Targeting the EGFR pathway: An alternative strategy for the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex?

INTRODUCTION: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is caused by variants in TSC1/TSC2, leading to constitutive activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1. Therapy with everolimus has been approved for TSC, but variations in success are frequent. Recently, caudal late interneuron progenitor (CLIP) cells were identified as a common origin of the TSC brain pathologies such as subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGA) and cortical tubers (CT). Further, targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with afatinib, which is expressed in CLIP cells, reduces cell growth in cerebral TSC organoids. However, investigation of clinical patient-derived data is lacking. AIMS: Observation of EGFR expression in SEGA, CT and focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) 2B human brain specimen and investigation of whether its inhibition could be a potential therapeutic intervention for these patients. METHODS: Brain specimens of 23 SEGAs, 6 CTs, 20 FCD2Bs and 17 controls were analysed via immunohistochemistry to characterise EGFR expression, cell proliferation (via Mib1) and mTOR signalling. In a cell-based assay using primary patient-derived cells (CT n = 1, FCD2B n = 1 and SEGA n = 4), the effects of afatinib and everolimus on cell proliferation and cell viability were observed. RESULTS: EGFR overexpression was observed in histological sections of SEGA, CT and FCD2B patients. Both everolimus and afatinib decreased the proliferation and viability in primary SEGA, tuber and FCD2B cells. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that EGFR suppression might be an effective alternative treatment option for SEGAs and tubers, as well as other mTOR-associated malformations of cortical development, including FCD2B.

Molecular alterations and clinical prognostic factors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: EGFR inhibitor and immunotherapy have been approved for adjuvant treatment in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limited reports of molecular and clinical characteristics as prognostic factors in NSCLC have been published. METHODS: Medical records of patients with resectable NSCLC stage I-III diagnosed during 2015-2020 were reviewed. Real time-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed for EGFR mutations (EGFRm). Immunohistochemistry staining was conducted for ALK and PD-L1 expression. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis was done by cox-regression method. RESULTS: Total 441 patients were included. The prevalence of EGFRm, ALK fusion, and PD-L1 expression were 57.8%, 1.9%, and 20.5% (SP263), respectively. The most common EGFRm were Del19 (43%) and L858R (41%). There was no significant difference of recurrence free survival (RFS) by EGFRm status whereas patients with PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 positive patients) had lower RFS compared to without PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 negative patients) (HR = 1.75, P = 0.036). Patients with both EGFRm and PD-L1 expression had worse RFS compared with EGFRm and PD-L1 negative patients (HR = 3.38, P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed higher CEA at cut-off 3.8 ng/ml, pT4, pN2, pStage II, and margin were significant poor prognostic factors for RFS in the overall population, which was similar to EGFRm population (exception of pT and pStage). Only pStage was a significant poor prognostic factor for PD-L1 positive patients. The predictive score for predicting of recurrence were 6 for all population (63% sensitivity and 86% specificity) and 5 for EGFRm population (62% sensitivity and 93% specificity). CONCLUSION: The prevalence and types of EGFRm were similar between early stage and advanced stage NSCLC. While lower prevalence of PD-L1 expression was found in early stage disease. Patients with both EGFRm and PD-L1 expression had poorer outcome. Thus PD-L1 expression would be one of the prognostic factor in EGFRm patients. Validation of the predictive score should be performed in a larger cohort.

The radiological characteristics, tertiary lymphoid structures, and survival status associated with EGFR mutation in patients with subsolid nodules like stage I-II LUAD.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) recommended for the patients with subsolid nodule in early lung cancer stage is not routinely. The clinical value and impact in patients with EGFR mutation on survival outcomes is further needed to be elucidated to decide whether the application of EGFR-TKIs was appropriate in early lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) stage appearing as subsolid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The inclusion of patients exhibiting clinical staging of IA-IIB subsolid nodules. Clinical information, computed tomography (CT) features before surgical resection and pathological characteristics including tertiary lymphoid structures of the tumors were recorded for further exploration of correlation with EGFR mutation and prognosis. RESULTS: Finally, 325 patients were enrolled into this study, with an average age of 56.8 ± 9.8 years. There are 173 patients (53.2%) harboring EGFR mutation. Logistic regression model analysis showed that female (OR = 1.944, p = 0.015), mix ground glass nodule (OR = 2.071, p = 0.003, bubble-like lucency (OR = 1.991, p = 0.003) were significant risk factors of EGFR mutations. Additionally, EGFR mutations were negatively correlated with TLS presence and density. Prognosis analysis showed that the presence of TLS was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS)(p = 0.03) while EGFR mutations were associated with worse RFS(p = 0.01). The RFS in patients with TLS was considerably excel those without TLS within EGFR wild type group(p = 0.018). Multivariate analyses confirmed that EGFR mutation was an independent prognostic predictor for RFS (HR = 3.205, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In early-phase LUADs, subsolid nodules with EGFR mutation had specific clinical and radiological signatures. EGFR mutation was associated with worse survival outcomes and negatively correlated with TLS, which might weaken the positive impact of TLS on prognosis. Highly attention should be paid to the use of EGFR-TKI for further treatment as agents in early LUAD patients who carrying EGFR mutation.

Stepwise prolongation of overall survival from first to third generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project (TREAD 01).

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of new-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has afforded promising overall survival outcomes in clinical trials for non-small-cell lung cancer. We aim to investigate the current adoption rate of these agents and the real-world impact on overall survival among institutions. METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 46 Tokushukai Medical Group hospitals in Japan, we analyzed clinical data of consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs between April 2010 and March 2020. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses examined the associations between overall survival and patient/tumor-related factors and first-line EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients (58.5% females; median age, 73 years) were included. Of 40 patients diagnosed in 2010, 72.5% received gefitinib, whereas 81.3% of 107 patients diagnosed in 2019 received osimertinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median overall survival was 28.4 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-31.0). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, body mass index, disease status, EGFR mutational status and first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor were identified as significant prognostic factors after adjusting for background factors including study period, hospital volume and hospital type. The estimated 2-year overall survival rates for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 70.1% (95% confidence interval 59.7-82.4), 67.8% (95% confidence interval 55.3-83.2), 75.5% (95% confidence interval 64.7-88.0) and 90.8% (95% confidence interval 84.8-97.3), respectively. The median time to treatment failure of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 12.8, 8.8, 12.0 and 16.9 months or more, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data revealed that the swift and widespread utilization of newer-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and that these newer-generation EGFR-TKIs can prolong overall survival regardless of hospital volume or type. Therefore, osimertinib could be a reasonable first choice treatment for these patients across various clinical practice settings.

Glioblastoma with novel EGFR mutations (T790M and exon 20 insertion) yet unresponsive to osimertinib: A case report.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a high-grade adult-type IDH-wildtype diffuse glioma, commonly harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification. Here, we describe a case of a 49-year-old man with a GBM harboring a TERT promoter mutation. Despite surgical and chemoradiation therapy, the tumor recurred. At that time, comprehensive genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing identified two rare mutations in EGFR: T790M and an exon 20 insertion. Based on these findings, the patient elected to undergo off-label therapy with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown promising results in non-small cell lung carcinoma, including metastatic to brain, with exactly the same EGFR mutations. Moreover, the drug has excellent central nervous system penetration. Even so, no clinical response was observed, and the patient succumbed to the disease. The lack of response may be related to the specific nature of the EGFR mutations, and/or other unfavorable tumor biology overriding any benefit from osimertinib.

Anti-EGFR Antibodies in the Management of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and incidence is rising in younger individuals. Anti-EGFR antibodies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, have been incorporated into standard-of-care practice for patients with advanced disease. Herein, we review the molecular characteristics of these agents and the trials that lead to their approvals. Further, we discuss clinical implications of data regarding biomarkers that dictate treatment selection, different dosing strategies, and side effect management. Finally, we look towards the future and describe contexts in which these agents are currently being investigated clinically with a focus on combinations with MAPK-targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Overall, this review provides historical context, current clinical usage, and future directions for anti-EGFR antibodies in advanced colorectal cancer.

Phase Ib/II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Binimetinib (MEK162) Plus Panitumumab for Mutant or Wild-Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Activating RAS gene mutations occur in approximately 55% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade resistance. Combined EGFR and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibition may extend response to EGFR inhibition and overcome acquired resistance. This phase Ib/II dose escalation trial evaluated the safety and activity of dual inhibition with binimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) and panitumumab (EGFR inhibitor [EGFRi]) in patients with RAS mutant or BRAF wild type (WT)/RAS WT mCRC. METHODS: Phase Ib dose escalation started with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily plus panitumumab 6 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks. In the phase II study, patients with measurable mCRC were enrolled into 4 groups based on previous anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy and RAS mutational status. RESULTS: No patients in the phase Ib portion (n = 10) had a response; 70% of patients had stable disease. In the phase II portion (n = 43), overall response rate (ORR, confirmed) was 2.3% with one partial response in the RAS WT group, DCR was 30.2%, and median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95%CI, 1.6-3.3). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event, with the most common being diarrhea (71.7%), vomiting (52.8%), nausea (50.9%), fatigue (49.1%), dermatitis acneiform (43.4%), and rash (41.5%). Most patients required treatment interruption or dose reduction due to difficulties tolerating treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of binimetinib and panitumumab had substantial toxicity and limited clinical activity for patients with mutant or WT RAS mCRC, independent of EGFRi treatment history (Trial registration: NCT01927341).

Impact of Anti-EGFR Therapies on HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Five high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates. CONCLUSIONS: While this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Afatinib Versus Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Pooled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the effectiveness of afatinib compared to that of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbored uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS: A PubMed database-based literature review was conducted to retrieve related studies. Patients harboring EGFR mutations besides the deletion in exon 19 (19del) and point mutation of L858R were included in this analysis. The primary outcome events were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:1 was used between afatinib and osimertinib groups to control the confounding factors. Uncommon EGFR mutations were categorized into 4 groups: insertion in exon 20 (ex20ins), non-ex20ins single uncommon EGFR mutations, compound EGFR mutations that with 19del or L858R, and compound EGFR mutations without 19del or L858R. RESULTS: After PSM, 71 patients in either the afatinib or osimertinib group were matched. The afatinib group had an ORR of 60.6%, slightly higher than the osimertinib group's (50.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = .610). However, the afatinib group showed a significantly superior PFS benefit than the osimertinib group (11.0 vs. 7.0 months, P = .044). In addition, patients harboring non-ex20ins single uncommon EGFR mutations yield the best ORR and PFS, following treatment of either afatinib (ORR: 76.7%, mPFS: 14.1 months) or osimertinib (ORR: 68.8%, mPFS: 15.1 months). Moreover, there was no significant difference in terms of ORR or PFS between the cohort of patients treated with afatinib or osimertinib, regardless of whether or not the patients had brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Both afatinib and osimertinib displayed favorable clinical activities toward uncommon EGFR mutations. Afatinib showed a more profound and durable PFS benefit than osimertinib, although no efficacy advantage was observed.

Radiotherapy Plus Temozolomide With or Without Nimotuzumab Against the Newly Diagnosed EGFR-Positive Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) has a poor prognosis, and patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification have an even worse prognosis. Nimotuzumab is an EGFR monoclonal antibody thought to play a significant role in the treatment of GBM. This paper presents a retrospective cohort study that evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 56 newly diagnosed patients with EGFR-positive GBM were included in our study. The patients were divided into radiotherapy (RT) + temozolomide (TMZ) + nimotuzumab (39 patients) and RT + TMZ (17 patients) groups based on whether or not nimotuzumab was added during RT. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 27.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.1-30.8). The median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-17.0) and 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.3) in the 2 groups, respectively, P = .052. The median OS was 27.3 months (95% CI, 19.0-35.6) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 11.1-22.2), respectively, P = .018. In patients with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter, the PFS and OS were significantly better in patients treated with nimotuzumab than in those without nimotuzumab (median PFS: 19.3 vs 6.7 months, P = .001; median OS: 20.2 vs 13.8 months, P = .026). During the treatment period, no statistically significant difference in toxicity was noted between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective cohort study suggests the efficacy of Nimotuzumab combined with concurrent RT with TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed EGFR-positive GBM, and specifically those with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings. Besides, nimotuzumab demonstrated good safety and tolerability.

Results of the phase IIa study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation from a phase I/IIa study.

BACKGROUND: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This phase IIa study was part of a phase I/IIa study (NCT03386955), aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received the first-line treatment of 180 mg rezivertinib orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: From Jun 12, 2019, to Oct 17, 2019, 43 patients were enrolled. At the data cutoff date on Dec 23, 2021, the ORR by BICR was 83.7% (95% CI: 69.3-93.2%). The median DoR was 19.3 (95% CI: 15.8-25.0) months. The median PFS by BICR was 20.7 (95% CI: 13.8-24.8) months and 22.0 (95% CI: 16.8-26.3) months by investigators. Data on OS was immature. Totally, 40 (93.0%) patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event while 4 (9.3%) of them were grade ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) showed promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile for the treatment among the locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation in the first-line setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03386955.

Normofractionated irradiation and not temozolomide modulates the immunogenic and oncogenic phenotype of human glioblastoma cell lines.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, with an overall poor prognosis after diagnosis. Conventional treatment includes resection, chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), and concomitant radiotherapy (RT). The recent success of immunotherapy approaches in other tumor entities, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, could not be clinically transferred to GBM treatment so far. Therefore, preclinical analyses of the expression of both immune-suppressive and immune-stimulatory checkpoint molecules following treatment of human glioblastoma cells with RT and/or temozolomide is needed to design feasible radio(chemo)immunotherapy trials for GBM in the future. METHODS: Five human glioblastoma cell lines (H4, HROG-06, U118, U138, U251) were analyzed regarding their clonogenic survival and cell death forms after chemotherapy (CT) with TMZ and/or normofractionated RT (5â€¯× 2 Gy) via multicolor flow cytometry. Further, the tumor cell surface expression of immune-activating (OX40L, CD137L, CD70, and ICOSL) and immune-suppressive (PD-L1, PD-L2, HVEM) checkpoint molecules and of an oncogenic molecule (EGFR) were measured via multicolor flow cytometry after CT and RT alone or after RCT. RESULTS: Normofractionated RT and not TMZ was the trigger of induction of predominantly necrosis in the glioblastoma cells. Notably, clonogenicity did not correlate with cell death induction by RT. The basal expression level of immune-suppressive PD-L1, PD-L2, and HVEM varied in the analyzed glioblastoma cells. RT, but not TMZ, resulted in a significant upregulation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in all tumor cells investigated. Also, the expression of HVEM was increased after RT in most of the GBM cell lines. In contrast, normofractionated RT individually modulated expression of the stimulating immune checkpoint molecules CD70, CD137L, OX40L, and ICOSL1. The oncogenic factor EGFR was significantly increased by irradiation in all examined cell lines, albeit to a different extent. None of the investigated molecules were downregulated after the treatments. CONCLUSION: Normofractionated radiotherapy modulates the immunogenic as well as the oncogenic phenotype of glioblastoma cells, partly individually. Therefore, not only PD-L1 and PD-L2, but also other immunogenic molecules expressed on the surface of glioblastoma cells could serve as targets for immune checkpoint blockade in combination with RT in the future.

Risk of seizures in a population of women with BRCA-positive metastatic breast cancer from an electronic health record database in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and risk factors for seizures among women with advanced breast cancer (BC) and brain metastases are not well characterized across treatment-related or clinical subtypes. This study leveraged a large real-world dataset to describe incidence and risk factors for seizures in BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: The Optum® de-identified electronic health records database was used. Females with a BC diagnoses between 2008 and 2018, with clinic visits 12 months before BC index date, evidence of BRCA mutation (BRCA+), evidence of metastasis, and no previous cancers were included. Analyses were stratified by the overall BRCA+ cohort and 4 molecular phenotypes: HER2+/HR- (human epidermal growth factor 2/hormone receptor), HER2-/HR+, HER2+/HR+, and triple negative BC (TNBC; HER2-/HR-). Seizures were identified using diagnosis codes and natural language processing. Incidence, occurrence rates, and cumulative incidence of seizures from the diagnosis of metastasis to the end of follow up were calculated. Comparisons were made between phenotypes and stratified on PARP inhibitor use, diagnosed brain metastases, history of seizures, and anticonvulsants use before BC. All comparisons included age at metastasis, number of prior lines of treatment, and metastasis location as covariates. RESULTS: 27.8% of 7941 BRCA+ patients had ≥1 seizure over a mean follow-up time of 2.35 years. Incidence and occurrence rates were 11.83 (95% CI: 11.35-12.33) and 201.3 (95% CI: 198.05-204.50), respectively, per 100 person-years. HER2-/HR+ and TNBC patients had the lowest and highest seizure incidence rates, respectively (10.94 [95% CI: 10.23-11.71] and 16.83 [95% CI: 15.34-18.46]). With HER2-/HR+ as the reference group in a competing risk analysis, TNBC (hazard ratio, HR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.21, 1.52; p < 0.001) and HER2+/HR- (HR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.56; p < 0.01) patients had a greater risk of seizures. Patients with diagnosed brain metastases or a history of seizures had higher seizure rates. Incidence trended higher with PARP inhibitor use, but patient numbers were low. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel real-world evidence on seizure incidence rates in BRCA+ BC patients, even those without diagnosed brain metastases, and underscores the need to understand patients' tumor phenotypes when assessing seizure risk. These findings may have implications for clinical practice and assessment of benefit-risk ratios of new therapeutic agents.

Downregulation of Pinkbar/pAKT and MMP2/MMP9 Expression in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells as Potential Targets in Cancer Therapy by hAMSCs Secretome.

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. Cancer therapy based on stem cells is considered as a novel and promising platform. In the present study, we explored the therapeutic effects of human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSCs) through Pinkbar (planar intestinal- and kidney-specific BAR domain protein), pAKT, and matrix metalloproteinases including MMP2 and MMP9 on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. For this purpose, we employed a co-culture system using Transwell 6-well plates with a pore size of 0.4 µm. After 72 h, the hAMSCs-treated MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and c-Src (a key mediator in EGFR signaling pathway), Pinkbar, pAKT, MMP2, and MMP9 were analyzed using quantitative real time PCR and western blot methods. Based on 2D and 3D cell culture models, significant reduction of tumor cell growth and motility through downregulation of EGFR, c-Src, Pinkbar, pAKT, MMP2, and MMP9 were found in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Moreover, induction of cellular apoptosis was also reported. Our finding indicates that the hAMSCS secretome has therapeutic effects on cancer cells. To identify the details of the molecular mechanisms, more experiments will be required.

