Therapeutic plasma exchange in refractory Susac's syndrome: A brief report.

Susac's syndrome (SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy that typically presents with the clinical triad of encephalopathy, hearing loss, and branch retinal artery occlusion. It has a wide range of possible presentations, and its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Fulminant and refractory cases are difficult to treat, and no standard treatment protocol has been established. However, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been described as an adjunctive therapy in several SuS cases. Herein we present a case of a 63-year-old male with debilitating encephalopathy and recent hearing and vision loss, who responded favorably to TPE. Given this and other published reports of plasma exchange therapy for SuS, treatment protocols should consider TPE in early stages of disease.

Ophthalmological Outcomes in Patients with Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To report ophthalmological outcomes and treatment regimen in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with Susac syndrome treated between November 2015 and March 2023. Multimodal imaging findings, ophthalmic examination data, information on neurological and sensorineural involvement, and therapeutic regimen were reviewed. Visual acuity was recorded as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Ophthalmological manifestations and disease severity were assessed using the previously described clinical activity score (CAS). RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac syndrome m : f = 5 : 5 were identified. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 ± 23.3 months (range 1 to 78 months). The mean age was 41.4 ± 13.8 years (range 21 to 59 years). At baseline, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR. At the last follow-up, CDVA improved to 0.00 ± 0.03 logMAR (p = 0.029). Three of 20 eyes showed an improvement of 5 letters, while no loss of visual acuity was recorded during the follow-up time. Baseline CAS was 10.65 ± 12.69, and CAS at the last follow-up was 5.15 ± 5.49 (p = 0.068). Except for one patient, all were initially treated with intravenous (i. v.) steroids and subsequent oral tapering. Depending on the treatment response, cyclophosphamide (n = 4), i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIGs) (n = 4), anti-CD20 antibodies (n = 3), or plasmapheresis (n = 1) were applied. All patients under treatment for more than 1 month (n = 9) showed improvement in CAS and CDVA. CONCLUSION: Susac syndrome is a rare autoimmune vascular endotheliopathy. Treatment of Susac syndrome appears to result in improving CAS and CDVA. The majority of patients, in addition to the systemic steroids, required systemic immunosuppressive agents. Interdisciplinary communication is crucial to reduce the time to diagnosis and initiation of therapy in patients with Susac syndrome.

Susac syndrome: challenges in the diagnosis and treatment.

Susac syndrome is a disorder thought to be mediated by an autoimmune response towards endothelial cells, leading to a characteristic clinical triad of encephalopathy, visual disturbances due to branch arterial occlusions and sensorineural hearing impairment. Although it is a rare disease, three reasons make it important. First, given its variable presentation, Susac syndrome is underdiagnosed. Second, it is considered an important differential diagnosis in different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders, and consequently is frequently misdiagnosed. Third, in many cases, Susac syndrome is diagnosed and treated late, with significant irreversible sequelae including dementia, blindness and hearing loss. Neuropathology findings derived from both Susac syndrome patient tissue and novel transgenic mouse models indicate cytotoxic CD8+ T cells adhere to microvessels, inducing endothelial cell swelling, vascular narrowing and occlusion, causing microinfarcts. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies are present in serum in 25% of Susac syndrome patients, but it is unclear whether they are aetiologically related to the disease, or an epiphenomenon. The clinical triad comprising encephalopathy, branch arterial occlusions, and sensorineural hearing impairment is considered pathognomonic, although great variability is found in presentation and natural course of disease. At first evaluation, only 13-30% of patients exhibit the full clinical triad, making diagnosis difficult. Retinal fluorescein angiography, optic coherence tomography, MRI and tonal audiometry are helpful methods for diagnosing and monitoring disease activity during treatment. By contrast, there are no reliable objective immune markers to monitor disease activity. Immunosuppression is the current treatment, with high-dose corticosteroid therapy as the mainstay, but additional therapies such as intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are often necessary, because the disease can be devastating, causing irreversible organ damage. Unfortunately, low rates of disease, variability in presentation and paucity of objective biomarkers make prospective controlled clinical trials for Susac syndrome treatment difficult. Current immunosuppressive treatments are therefore based on empirical evidence, mainly from retrospective case series and expert opinion. In this review, we draw attention to the need to take consider Susac syndrome in the differential diagnosis of different neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological and hearing disorders. Furthermore, we summarize our current knowledge of this syndrome, in reference to its pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, emphasizing the need for prospective and controlled studies that allow a better therapeutic approach.

