Intrabronchial Valves for Air Leaks After Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery.

PURPOSE: Air leaks are common after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). This can increase post-operative morbidity, cost, and hospital length of stay. The management of post-pulmonary resection air leaks remains challenging. Minimally invasive effective interventions are necessary. The Spiration Valve System (SVS, Olympus/Spiration Inc., Redmond, WA, US) is approved by the FDA under humanitarian use exemption for management of prolonged air leaks. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter registry of 39 patients with air leaks after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and LVRS managed with an intention to use bronchoscopic SVS to resolve air leaks. RESULTS: Bronchoscopic SVS placement was feasible in 82.1% of patients (32/39 patients) and 90 valves were placed with a median of 2 valves per patient (mean of 2.7 ± 1.5 valves, range of 1 to 7 valves). Positive response to SVS placement was documented in 76.9% of all patients (30/39 patients) and in 93.8% of patients when SVS placement was feasible (30/32 patients). Air leaks ultimately resolved when SVS placement was feasible in 87.5% of patients (28/32 patients), after a median of 2.5 days (mean ± SD of 8.9 ± 12.4 days). Considering all patients with an intention to treat analysis, bronchoscopic SVS procedure likely contributed to resolution of air leaks in 71.8% of patients (28/39 patients). The post-procedure median hospital stay was 4 days (mean 6.0 ± 6.1 days). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective registry adds to the growing body of literature supporting feasible and effective management of air leaks utilizing one-way valves.

Comparison of Sample Adequacy and Diagnostic Yield of the 21-G and 25-G EBUS TBNA Needles.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) of mediastinal lymphadenopathy has been shown to be equivalent and possibly even superior to mediastinoscopy. Since the original dedicated 22-G aspiration needle, 21-G, 25-G, and recently 19-G needles have been introduced. Smaller needles may be more flexible and adept at accessing more difficult nodes, and may have less blood contamination compared with larger needles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with a 21-G needle and a 25-G needle for a total of 100 biopsies. The study slides were examined by a dedicated lung cytopathologist, who was blinded to the needle size used for each slide. Demographic data, and lymph node size were recorded. Comparisons between the 2 needles with regards to sample adequacy and diagnostic yield was performed using the McNemar test for dichotomous variables and marginal homogeneity test for nondichotomous variables since samples were related. RESULTS: The majority of lymph nodes (96%) were at least >1 cm. Adequate specimens were obtained in 78% of cases with the 21-G needle and 86% of cases with 25-G needle (P-value=0.424). The overall diagnostic yield was 74% and 80% with the 21-G needle and 25-G needle, respectively (P-value=0.607). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the there is no difference in terms of specimen adequacy and diagnostic yield when the 25-G needle is compared with the 21-G needle.

Utility and diagnostic accuracy of bedside lung ultrasonography during medical emergency team (MET) activations for respiratory deterioration.

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography during medical emergency team (MET) activations for respiratory deterioration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of inpatients requiring MET evaluation for respiratory decompensation. A blinded investigator recorded videos of lung and lower extremity ultrasonography. The videos were reviewed by blinded investigators to determine a ultrasonography diagnosis. The accuracy of MET diagnosis and ultrasonography diagnosis were compared to the final diagnosis determined by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: The ultrasound exam was completed in 49/50 (98%) patients enrolled in the study with a mean duration of 13±4min. When excluding six cases that were not amenable to diagnosis by our algorithm, we report a lung ultrasonography diagnostic accuracy of 84% (37/44) which is similar to the accuracy of the MET clinical diagnosis of 75% (33/44) (p=0.29). Furthermore, we report in 28/37 (76%) of cases where the lung ultrasonography diagnosis was correct, patients may have received inappropriate therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasonography can be rapidly performed in the majority of patients with MET activation for respiratory deterioration. As an independent diagnostic test, lung ultrasonography is non-inferior to the MET clinical assessment and may prevent unnecessary treatments if used simultaneously.