Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Proc ; 50(10): 3397-3404, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30577212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although rare, major urologic complications (MUC) in kidney transplantation can cause significant morbidity, increased cost, and may even lead to graft loss. Ureteric stents are routinely used to prevent MUC, although complications related to their use have been reported. Here, we systematically reviewed the role of routine stenting in preventing MUC in kidney transplantation with extravesical ureteric implantation and performed a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed for studies on MUC and stents in kidney transplant recipients. Randomized controlled trials were shortlisted for the review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RevMan 5 was used for statistical analysis, and outcome analysis was done with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using random effect model. RESULTS: Six trials meeting the criteria were identified. Although stent use did not decrease the incidence of urinary leak (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14-1.11; P = .08) or obstruction (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.24; P = .11), it was associated with a higher incidence of urinary tract infection (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.33-9.75; P = .01). CONCLUSION: In the present era of extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis, routine stenting has a limited role in decreasing major urologic complications and may be associated with higher incidence of urinary tract infections.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Ureter/cirurgia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 10(4): 775.e1-2, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24928476

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum is a rare entity. This teaching video shows the scrotal pop-off mechanism for an anterior urethral diverticulum and the unique voiding pattern of a boy who empties his bladder by compression of his scrotum. The findings during urethroscopy and open reconstruction are also demonstrated. PATIENT AND METHODS: A four-year-old boy presented to the clinic with a poor urinary stream and scrotal swelling during voiding. Physical examination during voiding revealed a dumbbell-shaped anterior urethral diverticulum with scrotal pop off and preserved renal function. RESULTS: Open excision of the scrotal part of diverticulum was performed. Urethroplasty was conducted using a de-epithelialised diverticular wall flap from the penobulbar urethra. On follow up the boy voided with a good flow and resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Scrotal pop off with completion of voiding by manual compression of the diverticulum may preserve bladder and renal function. The preferred treatment of anterior urethral diverticulum is open excision of the diverticulum and reconstruction. The wall of the diverticulum may be used to reinforce the repair ventrally, where the corpus spongiosum is deficient.


Assuntos
Divertículo/cirurgia , Escroto , Doenças Uretrais/cirurgia , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Divertículo/complicações , Divertículo/congênito , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Uretrais/complicações , Doenças Uretrais/congênito
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa