Functional Outcomes and Satisfaction Rates in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older are Not Clinically Different From Their Younger (65 to 75 Years) Counterparts Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the proportion of elderly patients requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases, but it is not clear whether older age independently influences outcome. The aim was to assess function, quality of life, and satisfaction after THA in patients ≥ 80 years compared with those aged between 65 and 75 years when adjusting for confounding factors. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed between 2010 and 2019. A total 2,367 THAs were performed on patients ≥ 80 years and 5,113 on patients aged 65 to 75 years. The demographic data and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), EuroQol (EQ-5D), and satisfaction scores were collected. Clinically meaningful difference was defined as 5 points in OHS and utility of 0.085 in EQ-5D. Regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Patients in ≥ 80-years group were more likely women (P < .001), have higher American Society of Anesthesiolgists grade (P < .001), worse preoperative OHS (mean difference [MD] 2.3, P < .001), and EQ-5D (MD 0.087, P < .001). Both age groups achieved clinically meaningful and statistically significant (P < .001) improvement in OHS and EQ-5D utility at 2 years. When adjusting for confounding variables, the ≥ 80-year-old group had significantly (P < .001) lower improvement in OHS (MD -1.9 points) and EQ-5D (MD -0.055 utility), but these differences were not clinically meaningful. There was no difference (P = .813) in satisfaction between the groups. When adjusting for confounding variables, ≥ 80-year-old group had increased risk of longer LOS (odds ratio 1.27, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically meaningful differences in hip-specific outcome or health-related quality of life according to age group, and both were equally satisfied with their outcome. The older age group did, however, have longer LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective cohort study.

Post-traumatic stress disorder is more likely in younger patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty: impact on function and quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess whether PTSD was associated with preoperative and/or postoperative joint-specific function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether there were associated preoperative factors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a single centre using an established arthroplasty database over a 2-year period. Patients undergoing THA and TKA completed pre and 1-year postoperative Oxford hip/knee scores and EuroQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D) to assess joint specific function and HRQoL. Postoperatively, patients completed the self-reported PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) questionnaire where a score of 31 or greater was used to determine a provisional diagnosis of PTSD. RESULTS: There were 1244 THA and 1356 TKA patients, of which 42 (3.4%) and 54 (4.0%) had a PCL-5 score of ≥ 31, respectively (PTSD groups). Younger age was associated (p < 0.001) with PTSD for both THA (mean difference (MD) 9.9, 95%CI 6.7-13.0) and TKA (MD 4.6, 95%CI 2.2-6.9), which remained significant when adjusting for confounding variables (THA: p < 0.001; TKA: p = 0.020). The preoperative Oxford (THA:MD 4.9, p < 0.001; TKA:MD 5.7, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D scores (THA:MD 0.378, p < 0.001; TKA:MD 0.276, p < 0.001) were significantly worse in the PTSD groups. Age (AUC 73.8%, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D (AUC 72.9%, p < 0.001) were independent factors that were predictive of PTSD in patients undergoing THA and TKA, respectively. When adjusting for confounding variables, PTSD was clinically and statistically significantly (p < 0.001) associated with a lower improvement in the Oxford (THA:MD 9.3; TKA:MD 10.0) and EQ-5D (THA:MD 0.375; TKA:MD 0.293) scores. CONCLUSIONS: One in 25 patients met a provisional PTSD diagnosis; they were younger and had worse preoperative and improvement in postoperative joint specific function and HRQoL. Age and EQ-5D could be used to identify patients at risk.

Patella resurfacing is not associated with a difference in the Oxford knee score after total knee arthroplasty but stair descent is enhanced.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim was to assess the Oxford knee scores (OKS) on patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing compared to those who did not. Secondary aims were to identify: (1) factors associated with resurfacing, (2) the effect of resurfacing on specific components of the OKS related to patellofemoral function, (3) the influence on patient satisfaction, and (4) whether a subgroup of patients had an improved outcome when resurfacing was undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using outcome data from the arthroplasty database held at the study centre. Patient demographics and OKS were collected preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria of which 46.5% (n = 1453) underwent resurfacing. There were no differences in the OKS change at 1 or 2 years between those undergoing and not undergoing resurfacing (difference 0.2, p ≥ 0.469). Patients undergoing resurfacing were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.30-1.79, p < 0.001), undergo a posterior stabilised knee (OR 6.87, 95% CI 5.71-8.27, p < 0.001) or had a worse response to question 5-standing from a chair, (p = 0.011) or 12-stair descent, (p = 0.017) of the OKS preoperatively. There was no difference in postoperative patient satisfaction (p ≥ 0.180). There was a significantly greater improvement in question 12 of the OKS at 1 year (p = 0.019) in the resurfaced group. There were no patient-related factors or symptoms that were associated with a clinically significant (≥ 5 points) greater postoperative OKS. CONCLUSION: Patella resurfacing was not associated with a clinically important improvement in OKS. No specific indications for patella resurfacing were identified that offered an improved outcome, but when it was undertaken there was a greater improvement in the ability to descend stairs. Level of evidence Retrospective diagnostic study, Level III.

Clinical and functional outcomes of displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with PHILOS plate system and autologous bone graft.

This retrospective case series analyses the clinical and radiological outcomes of displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with PHILOS plate system and iliac crest bone autograft. Twenty-six patients with displaced fractures of proximal humerus, who were treated with PHILOS plate and autologous iliac crest bone grafts from January 2015 to September 2020, were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were proximal humerus fractures with displacement of more than 1cm and angulation of more than 45 degrees. The functional outcomes were evaluated using DASH and constant score. Radiological outcomes were measured by calculating the fracture union. The average age of the cohort was 47.28±13.69 years. Over all, the mean DASH score was 10.25 and constant score was 77.65 at three-year follow-up. The PHILOS plate with iliac crest bone autologous graft provides good radiological and functional outcomes, especially for the cases with bone defects and poor-bone stock.

Total knee arthroplasty: Quality assurance and improved longevity costs less.

Background: There is an accepted variation in the financial cost of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants but it is not known whether this cost is reflected by the evidence in support of their use. A cost analysis study was carried out to determine the total cost of consumables of a TKA, and whether this was related to the supporting evidence and survivorship data. Methods: Intra-operative data for all unilateral, cemented, primary TKA over a 13 month period at a high-volume Orthopaedic Centre was collected. Level of evidence for each model was taken from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) website, and data from the UK National Joint Registry was used to assign survivorship (failure rates). Correlation was calculated using the Spearman rank correlation (r). Results: A total of 1301 TKA were performed at the study centre during the data collection period. The mean cost of consumables for a TKA with patella resurfacing (n = 816) was £1969.08 (range of £1061.46 and £5143.89), and without resurfacing (n = 485) was £1846.62 (range of £1118.98 and £4196.81). There was a negative correlation between price of implant and ODEP rating (r = -0.47), with increasing level of evidence being associated with a lower cost. There was a positive correlation between price of implant and rate of implant failure at the1-, 3- and 5-year time-points (r = 0.55, 0.44, 0.28 respectively), with increasing cost being associated with a higher failure rate. Conclusion: Higher financial cost of TKA prostheses was associated with a weaker level of supporting evidence and a higher failure rate. The increased financial cost of new implants may be justified as more data and evidence becomes available to support an advantage in its use over currently established implants.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Exeter V40 Short Stem in Primary and Revision Arthroplasty: Does the Indication Affect Outcomes in the Short Term?

Purpose: A variety of short Exeter stems designed specifically for use in performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in primary and revision settings have recently been introduced. Some have been used 'off label' for hip reconstruction. The aim of this study is to report clinical and radiological results from the Exeter V40 125 mm stem in performance of primary THA and revision THA. Materials and Methods: This study had a retrospective design. Insertion of 58 (24 primary, 34 revision) Exeter V40 125 mm stems was performed between 2015 and 2017. The minimum follow-up period was two years. Assessment of the Oxford hip score (OHS), EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and radiological follow-up was performed at one and two years. Results: In the primary group, the preoperative, mean OHS was 13.29. The mean OHS was 32.86 and 23.39 at one-year and two-year post-surgery, respectively. The mean EQ-5D-3L scores were at 0.14, 0.59, and 0.35, preoperatively, at one-year follow-up and two-year follow-up, respectively. In the revision group, the mean preoperative OHS was 19.41. The mean OHS was 30.55 and 26.05 at one-year and two-year post-surgery, respectively. The mean EQ-5D-3L scores were 0.33, 0.61, and 0.48 preoperatively, at one-year follow-up and two-year follow-up, respectively. No progressive or new radiolucent lines were observed around any stem at the time of the final follow-up in all patients in both groups. Conclusion: Encouraging results regarding use of Exeter V40 125 mm stems have been reported up to two years following surgery in primary and revision THA settings.

The effect of BMI and other factors on post-operative length of stay: A multivariable regression analysis of 860 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a trend towards minimising length of stay (LOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as greater LOS is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. Patient factors known to influence LOS post-TKA include age and ASA grade. Evidence regarding the effect of body mass index (BMI) in particular is conflicting, with some studies finding that increased BMI predicts increased LOS, while others have found no relationship. Few previous studies, which have mostly been conducted outside the UK, have examined the effect of living alone or socioeconomic deprivation, which may be confounders. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1031 consecutive primary TKAs performed between 1 April 2021 and 31 December 2021 in a single high-volume arthroplasty centre. A multivariable negative binomial regression model was performed for the 860 patients with complete data, using pre-operative (BMI, age, gender, ASA grade, smoking, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, living arrangement, EQ5D quality of life score, and indication for surgery) and peri-operative variables (surgeon, surgical approach, tourniquet use, a.m./p.m operation, operation side, duration, and day of the week). RESULTS: Mean LOS was 2.6 days. BMI and socioeconomic deprivation had no effect on LOS (P > 0.05). Increased LOS was associated with living alone, lower EQ5D, age and ASA grade (all P < 0.001), p.m. operation (P < 0.01), female gender and duration of surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: BMI and socioeconomic status were not correlated with LOS after TKA. Living alone, which has not been previously reported and lower pre-operative EQ5D status were significant risk factors, which merit consideration in pre-operative planning and counselling.

A Simple Technique to Remove an Incarcerated Ceramic Liner in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Extraction of a well-fixed ceramic liner during revision total hip arthroplasty can be technically challenging, particularly when acetabular fixation screws prevent en bloc removal of the shell and insert without causing collateral damage to the adjacent pelvic bone. It is also important to remove the ceramic liner intact, as ceramic debris left in the joint may cause third body wear with premature articular wear of the revised implants. We describe a novel technique to extract an incarcerated ceramic liner when previously described strategies prove ineffective. Knowledge of this technique will help surgeons avoid unnecessary damage to the acetabular bone and optimize prospects for stable implantation of revision components.

Is success written in the stars? The effect of zodiac sign on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

AIM: There are 12 signs of the zodiac, each attributed with its own specific personality traits, desires and attitudes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of zodiac sign on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHOD: Patients undergoing primary TKA during a 2-year period (January 2019 to December 2020) were identified retrospectively. Patient demographics, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) (baseline, 1 and 2 years) and patient satisfaction scores (1 and 2 years) were collected. Each patient's zodiac sign was assigned from their date of birth. RESULTS: There were 509 patients (228 males [44.8%] and 281 females [55.2%]) with a mean age of 70.9 years and a mean BMI of 30.3. There were no significant differences in gender (p=0.712), age (p=0.088), BMI (p=0.660), or pre-operative OKS (p=0.539). Aries and Gemini (0.366) had the worst and Pisces the best (0.595) pre-operative EQ-5D scores (p=0.038). When adjusting for confounding, Aries (p=0.031) had a greater improvement in EQ-5D at 1 year, although this was not maintained at 2 years. When adjusting for confounding, Pisceans had significantly less of an improvement in OKS at both 1 (p=0.022) and 2 years (p=0.042) and also had a significantly lower risk of satisfaction at 2 years (odds ratio 0.41, p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Zodiac sign was associated with outcome following TKA. Pisceans had the best pre-operative EQ-5D scores, but the least improvement in the post-operative joint specific score (OKS) and were less likely to be satisfied, despite achieving an equal improvement in their health-related quality of life (EQ-5D). Aries started with the lowest pre-operative EQ-5D scores but achieved the best scores at 1 year. Our study shows that an individual's zodiac sign may serve as a useful predictive factor for functional outcomes and satisfaction following TKA. However, our findings are the result of multiple testing in a large dataset following a data trawl, and correlation does not necessarily equal causation even in a real-world registry.

Preoperative Factors Affecting the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Total Knee Replacement: Socioeconomic Factors and Preoperative OKS Have a Clinically Meaningful Effect.

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire typically used to assess function and pain in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). However, research is inconclusive as to which preoperative factors are important in explaining variation in outcome following TKR. The operative records of 12,709 patients who underwent primary TKR over a 9-year period were analyzed. The following variables were collected for each patient: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Index of Multiple Deprivation decile rank, side of operation, diagnosis, the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, preoperative OKS, EQ-5D index score, EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score, the postoperative OKS at 1 and 2 years. Generalized linear regression models were performed at 1 and 2 years to investigate the effect of the preoperative variables on the postoperative OKS. The effect of age, sex, BMI, Index of Multiple Deprivation decile rank, diagnosis, ASA grade, preoperative OKS, EuroQoL five-dimensional (EQ-5D) index score, and EQ-VAS score were all statistically significant in explaining the variation in OKS at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, with critical level of significance of 0.05 (5%). Being male aged 60 to 69 years of normal BMI, ASA grade I (fit and healthy), living in an affluent area, not reporting preoperative anxiety/depression, were associated with an enhanced mean postoperative OKS at both 1 and 2 years. When adjusted for potential confounding, age of 60-69 years, male sex, normal BMI, lower ASA grade, higher Index of Multiple Deprivation and higher pre-operative EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and OKS were identified as factors that resulted in higher post-operative OKS after primary TKR.

Environmental sustainability in orthopaedic surgery : a scoping review.

AIMS: In the UK, the NHS generates an estimated 25 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (4% to 5% of the nation's total carbon emissions) and produces over 500,000 tonnes of waste annually. There is limited evidence demonstrating the principles of sustainability and its benefits within orthopaedic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery and the environmentally sustainable initiatives undertaken to address this. The secondary aim of this study was to describe the barriers to making sustainable changes within orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines through EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed libraries using two domains of terms: "orthopaedic surgery" and "environmental sustainability". RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the final analysis. All papers studied the environmental impact of orthopaedic surgery in one of three areas: waste management, resource consumption, and carbon emissions. Waste segregation was a prevalent issue and described by nine studies, with up to 74.4% of hazardous waste being generated. Of this, six studies reported recycling waste and up to 43.9% of waste per procedure was recyclable. Large joint arthroplasties generated the highest amount of recyclable waste per procedure. Three studies investigated carbon emissions from intraoperative consumables, sterilization methods, and through the use of telemedicine. One study investigated water wastage and demonstrated that simple changes to practice can reduce water consumption by up to 63%. The two most common barriers to implementing environmentally sustainable changes identified across the studies was a lack of appropriate infrastructure and lack of education and training. CONCLUSION: Environmental sustainability in orthopaedic surgery is a growing area with a wide potential for meaningful change. Further research to cumulatively study the carbon footprint of orthopaedic surgery and the wider impact of environmentally sustainable changes is necessary.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):628-640.

The safe resumption of elective orthopaedic services following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic : a review of 2,316 consecutive cases and implications for recovery following further waves.

AIMS: There is little published on the outcomes after restarting elective orthopaedic procedures following cessation of surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the reported perioperative mortality in patients who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection while undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was 18% to 20%. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes, complications, and risk of developing COVID-19 in 2,316 consecutive patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery in the latter part of 2020 and comparing it to the same, pre-pandemic, period in 2019. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation of patients who underwent elective surgical procedures between 16 June 2020 and 12 December 2020 was undertaken. The number and type of cases, demographic details, American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI, 30-day readmission rates, mortality, and complications at one- and six-week intervals were obtained and compared with patients who underwent surgery during the same six-month period in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 2,316 patients underwent surgery in 2020 compared to 2,552 in the same period in 2019. There were no statistical differences in sex distribution, BMI, or ASA grade. The 30-day readmission rate and six-week validated complication rates were significantly lower for the 2020 patients compared to those in 2019 (p < 0.05). No deaths were reported at 30 days in the 2020 group as opposed to three in the 2019 group (p < 0.05). In 2020 one patient developed COVID-19 symptoms five days following foot and ankle surgery. This was possibly due to a family contact immediately following discharge from hospital, and the patient subsequently made a full recovery. CONCLUSION: Elective surgery was safely resumed following the cessation of operating during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Strict adherence to protocols resulted in 2,316 elective surgical procedures being performed with lower complications, readmissions, and mortality compared to 2019. Furthermore, only one patient developed COVID-19 with no evidence that this was a direct result of undergoing surgery. Level of evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):42-53.

The composition of cell-based therapies obtained from point-of-care devices/systems which mechanically dissociate lipoaspirate: a scoping review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Cell-based therapies using lipoaspirate are gaining popularity in orthopaedics due to their hypothesised regenerative potential. Several 'point-of-care' lipoaspirate-processing devices/systems have become available to isolate cells for therapeutic use, with published evidence reporting their clinical relevance. However, few studies have analysed the composition of their 'minimally-manipulated' cellular products in parallel, information that is vital to understand the mechanisms by which these therapies may be efficacious. This scoping review aimed to identify devices/systems using mechanical-only processing of lipoaspirate, the constituents of their cell-based therapies and where available, clinical outcomes. METHODS: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles until 21st April 2022. Information relating to cellular composition and clinical outcomes for devices/systems was extracted. Further information was also obtained by individually searching the devices/systems in the PubMed database, Google search engine and contacting manufacturers. RESULTS: 2895 studies were screened and a total of 15 articles (11 = Level 5 evidence) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 13 unique devices/systems were identified from included studies. All the studies reported cell concentration (cell number regardless of phenotype per millilitre of lipoaspirate) for their devices/systems (range 0.005-21 × 106). Ten reported cell viability (the measure of live cells- range 60-98%), 11 performed immuno-phenotypic analysis of the cell-subtypes and four investigated clinical outcomes of their cellular products. Only two studies reported all four of these parameters. CONCLUSION: When focussing on cell concentration, cell viability and MSC immuno-phenotypic analysis alone, the most effective manual devices/systems were ones using filtration and cutting/mincing. However, it was unclear whether high performance in these categories would translate to improved clinical outcomes. Due to the lack of standardisation and heterogeneity of the data, it was also not possible to draw any reliable conclusions and determine the role of these devices/systems in clinical practice at present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Therapeutic.

Mapping analysis to predict the associated EuroQol five-dimension three-level utility values from the Oxford Knee Score : a prediction and validation study.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to assess mapping models to predict the three-level version of EuroQoL five-dimension utility index (EQ-5D-3L) from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and validate these before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients was used to create the prediction models, and a second cohort of 721 patients from a different centre was used to validate the models, all of whom underwent TKA. Patient characteristics, BMI, OKS, and EQ-5D-3L were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Generalized linear regression was used to formulate the prediction models. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between the OKS and EQ-5D-3L preoperatively (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). Three different models (preoperative, postoperative, and change) were created. There were no significant differences between the actual and predicted mean EQ-5D-3L utilities at any timepoint or for change in the scores (p > 0.090) in the validation cohort. There was a significant correlation between the actual and predicted EQ-5D-3L utilities preoperatively (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that a lower utility was overestimated, and higher utility was underestimated. The individual predicted EQ-5D-3L that was within ± 0.05 and ± 0.010 (minimal clinically important difference (MCID)) of the actual EQ-5D-3L varied between 13% to 35% and 26% to 64%, respectively, according to timepoint assessed and change in the scores, but was not significantly different between the modelling and validation cohorts (p ≥ 0.148). CONCLUSION: The OKS can be used to estimate EQ-5D-3L. Predicted individual patient utility error beyond the MCID varied from one-third to two-thirds depending on timepoint assessed, but the mean for a cohort did not differ and could be employed for this purpose. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):573-581.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the length of stay following total hip and knee arthroplasty in a high volume elective orthopaedic unit.

AIMS: Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients undergoing primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty over a six-month period, from 1 July to 31 December 2020, were compared to the same period in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, wait to surgery, COVID-19 status, and length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,311 patients underwent hip or knee arthroplasty in the six-month period following recommencement of elective services in 2020 compared to 1,527 patients the year before. Waiting time to surgery increased in post-COVID-19 group (137 days vs 78; p < 0.001). Length of stay also significantly increased (0.49 days; p < 0.001) despite no difference in age or ASA grade. There were no cases of postoperative COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Time to surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly higher following recommencement of elective orthopaedic services in the latter part of 2020 in comparison to a similar patient cohort from the year before. Longer waiting times may have contributed to the clinical and radiological deterioration of arthritis and general musculoskeletal conditioning, which may in turn have affected immediate postoperative rehabilitation and mobilization, as well as increasing hospital stay. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):655-660.

The Medial Rotation Knee replacement: Clinical and radiological results of a multi-centre surveillance study at five years.

BACKGROUND: The Medial Rotation Knee (MRK) has one of the lowest revision rates of total knee replacement designs in the National Joint Registry. While survival is one metric of performance of implants, patient-reported outcomes, combined with clinical and radiological evaluation, allow more complete analysis. We report the five-year results of a prospective, multi-centre surveillance study of the MRK. METHODS: A 16-surgeon, three-centre series of 520 total knee replacements were performed in 486 patients, comprising 182 males and 304 females. The mean age was 70.3 years (46-96) and BMI 29.5 kg/m2 (18-57). Study subjects were given questionnaires pre-operatively, at six months, and annually thereafter. Clinical and radiological reviews were scheduled pre-operatively, at six months, three and five years. RESULTS: At five years, 395 of the original 486 patients (427 of 520 knees) remained under active review. Twenty-six patients (27 knees) had withdrawn, 44 patients/knees had died and one was excluded. Thirteen patients (14 knees) were lost to follow-up, but were not revised. Seven knees were revised, equating to a survival probability of 98.6% at five years. There were significant improvements in mean Oxford Knee Score (21.23-35.79), EQ-5D (0.440-0.694) and Knee Society Score (Knee 43.00-83.97; Function 49.45-71.39). Of the radiographs available for evaluation, radiolucency was identified in 25 knees (14.6%) with one case of osteolysis of the tibial component. CONCLUSION: In addition to excellent survivorship, mid-term patient-reported, clinical and radiological results at five years are satisfactory, and consistent with other medial pivot designs.

A systematic review of imageless hand-held robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: learning curve, accuracy, functional outcome and survivorship.

The aim of this systematic review was to present and assess the quality of evidence for learning curve, component positioning, functional outcomes and implant survivorship for image-free hand-held robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty.Searches of PubMed and Google Scholar were performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The criteria for inclusion was any published full-text article or abstract assessing image-free hand-held robotic knee arthroplasty and reporting learning curve, implant positioning, functional outcome or implant survival for clinical or non-clinical studies.There were 22 studies included. Five studies reported the learning curve: all were for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) - no learning curve for accuracy, operative time was reduced after five to 10 cases and a steady surgical time was achieved after eight cases.There were 16 studies reporting accuracy: rate of outliers was halved, higher rate of joint line and mechanical axis restoration, supported by low root mean square error values.Six studies reported functional outcome: all for UKA, improvement at six to 52 weeks, no difference from manual UKA except when assessed for lateral UKA which showed improved clinical outcomes.Two studies reported survivorship: one reported an unadjusted revision rate of 7% at 20 months for medial UKA and the other found a 99% two-year survival rate for UKA.There was evidence to support more accurate implant positioning for UKA, but whether this is related to superior functional outcomes or improved implant survivorship was not clear and further studies are required. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:319-326. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190065.

Three-year results of a polycarbonate urethane acetabular bearing in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) is a bearing surface with a lower modulus of elasticity than polyethylene or ceramic and is thought to more closely replicate the tribology of native hyaline cartilage. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes with the use of PCU in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study in which 157 patients underwent elective THA with a metal-on-PCU hip system. Patients had radiographic follow-up at 6 months and 3 years after surgery. Oxford Hip Scores and EuroQol scores were obtained annually and Harris Hip Scores were obtained at 6 months and 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: 180 hips were implanted, of which, 149 hips reached 3-year review with no revisions. There was an increase in Harris Hip Scores, Oxford Hip Scores and EuroQol scores (p < 0.001). 12 patients (12 hips) reported painless hip squeaking. There were no dislocations and no other adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Our results showed satisfactory survivorship and improvements in patient reported outcomes with metal on PCU THA. Long-term data are still being collected to confirm these findings. We recommend further tribological research into the squeaking phenomenon we observed.

The preoperative Oxford Knee Score is an independent predictor of achieving a postoperative ceiling score after total knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) demonstrated a ceiling effect at one and/or two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify preoperative independent predictors for patients that achieved a ceiling score after TKA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients undergoing a primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), OKS, and EuroQoL five-dimension (EQ-5D) general health scores were collected preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative predictors of patients achieving postoperative ceiling scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify a preoperative OKS that predicted a postoperative ceiling score. RESULTS: The ceiling effect was 4.6% (n = 272) at one year which increased significantly (odds ratio (OR) 40.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 30.4 to 53.3; p < 0.001) to 6.2% (n = 363) at two years, when defined as those with a maximal score of 48 points. However, when the ceiling effect was defined as an OKS of 44 points or more, this increased to 26.3% (n = 1,540) at one year and further to 29.8% (n = 1,748) at two years (OR 21.6, 95% CI 18.7 to 25.1; p < 0.001). A preoperative OKS of 23 or more and 22 or more were predictive of achieving a postoperative ceiling OKS at one and two years when defined as a maximal score or a score of 44 or more, respectively. CONCLUSION: The postoperative OKS demonstrated a small ceiling effect when defined by a maximal score, but when defined by a postoperative OKS of 44 or more the ceiling effect was moderate and failed to meet standards. The preoperative OKS was an independent predictor of achieving a ceiling score. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1519-1526.

Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.

BACKGROUND: With over 2.35 million records, the National Joint Registry (NJR) is the largest arthroplasty registry in the world. It provides a powerful tool to monitor implant survivorship and influence different surgical strategies. To date, little work has been undertaken to investigate the validity of the 'Reason for Revision' recorded in Consultant Outcome Reports on the NJR. METHODS: The NJR was queried to identify all revisions on the THR performed at a single centre over an 11-year period. Review and validation of 'Reason for Revision' for each case was undertaken using radiological imaging studies, pathology, histology, microbiology and electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of the 22,046 primary total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) undertaken by 23 surgeons at our hospital, over an 11-year period, 1.35% (297) were subsequently reported to the NJR as revised. Discrepancies in reporting to the NJR were identified for 41 cases (25.63%) for THR and 28 (20.40%) cases for TKR. Revision for infection was under-reported for both THR and TKR by 1.88% and 3.65% respectively. Reporting of adverse soft tissue reaction to particulate debris for THR was unreported by 11%. Progressive arthritis following a TKR was unreported by 6.56%. All the cases reported as 'other' (8.75% for THRs and 3.65% for TKRs) were reclassified to the most appropriate 'reason for revision' category. The 'reason for revision' data is recorded to the NJR with findings at the time of surgery. It is some days before microbiology and histology reports become available and source data is not always updated. CONCLUSION: If an average of 23% wrong data entry at a highly organised institution is replicated throughout the UK, a formal process to validate primary and revision data submitted to the NJR should be considered. Local scrutiny, review and validation of revision data are all vital to optimise the value of the NJR. Accurate data recorded to the NJR is imperative to provide safe and effective improvements in orthopaedic surgery.