Health-economic evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for patients with forearm or humerus fractures: an analysis of insurance claims data from Germany.

Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) describes a collaboration of orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians for the treatment of fragility fractures in geriatric patients. While its cost-effectiveness for hip fractures has been widely investigated, research focusing on fractures of the upper extremities is lacking. Thus, we conducted a health economic evaluation of treatment in OGCM hospitals for forearm and humerus fractures.In a retrospective cohort study with nationwide health insurance claims data, we selected the first inpatient stay due to a forearm or humerus fracture in 2014-2018 either treated in hospitals that were able to offer OGCM (OGCM group) or not (non-OGCM group) and applied a 1-year follow-up. We included 31,557 cases with forearm (63.1% OGCM group) and 39,093 cases with humerus fractures (63.9% OGCM group) and balanced relevant covariates using entropy balancing. We investigated costs in different health sectors, length of stay, and cost-effectiveness regarding total cost per life year or fracture-free life year gained.In both fracture cohorts, initial hospital stay, inpatient stay, and total costs were higher in OGCM than in non-OGCM hospitals. For neither cohort nor effectiveness outcome, the probability that treatment in OGCM hospitals was cost-effective exceeded 95% for a willingness-to-pay of up to €150,000.We did not find distinct benefits of treatment in OGCM hospitals. Assigning cases to study groups on hospital-level and using life years and fracture-free life years, which might not adequately reflect the manifold ways these fractures affect the patients' health, as effectiveness outcomes, might have underestimated the effectiveness of treatment in OGCM hospitals.

Haematoma block is the most efficient technique for closed forearm fracture reduction: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. This study aimed to compare the resource utilisation of three anaesthetic techniques used for closed forearm fracture reduction in the ED: haematoma block (HB), Bier's block (BB) and procedural sedation (PS). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted of adult patients presenting to either Port Macquarie Base Hospital ED or Kempsey District Hospital ED in New South Wales, Australia, from January 2018 to June 2021. Patients requiring a closed reduction in the ED were included. ED length of stay (LOS) was compared using a likelihood ratio test. Successful reduction on the first attempt and the number of ED specialists present for each method were both modelled with a linear regression. Staff utilisation by the level of training, cost of consumables and complications for each group were presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 226 forearm fractures were included. 84 used HB, 35 BB and 107 PS. The mean ED LOS was lowest for HB (187.7 min) compared with BB (227.2 min) and PS (239.3 min) (p=0.023). The number of ED specialists required for PS was higher when compared with HB and BB (p=0.001). The cost of consumables and a total number of staff were considerably lower for HB compared with PS and BB methods. PS had the highest proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt (94.4%) compared with BB (88.6%) and HB (76.2%) (p=0.006). More patients experienced complications from PS (17.8%) compared with BB (14.3%) and HB (13.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the HB method was the most efficient as it was associated with a shorter ED LOS, lower cost and staff resource utilisation. Although PS had a significantly greater proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt, HB had fewer complications than BB and PS. EDs with limited resources should consider using HB or BB as the initial technique for fracture reduction with PS used for failed HB or when regional blocks are contraindicated.

Regional Anesthesia as an Alternative to Procedural Sedation for Forearm Fracture Reductions in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric forearm fractures are common injuries in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) is often required for forearm fracture reductions and pain control for casting. Bier blocks and hematoma blocks are types of regional anesthesia (RA) procedures that can be performed as a potential alternative to PPS. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the safety of RA with that of PPS. We hypothesized that RA has a safety profile that is equal or superior to PPS as well as a shorter duration of treatment in the PED. METHODS: Pediatric emergency department encounters in patients presenting with a diagnosis of radius fracture, ulna fracture, distal "both-bone" fracture, Monteggia fracture, and/or Galeazzi fracture were included. Outcomes of interest included patient adverse events (AEs), sedation medications used, PED duration of treatment (arrival time to disposition time), sedation failures, and reduction failures. RESULTS: Propensity matching was performed resulting in 632 well-matched RA-PPS pairs. The PPS cohort had 13% of encounters with at least 1 AE compared with 0.2% in the RA cohort, P < 0.001. The most common AE in the PPS group was hypoxia (9.8%), and the only AE in the RA group was an intravenous infiltrate (0.16%). Within the matched cohorts, PPS required more medications than RA (100% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Ketamine alone was more commonly used in the PPS group than the RA group (86% vs 0.2%, P < 0.001). Propofol was used only in the PPS group. The average duration of treatment was 205 (SD, 81) minutes in the PPS group and 178 (SD, 75) minutes in the RA group ( P < 0.001). There were no reduction failures in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Bier blocks and hematoma blocks are an acceptable alternative to PPS for children requiring forearm reductions. The AE rate is low and the reduction success rate is high. Duration of treatment in the PED is shorter for patients receiving RA compared with PPS.

The construct validity and internal consistency of QuickDASH in pediatric patients with upper extremity fractures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Investigation of treatment options in the pediatric population necessitates the use of valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We aimed to assess the construct validity and internal consistency of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) in the pediatric population with upper extremity fractures treated both operatively and conservatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QuickDASH, along with several reference PROMs and objective outcome measures, was obtained from 148 5- to 18-year-old patients with a humeral medial epicondyle fracture or a fracture of the distal forearm in a cross-sectional setting with a single follow-up visit. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression models were used to assess convergent validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to assess structural validity, and Cronbach's alpha to investigate internal consistency. RESULTS: The direction and magnitude of correlation showed by QuickDASH with reference outcome measures was consistent and demonstrated good convergent validity. EFA indicated a 3-factor model with poor fit indices and structural validity remained questionable. Construct validity was considered acceptable overall. QuickDASH demonstrated good internal consistency with an acceptable Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.75). CONCLUSION: QuickDASH demonstrated acceptable construct validity and good internal consistency and is thus a valid instrument, with some limitations, to assess disability and quality of life in pediatric patients with upper extremity fractures.

Forearm fractures - are we counting them all? An attempt to identify and include the missing fractures treated in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: Norway has a high incidence of forearm fractures, however, the incidence rates based on secondary care registers can be underestimated, as some fractures are treated exclusively in primary care. We estimated the proportion of forearm fracture diagnoses registered exclusively in primary care and assessed the agreement between diagnosis for forearm fractures in primary and secondary care. DESIGN: Quality assurance study combining nationwide data from 2008 to 2019 on forearm fractures registered in primary care (Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursement) and secondary care (the Norwegian Patient Registry). SETTING AND PATIENTS: Forearm fracture diagnoses in patients aged ≥20 treated in primary care (n = 83,357) were combined with injury diagnoses for in- and outpatients in secondary care (n = 3,294,336). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of forearm fractures registered exclusively in primary care, and corresponding injury diagnoses for those registered in both primary and secondary care. RESULTS: Of 189,105 forearm fracture registrations in primary and secondary care, 13,948 (7.4%) were registered exclusively in primary care. The proportion ranged from 4.9% to 13.5% on average between counties, but was higher in some municipalities (>30%). Of 66,747 primary care forearm fractures registered with a diagnosis in secondary care, 62% were incident forearm fractures, 28% follow-up controls, and 10% other fractures or non-fracture injuries. CONCLUSION: An overall small proportion of forearm fractures were registered only in primary care, but it was larger in some areas of Norway. Failing to include fractures exclusively treated in primary care could underestimate the incidence rates in these areas.

Norwegian forearm fracture incidence based on secondary care may be underestimated by not including fractures treated exclusively in primary care.The mean proportion of forearm fractures exclusively handled in primary care is 7% and varies from 5% to 14% between counties.Fractures treated in primary care can be considered for more accurate national incidence rates. Correct fracture diagnosis needs further investigation.

A Narrative Review of the Uses of Ultrasound in the Evaluation, Analgesia, and Treatment of Distal Forearm Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal forearm fractures are a commonly encountered injury in the emergency department (ED), accounting for 500,000 to 1.5 million visits and 17% of ED fractures. The evaluation and management of these fractures frequently employs x-ray studies, conscious sedation, closed reduction, and splinting. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can offer significant benefit in the diagnosis and management of these common injuries. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: To review the clinical utility of POCUS in the diagnosis of distal forearm fractures, as well as to demonstrate the performance of ultrasound-guided analgesia delivery and ultrasound-guided reduction technique. DISCUSSION: The initial evaluation of forearm injuries frequently includes x-ray studies. However, multiple studies have shown ultrasound to be sensitive and specific for distal radius fractures, with the added value of detecting soft tissue injuries missed by conventional radiography. POCUS may also facilitate analgesia through the use of ultrasound-guided hematoma blocks, which removes the need for conscious sedation prior to manipulation. Finally, POCUS can be used after manipulation to assess cortical realignment of the bone fragments and spare the patient multiple reduction attempts and repeat radiographs. CONCLUSION: Distal forearm fractures are common, and the emergency physician should be adept with the evaluation and management of these injuries. POCUS can be a reliable modality in the detection of these fractures and can be used to facilitate analgesia and augment success of reduction attempts. These techniques may decrease length of stay, improve patient pain, and decrease reduction attempts.

Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for determining the adequacy of pediatric forearm fracture reductions.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to the determine the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in assessing closed reduction (CR) of pediatric forearm fractures in a pediatric emergency setting. METHODS: After determination of the need for CR using X-ray images by an orthopedic consultant, POCUS examinations were performed just before and after the reduction attempt. The transducer was positioned longitudinally over the dorsal, volar, and lateral surfaces of the radius and ulna to view the fracture site. The presence of angulation, displacement, or bayonetting of the fracture fragments was recorded. The adequacy of realignment according to the POCUS and the orthopedic consultant's final determination were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study and 96 bones were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for adequacy of CR were 95.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.3-99.1)] and 95.8% (95% CI: 78.8-99.8), the positive predictive value was 98.5% (95% CI: 91.0-99.7), and the negative predictive value was 88.4% (95% CI: 71.6-95.8). The corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios were 23 (3.37-156.77) and 0.04 (0.01-0.12). There was high agreement between POCUS and X-ray images for predicting adequacy of CR [κ: 0.892 (±0.053)]. There was also a significant correlation between POCUS and X-ray measurements of angulation and displacement performed before and after CR, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study has reported the successful use of POCUS for the management of pediatric forearm fractures in a pediatric emergency department. Point-of-care ultrasound can minimize radiation exposure and appears to be an alternative and accurate tool for reduction attempts.

Treatment Choice of Complete Distal Forearm Fractures in 8 to 14 Years Old Children.

BACKGROUND: New surgical techniques have challenged traditional guidelines for nonsurgical treatment in pediatric and adolescent distal forearm fractures. This study was performed to compare outcomes and costs between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and closed reduction with casting in the treatment of complete distal forearm fractures in children 8 to 14 years old. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of 175 displaced distal forearm fractures treated with 2 different methods in the emergency department of a children's trauma center. One hundred and fourteen children were managed using CRPP. The remaining 61 were treated with closed reduction and casting. All patients had initial follow-up radiographs. The quality of reduction and the residual angulation in both the coronal and sagittal planes were recorded. Outcomes included the angulation after reduction, residual angulation at final follow-up, radiation exposure, total immobilization time, days absent from school, total costs, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The postreduction sagittal plane angulation was significantly lower in the CRPP group (P=0.037). While residual deformity between the groups at the 6-month final follow-up was not significantly different in either the sagittal or coronal planes (P=0.486, 0.726), patients in the nonoperative group received greater radiation than those in the operative group (P<0.001). Patients in the nonoperative group missed fewer classes and sustained lower costs (P<0.001, <0.001). The mean immobilization time in each group was not significantly different (31.4±4.4 vs. 32.8±5.9 d; P=0.227). CONCLUSIONS: Although the postreduction quality was a little better and radiation exposure was less in the CRPP group, there was no difference between the 2 groups in angulation, total immobilization time, or complication rates after 6 months. The cost and time absent from school of patients in the nonoperative group was significantly lower than in the operative group. There is no clear advantage to CRPP treatment on outcomes. Therefore, closed reduction and casting is recommended in complete distal forearm fractures of children 8 to 14 years old. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic study.

Short and long-arm fiberglass cast immobilization for displaced distal forearm fractures in children: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether short-arm fiberglass cast (SAC) immobilization provides fracture stabilization comparable to that of long-arm cast (LAC) treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures after closed reduction in paediatric patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of children aged four to 16 years (mean 9.9 years) was designed with a sample of 120 children, whose size was set a priori, with 60 treated with SAC and 60 with LAC. The primary outcome was fracture stability and rate of loss of reduction. The secondary outcome analysis evaluated duration of analgesic therapy, restriction in activities of daily life, and the duration until patients regained normal range of motion in the elbow. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in loss of reduction or duration of analgesic therapy. In contrast, the duration until normal range of motion in the elbow was regained was significantly longer in the LAC group (median 4.5 days, P < 0.001). Restriction in activities of daily life did not differ significantly between the two groups except for the item "help needed with showering in the first days after trauma" (SAC 60%, LAC 87%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fracture immobilization with short-arm fiberglass cast in reduced distal forearm fractures is not inferior to long-arm casts in children four years and older, excluding completely displaced fractures. Furthermore, short-arm casting reduces the need for assistance during showering. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03297047, September 29, 2017.

Below-elbow cast sufficient for treatment of minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children: long-term results of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Background and purpose - We have previously shown that children with minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures, who were treated with a below-elbow cast (BEC) instead of an above-elbow cast (AEC), experienced more comfort, less interference in daily activities, and similar functional outcomes at 7 months' follow-up (FU). This study evaluates outcomes at 7 years' follow-up.Patients and methods - A secondary analysis was performed of the 7 years' follow-up data from our RCT. Primary outcome was loss of forearm rotation compared with the contralateral forearm. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) consisting of the ABILHAND-kids and the DASH questionnaire, grip strength, radiological assessment, and cosmetic appearance.Results - The mean length of FU was 7.3 years (5.9-8.7). Of the initial 66 children who were included in the RCT, 51 children were evaluated at long-term FU. Loss of forearm rotation and secondary outcomes were similar in the 2 treatment groups.Interpretation - We suggest that children with minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures should be treated with a below-elbow cast.

The Management of Pediatric Open Forearm Fractures.

Open pediatric forearm fractures are common injuries that present to emergency departments across the United States. A total of 32% to 80% of all open pediatric fractures involve the forearm. Standard treatment for these injuries includes prompt intravenous antibiotic administration, tetanus prophylaxis, and usually bedside irrigation as a temporizing measure. Gustilo and Anderson type 2 and 3 open pediatric forearm fractures are generally managed with formal irrigation and debridement and fracture stabilization in the operating room. Management of Gustilo and Anderson type 1 open pediatric forearm fractures is not standardized, and level I evidence is currently lacking. Based on the existing data available, early antibiotic administration, bedside irrigation, and fracture stabilization in the emergency department may be a safe and effective initial treatment for these injuries, conferring a low risk for subsequent infection.

Utility of Postreduction Radiographs After Fluoroscopy-Guided Reduction and Casting of Uncomplicated Pediatric Forearm Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine efficacy of performing postreduction radiographs in managing uncomplicated pediatric forearm fractures after reduction and casting under fluoroscopic guidance. DESIGN: This is retrospective analysis of consecutive cases. SETTING: The study was conducted in a large urban hospital pediatric emergency department (ED). PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric patients presenting to the ED with a forearm fracture between the ages of 0 to 18 years. All received orthopedic manual reduction with fluoroscopic guidance and casting, then followed by performance of a dedicated 2-view radiographic series of postreduction forearm to document proper alignment and cast placement. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Of 236 consecutive cases studied, there were only 5 cases (2%) in which the managing orthopedist determined that a further reduction attempt was warranted based on the postreduction radiograph results. All were mid-shaft fractures of both radius and ulna, which were angulated and/or displaced. The remaining 231 patients with an uncomplicated forearm fracture received no further ED clinical orthopedic intervention after performing postreduction radiographs. The mean ED time to ultimate discharge was prolonged an average of 89 minutes per patient after reduction and casting while awaiting performance/orthopedic review of postreduction radiographs. A calculation of postreduction radiograph cost amounted to a total of nearly US $50,000. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of postreduction radiographs in children with uncomplicated pediatric forearm fractures that are reduced and casted under fluoroscopy has little clinical utility and contributes to increased radiation exposure, patient health care cost, and time spent in the ED. Patients with mid-shaft forearm fractures involving both radius and ulna (especially if angulated or displaced) are at risk for unacceptable reduction after casting and may be the target group in which performing post reduction radiographs has potential benefit.

Does Mentoring by Orthopedic Surgeons Improve Forearm Fracture Reduction Outcomes by Pediatric Emergency Physicians? Evaluation of a Process Improvement Intervention Program.

BACKGROUND: Forearm fractures are among the most frequently encountered orthopedic injuries in children. The maintenance of satisfactory alignment can be problematic and postreduction displacement with resultant malunion can occur. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians' performance on forearm fracture reduction to determine the impact of a Process Improvement Intervention Program (PIIP) on postreduction displacement rates after initial reduction. The PIIP was designed to improve our PEM physicians' skills and knowledge in how to properly apply and mold casts to better maintain the alignment of reduced forearm fractures. METHODS: A PIIP was implemented during 2015-2016 when orthopedic surgeons mentored postfellowship-trained PEM physicians. Patient cohorts from pre- and post-PIIP implementation were investigated and compared to evaluate the impact of the PIIP on PEM physicians' initial fracture reduction success rates and postreduction displacement rates. Descriptive and analytical statistics including univariate and multivariate models were tested to understand changes in physicians' performance. RESULTS: Pre- and postcohorts had similar demographic and clinical characteristics and similarly high initial reduction success rates. When distal and midshaft fracture types were combined, there was no significant difference in postreduction displacement rates between the 2 cohorts, but when stratified based on fracture type, the distal radius postcohort showed a statistically significant improvement in postreduction maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: A PIIP by pediatric orthopedic surgeons did not change the PEM physicians' initial fracture reduction success rate, but it did result in a statistically significant improvement in maintenance of reduction rates.

Current Approach to the Management of Forearm and Elbow Dislocations in Children.

Pediatric orthopedic injuries are a common reason for presentation to the emergency department. This article sequentially discusses 2 important upper extremity injuries that require prompt management in the emergency department. Radial head subluxations are discussed with a focus on current evidence for imaging, reduction techniques, and follow-up. Elbow dislocations, although less common than radial head subluxations, are also addressed, highlighting imaging, reduction, immobilization, and follow-up recommendations.

Reduced Length of Stay and Adverse Events Using Bier Block for Forearm Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: Forearm fractures are among the most common pediatric injuries. Procedural sedation is frequently used for analgesia during fracture reduction but requires a prolonged recovery period and can be associated with adverse events. Bier block is a safe alternative for fracture reduction analgesia. This study sought to compare Bier block and procedural sedation for forearm fracture reduction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients aged 6 to 18 years, presenting with forearm fractures requiring closed reduction from June 2012 to March 2014. Outcomes assessed were emergency department length of stay, reduction success rates, adverse events, and unscheduled return visits. RESULTS: Overall, 274 patients were included (Bier block, n = 109; procedural sedation, n = 165). Mean length of stay was 82 minutes shorter for Bier block patients (279 vs 361 minutes, P < 0.001). Subanalysis revealed a reduced length of stay among Bier block patients with forearm fractures involving a single bone (286 vs 388 minutes, P < 0.001) and both bones (259 vs 321 minutes, P < 0.05). Reduction success did not differ between Bier block and procedural sedation (98.2% vs 97.6%, P = 0.74). There were no major adverse events in either group, but Bier block patients experienced fewer minor adverse events (2.7% vs 14.5%, P < 0.001). Return visit rates were similar between Bier block and procedural sedation (17.6% vs 16.9%, P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with procedural sedation, forearm fracture reduction performed with Bier block was associated with a reduced emergency department length of stay and fewer adverse events, with no differences in reduction success or return visits.

[Distal Forearm Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Frequency and Health Care Provision in Germany]. / Distale Unterarmfrakturen im Kindes- und Jugendalter: Häufigkeit und Versorgungsgeschehen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Despite their frequent occurrence, there are no standardized recommendations for treating distal forearm fractures in growing children. Due to the marked remodelling capacity, conservative therapy is the first choice treatment of fractures in children. However, there are concerns that the possibilities of conservative treatments are often underestimated. Information on the health care situation in Germany on this issue is scarce. METHODS: The present study is based on routine data of a German Health Insurance fund, the Gmünder ErsatzKasse (GEK). Data on diagnoses and treatment of insured persons aged 0-15 years were analysed for the period from 01/07/2005 to 30/06/2009 regarding the frequency of distal forearm fractures and fracture treatment. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate was 56.8 per 10 000 person-years (64.5 in boys; 48.7 in girls). Most of the distal forearm fractures occurred during spring and summer months. The majority of the fractures were immobilized in a plaster cast (84.2%; n=2 609). 8.7% (n=270) of the fractures were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis. 4.5% (n=138) were treated with closed reduction without any form of osteosynthesis. Only 1.4% (n=43) of the fractures were treated with open reduction. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that boys suffer distal forearm fractures more frequently than girls and that incidences tend to be higher in older children. In addition, analyses indicated seasonal differences between the age groups. In childhood, distal forearm fractures were treated more often conservatively than operatively. However, it was remarkable that fractures in the case of closed reduction were more frequently fixed with an osteosynthesis than just by immobilization in a plaster cast.

[Vascularised Fibula and Tendon Transfer in the Comprehensive Treatment of Forearm Fracture with Gas Gangrene Complication]. / Vaskularizovaná fibula a slachový transfer v komplexnej liecbe otvorenej zlomeniny predlaktia komplikovanej plynnou snetou.

Vascularized bone grafting was for the first time described in the 1970s. It has become a crucial component in the reconstruction of long bone defects and non-unions in a poorly vascularised environment. Although the vascularized bone is well described for the lower extremity and mandibular reconstructions, it started to be used for the upper extremity bone defects only recently. This publication presents a case of a young man with an open fracture of both the forearm bones. The treatment of the injury has been complicated with anaerobic gas gangrene of the forearm. This resulted in a non-union, radius shortening and necrosis of both the thumb extensors and flexors muscles. Once the acute infection was managed, the patient received a two-step treatment provided jointly by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons at the University Hospital in Bratislava. At the first stage auto transplantation of the vascularized fibula into the defect of radius was performed, with radial artery and radial veins being the recipient vessels. One year later, a tendon transfer was made in order to reconstruct the extension and flexion of the thumb. Donor tendons were the following: extensor indicis proprius and flexor digitorum superficialis for ring finger. The result of the reconstruction is the full incorporation of the fibular transplant (6 months after the primary operation) and the excellent range of motion of the hand and wrist. Thanks to the tendon transfer the function of the thumb, including the opposition, was achieved two months after the secondary surgery. Key words: defect of radius, tendon transfer, anaerobic infection, gas necrosis, microsurgery.

Acute Traumatic Compartment Syndrome of the Forearm: Literature Review and Unfavorable Outcomes Risk Analysis of Fasciotomy Treatment.

Forearm compartment syndrome is a relatively underreported event compared with compartment syndrome of the lower extremity or trunk. The aim of this review of the literature was to provide insight into the potential consequences of certain treatment modalities in the control of acute compartment syndrome of the forearm based on data presented over the past 44 years. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases including EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, capturing studies published from 1973 to 2017 to identify potential articles for inclusion in the review. Outcomes data were evaluated for each of the studies included in this analysis on the basis of treatment utilized (fasciotomy vs. no fasciotomy) and respective outcome (favorable vs. unfavorable). Relative risk (RR) analysis was performed to determine risk factors for unfavorable outcomes from the pooled data. The analysis revealed a statistically significant higher likelihood of unfavorable outcomes resulting from performing fasciotomy in the event of forearm compartment syndrome compared with conservative management (RR = 4.82, p < .01). Fasciotomy treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of patients presenting with forearm compartment syndrome to experience unfavorable outcomes. The results of this study can help guide awareness of potential sequelae of treatment choices in forearm compartment syndrome, and clinical decision-making for wise patient selection for surgical intervention, when necessary.

Outcome of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Reductions Performed by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Providers Compared With Reductions Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the outcome differences between board-certified orthopedists and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians conducting forearm fracture reductions. METHODS: We performed an analysis of patients between 1 and 14 years of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a forearm fracture requiring reduction. Data collected included reducing provider (PEM or orthopedist) and prereduction, postreduction, and follow-up fracture angles and displacements of both radius and ulna. We collected costs of care, both in the ED and at follow-up, as well as length-of-stay data. χ Tests and Fisher exact test compared associations between categorical variables; 2-sample t tests compared the PEM and orthopedic groups. Regression models were used to control for injury severity confounders. RESULTS: Of the 222 fractures, orthopedists reduced 135, and PEM doctors reduced 87. Based on fracture angle and displacement, the orthopedic group tended to have slightly more complicated cases. After adjusting for age and time to follow-up, fractures reduced by orthopedists were less likely to require remanipulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; P = 0.020). The PEM group had a significantly lower length of stay (59.4 minutes shorter; P < 0.001) and a small overall saving in charges ($273.90; P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedists performed better in maintaining fracture reductions compared with PEM physicians but lengthened the ED stay for our patients. There was no significant difference in cost.

Camel Bites: A Case Study with a Summary of Current Epidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Treatment Modalities.

Animal bites are a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, the majority of animal bites come from domestic pets, including dogs, cats, and rodents. Camel bites, on the other hand, are exceedingly rare in the United States and are poorly described in the western medical literature. Special considerations must be made when camel bite injuries occur, as they may be therapeutically challenging. Although some clinical features of camel bites resemble those of the more common animal bite injuries, the camel's unique dentition and bite force must be taken into account when managing these wounds.