Anti-EGFR Antibodies in the Management of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and incidence is rising in younger individuals. Anti-EGFR antibodies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, have been incorporated into standard-of-care practice for patients with advanced disease. Herein, we review the molecular characteristics of these agents and the trials that lead to their approvals. Further, we discuss clinical implications of data regarding biomarkers that dictate treatment selection, different dosing strategies, and side effect management. Finally, we look towards the future and describe contexts in which these agents are currently being investigated clinically with a focus on combinations with MAPK-targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Overall, this review provides historical context, current clinical usage, and future directions for anti-EGFR antibodies in advanced colorectal cancer.

Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.

AIM: To compare the cost of biweekly regimens of first-line (1L) treatments of cetuximab-folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus panitumumab-folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in patients with Kirsten's rat sarcoma wild type (KRAS WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the United States, across varying weights and body surface areas (BSAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost-minimization analysis (CMA) was performed to estimate per-patient cost differences of cetuximab-FOLFIRI versus panitumumab-FOLFOX. The CMA estimated the costs of RAS testing, premedication, drug acquisition, treating infusion reactions (IRs), supportive therapy, and biweekly administration of chemotherapy, cetuximab (500 mg/m2), and panitumumab (6 mg/kg) over 43 weeks (median progression-free survival). To calculate dose and cost, weight and height data were gathered from an electronic health record-derived de-identified database (n = 7,669; January 2013-October 2020). Base case analysis utilized mean weight/BSA of the overall cohort (82.04 kg/1.92 m2), and alternate scenarios were based on 88.18 kg/2.03 m2 (men, n = 4,477) and 73.43 kg/1.76 m2 (women, n = 3,192). RESULTS: For the base case, total treatment costs were $167,853 for cetuximab-FOLFIRI and $168,254 for panitumumab-FOLFOX; cost savings per patient receiving cetuximab-FOLFIRI was $400. Cost savings in alternate scenarios (men, $15,138; women, $15,004) resulted from lower drug acquisition costs for cetuximab (men, $14,833; women $14,854) and administration cost ($440) versus panitumumab. Cost savings of cetuximab-FOLFIRI in treating IR ($353) were similar across all scenarios. LIMITATIONS: With no head-to-head clinical trial data in the 1L setting, assumptions of similarity in efficacy and safety of cetuximab versus panitumumab were based on published network meta-analysis and the ASPECCT trial. This model did not consider a lifetime horizon. Costs of managing all adverse events (except IR) were not included. CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly cetuximab-FOLFIRI offers cost savings compared with panitumumab-FOLFOX for 1L therapy of patients with KRAS WT mCRC in the United States. These cost differences were observed for the overall population and across different BSA and weights for men and women.