Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gac Med Mex ; 157(1): 58-63, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125821

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinical distinction between arbovirus infections and those caused by rickettsia is crucial to initiate appropriate medical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences between Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) and other vector-borne diseases (dengue and chikungunya) with similar clinical presentation, and to identify data that could aid rapid diagnosis of these diseases. METHODS: We evaluated sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data of 399 patients from five hospitals and clinics of Sonora, Mexico, between 2004 and 2016, with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of RMSF, dengue, or chikungunya. RESULTS: The RMSF group had the highest lethality (49/63 deaths, 77.8 %), followed by the chikungunya group (3/161, 1.9 %) and the dengue group (3/161, 1.9 %). Clinical differences included the presence of rash, edema, and pruritus; in addition, differences in multiple biomarkers such as platelets, hemoglobin, indirect bilirubin, and serum sodium levels were documented. CONCLUSION: Rash on the palms and soles, edema and absence of pruritus, together with high levels of direct bilirubin and severe thrombocytopenia could be useful indicators to differentiate patients at RMSF advanced stages from those with dengue and chikungunya.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La distinción clínica entre infecciones arbovirales y las provocadas por rickettsias es crucial para iniciar el tratamiento médico apropiado. OBJETIVO: Comparar las diferencias entre fiebre manchada de las montañas rocosas (FMMR) y otras enfermedades transmitidas por vector (dengue y chikungunya) con presentación clínica similar e identificar los datos que pudieran ayudar al diagnóstico rápido de esas enfermedades. MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio de 399 pacientes de cinco hospitales y clínicas en Sonora, México, entre 2004 y 2016, con el diagnóstico confirmado por laboratorio de FMMR, dengue o chikungunya. RESULTADOS: El grupo con FMMR presentó la mayor letalidad (49/63 muertes, 77.8 %), seguido por el de chikungunya (3/161, 1.9 %) y el de dengue (3/161, 1.9 %). Las diferencias clínicas consistieron en la presencia de exantema, edema y prurito; además, se documentaron diferencias en múltiples biomarcadores como plaquetas, hemoglobina, bilirrubina indirecta y niveles de sodio sérico. CONCLUSIÓN: El exantema en palmas y plantas, edema y ausencia de prurito, aunados a niveles altos de bilirrubina directa y trombocitopenia severa pudieran ser indicadores útiles para diferenciar a pacientes con FMMR en etapas avanzadas de aquellos con dengue y chikungunya.


Assuntos
Febre de Chikungunya/diagnóstico , Dengue/diagnóstico , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Febre de Chikungunya/complicações , Febre de Chikungunya/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Dengue/complicações , Dengue/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/complicações , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/mortalidade , Avaliação de Sintomas , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(1): 190-197, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146112

RESUMO

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), caused by Rickettsia rickettsii, is a severe and potentially fatal tick-borne disease. In 2015, Mexico issued a declaration of epidemiologic emergency in response to ongoing outbreaks of RMSF in northern Mexico. Sonora state is one of the most heavily impacted states in Mexico, with historic case fatality rates (CFRs) of 18%. We summarized data from enhanced surveillance to understand demographic, clinical, and treatment factors associated with the high mortality. We conducted a retrospective review of confirmed and probable RMSF cases reported to the General Directorate of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Sonora. A case of RMSF is defined as fever (> 38.5°C), plus two symptoms, and epidemiologic criteria. A confirmed case requires laboratory evidence. During 2015-2018, a total of 510 cases of RMSF were reported; 252 (49%) were in persons aged ≤ 18 years. Case fatality rate was 44% (n = 222). Older age and being confirmed by PCR were associated with fatal outcome (P-value < 0.01). The mean time from onset of symptoms to treatment with doxycycline was 7.9 days (SD ± 5.5). Hot spot analysis revealed neither areas of inordinately high nor low incidence, rather clusters of disease in population centers. The CFR for RMSF in Sonora remains high, and a large proportion of cases are seen in persons aged ≤ 18 years. Whereas previously children experienced a disproportionately high CFR, interventions have reversed this trend. Disease clusters in urban nuclei, but location remains a predictor of fatal outcome.


Assuntos
Vigilância da População , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/mortalidade , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/patologia , Estações do Ano , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
3.
Gac. méd. Méx ; 157(1): 61-66, ene.-feb. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1279075

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción: La distinción clínica entre infecciones arbovirales y las provocadas por rickettsias es crucial para iniciar el tratamiento médico apropiado. Objetivo: Comparar las diferencias entre fiebre manchada de las Montañas Rocosas (FMMR) y otras enfermedades transmitidas por vector (dengue y chikungunya) con presentación clínica similar e identificar los datos que pudieran ayudar al diagnóstico rápido de esas enfermedades. Métodos: Se evaluaron datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio de 399 pacientes de cinco hospitales y clínicas en Sonora, México, entre 2004 y 2016, con el diagnóstico confirmado por laboratorio de FMMR, dengue o chikungunya. Resultados: El grupo con FMMR presentó la mayor letalidad (49/63 muertes, 77.8 %), seguido por el de chikungunya (3/161, 1.9 %) y el de dengue (3/161, 1.9 %). Las diferencias clínicas consistieron en la presencia de exantema, edema y prurito; además, se documentaron diferencias en múltiples biomarcadores como plaquetas, hemoglobina, bilirrubina indirecta y niveles de sodio sérico. Conclusión: El exantema en palmas y plantas, edema y ausencia de prurito, aunados a niveles altos de bilirrubina directa y trombocitopenia severa pudieran ser indicadores útiles para diferenciar a pacientes con FMMR en etapas avanzadas de aquellos con dengue y chikungunya.


Abstract Introduction: Clinical distinction between arbovirus infections and those caused by rickettsia is crucial to initiate appropriate medical treatment. Objective: To compare the differences between Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) and other vector-borne diseases (dengue and chikungunya) with similar clinical presentation, and to identify data that could aid rapid diagnosis of these diseases. Methods: Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data of 399 patients from five hospitals and clinics of Sonora, Mexico, with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of RMSF, dengue, or chikungunya between 2004 and 2016 were evaluated. Results: The RMSF group had the highest lethality (49/63 deaths, 77.8 %), followed by the chikungunya group (3/161, 1.9 %) and the dengue group (3/161, 1.9 %). Clinical differences included the presence of rash, edema, and pruritus; in addition, differences in multiple biomarkers such as platelets, hemoglobin, indirect bilirubin, and serum sodium levels were documented. Conclusion: Rash on the palms and soles, edema and absence of pruritus, together with high levels of direct bilirubin and severe thrombocytopenia could be useful indicators to differentiate patients at RMSF advanced stages from those with dengue and chikungunya.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/diagnóstico , Dengue/diagnóstico , Febre de Chikungunya/diagnóstico , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/complicações , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Dengue/complicações , Dengue/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Avaliação de Sintomas , Febre de Chikungunya/complicações , Febre de Chikungunya/mortalidade , México/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa