Andexanet Alfa or Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in Acute Major Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To combine evidence on andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrates for factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding to guide clinicians on reversal strategies. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies and randomized clinical trials studying hemostatic effectiveness of andexanet alfa or prothrombin complex concentrate for acute reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated hemorrhage. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the studies. Visualization and comparison of hemostatic effectiveness using Sarode et al or International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee criteria at 12 and 24 hours, (venous) thrombotic event rates, and inhospital mortality were performed by constructing Forest plots. Exploratory analysis using a logistic mixed model analysis was performed to identify factors associated with effectiveness and venous thromboembolic event. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 21 studies were included (andexanet: 438 patients; prothrombin complex concentrate: 1,278 patients). The (weighted) mean effectiveness for andexanet alfa was 82% at 12 hours and 71% at 24 hours. The (weighted) mean effectiveness for prothrombin complex concentrate was 88% at 12 hours and 76% at 24 hours. The mean 30-day symptomatic venous thromboembolic event rates were 5.0% for andexanet alfa and 1.9% for prothrombin complex concentrate. The mean 30-day total thrombotic event rates for andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate were 10.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Mean inhospital mortality was 23.3% for andexanet versus 15.8% for prothrombin complex concentrate. Exploratory analysis controlling for potential confounders did not demonstrate significant differences between both reversal agents. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, available evidence does not unequivocally support the clinical effectiveness of andexanet alfa or prothrombin complex concentrate to reverse factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute major bleeding, nor does it permit conventional meta-analysis of potential superiority. Neither reversal agent was significantly associated with increased effectiveness or a higher rate of venous thromboembolic event. These results underscore the importance of randomized controlled trials comparing the two reversal agents and may provide guidance in designing institutional guidelines.

[Intravenous thrombolysis after reversion of acenocoumarol anticoagulation. Report of one case]. / Trombolisis endovenosa post reversión de acenocumarol con complejo de protrombina. Caso clínico.

We report an 89-year-old male under oral anticoagulant therapy with a therapeutic international normalized ratio, presenting at the emergency room with right side hemiparesis and aphasia. Neuroimaging was compatible with an acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. Anticoagulation was reverted with the use of four factor prothrombin complex, followed by thrombolysis with alteplase, with a favorable evolution, returning to his basal functional status.

Efficacy and safety of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa in patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding: a proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic treatment of active gastrointestinal bleeding often remains difficult, and considerable technical expertise is required. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemostasis with a liquid combination of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa (SeraSeal). METHODS: Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding were prospectively included. In group A, 5 mL of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa was topically applied via catheters to the bleeding site as initial hemostasis; group B received a similar application but as rescue therapy after failure of conventional endoscopic hemostasis. RESULTS: In group A, bleeding was stopped by the agent in 15 /22 patients (68 %) and by conventional endoscopic hemostasis in 5 of the other 7, with coiling and surgery required for definitive hemostasis in 2. In group B, the addition of the agent definitively stopped bleeding in 13 /15 patients (87 %), with hemostasis in the remaining 2 achieved with fibrin glue. Rebleeding was observed in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our proof of concept study suggests that the use of bovine activated factors IIa/VIIa/IXa/Xa might be a safe and effective addition to current endoscopic hemostatic strategies, but further studies are necessary.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02349490.

[CORRECTION OF HEMOSTASIS WITH BLOOD PRODUCTS IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE IN INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN].

The article deals with the safety and efficiency of recombinant activated factor VII (Coagil VII, Russia) and prothrombin complex concentrate (protromplex-600, Baxter Austria) in the neonatal and pediatric cardiac surgery. The study included 56 children aged from 7 days to 5.5 years underwent surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass for congenital heart defects repair. Clinical and laboratory evidences suggest that Coagil VII and protromplex-600 effective for bleeding stop. The drugs have no negative impact on hemodynamics. We did not identify allergic reactions and thrombosis associated with the introduction of drugs in the pen operative period.

Health-related quality of life in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors on prophylaxis with anti-inhibitor complex concentrate: results from the Pro-FEIBA study.

Patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors are at high risk for severe bleeding, progression of joint disease and deterioration of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To determine the impact of prophylaxis with an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on HRQoL, HRQoL was assessed using the Short-Form (SF)-36 Health Survey and the EQ-5D questionnaire in subjects ≥ 14 years participating in a prospective, randomized, crossover study comparing 6 months of aPCC prophylaxis with 6 months of on-demand therapy. Eighteen of 19 patients completed the survey or questionnaire before and after the on-demand therapy and prophylaxis periods. A general trend towards improved HRQoL after prophylaxis was observed for the 18 evaluable patients in all SF-36 dimensions except for vitality/energy and physical functioning. After prophylaxis, 'good responders,' defined as patients experiencing ≥ 50% reduction in bleeding, exhibited statistically and clinically significant differences in the physical component score (P = 0.021), role - physical (P = 0.042), bodily pain (P = 0.015), and social functioning (P = 0.036). Similarly, the EQ-5D health profile showed a trend towards improvement after prophylaxis in all evaluable patients. Among the good responders, improvements did not differ from those observed after on-demand treatment. EQ visual analogue scale values were slightly improved following prophylaxis for all evaluable patients and the EQ-5D utility index improved in the good responders only. During prophylaxis, patients missed significantly fewer days from school or work because of bleeding than during on-demand treatment (P = 0.01). In conclusion, by significantly reducing bleeding frequency in good responders, aPCC prophylaxis improved HRQoL compared with on-demand treatment.

Bypass therapy assay testing as a strategy to reduce costs for treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Published studies suggest that bypass therapy assay testing can be used to predict treatment response and dosing requirements for haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs of utilizing and not utilizing bypass therapy assay testing before treating mild-to-moderate bleeding episodes on-demand in haemophilia patients with inhibitors from a US third-party payer perspective. In our exploratory decision tree model, the average patient was assumed to be an adult weighing 75 kg. Based on existing head-to-head clinical trials, the efficacy of activated prothrombin complex (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was assumed to be equivalent and based on expert opinion of the haematologist in our study it was conservatively assumed that assay testing improves the efficacy of both the bypassing agents by 10%. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the results. Cost savings per bleeding episode were estimated at $6886 (95% CI = $4310-7978) for aPCC and $7647 (95% CI = $3134-10 388) for rFVIIa treatment. This translates in potential cost savings of 24.8% (95% CI = 15.5-28.8%) for aPCC use and 18.2% (95% CI = 8-24.7%) for rFVIIa use. Furthermore, if testing successfully predicts the optimum dose for concomitant therapy at the onset of bleeding, significant cost savings were observed compared with rFVIIa and aPCC therapies alone. Use of bypass therapy assay testing before treatment administration in haemophilia inhibitor patients can potentially reduce treatment costs significantly while optimizing dose and therapy response.

Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model.

BACKGROUND: As a potent anticoagulant agent, rivaroxaban exposes a risk of bleeding. An effective way to reverse its effects is needed. Objectives were to study efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to reverse the anticoagulant effect of an overdose of rivaroxaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: First, a dose-ranging study assessed the minimal rivaroxaban dose that increased bleeding. Then, 48 anesthetized and ventilated rabbits were randomized into four groups: control (saline), rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban and saline), rFVIIa (rivaroxaban and rFVIIa), and PCC (rivaroxaban and PCC). The Folts model was applied: a stenosis and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis, detected as cyclic flow reductions, which were recorded over 20 min. Then the following were measured: ear immersion bleeding time, clotting times, anti-Xa activity, thrombelastometric parameters, and thrombin generation test. Ultimately, a hepatosplenic section was performed and the total amount of blood loss after 15 min was evaluated as primary endpoint. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban increased blood loss (17 g [8-32] vs. 7 g [5-18] for control (median [range]), P = 0.0004), ear bleeding time, clotting times, thrombelastographic clotting time, and decreased thrombin generation. In contrast, rFVIIa decreased ear bleeding time (92 s [65-115] vs. 140 s [75-190], P < 0.02), but without efficacy on blood loss. PCC and rFVIIa decreased activated partial thromboplastin time as well as thrombelastographic clotting time. Regarding safety, neither rFVIIa nor PCC increased cyclic flow reductions. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa and PCC partially improved laboratory parameters, but did not reverse rivaroxaban induced-bleeding.

Impact of infusion speed on the safety and effectiveness of prothrombin complex concentrate: a prospective clinical trial of emergency anticoagulation reversal.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) infusion is preferred for emergency reversal of coumarin therapy. Rapid infusion can potentially save crucial time; however, the possible impact of high infusion speed on PCC safety and effectiveness has not been delineated. In a prospective multinational clinical trial with 43 patients receiving PCC (Beriplex P/N) for emergency reversal of coumarin therapy, infusion speeds were selected by the investigators. In a two-phase statistical analysis, the influence of baseline patient variables and dose on selected infusion speed was assessed. Then, the effect of infusion speed on reduction in international normalized ratio (INR) and on thrombogenicity marker pharmacokinetics was evaluated. Infusion speed ranged widely from 2.0 to 40.0 mL min(-1) with a median of 7.5 mL min(-1). Selection of infusion speed was not significantly influenced by gender, age, body mass index, presence of acute bleeding, indication for coumarin therapy, baseline INR, or PCC dose. Infusion speed was higher by a median of 2.2 mL min(-1) (95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.3 mL min(-1)) among patients receiving Beriplex P/N volumes > or =80 mL compared with smaller infusion volumes. Infusion speed did not affect INR attained 30 min following PCC infusion. None of the evaluated thrombogenicity marker pharmacokinetic parameters was affected by infusion speed. Infusions in one patient with questionable hemostatic efficacy and another with a possibly PCC-related thromboembolic event were at moderate and slow speeds, respectively. This study provides the first direct evidence that Beriplex P/N can be rapidly infused for emergency coumarin therapy reversal without altering safety or effectiveness.

Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate strategy for trauma-induced coagulopathy management is under debate. We report the treatment of major trauma using mainly coagulation factor concentrates. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included trauma patients who received >or= 5 units of red blood cell concentrate within 24 hours. Coagulation management was guided by thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Fibrinogen concentrate was given as first-line haemostatic therapy when maximum clot firmness (MCF) measured by FibTEM (fibrin-based test) was <10 mm. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) was given in case of recent coumarin intake or clotting time measured by extrinsic activation test (EXTEM) >1.5 times normal. Lack of improvement in EXTEM MCF after fibrinogen concentrate administration was an indication for platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was compared with the mortality predicted by the trauma injury severity score (TRISS) and by the revised injury severity classification (RISC) score. RESULTS: Of 131 patients included, 128 received fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy, 98 additionally received PCC, while 3 patients with recent coumarin intake received only PCC. Twelve patients received FFP and 29 received platelet concentrate. The observed mortality was 24.4%, lower than the TRISS mortality of 33.7% (P = 0.032) and the RISC mortality of 28.7% (P > 0.05). After excluding 17 patients with traumatic brain injury, the difference in mortality was 14% observed versus 27.8% predicted by TRISS (P = 0.0018) and 24.3% predicted by RISC (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM-guided haemostatic therapy, with fibrinogen concentrate as first-line haemostatic therapy and additional PCC, was goal-directed and fast. A favourable survival rate was observed. Prospective, randomized trials to investigate this therapeutic alternative further appear warranted.

Management of anticoagulation before and after gastrointestinal endoscopy.

The management of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures is a common clinical problem. Although guidelines have been published, they are supported by little prospective or randomized trial data, but are primarily based on observational studies, expert opinion, and best clinical practices. As a general principle, the risks of thromboembolism need to be balanced against the risks of bleeding during the endoscopic procedure. By understanding these risks, management plans for individual cases may be made. This article reviews the current data and guidelines on the management of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, use of reversal agents, and the role and risks of concomitant proton pump inhibitors.

Fixed-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Vitamin K Antagonist Reversal: Does One Dose Fit All?

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred option for emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs); however, the optimal dosing strategy is unknown. Although several studies have attempted to determine the optimal dose of 4F-PCC using a variety of dosing regimens, no dosing strategy has been found to be superior. Many of these studies have evaluated a low, fixed dose of 4F-PCC rather than individualized dosing as recommended in product labeling. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various fixed-dose strategies of 4F-PCC for emergent VKA reversal and to assess limitations of the existing literature. A search of the PubMed database was performed from the earliest available date through 2018 for relevant articles describing fixed-dose 4F-PCC for VKA reversal. Reference lists of relevant articles were also manually reviewed. Most currently available studies are primarily observational and heterogeneous in design. A very low fixed dose of 500 IU is likely inadequate for successful VKA reversal, but increased fixed doses of 1000-1500 IU have found some degree of success and may be considered for VKA reversal. However, many of these studies consistently identified a trend toward international normalized ratio (INR) reversal failure in patients presenting with high baseline INR values or intracranial hemorrhage, suggesting that higher 4F-PCC doses are needed in these patients. Available studies are underpowered to determine whether a dose-dependent association with thrombotic risk exists. Additional large, randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal dosing strategy and ascertain the role for fixed-dose 4F-PCC.

Effects of modification of trauma bleeding management: A before and after study.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that the association of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration and thromboelastometry-guided haemostatic therapy (TGHT) with implementation of Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) reduced blood products (BP) use and massive transfusion (MT). METHODS: Retrospective comparison of 2 cohorts of trauma patients admitted in a university hospital, before (Period 1) and after implementation of DCR, TXA (first 3-hours) and TGHT (Period 2). Patients were included if they received at least 1 BP (RBC, FFP or platelet) or coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen or prothrombin complex) during the first 24-hours following the admission. RESULTS: 380 patients were included. Patients in Period 2 (n = 182) received less frequently a MT (8% vs. 33%, P < 0.01), significantly less BP (RBC: 2 units [1-5] vs. 6 [3-11]; FFP: 0 units [0-2] vs. 4 [2-8]) but more fibrinogen concentrates (3.0 g [1.5-4.5] vs. 0.0 g [0.0-3.0], P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Period 1 as being associated with an increased risk of receiving MT (OR: 26.1, 95% CI: 9.7-70.2) and decreased survival at 28 days (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-3.9). After propensity matching, the same results were observed but there was no difference for survival and a significant decrease for the cost of BP (2370 ± 2126 vs. 3284 ± 3812 €, P: 0.036). CONCLUSION: Following the implementation of a bundle of care including DCR, TGHT and administration of TXA, we observed a decrease to the use of blood products, need for MT and an improvement of survival.

Anti-inflammatory effect of a human prothrombin fragment-2-derived peptide, NSA9, in EOC2 microglia.

Pro-inflammatory mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), and several cytokines (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and IL-6) are responsible for central nervous system (CNS) injuries that include ischemia, Alzheimer's disease, and neural death. Inhibition of these pro-inflammatory mediators would be an effective therapy to reduce the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. In this study, we examined the anti-inflammatory effects of a human prothrombin fragment-2-derived peptide, NSA9 (NSAVQLVEN), on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated brain microglia. NSA9 significantly inhibited the release of NO, PGE(2), and pro-inflammatory cytokines in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, NSA9 reduced the expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 mRNA and protein, which control the production of NO and PGE(2), respectively. Moreover, NSA9 suppressed the LPS-induced nuclear translocation and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). These results suggest that NSA9 strongly inhibits the pro-inflammatory responses of microglia through the modulation of NF-kappaB activity.

Conjugated equine estrogen, esterified estrogen, prothrombotic variants, and the risk of venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Joint exposure to oral conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and prothrombotic genetic variants factor II G20210A or factor V G1601A (Leiden) increase venous thrombotic risk 6- to 16-fold in postmenopausal women. Esterified estrogen (EE), an alternative estrogenic compound, appears not to be associated with increased risk and nothing is known about the joint risk with prothrombotic genetic variants. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based, case-control study among postmenopausal women within a health maintenance organization. Subjects included 328 cases who sustained a first venous thrombosis and 1591 controls. Current hormone use was defined using electronic pharmacy records and variants FII G20210A and FV Leiden were genotyped using blood samples. FII and FV Leiden variants were associated with 2.1-fold and 3.7-fold increases in venous thrombotic risk, respectively. Overall, CEE use was associated with a 2.5-fold increase in risk compared with no hormone use, whereas EE use was not associated with a statistically increased risk. Compared with no hormone use and no variant, joint exposure to CEE and either prothrombotic variant was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 9.1 (95% CI: 4.5 to 18.2), whereas joint exposure to EE and either variant was associated with an OR of 2.1 (0.6 to 6.8). When analyses were restricted to hormone users with either variant, CEE use was associated with an OR of 5.3 (1.3 to 21.7) compared with EE use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings need replication and suggest EE use is associated with less risk than CEE use especially among 5% to 10% of women who are carriers of a prothrombotic variant.

Urgent reversal of warfarin with prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: When life-threatening bleeding occurs in patients on warfarin, timely reversal becomes imperative. In the USA, warfarin effect is commonly reversed with fresh frozen plasma (FFP). The use of FFP is complicated by delays in correction, volume overload and often, inadequate correction. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a protocol for rapid administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the setting of the urgent need for reversal of warfarin. METHODS/PATIENTS: We instituted a policy for rapid delivery and administration of PCC. Appropriate patients received 25-50 U kg(-1) of PCC. The prothrombin time (PT)/International Normalized Ratios (INR) was recorded before and immediately after dosing, and 24 h postdosing. Patients requiring surgical interventions were cleared for the operating room (OR) immediately. Fifty-eight patients were treated, with a median age of 75.5 years (range 26-92). RESULTS: The median INR on presentation was 3.8 (1.4-52.8). Immediately following PCC administration the median INR was 1.3 (0.9-5.7), only two patients with INRs exceeding 2.0. The benefit was maintained at 24 h with a median INR of 1.5 (1.1-3.4). Four patients experienced thrombotic events during their hospitalization, (two deep vein thrombosis, two non-q-wave myocardial infarction) although none was attributed to PPC therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PCC administration is an effective treatment modality for the correction of warfarin anticoagulation in the urgent setting. Advantages over FFP include more timely correction, absence of volume overload and potentially more complete correction. Broader use of PCC in this setting appears to be appropriate.

Efecto de las diferentes drogas anticoagulantes sobre el ensayo de fibrinógeno derivado del tiempo de protrombina / Effect of different anticoagulant drugs on the prothrombin time-derived fibrinogen assay

Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar los niveles de fibrinógeno (FBG) obtenidos por el método de Clauss con los obtenidos por el método de fibrinógeno derivado del tiempo de protrombina (FBG PT-d), con dos tromboplastinas, en pacientes anticoagulados con distintas drogas. Se estudiaron pacientes anticoagulados consecutivos: 105 con antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), 55 con heparina no fraccionada (HNF), 58 con heparina de bajo peso molecular (HBPM), 60 con rivaroxabán, 45 con apixabán, 60 con dabigatrán y 100 controles normales (CN). El FBG se determinó por el método de Clauss y FBG PT-d utilizando tromboplastina de cerebro de conejo o recombinante humana; los niveles de heparina, rivaroxabán y apixabán por método cromogénico anti Xa; el dabigatrán con el ensayo de tiempo de trombina diluido. Existió un sesgo positivo (p<0,001) al comparar el FBG PT-d vs. FBG por Clauss: CN: 13,7%, AVK: 31,8%, rivaroxabán: 34,8% y apixabán: 20,0% cuando se utilizó tromboplastina de conejo. En el caso de las muestras que contenían HBPM se observó este desvío con ambas tromboplastinas. El sesgo porcentual en presencia de dabigatrán y heparina no fraccionada no fue estadísticamente distinto del obtenido en el grupo control. El ensayo de FBG PT-d no debe utilizarse en pacientes anticoagulados con rivaroxabán, apixabán, HBPM o AVK, ya que sobreestima los niveles de FBG. El porcentaje de sesgo depende del tipo de tromboplastina utilizado y fue mayor con la de cerebro de conejo en el sistema de detección utilizado.

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare fibrinogen (FBG) results obtained by Clauss method (FBG-C) and by the prothrombin time-derived fibrinogen assay (FBG PT-d) with two thromboplastins in patients under anticoagulation. Consecutive anticoagulated patients were studied: 105 vitamin-K antagonist (VKA), 55 unfractioned heparin, 58 LMWH, 60 rivaroxaban, 45 apixaban and 60 dabigatran, and 100 healthy controls (NC). FBG-C was performed by Clauss and FIB PT-d with rabbit brain and human recombinant thromboplastins, respectively. Heparins, rivaroxaban and apixaban levels were measured by antiXa; dabigatran by thrombin diluted assay. A positive bias of FBG PT-d vs. FBG-C with both thromboplastins were seen in NC (13.7 and 19.0 % for HS and RP, respectively), but bias with HS in rivaroxaban, apixaban and VKA patients were significantly higher compared to NC: 34.8%, 20.0 % and 31.8 %, respectively. LMWH presented higher BIAS compared to NC with both thromboplastins. Samples with unfraction heparin and dabigatran presented similar bias to NC. FBG PT-d should not be used in patients under anticoagulant treatment because of an important overestimation of FBG could be obtained in these patients. The percentage of bias depends on the type of thromboplastin used; it was higher with rabbit brain thromboplastin in the detection system used.

Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar os níveis de fibrinogênio (FBG) obtidos pelo método de Clauss com aqueles obtidos pelo método do fibrinogênio derivado do tempo de protrombina (FBG PT-d), com duas tromboplastinas, em pacientes anticoagulados com diferentes drogas. Pacientes anticoagulados consecutivos foram estudados: 105 com antagonista da vitamina K (AVK); 55 com heparina não fracionada (UFH); 58 com heparina de baixo peso molecular (HBPM), 60 com rivaroxabana, 45 com apixabana, 60 com dabigatrana e 100 controles normais (CN). FBG foi determinado pelo método de Clauss e FBG PT-d usando tromboplastina de cérebro de coelho ou tromboplastina humana recombinante; níveis de heparina, rivaroxabana e apixabana pelo método cromogênico anti-Xa; dabigatrana com ensaio de tempo de trombina diluída. Há um viés positivo (p<0,001) ao comparar o FBG PT-d vs FBG de Clauss: CN: 13,7%; AVK: 31,8%, rivaroxabana: 34,8% e apixabana 20,0% quando foi utilizada tromboplastina de coelho. No caso das amostras contendo HBPM, esse desvio foi observado com ambas as tromboplastinas. O viés percentual na presença de dabigatrana e heparina não fracionada não foi estatisticamente diferente daquela obtida no grupo controle. O ensaio de FBG PT-d não deve ser usado em pacientes anticoagulados com rivaroxabana, apixabana, LMWH ou VKA, pois superestima os níveis de FBG. A porcentagem de viés depende do tipo de tromboplastina utilizado e foi maior com a de cérebro de coelho, no sistema de detecção utilizado.

Disruption of Prostate Microvasculature by Combining Microbubble-Enhanced Ultrasound and Prothrombin.