Preclinical Evidence that Arctigenin Effectively and Selectively Targets Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Via Suppressing EGFR and RhoA.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has poor clinical outcomes and necessitates new treatment options. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a potential therapeutic target, due to the associations with various carcinomas' progression. Arctigenin, a natural compound of Arctium lappa, has been shown to display anticancer abilities in various carcinomas. Cellular assays and combination studies were conducted using arctigenin and anti-ccRCC drugs. In vivo efficacy of arctigenin was determined using ccRCC xenograft mouse model. Immunoblotting and biochemistry analysis were applied to investigate the signaling affected by arctigenin. Arctigenin inhibits growth, migration, and survival of ccRCC cells while sparing normal kidney cells. Arctigenin acts synergistically with 5-FU and sorafenib but not temsirolimus in inhibiting ccRCC cells. Synergism of arctigenin with 5-FU and sorafenib was further shown in ccRCC xenograft mouse model. The combination of arctigenin with clinical anti-RCC drugs completely inhibits tumor growth without tumor progression even for an extended time period. Mechanistically, arctigenin inhibits migration in a RhoA-dependent manner while inhibits growth via suppressing EGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Our findings suggest that arctigenin performs well to add to current treatment in ccRCC and confirm the value to target EGFR to improve therapy in RCC.

Formononetin Inhibits Microglial Inflammatory Response and Contributes to Spinal Cord Injury Repair by Targeting the EGFR/MAPK Pathway.

Zhenbao Pill contains many Chinese herbal medicinal ingredients and has been proven to have therapeutic effects on the repair of spinal cord injury (SCI). This study attempts to investigate the role of formononetin (FMN), an ingredient of Zhenbao Pill, in regulating neuroinflammation after SCI and the underlying mechanism. Primary microglia isolated from the spinal cord of newborn rats and human microglial clone 3 (HMC3) cells were stimulated with IL-1ß followed by FMN incubation. The cell viability and inflammatory cytokine levels were detected. The target of FMN was predicted and screened using databases. By silencing or overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the anti-neuroinflammatory effect of FMN was assessed in vitro. In vivo, FMN was intraperitoneally injected into rats after SCI followed by the neurological function and histopathology examination. The isolated microglia were in high purity, and the different concentrations of FMN incubation had no toxic effects on primary microglia and HMC3 cells. FMN reduced the inflammatory cytokine levels (TNF-α and IL-6) in a concentration-dependent manner. EGFR silencing or FMN incubation decreased p-EGFR and p-p38 levels and down-regulated inflammatory cytokine levels in IL-1ß-stimulated cells or supernatants. Nevertheless, the effects of FMN on microglial inflammation were reversed by EGFR overexpression. In vivo, FMN treatment improved the neuromotor function, repaired tissue injury, and inhibited EGFR/p38MAPK phosphorylation. Formononetin inhibits microglial inflammatory response and contributes to SCI repair via the EGFR/p38MAPK signaling pathway.

Current treatment strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: from first line to beyond osimertinib resistance.

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, is the standard therapy for previously untreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients following the landmark FLAURA study. However, resistance inevitably hinders patient prognosis, increasing the need for new therapeutic strategies beyond osimertinib. Frontline osimertinib-based combination strategies (platinum-based chemotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors) are currently being tested primarily to prevent initial resistance. In the later-line setting after osimertinib, many next-line therapeutic candidates have been actively examined in clinical trials. Notably, several drugs with novel mechanisms of action, such as antibody-drug conjugates and EGFR -MET bispecific antibodies, have shown promising efficacy despite the resistance mechanisms and are close to clinical application. In addition, genotype-based target strategies have been investigated for a better understanding of osimertinib resistance mechanisms based on molecular profiling tests at relapse. The C797S mutation and MET gene alterations are commonly identified following osimertinib resistance, for which targeting strategies are actively tested. This review describes current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer based on the results of clinical trials and the latest published data, broadly grouped into two sections: 1) EGFR TKIs-based combination therapy in the front-line setting and 2) novel therapeutic strategies after osimertinib resistance.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with resected pathological stage II/III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations remains controversial. METHODS: This retrospective study included 353 patients with resected pathological N1/N2 stage II/III NSCLC between 2010 and 2016. Mutant EGFR (mEGFR) was detected in 76 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was administered to 151 patients. We compared cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between AC and surgery-alone (SA) groups, including patients with wild-type EGFR (wEGFR) and mEGFR. Using multivariate analysis, we evaluated the prognostic factors in patients with wEGFR and mEGFR. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.7 years. In patients with wEGFR, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 114) and SA (n = 163) groups were significant (CSS: 66.8% [5 years] vs. 49.4% [5 years], p = 0.001; RFS: 54.2% [5 years] vs. 39.2% [5 years], p = 0.013). The significant prognostic factors were AC (vs. SA; p < 0.0001), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide > 60% (p = 0.028), tumor size (p < 0.001), lymphatic permeation (p = 0.041), and pN1 (vs. pN2; p < 0.001). However, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 37) and SA (n = 39) groups were not significant (CSS: 64.0% [5 years] vs. 58.1% [5 years], p = 0.065; RFS: 45.0% [5 years] vs. 33.8% [5 years], p = 0.302). Multivariate analysis identified no significant prognostic factors in patients with mEGFR. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the efficacy of AC in patients with mEGFR and wEGFR. The efficacy of AC may be lower in patients with mEGFR than in those with wEGFR.

An Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients on Monoclonal Antibody Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors.

Acneiform eruptions occur frequently and early in patients on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Identification of baseline patient risk factors would prompt earlier referral to dermatology to optimize prevention and management. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to determine the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with colon and head and neck cancers who started EGFRi between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were followed until death or September 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were documented and patients were followed from the time of diagnosis to most recent visit for the development and management of an acneiform eruption. Regression analyses were performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A total of 66 patients were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab between 2017-2021 were included in the analysis. Forty-seven of the sixty-six patients developed an acneiform eruption while on EGFRi therapy (71.2%). Combination cancer therapy with another chemotherapeutic agent was associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption (OR 0.03, P = .027). No other baseline features were statistically associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption. Acneiform eruptions are a common cutaneous adverse event of EGFRi therapy. Ongoing research is required to elucidate risk factors for the development of acneiform eruptions, to improve the quality of life of oncology patients.

The effect of PLK1 inhibitor in osimertinib resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. / Poloæ ·æ¿€é ¶1抑制剂在奥希替尼耐药的非小细胞肺癌细胞中的作用.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PLK1 inhibitors on osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells and the anti-tumor effect combined with osimertinib. METHODS: An osimertinib resistant NCI-H1975 cell line was induced by exposure to gradually increasing drug concentrations. Osimertinib-resistant cells were co-treated with compounds from classical tumor pathway inhibitor library and osimertinib to screen for compounds with synergistic effects with osimertinib. The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to investigate the activated signaling pathways in osimertinib-resistant cells; sulforhodamine B (SRB) staining was used to investigate the effect of PLK1 inhibitors on osimertinib-resistant cells and the synergistic effect of PLK1 inhibitors combined with osimertinib. RESULTS: Osimertinib-resistance in NCI-H1975 cell (resistance index=43.45) was successfully established. The PLK1 inhibitors GSK 461364 and BI 2536 had synergistic effect with osimertinib. Compared with osimertinib-sensitive cells, PLK1 regulatory pathway and cell cycle pathway were significantly activated in osimertinib-resistant cells. In NSCLC patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations treated with osimertinib, PLK1 mRNA levels were negatively correlated with progression free survival of patients (R=－0.62, P<0.05), indicating that excessive activation of PLK1 in NSCLC cells may cause cell resistant to osimertinib. Further in vitro experiments showed that IC50 of PLK1 inhibitors BI 6727 and GSK 461364 in osimertinib-resistant cells were lower than those in sensitive ones. Compared with the mono treatment of osimertinib, PLK1 inhibitors combined with osimertinib behaved significantly stronger effect on the proliferation of osimertinib-resistant cells. CONCLUSIONS: PLK1 inhibitors have a synergistic effect with osimertinib on osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cells which indicates that they may have potential clinical value in the treatment of NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance.