMP22 w raku pecherza moczowego.

Bladder cancer is a malignancy that affects mainly the elderly and males. Up to 90% of these cancers originate from urothelial epithelial cells and therefore they are called Transitional (Urothelial) Cell Carcinoma (TCC). Another types are: Squamous Cell Carcionoma (SCC), which involves about 5% of cases and Adenocarcinoma (less than 2%). The factors that may lead to the development of bladder cancer include: genetic disorders, molecular changes, environmental exposures, industrial carcinogens, chemical contaminants and chronic cystitis. This article depicts the current state of diagnostics of bladder cancer, with particular focus on urine-based tests. Although many markers with different structure are under research, only the following have gained FDA approval for bladder cancer screening: BTAstat, BTA TRAK, UroVysion and NMP22 BladderChek. For follow-up NMP22 ELISA and Immunocyt (uCyt+) are approved. This work is mainly focused on mainly on evaluating the diagnostic value of nuclear matrix protein NMP22 for bladder cancer in terms of the outlined researches among people susceptible to environmental toxins. A review of the current literature depicts that no research on correlation between NMP22 and genetic susceptibility has been conducted so far. There is some evidence that NMP22 protein is particularly important in high-risk groups, e.g. among tobacco smokers. The work also describes the methods of detecting NMP22 protein and factors that may influence the results. The review of current literature showed that NMP22 cannot replace invasive cystoscopy neither in screening for bladder cancer nor in follow-up. The NMP22 test could be useful for determining the frequency of cystoscopy and for early detection of high-grade tumors. Research focused on improving the specificity of this marker seems to be crucial, e.g. through the correlation between NMP22 and other parameters (e.g. other laboratory tests), which is confirmed by preliminary data about combining various markers.

Screening for bladder cancer with urinary tumor markers in chemical workers with exposure to aromatic amines.

PURPOSE: To validate urinary markers for the early detection of bladder cancer (BC) in chemical workers. METHODS: UroScreen was conducted as a validation study for tumor markers within the frame of a health surveillance program of the German Social Accident Insurance for active or retired workers with former exposure to aromatic amines. From 2003 to 2010, 1,609 men took part in voluntary annual screens. Cytology, the quantitative NMP22(®) assay, and UroVysion™ were applied to 7,091 urine samples. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 21 tumors were detected following test positivity. The UroVysion/NMP22 panel detected 14 out of 21 tumors versus 8 tumors with cytology alone (sensitivity 66.7 vs. 44.4 %, specificity 94.5 vs. 98.5 %). The sensitivity of the panel increased to 85.7 % in samples collected ≤12 months before diagnosis and when papillomas were excluded, compared to 58.3 % with cytology. About 3 % of NMP22 tests were false-positive. UroVysion results overlapped with cytology due to the preselection of atypical cells. NMP22 was less and UroVysion more frequently positive in diluted urine samples. Leukocytes confounded NMP22 but not UroVysion. The low incidence of BC in this study population yielded low positive predictive values of the markers and high costs per tumor detected with screening. CONCLUSIONS: UroVysion in combination with NMP22 detected more cases than cytology alone, at the expense of a lower specificity. High costs per detected case resulted from a lower BC incidence than in the past when levels of occupational exposure to aromatic amines were higher. Currently, it cannot be recommended to apply these markers for screening in asymptomatic workers. The increase in sensitivity is not balanced by the high costs of UroVysion and the false-positive tests of NMP22.

IMAC fractionation in combination with LC-MS reveals H2B and NIF-1 peptides as potential bladder cancer biomarkers.

Improvement in bladder cancer (BC) management requires more effective diagnosis and prognosis of disease recurrence and progression. Urinary biomarkers attract special interest because of the noninvasive means of urine collection. Proteomic analysis of urine entails the adoption of a fractionation methodology to reduce sample complexity. In this study, we applied immobilized metal affinity chromatography in combination with high-resolution LC-MS/MS for the discovery of native urinary peptides potentially associated with BC aggressiveness. This approach was employed toward urine samples from patients with invasive BC, noninvasive BC, and benign urogenital diseases. A total of 1845 peptides were identified, corresponding to a total of 638 precursor proteins. Specific enrichment for proteins involved in nucleosome assembly and for zinc-finger transcription factors was observed. The differential expression of two candidate biomarkers, histone H2B and NIF-1 (zinc finger 335) in BC, was verified in independent sets of urine samples by ELISA and by immunohistochemical analysis of BC tissue. The results collectively support changes in the expression of both of these proteins with tumor progression, suggesting their potential role as markers for discriminating BC stages. In addition, the data indicate a possible involvement of NIF-1 in BC progression, likely as a suppressor and through interactions with Sox9 and HoxA1.

Influence of age on false positive rates of urine-based tumor markers.

INTRODUCTION: Several influencing factors on false positive rates (FPRs) of urine-based tumor markers in the detection of urothelial cancer (UC) have been identified. We evaluated age as a possible influencing factor. METHODS: Urinary cytology (Cyt), UroVysion (FISH), ImmunoCyt (uCyt+) and NMP22 were determined in 1,554 patients suspicious for UC of the bladder before cystoscopy and in case of cancer detection before TURB. Additionally, upper urinary tract imaging was performed. Maker sensitivity, specificity and FPRs were evaluated in the entire cohort and in subgroups divided by age into <50, ≥ 50-70 and ≥ 70 years. Contingency tables and the Cochrane Armitage tests were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: UC was found in 377 and no UC in 1,177 (75 %) patients. A total of 336 patients were diagnosed with UC of the bladder and 41 with UC of the upper urinary tract. Overall sensitivity and specificity for Cyt were 82 and 82 %: for FISH, 73 and 79 % and for uCyt+, 79 and 75 %, respectively. For NMP22, regardless of the exclusion criteria they were 72 and 34 % and after exclusion of urinary tract infection (UTI) or prior to manipulation 46 and 86 %, respectively. Significantly higher FPRs were found with increasing age for Cyt (p = 0.001), a trend to higher FPRs for uCyt+ (p = 0.11) and almost no difference for FISH (p = 0.63). For NMP22, differences became significant after exclusion of patients with UTI or prior manipulation (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study give evidence that false positive rates of Cyt and NMP22 increase with age indicating that age should be respected for their correct interpretation.

The clinical usefulness of nuclear matrix protein-22 in patients with end-stage renal disease and microscopic hematuria.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and false-positive rate of the nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) test in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and microscopic hematuria in order to avoid unnecessary follow-up tests for patients with false-positive NMP22 test results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESRD were screened for microscopic hematuria as part of the pre-transplant workup. Patients with documented microscopic hematuria underwent workup as recommended by the American Urological Association. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and April 2012, 277 patients with ESRD were referred to the Department of Urology for pre-transplant evaluation. Fifty-seven (22.6%) patients were found to have microscopic hematuria and underwent further testing. Nineteen (33.3%) patients demonstrated a positive NMP22 test result and 38 (66.7%) had a negative NMP22 test result. The false-positive rate was 32.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test in this patient population were 50% and 67%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the test was 52.6% and the negative predictive value 97.3%. Especially noteworthy, the two detected transitional cell cancers of the urinary bladder were both demonstrated during cystoscopy, independent of their NMP22 or urine cytology test result. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a significantly increased NMP22 test false-positive rate, low sensitivity, and specificity in the setting of high prevalence of microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, and low glomerular filtration rate in patients with ESRD. Therefore, cystoscopy remains the gold standard for patients with ESRD and microscopic hematuria for pre-transplant evaluation.

BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL as urinary marker for bladder cancer: Final results of a German multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL are urinary-based rapid tests. This multicenter study is the first study comparing all available rapid tests on a large cohort of bladder cancer patients and healthy controls in one setting. METHODS: In total 732 urine samples (second morning urine) in a real-world assessment have been analyzed. We evaluated clinical samples from 464 patients with histologically confirmed urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder (17 solitary CIS, 189 low-grade, 187 high-grade nonmuscle invasive, 71 high-grade muscle invasive), 77 patients with No Evidence of Disease (NED), and from 191 healthy controls. Urine samples were analyzed by the BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test point-of-care (POC) system using the concile Omega 100 POC reader, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated by contingency analyses. RESULTS: All investigated urinary markers detected more pathological concentrations in urine of bladder cancer patients compared to tumor-free patients. The calculated diagnostic sensitivities for BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL, and cytology were 62.4%, 13.4%, 58.2%, 28.6%, 36.2% for low-grade, 83.4%, 49.5%, 84.5%, 63.1%, 71.2% for high-grade nonmuscle invasive, and 95.8%, 35.2%, 76.1%, 50.7%, 67.7% for high-grade muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The specificity was 67.9%, 95.5%, 79.4%, 94.4%, and 83.7%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) after receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for high-grade non-muscle-invasive tumors was 0.757, 0.725, 0.819, 0.787, and 0.774, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of more than 700 urine samples offers an objective view on urine-based rapid diagnostics. Elevated pathological concentrations of markers in urine of bladder cancer patients were detected in all investigated tests. The highest sensitivities for high-grade non-muscle-invasive tumors were calculated for BTA stat® and UBC® Rapid Test, whereas NMP22® BladderChek®, and cytology showed the highest specificities. BTA stat® and UBC® Rapid Test have the potential to be used as a clinical valuable urinary protein biomarker for the detection of high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and could be included in the management of these tumors.

Diagnosis of bladder cancer by immunocytochemical detection of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 in cells retrieved from urine.

BACKGROUND: We tested the accuracy of immunocytochemistry (ICC) for minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (MCM-2) in diagnosing bladder cancer, using cells retrieved from urine. METHODS: Adequate samples were obtained from 497 patients, the majority presenting with gross haematuria (GH) or undergoing cystoscopic surveillance (CS) following previous bladder cancer. We performed an initial study of 313 patients, followed by a validation study of 184 patients. In all cases, presence/absence of bladder cancer was established by cystoscopy/biopsy. RESULTS: In the initial study, receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.820 (P<0.0005) for the GH group and 0.821 (P<0.01) for the CS group. Optimal sensitivity/specificity were provided by threshold values of 50+ MCM-2-positive cells in GH samples and 200+ cells in CS samples, based on a minimum total cell number of 5000. Applying these thresholds to the validation data set gave 81.3% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity and 92.7% negative predictive value (NPV) in GH and 63.2% sensitivity, 89.9% specificity and 89.9% NPV in CS. Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC provided clinically relevant improvements over urine cytology, with greater sensitivity in GH and greater specificity in CS (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC is a reproducible and accurate test that is suitable for both GH and CS patient groups.

Decision curve analysis assessing the clinical benefit of NMP22 in the detection of bladder cancer: secondary analysis of a prospective trial.

OBJECTIVE: • To employ decision curve analysis to determine the impact of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) on clinical decision making in the detection of bladder cancer using data from a prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The study included 1303 patients at risk for bladder cancer who underwent cystoscopy, urine cytology and measurement of urinary NMP22 levels. • We constructed several prediction models to estimate risk of bladder cancer. The base model was generated using patient characteristics (age, gender, race, smoking and haematuria); cytology and NMP22 were added to the base model to determine effects on predictive accuracy. • Clinical net benefit was calculated by summing the benefits and subtracting the harms and weighting these by the threshold probability at which a patient or clinician would opt for cystoscopy. RESULTS: • In all, 72 patients were found to have bladder cancer (5.5%). In univariate analyses, NMP22 was the strongest predictor of bladder cancer presence (predictive accuracy 71.3%), followed by age (67.5%) and cytology (64.3%). • In multivariable prediction models, NMP22 improved the predictive accuracy of the base model by 8.2% (area under the curve 70.2-78.4%) and of the base model plus cytology by 4.2% (area under the curve 75.9-80.1%). • Decision curve analysis revealed that adding NMP22 to other models increased clinical benefit, particularly at higher threshold probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: • NMP22 is a strong, independent predictor of bladder cancer. • Addition of NMP22 improves the accuracy of standard predictors by a statistically and clinically significant margin. • Decision curve analysis suggests that integration of NMP22 into clinical decision making helps avoid unnecessary cystoscopies, with minimal increased risk of missing a cancer.

Nuclear matrix protein-22: a prospective evaluation in a population at risk for bladder cancer. Results from the UroScreen study.

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The prognosis of bladder cancer significantly depends on tumour stage and time of diagnosis so early diagnosis is desirable to decrease mortality and treatment costs. The NMP22 test is approved for clinical application by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the US. Previous studies have reported values of 47-100% for sensitivity and 58-91% for specificity with this test, but there is no new data on the predictive value of NMP22 for screening bladder cancer (BC). The most important risk factor for BC is the tobacco consumption but occupational exposure to carcinogenic substances, especially aromatic amines, is regarded as another risk factor. The UroScreen study is a prospective longitudinal study for the early detection of BC. To our knowledge, it is the largest prospective validation study conducted over the longest period of time. The study results led us to conclude that, based on the currently available data, NMP22 should not be regarded as an alternative to endoscopy, and we could not make a general recommendation for screening or follow-up. The UroScreen results indicate that urine-based molecular markers could be a suitable addition to urine cytology and the detection of microhaematuria. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) in bladder cancer (BC) screening, and its effect on variables in a prospective study in a high-risk population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1772 chemical workers (mean age 62 years) exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines were enrolled in the study. In all, 7091 screening check-ups in 1609 subjects were performed. Urine samples were collected for a quantitative NMP22 immunoassay, urine analysis and creatinine concentration assessment. Cystoscopy and subsequent transurethral resection were performed where there were suspicious findings. RESULTS: Histopathological analysis found three papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential, five recurrent BCs and 13 primary BCs. Three tumours were at a muscle-invasive stage (pT2, pT3a or pT3b). We found higher NMP22 concentrations (>10 U/mL) in 224 patients, which correctly predicted BC in six cases (sensitivity 97.29%, specificity 28.57%; negative predictive value 99.04%, positive predictive value 12.24%). Gross haematuria affected NMP22 results (odd ratio [OR] 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-6.73). Infection also affected NMP22 results (OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.31-7.35). NMP22 was more frequently positive in urine with creatinine concentration >2.5 g/L (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.91-2.86). CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 outcomes are affected by haematuria, infection and concentrated urine. NMP22 alone cannot be recommended for primary screening in a high-risk population nor as an alternative to cystoscopy during follow-up. A NMP22 test might be a useful adjunct to urine cytology.