Previous studies have shown a unique method to disrupt tumor vasculature using pulsed, high-pressure amplitude therapeutic ultrasound combined with microbubbles. In this study, we attempted to destroy the prostate vasculature of canine prostates using microbubble-enhanced ultrasound (MEUS) and prothrombin. The prostates of 43 male mongrel canines were surgically exposed. Twenty-two prostates were treated using MEUS (n = 11) or MEUS and prothrombin (PMEUS, n = 11). The other 21 prostates, which were treated using microbubbles (n = 7), ultrasound (n = 7) or prothrombin (n = 7) only, served as the controls. Prothrombin was intravenously infused at 20 IU/kg. MEUS was induced using a therapeutic ultrasound device at a peak negative pressure of 4.47 MPa and a microbubble injection. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed to assess the blood perfusion of the prostates. Then, the prostate tissue was harvested immediately after treatment and at 48 hours later for pathological examination. The contrast-enhanced ultrasound peak value of the prostate decreased significantly from 36.2 ± 5.6 to 27.1 ± 6.3 after treatment in the PMEUS group, but it remained unchanged in the other groups. Histological examination found severe microvascular rupture, hemorrhage and thrombosis in both MEUS- and PMEUS-treated prostates immediately after treatment, while disruption in the PMEUS group was more severe than in the MEUS group. Forty-eight hours after treatment, massive necrosis and infiltration of white blood cells occurred in the PMEUS group. This study demonstrated that PMEUS disrupted the normal microvasculature of canine prostates and induced massive necrosis. PMEUS could potentially become a new noninvasive method used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

[Direct oral anticoagulant associated bleeding]. / Hémorragie survenant chez un patient traité par un anticoagulant oral direct.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are recommended for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, they are associated with hemorrhagic complications. Management of DOAC-induced bleeding remains challenging. Activated or non-activated prothrombin concentrates are proposed, although their efficacy to reverse DOAC is uncertain. Therapeutic options also include antidotes: idarucizumab, antidote for dabigatran, has been approved for use whereas andexanet alpha, antidote for anti-Xa agents, and aripazine, antidote for all DOAC, are under development. Other options include hemodialysis for the treatment of dabigatran-associated bleeding and administration of oral charcoal if recent DOAC ingestion. DOAC plasma concentration measurement is necessary to guide DOAC reversal. We propose an update on DOAC-associated bleeding, integrating the availability of dabigatran antidote and the critical place of DOAC concentration measurements.

Periprocedural management of patients receiving a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant requiring an elective procedure or surgery.

The periprocedural management of patients receiving chronic therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs), including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin and direct OACs (DOACs), is a common clinical problem. The optimal perioperative management of patients receiving chronic OAC therapy is anchored on four key principles: (i) risk stratification of patient-related and procedure-related risks of thrombosis and bleeding; (ii) the clinical consequences of a thrombotic or bleeding event; (iii) discontinuation and reinitiation of OAC therapy on the basis of the pharmacokinetic properties of each agent; and (iv) whether aggressive management such as the use of periprocedural heparin bridging has advantages for the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism at the cost of a possible increase in bleeding risk. Recent data from randomized trials in patients receiving VKAs undergoing pacemaker/defibrillator implantation or using heparin bridging therapy for elective procedures or surgeries can now inform best practice. There are also emerging data on periprocedural outcomes in the DOAC trials for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This review summarizes the evidence for the periprocedural management of patients receiving chronic OAC therapy, focusing on recent randomized trials and large outcome studies, to address three key clinical scenarios: (i) can OAC therapy be safely continued for minor procedures or surgeries; (ii) if therapy with VKAs (especially warfarin) needs to be temporarily interrupted for an elective procedure/surgery, is heparin bridging necessary; and (iii) what is the optimal periprocedural management of the DOACs? In answering these questions, we aim to provide updated clinical guidance for the periprocedural management of patients receiving VKA or DOAC therapy, including the use of heparin bridging.