Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 217
Filtrar
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 126: 105041, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499979

RESUMEN

Human skin is a common route for topical steroids to enter the body. To aid with risk management of therapeutic steroid usage, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimates percutaneous penetration using mathematical models. However, it is unclear how accurate are mathematical models in estimating percutaneous penetration/absorption of steroids. In this study, accuracy of predicted flux (penetration/absorption) by the main mathematical model used by the EPA, the Potts and Guy model based on in vitro data is compared to actual human in vivo data from our laboratory of percutaneous absorption of topical steroids. We focused on steroids due to the availability of steroid in vivo human data in our laboratory. For most steroids the flux was underestimated by a factor 10-60. However, within the group itself, there was an association between the Potts and Guy model and experimental human in vivo data (Pearson Correlation = 0.8925, p = 0.000041). Additionally, some physiochemical parameters used in the Potts and Guy equation, namely log Kp (Pearson Correlation = 0.7307, p = 0.0046) and molecular weight (Pearson correlation = -0.6807, p = 0.0105) correlated significantly with in vivo flux. Current mathematical models used in estimating percutaneous penetration/absorption did not accurately predict in vivo flux of steroids. Why? Proposed limitations to mathematical models currently used include: not accounting for volatility, lipid solubility, hydrogen bond effects, drug metabolism, as well as protein binding. Further research is needed in order to increase the predictive nature of such models for in vivo flux.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Teóricos , Absorción Cutánea/fisiología , Esteroides/farmacocinética , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Humanos , Unión Proteica/fisiología , Solubilidad , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 124: 104969, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34089813

RESUMEN

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] exists in the ambient air at low concentrations (average upperbound ~0.1 ng/m3) yet airborne concentrations typically exceed EPA's Regional Screening Level for residential exposure (0.012 ng/m3) and other similar benchmarks, which assume a mutagenic mode of action (MOA) and use low-dose linear risk assessment models. We reviewed Cr(VI) inhalation unit risk estimates developed by researchers and regulatory agencies for environmental and occupational exposures and the underlying epidemiologic data, updated a previously published MOA analysis, and conducted dose-response modeling of rodent carcinogenicity data to evaluate the need for alternative exposure-response data and risk assessment approaches. Current research supports the role of non-mutagenic key events in the MOA, with growing evidence for epigenetic modifiers. Animal data show a weak carcinogenic response, even at cytotoxic exposures, and highlight the uncertainties associated with the current epidemiological data used in risk assessment. Points of departure from occupational and animal studies were used to determine margins of exposure (MOEs). MOEs range from 1.5 E+3 to 3.3 E+6 with a median of 5 E+5, indicating that current environmental exposures to Cr(VI) in ambient air should be considered of low concern. In this comprehensive review, the divergent results from default linear and MOE assessments support the need for more relevant and robust epidemiologic data, additional mechanistic studies, and refined risk assessment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos Ambientales/toxicidad , Cromo/toxicidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/normas , Epigénesis Genética/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
6.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 109: 104510, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31676319

RESUMEN

Synthesis of 11 steroid hormones in human adrenocortical carcinoma cells (H295R) was measured in a high-throughput steroidogenesis assay (HT-H295R) for 656 chemicals in concentration-response as part of the US Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program. This work extends previous analysis of the HT-H295R dataset and model by examining the utility of a novel prioritization metric based on the Mahalanobis distance that reduced these 11-dimensional data to 1-dimension via calculation of a mean Mahalanobis distance (mMd) at each chemical concentration screened for all hormone measures available. Herein, we evaluated the robustness of mMd values, and demonstrate that covariance and variance of the hormones measured appear independent of the chemicals screened and are inherent to the assay; the Type I error rate of the mMd method is less than 1%; and, absolute fold changes (up or down) of 1.5 to 2-fold have sufficient power for statistical significance. As a case study, we examined hormone responses for aromatase inhibitors in the HT-H295R assay and found high concordance with other ToxCast assays for known aromatase inhibitors. Finally, we used mMd and other ToxCast cytotoxicity data to demonstrate prioritization of the most selective and active chemicals as candidates for further in vitro or in silico screening.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/toxicidad , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Esteroides/biosíntesis , Línea Celular Tumoral , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
7.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 109: 104505, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639428

RESUMEN

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) mandates the US EPA perform risk-based prioritisation of chemicals in commerce and then, for high-priority substances, develop risk evaluations that integrate toxicity data with exposure information. One approach being considered for data poor chemicals is the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). Here, TTC values derived using oral (sub)chronic No Observable (Adverse) Effect Level (NO(A)EL) data from the EPA's Toxicity Values database (ToxValDB) were compared with published TTC values from Munro et al. (1996). A total of 4554 chemicals with structures present in ToxValDB were assigned into their respective TTC categories using the Toxtree software tool, of which toxicity data was available for 1304 substances. The TTC values derived from ToxValDB were similar, but not identical to the Munro TTC values: Cramer I ((ToxValDB) 37.3 c. f. (Munro) 30 µg/kg-day), Cramer II (34.6 c. f. 9.1 µg/kg-day) and Cramer III (3.9 c. f. 1.5 µg/kg-day). Cramer III 5th percentile values were found to be statistically different. Chemical features of the two Cramer III datasets were evaluated to account for the differences. TTC values derived from this expanded dataset substantiated the original TTC values, reaffirming the utility of TTC as a promising tool in a risk-based prioritisation approach.


Asunto(s)
Sustancias Peligrosas/normas , Valores Limites del Umbral , Toxicología/normas , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sustancias Peligrosas/toxicidad , Humanos , Nivel sin Efectos Adversos Observados , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Programas Informáticos , Pruebas de Toxicidad Crónica/normas , Pruebas de Toxicidad Subcrónica/normas , Toxicología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
8.
Environ Monit Assess ; 191(Suppl 1): 327, 2019 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222681

RESUMEN

One of the biggest challenges when conducting a continental-scale assessment of wetlands is setting appropriate expectations for the assessed sites. The challenge occurs for two reasons: (1) tremendous natural environmental heterogeneity exists within a continental landscape and (2) reference sites vary in quality both across and within major regions of the continent. We describe the process used to set reference expectations and define a disturbance gradient for the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency's National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA). The NWCA employed a probability design and sampled 1138 wetland sites across the conterminous US to make an unbiased assessment of wetland condition. NWCA vegetation data were used to define 10 reporting groups based on ecoregion and wetland type that reduced the naturally occurring variation in wetland vegetation associated with continent-wide differences in biogeography. These reporting groups were used as a basis for defining quantitative criteria for least disturbed and most disturbed conditions and developing indices and thresholds for categories of ecological condition and disturbance. The NWCA vegetation assessment was based on a reference site approach, in which the least disturbed reference sites were used to establish benchmarks for assessing the condition of vegetation at other sites. Reference sites for each reporting group were identified by filtering NWCA sample data for disturbance using a series of abiotic variables. Ultimately, 277 least disturbed sites were used to set reference expectations for the NWCA. The NWCA provided a unique opportunity to improve our conceptual and technical understanding of how to best apply a reference condition approach to assessing wetlands across the US. These results will enhance the technical quality of future national assessments.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Humedales , Benchmarking , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ambiente , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/organización & administración , United States Environmental Protection Agency/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Environ Monit Assess ; 191(Suppl 1): 329, 2019 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222449

RESUMEN

The National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA) is one of a series of probability-based National Aquatic Resource Surveys (NARS) conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to provide a comprehensive assessment of the condition of the Nation's waters. Randomized design and standardized training and protocols allow USEPA to analyze data that are nationally consistent and regionally relevant. Each NARS assessment was preceded by careful consideration of key logistical elements that included pre-survey planning, training, sampling logistics, and laboratory analysis. Numerous state, tribal, and contractor crews were supported across the country for each assessment; sampling and sample analyses were tracked from initiation; laboratory analyses were completed at USEPA, state, regional, and contract laboratories; and the data analyses and reporting were completed by USEPA-led workgroups, states, and contractors. The complexity and difficulty of each step offered unique challenges and provided lessons learned for each of the NARS assessments. Major logistical elements for implementing large scale assessments that are constrained by sampling period and number and duration of visits are covered in this paper. These elements include sample transport, equipment and supplies, sampling and sample tracking, information management regional technical expertise, and a sound field training program. This paper describes how lessons from previous assessments were applied to the NWCA and how new challenges faced in the NWCA were addressed and carried forward into future surveys.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/estadística & datos numéricos , Humedales , Conservación de los Recursos Hídricos/tendencias , Ecología , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Humanos , Laboratorios/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/organización & administración , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , United States Environmental Protection Agency/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Environ Monit Assess ; 191(Suppl 1): 321, 2019 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222514

