LUCL internal bracing restores posterolateral rotatory stability of the elbow.

PURPOSE: Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow occurs from an insufficient lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC). For subacute LCLC injuries, lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) internal bracing rather than reconstruction may be a viable option. The purpose of the study was to compare the stabilizing effects of LUCL internal bracing to triceps tendon graft reconstruction in simulated PLRI. METHODS: Sixteen cadaveric elbows were assigned for either LUCL internal bracing (n = 8) or reconstruction with triceps tendon graft (n = 8). Specimen were mounted and a valgus rotational torque was applied to the ulna to test posterolateral rotatory stability. Posterolateral rotation was measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion. Cyclic loading was performed for 1000 cycles at 90° of elbow flexion. Three conditions were compared in each specimen: intact elbow, LUCL and radial collateral ligament (RCL) transected, and then either LUCL internal bracing or reconstruction with triceps tendon graft. RESULTS: Transection of the LUCL and RCL significantly increased posterolateral rotation in all degrees of elbow flexion compared to the intact condition (P < 0.05). Both LUCL internal bracing and reconstruction restored posterolateral rotatory stability to the native state between 0° and 120° of elbow flexion, with no significant difference in improvement between groups. Similarly, LUCL internal bracing and reconstruction groups showed no significant difference in posterolateral rotation compared to the intact condition during cyclic loading. CONCLUSIONS: At time zero, both LUCL internal bracing and reconstruction with triceps tendon graft restored posterolateral rotatory stability. As such, this study supports the use of internal bracing as an adjunct to primary ligament repair in subacute PLRI.

Higher Critical Shoulder Angle and Acromion Index Are Associated With Increased Retear Risk After Isolated Supraspinatus Tendon Repair at Short-Term Follow Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromion index (AI), and glenoid inclination (GI) on the postoperative healing rate after arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. METHODS: Patients after arthroscopic repair of a symptomatic, unilateral, single-tendon, full-thickness supraspinatus tear in whom nonoperative management had failed were retrospectively reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were obtained 6 months postoperatively and were evaluated by 2 independent observers. Repair integrity was classified as either intact or torn. Preoperative true anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure CSA, AI, and GI. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were evaluated 6 months postoperatively. The mean patient age at surgery was 54.7 ± 7.7 years. On MRI studies, 41 patients (71.9%) had an intact repair and 16 patients (28.1%) had a full-thickness retear. There were no significant differences between the intact and retear group in regard to patient age (P = .648), initial tear size (P = .205), or fatty degeneration (P = .508). The mean CSA for the retear group (37° ± 4°) was significantly higher than that in the intact group (35° ± 3°; P = .014). If the CSA was >38°, the odds ratio of having a retear was 3.78 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 13.58; P = .042). Average AI for the retear group (0.73 ± 0.09) was significantly higher than that in the intact group (0.69 ± 0.06; P = .049). The mean GI was 17° ± 6° for the intact group and 16° ± 6° for the retear group (P = .739). CONCLUSIONS: At short-term follow-up, higher CSA and AI significantly increased the retear risk after arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. CSA >38° increased the retear risk almost 4-fold. Overall GI was elevated but did not correlate with failure rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control study.

What a Ratchet! A Gripping Case Report of an Entrapped Finger with an Unyielding Wrench.

Finger entrapment with rings or ring-like objects is an uncommon possible hand emergency. In cases in which noncutting removal is ineffective, ring cutters or dental drills with carbide or diamond burs have been successfully used. However, objects composed of hard metallic alloys, such as lug nuts or wrenches, are often resistant to such equipment. In these instances, larger diameter metal cutting burrs or rasps may be more advantageous. Due to their increased size and cutting power, these tools are better suited to handle the toughness of hard metals. In this case report, we present the effective and efficient removal of a stainless steel wrench from an entrapped digit using a helicoidal rasp. Availability of this instrument within orthopedic departments may prevent the delays often described in the treatment of finger entrapment when traditional cutting equipment fails.