Evaluating the Impact of the Novel Geographic Preferences Section on Interview Rate and Residency Match Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The American Association of Medical Colleges trialed residency application initiatives including geographic preferences and preference signals in 2022. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of geographic preferences on application outcomes during the 2022 residency match year. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. PARTICIPANTS: Applicants to categorical and preliminary internal medicine during the 2022 application cycle who completed the Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency survey. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was interview rate (interview offers/total applications) and whether an application resulted in a match. The key dependent variables were geographic preferences and program-specific preference signals. We also assessed differences in utilization of geographic preferences between specialties. KEY RESULTS: A total of 970 applicants into categorical (n = 884) and preliminary (n = 86) internal medicine were included in our study. A total of 704 (72.6%) applicants submitted at least one geographic preference and 424 (43.7%) submitted three preferences. On average, applicants who submitted a geographic preference had a higher interview rate than those who did not (46.0% vs. 41.8%). Applications submitted with both a preference signal and geographic preference were significantly more likely to receive an interview offer (OR: 3.2, p < 0.01) and match (OR: 6.4, p < 0.01) than applications with neither a preference signal nor a geographic preference. Geographic preferences were associated with an increase in the odds of an application receiving an interview offer, even in the setting of a preference signal (OR: 1.4, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both preference signals and geographic preferences have significant associations with odds of an application receiving an interview and matching for both categorical and preliminary internal medicine applicants. This study can be used to inform applicants, advisors, and programs how novel application strategies can affect important application outcomes for US medical school graduates. As more specialties pilot alternative processes, it will be important to study all application outcomes among varying applicant populations.

Personal Actions to Create a Culture of Inclusion: Navigating Difficult Conversations With Medical Colleagues.

Microaggressions between members of a team occur often in medicine, even despite good intentions. Such situations call for difficult conversations that restore inclusivity, diversity, and a healthy work culture. These conversations are often hard because of the unique background, experiences, and biases of each person. In medicine, skillful navigation of these interactions is paramount as it influences patient care and the workplace culture. Although much has been published about difficult interactions between providers and patients, significantly less information is available to help navigate provider-to-provider interactions, despite their critical role in improving multidisciplinary patient care teams and organizational environments. This article is intended to serve as a guide for medical professionals who are interested in taking personal responsibility for promoting a safe and inclusive culture by engaging in and modeling difficult conversations with colleagues. The article outlines important considerations to assist with intentional preparation and modulation of responses for all parties involved: conversation initiators, observers of the incident, and conversation receivers. Although these interactions are challenging, together as medical professionals we can approach each other with humility and compassion to achieve our ultimate goal of promoting humanity, not only for our patients but for ourselves and one another.

The Impact of Internal Medicine Clerkship Characteristics and NBME Subject Exams on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Exam Performance.

BACKGROUND: Residency program directors will likely emphasize the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) exam more during residency application given the recent USMLE Step 1 transition to pass/fail scoring. We examined how internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exam scores affect USMLE Step 2 CK performance. DESIGN: The authors used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to determine associations between Step 2 CK performance and internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exams. The sample had 21,280 examinees' first Step 2 CK scores for analysis. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, Step 1 performance (standardized ß = 0.45, p < .001) and NBME medicine subject exam performance (standardized ß = 0.40, p < .001) accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in Step 2 CK performance. Students who completed the internal medicine clerkship last in the academic year scored lower on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = -3.17 p < .001). Students who had a criterion score for passing the NBME medicine subject exam scored higher on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = 1.10, p = .03). There was no association between Step 2 CK performance and other internal medicine clerkship characteristics (all p > 0.05) nor with the total NBME subject exams completed (ß=0.05, p = .78). CONCLUSION: Despite similarities between NBME subject exams and Step 2 CK, the authors did not identify improved Step 2 CK performance for students who had more NBME subject exams. The lack of association of Step 2 CK performance with many internal medicine clerkship characteristics and more NBME subject exams has implications for future clerkship structure and summative assessment. The improved Step 2 CK performance in students that completed their internal medicine clerkship earlier warrants further study given the anticipated increase in emphasis on Step 2 CK.

Impact of Applicants' Characteristics and Geographic Connections to Residency Programs on Preference Signaling Outcomes in the Match.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of applicant and residency program characteristics on preference signaling outcomes in the Match during the first 2 years of implementation across 6 specialties. METHOD: Data were obtained from the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency survey for applicants applying into otolaryngology during the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 application cycles and into dermatology, internal medicine (categorical and preliminary year), general surgery, and urology during the 2021-2022 application cycle. The primary outcome was signal yield, defined as the number of interviews at signaled programs divided by the total number of signals sent. Associations with applicant-reported characteristics and geographic connections to residency programs were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum testing, Spearman's rank correlation testing, and ordinary least squares regression. RESULTS: 1,749 applicants with preference signaling data were included from internal medicine (n = 884), general surgery (n = 291), otolaryngology (n = 217), dermatology (n = 147), urology (n = 124), and internal medicine preliminary year (n = 86). On average 60.9% (standard deviation 32.3%) of signals resulted in an interview (signal yield). There was a stepwise increase in signal yield with the percentage of signals sent to programs with a geographic connection (57.3% for no signals vs. 68.9% for 5 signals, P < .01). Signal yield was positively associated with applicant characteristics, such as United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 scores, honors society membership, and number of publications ( P < .01). Applicants reporting a lower class rank quartile were significantly more likely to have a higher percentage of their interviews come from signaled programs ( P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Signal yield is significantly associated with geographic connections to residency programs and applicant competitiveness based on traditional metrics. These findings can inform applicants, programs, and specialties as preference signaling grows.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Physical Examination.

Performing a hypothesis-driven examination in patients with possible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important component of increasing the recognition and diagnosis of this avoidable and costly medical condition. Using known likelihood ratios for various physical examination maneuvers can be combined with known individual risk factors and symptoms to adjust a patient's post-test probability of having COPD and inform appropriate diagnostic work-up. Equally important is intentionality in history-taking and physical examination procedures for patients with known COPD to mitigate the decreased quality of life and mortality and to monitor response to treatment.

AAIM Recommendations for the 2020-2021 Internal Medicine Residency Application Cycle in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This statement was released in June 2020 by the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine to provide guidance for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many of the recommendations are specific to this cycle, others, such as the Department Summary Letter of Evaluation, are meant to be an enduring change to the internal medicine residency application process. AAIM realizes that some schools may not yet have the tools or resources to implement the template fully this cycle and look toward collaboration within the internal medicine education community to facilitate adoption in the cycles to come.

Integration of Dermatology-Focused Physical Diagnosis Rounds and Case-Based Learning within the Internal Medicine Medical Student Clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Over half of dermatologic conditions are seen by nondermatologists, yet medical students receive little dermatology education. Medical students in the clinical years of training at our institution felt insecure in their physical diagnosis skills for dermatologic conditions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to implement dermatology-focused curricula within the Internal Medicine (IM) Core Clerkship to increase student confidence in diagnosing skin diseases. METHODS: Two dermatology-focused sessions were integrated into the IM Clerkship. A faculty dermatologist leads students on a dermatology-focused physical diagnosis "Skin Rounds", where patients are seen at the bedside and students practice describing skin lesions and forming a differential diagnosis. Students also participate in a case-based active learning session. A dermatologist selects images of common skin conditions that students describe utilizing appropriate terminology and offer a differential diagnosis. The impact of these sessions was assessed through survey-based student feedback and by comparing the results from the IM Shelf Exam before and after intervention. RESULTS: A total of 74 students completed the skin rounds survey (32% response rate). About 99% (n = 73) of students felt that skin rounds were effective and useful, and 92% (n = 68) of students reported that they felt more confident in describing skin lesions afterward. A total of 43 students completed the case-based learning session survey (37% response rate), and 98% (n = 42) of students strongly agreed or agreed that the session was effective and useful. Performance on the dermatologic questions of the IM Shelf Exam was analyzed. While not statistically significant at P < 0.05, students improved from an average of 77% correct responses before intervention to 79% afterward (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Our case-based and bedside teaching interventions were met with high satisfaction from medical students and increased their confidence in describing skin lesions. This intervention can serve as a model to improve dermatology education and can be adapted to utilize the IM clerkship to address curriculum inadequacies at other institutions.