Characteristics and management of Susac syndrome in an emergent country: a multi-center case series from Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare endotheliopathy with an estimated prevalence of 0.14-0.024 per 100,000. It is an important differential diagnosis in demyelinating disorders. There are few case series and no large randomized controlled trials, and most reports come from developed countries. We report six cases of SS in three centers in Brazil and discuss management challenges in emergent countries. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with SS in three medical centers in Brazil between April 2018 and July 2021. The European Susac consortium (EuSaC) criteria were used for diagnosis of SS. Demographic data and clinical interventions were described and outcomes were assessed subjectively and by applying the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on last follow-up. RESULTS: Six patients were diagnosed with SS (3 males, 3 females). Mean age at presentation was 36 years (range 17 to 54). The most common initial symptom was confusion, followed by visual impairment and hearing loss. Characteristic snowball lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were present in four patients (66%). Retinal artery abnormalities were present in half (3/6) of patients, and sensorineural hearing loss was present in four patients (66%). Outcome was favorable (mRS ≤ 2) in five patients (86%). Patients treated early had a more favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Emergent countries face challenges in the diagnosis and management of patients with SS, such as access to advanced tests (fluorescein angiography, serial MRI) and treatment drugs (rituximab, mycophenolate). Further research should consider particularities of patients with SS in emergent countries.

Susac Syndrome Presenting as Recurrent Strokes.

Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare clinical entity that affects primarily young women and might result in significant morbidity. The triad that leads to suspecting the disease has classically been involvement of the brain, retina and inner ear. The likely pathology of the disease is thought to be immune mediated endotheliopathy; given its clinical and, possibly, pathological remission with immunosuppressive therapy. Here we describe an uncommon recurrent stroke in a young female that unfolds to Susac syndrome at the end. We also reviewed the literature behind diagnosis and treatment. Delayed diagnosis is associated with worse morbidity and mortality, and the most important predictor of long-term prognosis in the reported cases is the time to diagnosis. Therapies tried (with variable success) include corticosteroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab. The prognosis of SS is difficult to predict given the absence of strong clinical or radiographic features to suggest better/worse prognosis at the time of initial diagnosis. Brain MRIs and hearing/vision impairment have never normalized in previously studied cohort of patients.

Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of Susac syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses general features and organ-specific presentations of Susac syndrome as well as diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Latest literature regarding demographics, new diagnostic modalities such as optical coherence tomography and treatment options for Susac syndrome are discussed in detail in this review, summarizing the most recent updated information. SUMMARY: Susac syndrome is a rare, underdiagnosed, and often misdiagnosed disease that can lead to severe complications such as deafness, vision loss, dementia, and death. It involves the central nervous system and may mimic other neurological and neuro-ophthalmological diseases.

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Algorithm for Susac Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SS) classically presents with the clinical triad of retinal artery occlusion, sensorineural hearing loss, and encephalopathy and the neuroimaging triad of white matter lesions, deep gray matter lesions, and leptomeningeal disease. However, patients can present with an incomplete clinical or neuroimaging triads making diagnosis difficult in certain situations. A standard treatment paradigm also is lacking in this illness. It is important for neuro-ophthalmologists to recognize clinical and radiographic findings that are pathognomonic for this syndrome and have a basic understanding of the available treatment options. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Review of medical literature. RESULTS: A definite diagnosis of SS is made when the clinical triad or the neuroimaging triad is present. There are numerous reports of 2 other imaging findings in this condition: arteriolar wall hyperfluorescence (AWH) on fluorescein angiography in retinal arterioles remote from retinal ischemia and central callosal lesions on MRI. Both of these imaging findings are diagnostic of SS. Gass plaques in retinal arterioles are almost always seen in the acute phase of the illness but are not pathognomonic for SS. The most common medications used in this syndrome are corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. A number of other medications have been used including mycopheolate, rituximab, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of the clinical triad or magnetic resonance imaging triad for SS, AWH remote from retinal vascular injury and central callosal lesions are confirmatory of the diagnosis because they have never been described in any other condition. The presence of Gass plaques in retinal arterioles should strongly suggest the diagnosis. Despite the lack of clinical trial data, patients with SS must be treated promptly and aggressively. In more fulminant cases, addition of mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab is required, followed by cyclophosphamide when disease is refractory to other medications.

Susac's syndrome: clinical course and epidemiology in a Central European population.

OBJECTIVE: Susac's syndrome is characterized by inflammation and occlusion of pre-capillary arterioles with the clinical triad of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), encephalopathy and hearing loss. No epidemiological data are available for the disease. METHODS: All neurology departments in Austria were addressed to report adult patients who were on immunosuppressive treatment for a diagnosis of Susac's syndrome between 1 August 2010 and 1 August 2015. Clinical course, treatment regimens, period and point prevalence rates, and annual incidence of Susac's syndrome in Austria in people over 19 years of age are reported. RESULTS: Ten patients with Susac's syndrome were identified, and eight of them were newly diagnosed within the five-year timeframe. Minimum five-year period prevalence of the disease is 0.148/100,000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.071-0.272), annual incidence is 0.024/100,000 (95% CI 0.010-0.047). Minimum point prevalence rates varied from 0.030/100,000 (95% CI 0.004-0.108) to 0.088/100,000 (95% CI 0.032-0.192). Of all 10 patients, 8 showed typical callosal or internal capsule magnetic resonance imaging lesions at first presentation, 7 presented with BRAO and 5 had hearing loss or tinnitus at the beginning of the disease. Four patients developed the complete clinical triad of Susac's syndrome during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: We provide for the first time population-based data about the clinical course, prevalence and incidence of Susac's syndrome.

Diagnostic criteria for Susac syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is characterised by the triad of encephalopathy with or without focal neurological signs, branch retinal artery occlusions and hearing loss. Establishment of the diagnosis is often delayed because the triad is complete only in a minority of patients at disease onset. This leads to a critical delay in the initiation of appropriate treatment. Our objective was to establish criteria for diagnosis of either definite or probable Susac syndrome. METHOD: The establishment of diagnostic criteria was based on the following three steps: (1) Definition of a reference group of 32 patients with an unambiguous diagnosis of Susac syndrome as assessed by all interdisciplinary experts of the European Susac Consortium (EuSaC) team (EuSaC cohort); (2) selection of diagnostic criteria, based on common clinical and paraclinical findings in the EuSaC cohort and on a review of the literature; and (3) validation of the proposed criteria in the previously published cohort of all Susac cases reported until 2012. RESULTS: Integrating the clinical presentation and paraclinical findings, we propose formal criteria and recommend a diagnostic workup to facilitate the diagnosis of Susac syndrome. More than 90% of the cases in the literature fulfilled the proposed criteria for probable or definite Susac syndrome. We surmise that more patients could have been diagnosed with the recommended diagnostic workup. CONCLUSIONS: We propose diagnostic criteria for Susac syndrome that may help both experts and physicians not familiar with Susac syndrome to make a correct diagnosis and to prevent delayed treatment initiation.

Susac syndrome treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is a rare disease characterized by the triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss mainly affecting young women. The finding of antibodies against the endothelium in the sera of these patients has supported the hypothesis of an autoimmune endotheliopathy of the brain, inner ear and retina. Because of the rarity of the disease, treatment is based on the knowledge of case reports and small case series. Medical therapy consists of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, acetyl salicylic acid, and immunomodulatory agents such as intravenous immunoglobulin. METHODS: We present the case histories of 2 young women with Susac syndrome presenting with several episodes of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions, and hearing loss that were treated with different immunosuppressive drugs, glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin. In the course of the disease, the treatment was successfully switched to subcutaneous immunoglobulin without any further relapse in both patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the application of subcutaneous immunoglobulin is easy to learn, helps to reduce in-hospital costs and enables a more flexible everyday life. The treatment with subcutaneous immunoglobulin helps to reduce immunosuppressants and appears to prevent relapses.

Susac's Syndrome: A Case Presentation and Radiological Approach to this Rare Autoimmune Endotheliopathy.

Susac's syndrome is an uncommon neurologic disorder, consisting of the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions, and hearing loss. We report a case of a sudden vision and hearing impairment in a 35-year-old female patient. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed multiple lesions in the white matter and the corpus callosum, typical of Susac's syndrome.

Susac syndrome: neurological update (clinical features, long-term observational follow-up and management of sixteen patients).

Susac syndrome is a likely autoimmune microangiopathy affecting the brain, retina and inner ear. Due to the rarity of this condition, diagnosis and treatment can be challenging. Diagnosis is based on the presence of the clinical triad of central nervous system dysfunction, branch retinal artery occlusions and sensorineural hearing loss. Typical MRI findings of callosal and peri-callosal lesions may assist in diagnosis. Clinical course can be monophasic, polycyclic or chronic continuous. It is important to look out for red flags to attain an accurate diagnosis and follow a therapeutic algorithm based on severity of the disease and response to treatment. Patients are treated with steroids and immunosuppressive agents with a variable response. Early aggressive treatment especially in severe cases, may help in preventing relapses and morbidity/disability. This study highlights important diagnostic features and proposes a treatment algorithm based on clinical experience from management of 16 patients from 2 neuroscience centres in the UK since 2007, who were followed up over a long period of 3-15 years.

Clinical characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with Susac syndrome: a scoping review of cases.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare disease characterized by encephalopathy, hearing impairment and visual disturbances. Immunosuppressive treatments are used based on the hypothesis that an autoimmune endotheliopathy drives the disease. However, a solid evidence-based treatment approach is lacking. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of patient characteristics, disease course and treatment patterns related to successful outcome that have been reported in literature since 2013. METHODS: Three reviewers conducted a systematic literature search in February 2022. The primary outcome was treatment used, derived from cases classified as probable or definite SuS, describing successful treatment outcome (i.e. no signs of disease activity for ≥ 1 month). Secondary outcomes were time-to-relapse and follow-up time. Published case reports and case series were included. Various clinical characteristics and treatment(s) were extracted and categorized into different phases of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 810 records was identified. 120 articles met inclusion criteria and 161 cases were extracted. Of these, 151 cases were classified as probable or definite SuS and included in the final analysis. Number of combinations of treatments used per treatment phase were: 6 empirically, 35 after confirmed diagnosis, 43 for maintenance treatment, 22 after relapse, 18 during maintenance post-relapse. Median follow-up time was 12.3 months (0.5; 120) and median time to relapse was 4 months (1; 120). CONCLUSION: This scoping review summarizes treatment approaches in patients with SuS, highlighting variability. International efforts to collect clinical, imaging and treatment data from patients with SuS in registries are needed, in order to provide less biased and long-term follow-up information on treatment response, predictors of relapse and patient outcomes. This may lead to more evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Susac syndrome - A review of current knowledge and own experience.

Susac syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder. The pathology affects the small vessels of the brain, retina, and inner ear, and therefore the main symptoms of the disease include encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this article is to review the current medical knowledge on Susac syndrome and to present our clinical experience regarding this disease entity. In the paper, we are also presenting a case of a 25-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Susac syndrome on the basis of clinical presentation and additional test results. Susac syndrome should be differentiated from multiple sclerosis and other causes of multifocal brain damage as early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in later prognosis.

Susac syndrome: clinical characteristics and treatment in 29 new cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are few clinical studies on the attempted treatments and outcomes in patients with Susac syndrome (SS) (retinocochleocerebral vasculopathy). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients presenting with SS at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA (1 January 1998-1 October 2011). RESULTS: There were 29 cases of SS (24 women, mean age at presentation, 35 years; range, 19-65; full triad of brain, eye, and ear involvement, n = 16; mean follow-up time, 29 months). Thirty CSF analyses were performed in 27 cases (mean protein 130 mg/dl, range 35-268; mean cell count 14, range 1-86). MRI of the brain showed corpus callosal involvement (79%), T2-weighted hyperintensities (93%), and gadolinium enhancement (50%). Average lowest modified Rankin Scale score was 2.5 (median 2, range 0-5). Most patients (93%) received immunosuppressive treatment, with a mean time to treatment of 2 months following symptomatic onset. Treatments included intravenous methylprednisolone or dexamethasone (n = 23), oral corticosteroids (n = 24), plasma exchange (PLEX) (n = 9), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (n = 15), cyclophosphamide (n = 6), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 5), azathioprine (n = 2), and rituximab (n = 1). Most patients also received an antiplatelet agent (n = 21). Improvement or stabilization was noted in eight of 11 cases treated with IVIg in the acute period (three experienced at least partial deterioration) and eight of nine cases of PLEX treatment (one lost to follow up). CONCLUSIONS: Susac syndrome may be severe, disabling, and protracted in some patients. PLEX may be an adjunct or alternative therapy for patients who do not experience symptomatic improvement following steroid treatment.

Long-term clinical and radiological evolution in one case of Susac's syndrome.

Susac's syndrome is a rare idiopathic microangiopathy affecting the precapillary arterioles of the brain, retina and cochlea leading to the clinical triad of encephalopathy, retinopathy and hearing loss. The objective of this study is to describe a new case of Susac's syndrome reactivated after a 12-year period with a good response to immunosuppressive therapy. The patient was a 32-year-old woman, complaining of diplopia, right blurred vision, progressive gait disturbance, tinnitus, attention deficit, and slight memory loss. The patient was diagnosed as having Susac's syndrome and discharged with steroid therapy. After a 12-year period of clinical stability she had a relapse. Immunosuppressive therapy resulted in significant clinical and radiological improvement. Early clinical identification of Susac's syndrome is crucial for the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy and differential diagnosis. In our case, the combined use of corticosteroids and azathioprine was key in the relapse management.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: when ophthalmology meets otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a perplexing entity in otology. Susac's syndrome (also called retinocochleocerebral vasculopathy) is a rare disorder that consists of microangiopathy of the brain, retina, and inner ear, and usually affects women in young adulthood. We describe the clinical aspects, radiographic findings, and management of one such case. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of sudden onset of bilateral deafness and headache. During her hospitalization, she developed discrete right hemiparesis and hypoesthesia. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple signal hyperintensities and atrophy of the corpus callosum. The differential diagnosis was a myelinating condition, such as multiple sclerosis or acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis. CONCLUSION: Retinal fluorescein angiography helped the diagnosis of Susac's syndrome.

Susac's syndrome - A new ocular finding and disease outcome.

BACKGROUND: Susac's syndrome, a rare autoimmune vasculo-occlusive disease, may pose a diagnostic challenge and result in a devastating ocular and systemic outcome. Our study identifies a new retinal finding and evaluates disease outcome. We aimed to assess clinical and imaging findings, systemic manifestations and disease outcome in patients with ocular Susac's syndrome under immunosuppressive/immunomodulation therapies. METHODS: Retrospective tertiary center study including patients with a diagnosis of Susac's syndrome with >12 months follow up. Medical record review including ocular, neurological and auditory clinical and imaging findings, and treatment modalities. Main outcome measures were clinical manifestations and disease outcome. RESULTS: Seven patients (14 eyes) with a mean age of 34.1 years were included. Mean follow-up was 31.9 months (12.4-72.4). All had bilateral ocular disease. Retinal microaneurysms, a new ocular finding, were demonstrated in 5 patients and persisted at the final visit. In 5 eyes, they further extended during follow-up. All were treated with immunosuppressive drugs and 5/7 additional immunomodulation therapy. At last examination, best corrected visual acuity was >20/40 in all eyes, 1/10 eyes had visual field deterioration, no eye had active ocular disease, all patients achieved neurological stability, and 1 patient had auditory deterioration. CONCLUSION: Retinal microaneurysms, a new ocular finding in Susac's syndrome, were present in most of our patients, indicating ischemic retinal damage. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulation therapies seem to be highly effective in the control of disease activity.

[Susac syndrome: an interdisciplinary challenge]. / Susac-Syndrom : Eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung.

Susac syndrome, named after John Susac, the first to describe this condition, is characterized by the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss. Although certainly a rare disease, Susac syndrome needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of a broad variety of diseases. The pathogenesis is not yet clear. Autoimmune processes leading to damage and inflammation-related occlusion of the microvessels in brain, retina, and inner ear are thought to play a causal role. The diagnosis is based primarily on the clinical presentation, the documentation of branch retinal artery occlusion by fluorescence angiography, and characteristic findings on cerebral MRI. Usually, immunosuppressive therapy is required, though controlled therapy trials are missing so far. The intention of this review article is to raise awareness of this disease among neurologists, psychiatrists, ophthalmologists, and ENT specialists as a high number of unreported cases probably exists. Accordingly, the focus is on the clinical presentation and the diagnostic approach.