RESUMEN

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) is a 5-year ongoing cycle of nationwide aquatic resource surveys which provide a report card on the condition of our nation's waters. The surveys are performed using a randomized, statistically valid design and provide statistically robust data which are used to develop the reports. These reports assess how well existing pollution prevention programs are protecting those waters, and how to better target future protection efforts. This presentation will focus on the results and uses of the 2011 National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA) outcomes. Some of the outcomes from the NWCA include (1) robust multi-metric indices used to evaluate condition across varying wetland types, streams, and ecoregions and (2) physical, chemical, and biological indicators of stress (risk factors) which identify the factors which contribute most to poor condition. (3) A wealth of quality-assured, statistically valid data which can be mined to pursue other questions within both regulatory and non-regulatory programs by providing a more robust look at wetland and stream condition. There are a variety of ways in which knowledge of condition can be used to better evaluate environmental states and inform decision-making. Knowledge of risk factors, for example, can be used to prioritize restoration efforts to improve the health of streams and wetlands in poor condition, as well as to identify practices to be avoided in reviewing permit applications for work in waters. The use of multi-metric plant condition indices could be useful in better identifying achieved "lift" in wetland mitigation banks, as well as providing a more robust measure of mitigation or restoration success. It is our hope to generate some seeds for future thought and discussion on ways in which the products of these NARS surveys can enhance the protection and restoration of these aquatic resources.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Monitoreo del Ambiente/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/estadística & datos numéricos , Humedales , Contaminación Ambiental/prevención & control , Contaminación Ambiental/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Ríos , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/organización & administración , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
12.
Am J Public Health ; 107(9): 1395-1399, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28727529

RESUMEN

Canada is proposing a ban on asbestos, and the US Environmental Protection Agency has listed it among the first 10 materials it is investigating under the new Toxic Substances Control Act revisions. However, this effort is currently running up against enormous industry and political opposition. Here, we detail the activities in the early 1970s of the Friction Materials Standards Institute, an industry trade association, to stifle earlier attempts to regulate asbestos use in brake linings, one of the oldest and most obvious sources of asbestos exposure to mechanics, among others. (Am J Public Health. 2017: 1395-1399. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303901).


Asunto(s)
Asbestos Serpentinas/toxicidad , Automóviles , Exposición Profesional , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Canadá , Humanos , Industrias , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
15.
Environ Sci Technol ; 49(5): 3252-61, 2015 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25668051

RESUMEN

Equipment- and site-level methane emissions from 45 compressor stations in the transmission and storage (T&S) sector of the US natural gas system were measured, including 25 sites required to report under the EPA greenhouse gas reporting program (GHGRP). Direct measurements of fugitive and vented sources were combined with AP-42-based exhaust emission factors (for operating reciprocating engines and turbines) to produce a study onsite estimate. Site-level methane emissions were also concurrently measured with downwind-tracer-flux techniques. At most sites, these two independent estimates agreed within experimental uncertainty. Site-level methane emissions varied from 2-880 SCFM. Compressor vents, leaky isolation valves, reciprocating engine exhaust, and equipment leaks were major sources, and substantial emissions were observed at both operating and standby compressor stations. The site-level methane emission rates were highly skewed; the highest emitting 10% of sites (including two superemitters) contributed 50% of the aggregate methane emissions, while the lowest emitting 50% of sites contributed less than 10% of the aggregate emissions. Excluding the two superemitters, study-average methane emissions from compressor housings and noncompressor sources are comparable to or lower than the corresponding effective emission factors used in the EPA greenhouse gas inventory. If the two superemitters are included in the analysis, then the average emission factors based on this study could exceed the EPA greenhouse gas inventory emission factors, which highlights the potentially important contribution of superemitters to national emissions. However, quantification of their influence requires knowledge of the magnitude and frequency of superemitters across the entire T&S sector. Only 38% of the methane emissions measured by the comprehensive onsite measurements were reportable under the new EPA GHGRP because of a combination of inaccurate emission factors for leakers and exhaust methane, and various exclusions. The bias is even larger if one accounts for the superemitters, which were not captured by the onsite measurements. The magnitude of the bias varied from site to site by site type and operating state. Therefore, while the GHGRP is a valuable new source of emissions information, care must be taken when incorporating these data into emission inventories. The value of the GHGRP can be increased by requiring more direct measurements of emissions (as opposed to using counts and emission factors), eliminating exclusions such as rod-packing vents on pressurized reciprocating compressors in standby mode under Subpart-W, and using more appropriate emission factors for exhaust methane from reciprocating engines under Subpart-C.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción/instrumentación , Metano/análisis , Gas Natural/análisis , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/normas , Monitoreo del Ambiente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción/normas , Estados Unidos
16.
Inhal Toxicol ; 27(11): 511-4, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514779

RESUMEN

Biodiesel use as a fuel is increasing globally as an alternate to petroleum sources. To comprehensively assess the effects of the use of biodiesel as an energy source, end stage uses of biodiesel such as the effects of inhalation of combusted products on human health must be incorporated. To date, few reports concerning the toxicological effects of the emissions of combusted biodiesel or blends of biodiesel on surrogates of health effects have been published. The relative toxicity of the combusted biodiesel emissions compared to petroleum diesel emissions with short term exposures is also not well known. To address the paucity of findings on the toxicity of combusted biodiesel emissions, studies were undertaken at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency laboratories in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The studies used a variety of approaches with nonhuman animal models to examine biological responses of the lung and cardiovascular systems induced by acute and repeated exposures to pure biodiesel and biodiesel blended with petroleum diesel. Effects of the emissions on induction of mutations in bacterial test strains and mammalian DNA adducts were also characterized and normalized to engine work load. The emissions were characterized as to the physicochemical composition in order to determine the magnitude of the differences among the emissions utilized in the studies. This article summarizes the major finding of these studies which are contained within this special issue of Inhalation Toxicology. The findings provided in these articles provide information about the toxicity of biodiesel emissions relative to petroleum diesel emissions and which can be utilized in a life cycle analyses of the effects of increased biodiesel usage.


Asunto(s)
Biocombustibles/toxicidad , Glycine max/toxicidad , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Petróleo/toxicidad , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Emisiones de Vehículos/toxicidad , Animales , Humanos , North Carolina , Estados Unidos
17.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 72(1): 134-40, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25857292

RESUMEN

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) issues National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants, including ozone. Each standard has four elements: an indicator, level, averaging time, and form. Ozone levels (i.e., air concentrations) alone in scientific studies are not directly comparable to the "level" element of the NAAQS because the standard considers the level in the context of its relation to the remaining elements. Failure to appreciate this has led to misunderstandings regarding NAAQS that would be health-protective. This can be seen with controlled human ozone exposure studies, which often involved small numbers of people exercising quasi-continuously for a long duration at an intensity not common in the general population (and unlikely achievable by most sensitive individuals), under worst-case exposure profiles. In addition, epidemiology studies have used different averaging times and have had methodological limitations that may have biased results. Such considerations can make it difficult to compare ozone levels and results across studies and to appropriately apply them in a NAAQS evaluation. Relating patterns and circumstances of exposure, and exposure measurements, to all elements of the NAAQS can be challenging, but if US EPA fully undertook this, it would be evident that available evidence does not indicate that proposed lower ozone standards would be more health protective than the current one.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Ozono/efectos adversos , Ciencia/normas , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Humanos , Salud Pública/normas , Estados Unidos
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26327207

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare and assess phthalate contamination in various indoor environments. In this study, 44 floor dust samples from different indoor environments in Delaware, USA were collected and analyzed for 14 phthalates using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Phthalates were detected in all dust samples with the total concentration ranging from 84 to 7117 mg kg(-1). DEHP (di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate), BzBP (benzylbutyl phthalate), DBP (dibutyl phthalate), and DiBP (di-isobutyl phthalate) were both the most frequently and abundantly detected phthalates. The average concentration of total phthalates in dust from offices, student dorms, gyms, stores, and daycare centers was found to be significantly or insignificantly (P = 0.05) higher than that in dust from houses and apartments. Plastic flooring materials and the application of floor care chemical products were positively associated with total phthalate concentration in floor dust. Toxicological risk assessment indicated that an investigated daycare center in this study was the only indoor environment that may cause the intake amount of DEHP of infants, toddlers, and children via dust ingestion to exceed the reference dose established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Regular monitoring on phthalate contamination in sensitive indoor environments is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Polvo/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Pisos y Cubiertas de Piso , Ácidos Ftálicos/toxicidad , Niño , Guarderías Infantiles , Preescolar , Delaware , Dibutil Ftalato/análogos & derivados , Dibutil Ftalato/análisis , Dibutil Ftalato/toxicidad , Dietilhexil Ftalato/análisis , Dietilhexil Ftalato/toxicidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Ácidos Ftálicos/análisis , Plásticos/química , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
19.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 188(11): 1351-7, 2013 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24200465

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Short-term exposure to ambient air pollution has been associated with lower lung function. Few studies have examined whether these associations are detectable at relatively low levels of pollution within current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. OBJECTIVES: To examine exposure to ambient air pollutants within EPA standards and lung function in a large cohort study. METHODS: We included 3,262 participants of the Framingham Offspring and Third Generation cohorts living within 40 km of the Harvard Supersite monitor in Boston, Massachusetts (5,358 examinations, 1995-2011) who were not current smokers, with previous-day pollutant levels in compliance with EPA standards. We compared lung function (FEV1 and FVC) after previous-day exposure to particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) in the "moderate" range of the EPA Air Quality Index to exposure in the "good" range. We also examined linear relationships between moving averages of pollutant concentrations 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days before spirometry and lung function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Exposure to pollutant concentrations in the "moderate" range of the EPA Air Quality Index was associated with a 20.1-ml lower FEV1 for PM2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], -33.4, -6.9), a 30.6-ml lower FEV1 for NO2 (95% CI, -60.9, -0.2), and a 55.7-ml lower FEV1 for O3 (95% CI, -100.7, -10.8) compared with the "good" range. The 1- and 2-day moving averages of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 before testing were negatively associated with FEV1 and FVC. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to PM2.5, NO2, and O3 within current EPA standards was associated with lower lung function in this cohort of adults.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Capacidad Pulmonar Total/efectos de los fármacos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/normas , Boston , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Óxido Nítrico/efectos adversos , Ozono/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/normas , Espirometría , Capacidad Pulmonar Total/fisiología , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas
20.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 64(6): 661-9, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25039200

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Although widely used in air quality regulatory frameworks, the term "volatile organic compound" (VOC) is poorly defined. Numerous standardized tests are currently used in regulations to determine VOC content (and thus volatility), but in many cases the tests do not agree with each other, nor do they always accurately represent actual evaporation rates under ambient conditions. The parameters (time, temperature, reference material, column polarity, etc.) used in the definitions and the associated test methods were created without a significant evaluation of volatilization characteristics in real world settings. Not only do these differences lead to varying VOC content results, but occasionally they conflict with one another. An ambient evaporation study of selected compounds and a few formulated products was conducted and the results were compared to several current VOC test methodologies: SCAQMD Method 313 (M313), ASTM Standard Test Method E 1868-10 (E1868), and US. EPA Reference Method 24 (M24). The ambient evaporation study showed a definite distinction between nonvolatile, semivolatile, and volatile compounds. Some low vapor pressure (LVP) solvents, currently considered exempt as VOCs by some methods, volatilize at ambient conditions nearly as rapidly as the traditional high-volatility solvents they are meant to replace. Conversely, bio-based and heavy hydrocarbons did not readily volatilize, though they often are calculated as VOCs in some traditional test methods. The study suggests that regulatory standards should be reevaluated to more accurately reflect real-world emission from the use of VOC containing products. IMPLICATIONS: The definition of VOC in current test methods may lead to regulations that exclude otherwise viable alternatives or allow substitutions of chemicals that may limit the environmental benefits sought in the regulation. A study was conducted to examine volatility of several compounds and a few formulated products under several current VOC test methodologies and ambient evaporation. This paper provides ample evidence to warrant a reevaluation of regulatory standards and provides a framework for progressive developments based on reasonable and scientifically justifiable definitions of VOCs.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/normas , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/normas , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/clasificación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/normas , Estados Unidos , Volatilización
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda