Does increasing vertical dimension of occlusion in centric relation affect muscular activity? An electromyographic study.

OBJECTIVE: In many esthetic treatments, clinicians may consider the option to modify the maxillo mandibular position. A raise of the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) may help restore esthetics, increase the space for dental materials, and reduce the invasiveness of dental procedures. Traditionally, VDO increases are done by using the centric relation (CR) position. Despite a long history of use, the neuromuscular effects of different maxillo mandibular relations are not fully studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alterations of maxillo-mandibular relation from maximal intercuspal position (MIP) to a raised VDO CR position on jaw-elevator muscle activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy individuals were asked to carry out maximal voluntary clenching (MVC) in MIP and in CR on individual splints. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles was assessed in µV as the root mean square of the amplitude. Specific indexes and ratios were also computed. Data analyzed in MIP and CR were compared by paired student's t-tests. RESULTS: MVC levels were not negatively affected by a VDO increase in CR position. On the contrary masseter muscles showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.005). No significant effect on the anterior temporalis was observed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that no immediate negative effect on maximum voluntary clenching was induced by a VDO increase in CR position. A slight increase observed in EMG clenching levels could be explained by the increase in VDO when clenching on the splint. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study support the use of CR position as a pragmatic reference position due to the absence of relevant or negative changes in neuromuscular function.

Different methods of determining centric relation - comparison with a digital mandibular motion analyser.

BACKGROUND: Finding and registering the maxillary-mandibular jaw relation is crucial in dental practice. Several comparative studies have been conducted to investigate the reproducibility and accuracy of techniques for determining the centric relation (CR) position of the mandible. The aim of our study was to determine which of seven different CR determination methods had the smallest deviation from the theoretical zero with the help of a digital mandibular motion analyser. The chosen theoretical zero position, the maximal intercuspal position (MIP), is the most reproducible and widely used position. METHODS: Thirty-four volunteers (24 females and 10 males) with a mean (SD) age of 29.1 (± 7.3) years with a negative history of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) participated in the study. A digital mandibular motion analyser was used to register the condylar position after the use of each technique for the determination of CR. The calibration was performed to the maximal intercuspal position (MIP) for each volunteer. The investigated techniques were (A) the gothic arch tracer, (B) the adduction field method, (C) Dawson's bimanual manipulation, (D) the patient placing the tongue tip on the palatal rugae, (E) the patient placing the tongue tip to the border of the hard and soft palate, (F) the patient actively pulling the chin backwards, and (G) the examiner pushing the patient's chin back. RESULTS: The position of the mandibular condyle was illustrated in a three-dimensional coordinate system, where the origin represented the MIP. Among the seven methods examined, five showed significant deviations compared to the MIP. Among these, two methods resulted in posterior deviation of the condyles. Methods C and E coincided with the MIP in all directions. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of our study, we found that the smallest deviations from our theoretical zero (MIP) among the investigated centric relation determining methods were obtained with the bimanual mandibular manipulation technique derived from Dawson and the placement of the tongue tip on the border of the hard and soft palate (linguomandibular homotrophy theory).

Centric relation-A biological perspective of a technical concept.

BACKGROUND: Few terms and concepts have been so extensively debated in dentistry as the words 'centric relation' (CR). Debates involve its biological, diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness. METHODS: A review of the literature on the current concepts on CR as a diagnostic or therapeutic aid in dentistry was provided. Clinical trials assessing the superiority of one CR recording method over the others to identify patients with temporomandibular disorders (diagnostic use) or to manage patients with prosthodontic or orthodontic needs (therapeutic use) were tentatively included. RESULTS: Due to the absence of literature addressing either of the above targets, a comprehensive overview was provided. The diagnostic use of CR as a reference position to identify the correct position of the temporomandibular joint condyle within the glenoid fossa is not supported and lacks anatomical support. From a therapeutic standpoint, the use of CR can be pragmatically useful in prosthodontics as a maxillo-mandibular reference position when occlusal re-organization is warranted and/or when the position of maximum intercuspation is no longer available. CONCLUSIONS: The derived occlusal goals from a diagnostic misuse of CR are generally the result of circular reasoning, that is a technique is based on the recording of a certain condylar position that is believed to be 'ideal' and the treatment is considered successful when such position is shown by the specific instrument that was manufactured for that purpose. The term 'Centric Relation' might be replaced with the term 'Maxillo-Mandibular Utility Position'.

Tongue training technique for guiding the mandible in establishing horizontal jaw relation in edentulous patients.

BACKGROUND: Edentulous patients have poor neuromuscular proprioception to guide the mandible to the desirable horizontal relation. Horizontal jaw relation is a complex relationship in which variation may occur in vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to train the tongue and bring the mandible to centric relation in geriatric edentulous cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protrude the tongue to the maximum length and retract back to centric relation, move the tongue on the left side beyond the angle of the mouth and bringing back to centric relation, move the tongue on the right and left side beyond the angle of the mouth and bringing back to centric relation, then the tongue should move upwards and touches the marginal tubercle of upper lip and bringing back to centric relation and move the tongue upward and posteriorly to touch the posterior part of the hard palate of the maxilla and swallowing. RESULTS: Edentulous patient can successfully move the mandible in centric relation after training the tongue. CONCLUSION: The present technique is useful for establishment of horizontal jaw relation in edentulous cases using tongue training exercise in Prosthodontic dentistry.

[A clinical application study of digital manufacturing simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device in determining the centric relation of complete dentures].

OBJECTIVE: To verify the consistency between the digital manufacturing simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device and the traditional intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device in determining the centric relation of complete dentures restoration. METHODS: Ten outpatients with edentulous jaws were selec-ted, and the centric relation of the patients was determined by digital manufacturing of simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device (T1) and traditional intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device (T2); the difference of clinical operation time between the two methods was recorded; the upper and lower edentulous jaw plaster models were scanned with two kinds of centric relation, the Standard Triangle Language (STL) files imported into Geomagic studio software to apply the best fitting of multiple points of the both upper jaw models, the fitted STL files imported into the 3 shape viewer software, and the maximum position deviations of the vertical, labial (buccal) and lingual directions of the mandibular midline area and molar areas in T1 and T2 groups measured. During the clinical complete dentures try-in, we observed whether there was midline deviation in the mouth of T1 group and T2 group, and whether the occlusion of posterior teeth was stable or not. RESULTS: The mean time spent on determining the centric relation of T1 and T2 groups was (41.90±2.64) min, (57.50±2.37) min respectively. Paired t test was conducted in the two groups, P < 0.01 with significant statistical difference; The mean maximum position deviation between T1 group and T2 group of the midline mandibular region in labial lingual direction was (0.32±0.14) mm, that was (0.40±0.23) mm in vertical direction; the mean maximum position deviation of molar area in buccal lingual direction was (0.35±0.23) mm and that was (0.33±0.20) mm in vertical direction. In the vertical and horizontal directions, the maximum position deviation of mandibles between group T1 and group T2 was controlled within 0.5 mm. In the process of clinical complete dentures try-in, there was no deviation from the center line of dentures. There was not warping, swinging and other poor stability phenomena in T1 and T2 groups. CONCLUSION: The digital manufacturing of simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device can be used to determine the centric relation of complete dentures, which can not only save time of clinical operation, but also ensure the accuracy of the centric relation.

Selecting a Virtual Articulator: An Analysis of the Factors Available with Mechanical Articulators and their Potential Need for Inclusion with Virtual Articulators.

The ever-expanding world of digital technology has produced many changes, including the availability of virtual articulators. The use of such digital technology requires an understanding of the features that have been available with different mechanical articulators. These features include such items as facebow, intercondylar distance, incisal guide table, condylar inclination, reference plane, lateral condylar inclination, immediate mandibular translation, and ability to verify a centric relation record. This paper reviews the adjustable features that have been available with different types of mechanical articulators so that clinicians can determine if these features should be included in the virtual articulators they choose to use. Regardless of whether one is utilizing a mechanical or virtual articulator, the rationale for which type of articulator to select is the same and is predicated on the needs of the patient, the occlusal philosophy of the clinician, and the required accuracy.

Centric relation: A needed reference position.

PURPOSE: Centric relation (CR) is a universally recognized term and an acceptable reference position with a long history of success. The problem is that there is little consensus as to its definition or the method of recording it, and this has created an uprising to abolish it. METHODS: A review of pertinent literature related to its definition, method of recording, anatomic considerations, and long-standing principles was conducted. RESULTS: Centric relation is an established term but there are valid concerns over its definition and method of recording. There is consensus on using it as a restorative position in a patient in need of full-arch reconstruction, and there is no substantive clinical research to contradict this. If a clinician decides to use a different position, it should have a different name. CONCLUSIONS: Centric relation is a reproducible reference position that can be utilized for diagnostic and restorative dental procedures with substantial scientific evidence to support that premise. There are numerous well-documented techniques, all of which are intermaxillary, that can replicate the position. There is little scientific evidence to support a premise as to where the exact position of the condyle should be in relation to the fossa.

Clinical reproducibility of different centric relation recording techniques in edentulous individuals: An observational cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of four different centric relation (CR) recording techniques, and time spent performing each technique in edentulous individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four techniques were assessed: extraoral gothic arch (EOGA) tracing, intraoral gothic arch (IOGA) tracing, deglutition (D), and frontal manipulation with tongue elevation (FMTE). Twelve subjects participated in the study; four technique records were performed on each volunteer by the same operator. Each record was repeated three times, in the same period of the day, with a 30 min interval between each technique. The reproducibility of each technique was assessed by the tri-dimensional displacement of the position of the condylar housing (mandible condyle) to the wall of the condylar guide (glenoid cavity) in the semi-adjustable articulator (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior-inferior). The time spent on each technique was timed in seconds (from the beginning of each technique until the wax occlusion fixation). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test were performed for anteroposterior displacement (two-way) and for time spent on CT recording techniques (one-way) (α < 0.05). Regarding mediolateral and superior-inferior displacements, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis was performed for the comparison between recording methods, whereas the Mann-Whitney test was performed for the comparison between sides (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The factor recording technique interfered with the anteroposterior displacement (ANOVA: α < 0.001; F = 11.396). The technique D (right side: 3.78 ± 0.69 mm; left side: 3.45 ± 0.74 mm) showed a statistically significant difference compared to the other techniques (EOGA: right side: 3.00 ± 0.00 mm; left side: 3.00 ± 0.00 mm; FMTE: right side: 2.81 ± 0.52 mm; left side: 2.82 ± 0.79 mm; IOGA: right side: 2.90 ± 0.65 mm; left side: 3.12 ± 0.44 mm). The time spent on the recording technique influenced the results (ANOVA: α < 0.001; F = 21.118). The IOGA (340.40 ± 163.41 s) and EOGA (285.93 ± 133.84 s) required more time compared to the D (86.00 ± 34.33 s) and FMTE (101.33 ± 36.72 s) techniques. CONCLUSION: Graphic recordings showed better reproducibility and accuracy of the position of the centric relation.

Diagnosis, treatment planning, and comprehensive restoration of a patient with Costello syndrome: rationale and application of indirect composite resin onlays.

Patients with a complex problem set involving multiple levels of altered structure challenge the clinician to develop an individualized, appropriate treatment plan. Dentofacial deficiency, occlusal problems, and loss of tooth structure require intervention to establish stability and regain function, speech, esthetics, and masticatory muscle comfort. The comprehensive examination must quantify each problem to specify the diagnosis for realistic treatment planning. The clinical case of a patient with Costello syndrome is presented to illustrate essential concepts in diagnosis and treatment of complex cases, including (1) Global Diagnosis of anterior esthetic relationships, (2) occlusal analysis with diagnostic casts verified in centric relation, (3) comprehensive restoration previewed with a diagnostic wax-up and removable acrylic resin overlay, (4) adhesive monobody composite resin onlays that preserve tooth structure, and (5) programmed occlusion, quantified with digital occlusal analysis, to ensure stability and comfort. Costello syndrome is a neurodevelopmental syndrome causing multisystem effects, including a distinctive craniofacial phenotype, cardiovascular disease, intellectual disability, growth hormone deficiency, and dental abnormalities such as delayed dental development, bruxism, and demineralized enamel lesions. In the present case, quantification of the patient's problem set allowed precise treatment planning that resulted in predictable restoration.

Centric relation: A matter of form and substance.

The recent review article by Zonnenberg, Türp and Greene 'Centric relation critically revisited - What are the clinical implications'? opens an important debate by addressing topics of central relevance in Dentistry, namely the relationship between occlusion and the condyle-to-glenoid-fossa position, and the need for diagnostic assessment and therapeutic alteration of the condylar position in orthodontic patients. Zonnenberg, Türp and Greene concluded that the mandibular condyle is correctly situated in most orthodontic patients. Thus, in their view, orthodontists can disregard this aspect during treatment, and rely on the plastic properties of the masticatory supporting structures, while aiming at finishing the cases in a good occlusal relationship. We think that this approach fails to consider that biological variation of the stomatognathic structures can also be pathological and that, as dental occlusion determines condylar relative position within the glenoid fossa, changes in the occlusion are likely to alter the original condylar-to-glenoid-fossa relation. Hence, we claim that whenever the occlusal relationship must be changed, the clinician should carefully monitor the condyle position and the mandibular function to prevent possible iatrogenic effects. To advance the discourse on the topic, we invite Zonnenberg, Türp and Greene to clarify their definition of 'average patient' and their interpretation of 'full-mouth orthodontic and orthognathic treatment', their understanding of 'biologically acceptable condylar relationship', their justification of maximum intercuspation as reference position, the extent to which they think it is safe to rely on the TMJ resilience, and finally their alternative to centric relation in the treatment of patients needing condylar repositioning.

Evaluation of the condylar position in younger and older adults with or without temporomandibular symptoms by using cone beam computed tomography.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recent studies in young adults have questioned the influence of discrepancies between central and maximal intercuspal positions in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). However, whether this finding was because this type of etiologic agent requires time for the development of changes in the condylar position is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the presence or absence of discrepancies between the centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MI) in younger and older adults in populations with or without TMDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample was composed of 80 volunteers, 40 younger individuals aged 18 to 25 years (27 women and 13 men), half with and half without TMD symptoms, and 40 older participants aged 35 to 50 years (30 women and 10 men), half with and half without TMD symptoms. The TMD symptoms were diagnosed by using the diagnostic (standard) criteria for TMD research (RDC/TMD). Two CBCT scans were performed on each participant, one in MI and another in CR. Measurements of the joint space were performed in coronal and sagittal cuts of the temporomandibular joints, and the collected data were statistically analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05). RESULTS: No significant differences were found when the CR and MI positions and the presence or absence of TMD symptoms were compared in the younger and older groups. However, when the younger and older groups were compared, significant differences were found in all measures used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The condyle and mandibular fossa do not seem to be influenced by the CR or MI positions or by the presence or absence of TMD symptoms, but age seems to lead to a quantitative increase in the relationship between these structures.

Centric relation critically revisited-What are the clinical implications?

PURPOSE OF THE ARTICLE: Centric relation is a dental term that has undergone many alterations over the years, which in turn have led to significant clinical controversies. These continuing changes in the meaning of the term CR have not only led to confusion, but they also have resulted in a variety of unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Analysis of the dental literature reveals ongoing misunderstanding and disagreement regarding that term among both clinicians and academic dentists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the PubMed database was performed with the following search terms: "centric relation", "masticatory muscles", "maxillomandibular relationship" and "condylar position." Relevant literature from the past 70 years until the present day was meticulously scrutinised. RESULTS: As expected, the literature review on the topic of CR revealed a problematic pattern of changing definitions and clinical disagreements, all of which have had a significant impact on the practice of dentistry. CONCLUSION: There are semantic, conceptual and practical reasons for concluding that the term 'centric relation' is flawed. Those flaws have a significant impact on dental practice. Based on our analysis, argumentation is provided to conclude that the term 'centric relation' should be abandoned. Instead, it appears that every individual has a unique temporomandibular joint relationship which cannot be described by any singular term. In healthy dentate patients, this relationship is determined by the maximum intercuspation of the teeth and should therefore be considered as biologically acceptable.

An open-source multifunctional registration device for implant-supported complete dentures.

A 3D printed registration device is described for implant-supported complete dentures that simultaneously register implant position, soft-tissue contour, anterior tooth position, occlusal vertical dimension, and centric relation. This information is captured clinically in 10 to 20 minutes and can then be transferred to the dental laboratory technician to continue the prosthetic workflow. The standard tessellation language (STL) file for the registration device is available for free download and use.

Printing and mounting digital casts in the centric relation position for use on an analog articulator: A dental technique.

A technique for recording, printing, and mounting digital casts in centric relation is described. Combining elements of analog and digital workflows, centric relation records can be transferred by digital scanning and used to align casts for articulation. This method is useful to the clinician adapting to digital workflow or preferring a physical semiadjustable articulator in conjunction with digital scans.

Angle's Classification-A Prosthodontic Consideration: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: This Best Evidence Consensus Statement evaluated the existing Angle's classification clinical literature to determine if the Angle's classification as historically determined in maximum intercuspal position (MIP) with hand held casts is coincident with the centric occlusion (CO) determined Angle's classification. In addition, it explored the value of using Angle's classification for edentulous patients MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy was related to the focus questions and limited to Meta-analyses, Systematic Reviews (SR), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Clinical Trials. Searches were completed using the term Angle's classification and Boolean Modifiers (AND) with the key terms: dental occlusion, dental occlusion centric, centric occlusion, centric relation, maximal intercuspation, MIP, intercuspal position, and edentulous patient, retrognathia, determination, and prognathia. Additional related articles were culled from the reference lists in the articles found in the PubMed searches. RESULTS: The search identified 494 articles related to the selected terminology. Titles were reviewed and selected if related to the focus questions for further review. Seven papers could be identified that addressed the specifics of the questions. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that the Angle's classification for many patients will change when recorded in CO compared to the historical MIP determination/definition. A different Angle's classification recorded in CO is potentially a significant diagnostic finding for patients needing complete mouth rehabilitation. The current definitions of Angle's Classification are not useful in the management of edentulous patients.

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing literature relative to two focus questions: What are the techniques used and their reproducibility in recording centric relation (CR) in a dentate and partially dentate population and what effect do different recording materials have on the reproducibility of CR? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Keywords used in the initial search were: CR, interocclusal records, CR accuracy, CR reproducibility, and CR technique. The search was then limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, Meta-analyses, and Clinical Trials. RESULTS: Initial search related to the selected search terms resulted in more than 3500 articles. When subsequent search was limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, and Meta-Analysis and Clinical Trials, this resulted in 291 articles selected for further analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Techniques using chin point guidance, bimanual manipulation, power centric, Gothic arch tracing, leaf gauge, and anterior deprogramming devices to record CR can all be comparable in precision and clinical accuracy in regards to clinical relevance. Practitioner experience and familiarity with a particular technique is critical for accuracy when recording CR. Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether consistently performed better in the broad range of studies on recording materials. Virtual capture of CR could serve as a comparable recording medium but requires further clinical study.

The Relationship Between Centric Occlusion and The Maximal Intercuspal Position and Their Use as Treatment Positions for Complete Mouth Rehabilitation: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing literature relative to two focus questions: How often does centric occlusion coincide with maximal intercuspal position in dentate and partially dentate populations?; and should centric occlusion or maximal intercuspal positions be equivalent for dentate and partially dentate patients undergoing complete mouth rehabilitation? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Keywords used in the initial search were: intercuspal position, centric occlusion, centric relation, maximal intercuspal position, prosthodontic rehabilitation, and occlusion. The search was then limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials. RESULTS: The initial search strategy related to the selected search terms resulted in more than 15,000 articles. When the subsequent search was limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, and Meta-Analysis and Clinical Trials, 313 articles were selected for further analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Review of the literature reveals that most dentate and partially dentate patients do not have coincident centric occlusion and maximal intercuspal position. There is support for coincidence between centric occlusion and maximal intercuspal position as the preferred occlusal relationship in complete mouth rehabilitations. The literature does not report conclusive evidence of adverse prosthodontic outcomes with complete rehabilitations in centric occlusion or maximal intercuspal position in a healthy population. However, there is support for an association between centric occlusion-maximal intercuspal position discrepancies and occlusal instability as well as temporomandibular joint disorders. Hence, it is concluded that partially and completely dentate patients requiring complete mouth rehabilitation should be restored in centric occlusion.

Comparison of different methods for obtaining centric relation: a systematic review.

The objective of this study was to compare techniques of different methods of obtaining centric relation to verify which technique generates the greatest reproducibility of the centric relation. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published up to May 15, 2018. The search terms were combinations of "dental centric relation" with each of the following terms (individually): "reproducibility of findings"; "jaw relation record"; "chin point"; "gothic arch"; "bimanual manipulation"; "swallowing"; and "jig." The inclusion criteria included clinical studies in English that had to compare at least 2 techniques representing different methods for obtaining centric relation (based on the reproducibility of the centric relation) in individuals without temporomandibular dysfunction; and studies performed in individuals with complete or nearly complete dentition or complete edentulism. Methods (techniques) included in this study were guided methods (chin point guidance and bimanual manipulation); graphic methods (intraoral and extraoral gothic arch tracing); and physiologic methods (swallowing and tongue retrusion along the palate). A total of 1638 articles were identified. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 7 articles were included in this review. None of the reviewed studies evaluated edentulous individuals. Two articles compared physiologic methods with guided methods; one concluded that the swallowing technique generates greater variability than guided methods, and the other concluded that there was no difference between the swallowing technique and chin point guidance. Of 5 articles comparing intraoral gothic arch tracing with guided methods, 2 showed similar results between different methods, 2 showed superior results for gothic arch tracing, and 1 showed superior results for the guided methods. Based on the guided methods and swallowing technique, it is not possible to conclude which technique can generate the greatest reproducibility of the centric relation. It is possible to suggest that in most cases intraoral gothic arch tracing is superior or equivalent when compared to guided methods.

Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows.

Correctly articulated dental casts are essential for certain dental treatment. Articulation can be traditional: using a physical articulator; digital: using a physical articulator followed by 3D scanning, or virtual: using 3D scanning and software to articulate scans without initial physical articulation. This study compared the precision of traditional articulation, using physical centric relation records and an articulator and virtually, by digitally aligning scans of the casts and record. Articulated casts and centric relation records were obtained. 12 record pairs were recorded from the articulated casts. Virtual method: all records were scanned, unclamped, in a custom laboratory scanner. The casts were aligned to each scanned record to create virtual articulations. Traditional method: each record was used to physically articulate the casts. Each articulation was recorded using an intraoral scanner. The mean inter-arch separation between three key-points on each cast-pair were used to determine differences in occlusal separation in three anatomical directions, and precision of methods. Traditional articulations: standard deviations in key-point distance never exceeded 0.102mm. The virtual equivalent was 0.059mm. Statistically significant differences (p⟨0.05) between all anteroposterior separation distances were found between the methods, and in three of six lateral/vertical separations. Virtual articulation was significantly more precise than traditional articulation.

Digital recording of a conventionally determined centric relation: A technique using an intraoral scanner.

This article describes a technique for digitally recording centric relation using an intraoral scanner based on conventional clinical procedures and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of such a recording.