Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with portal hypertension with liver function of Childs A.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced liver disease and portal hypertension (PH) are seen as a relative contraindication for bariatric and metabolic surgery. Several studies have shown significant improvement in liver function and liver histology after bariatric surgery. There are very few studies describing bariatric surgery in patients with PH. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the feasibility and results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients with PH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present our experience of performing laparoscopic SG in 15 patients with evidence of PH. All the patients were Childs Pugh Criteria A. PH was confirmed by the presence of dilated esophageal varices on endoscopy. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 77.33 ± 15.22 min and mean blood loss was 80.67 ± 37.12 ml. The mean length of stay was 2.73 ± 0.59 days. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. None of the patients required blood transfusion in the postoperative period. The weight, BMI, Excess body weight loss% (EBWL%), Total weight loss (TWL) and TWL% at 1 year were 86.05 ± 14.40 kg, 31.16 kg/m2 ± 3.82, 63.84% ± 15.24, 31.49 ± 9.54 kg and 26.50 ± 5.42%, respectively. Diabetes and hypertension resolution at 1 year was 80% and 72.72%, respectively. All the patients were followed up for mean 3 ± 1.5 years. There were no immediate or long-term morbidity and mortality noted. CONCLUSION: SG is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of obesity in carefully selected patients with PH with good weight loss and comorbidity resolution.

Proliferative fasciitis arising from the abdominal wall: A rare tumour excised by laparoscopy.

Proliferative fasciitis (PF) is a rare pseudosarcomatous lesion arising from the subcutaneous fascia and the fibrous septa. Only few hundred cases have been reported in the literature. In the largest series of 53 patients, only two patients had PF lesion arising from the flank. The most common site of origin is extremities followed by abdomen and head and neck. Its origin from the abdominal wall layer and presentation as the fever has been rarely reported in the literature. A PF lesion larger than 5 cm dimension has been sparsely noted. We report the presence of this rare entity in a 68-year-old gentleman who presented to us with low-grade fever and the presence of large lump arising from the abdominal wall. In our patient, the lesion was arising from transervsalis fascia and was excised in toto laparoscopically without damaging the abdominal muscles. It is imperative to differentiate both these lesions from sarcoma on histopathological examination as the follow-up treatment protocols for both vary.

Modified port positions for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair for groin hernias: our experience.

BACKGROUND: Totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP) is the preferred method of inguinal hernia repair for many surgeons worldwide. However, because of limited working space, there may be difficulties when operating on large and irreducible groin hernias and short stature patients. There are many ways in which the port positions can be modified during TEP for different kinds of hernias and according to the comfort of the surgeons. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We describe two different variations in port placement for TEP in patients with large irreducible hernias and short stature patients. RESULTS: A total of 19 procedures were performed with these port positions. Most of these were large irreducible hernias or patients with short stature. With these modified port positions, difficult hernias could be completed with extraperitoneal approach. We had no recurrence and 5 seromas that eventually settled in 1-3 months. CONCLUSION: Modified port positions in TEP by shifting the ports farther away can be useful for hernias where the surgery is difficult due to limited working space and is a good alternative to TAPP.

Bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatus hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatus hernia (HH) are frequently encountered comorbidities in patients seeking bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) for obesity. sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are the three commonest bariatric procedures performed worldwide. The purpose of this review was to analyze and compare the data on outcomes of these three procedures in patients with GERD and/or HH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We examined published English language scientific literature available on PubMed for data comparing SG, RYGB, and OAGB with specific focus on GERD outcomes and outcomes in those with GERD and/or HH. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Several authors have addressed the outcome of GERD after bariatric surgery. There have been randomized control trials and comparative studies in the literature comparing the results of these procedure. But very few studies have exclusively looked into the outcome of different procedures in patients with pre-existing GERD and/or HH. In this narrative review, we evaluate pros and cons of three commonest bariatric procedures worldwide in this subgroup of patients seeking BMS. We also suggest an algorithm on the basis of our experience and the available data in scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS: Though RYGB is the best anti reflux procedure it is associated with significant higher morbidity/mortality as compared to SG and OAGB. These two procedures can be used in the majority of patients with GERD and/or HH seeking BMS with an acceptance that some patients will need conversion to RYGB in the long term.

MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.

INTRODUCTION: Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) has been approved as a mainstream metabolic/bariatric procedure by IFSO. Still there are lots of concerns regarding nutritional deficiency after MGB-OAGB. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the effect of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and nutritional deficiencies in patients 1 year after MGB-OAGB and to find suitable BPL length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who underwent MGB-OAGB were divided into three groups of 150 cm, 180 cm, and 250 cm depending on the length of BPL bypassed. The nutritional parameters (vitamin D3, vitamin B12, serum iron, serum ferritin, total protein, serum albumin, serum globulin), anthropometric measurements (weight, BMI), and comorbidity resolution (T2DM, hypertension) were compared between the three groups at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference in number of patients having deficiencies in all the nutritional parameters except globulin between 150 cm and 250 cm groups (P < 0.05). While on comparing 180- and 250-cm group, a statistically significant difference was present in vitamin D3, vitamin B12, and total protein (P < 0.05) only. The difference was statistically insignificant between the three groups on T2DM, hypertension resolution, and %EWL but TWL between 150 cm vs 180 cm and 150 cm vs 250 cm showed significant difference. CONCLUSION: A 150-cm BPL length is adequate with very minimal nutritional complications and good results. A 180-cm BPL can be used in super obese while a 250-cm BPL should be used with utmost care as it results in significant nutritional deficiencies.

LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.

AIM: The objective of this study is to compare 3-year follow-up results of one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study of results between 100 LSG patients and 101 MGB-OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life (BAROS score) at 3 years follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up was achieved in 93 MGB-OAGB vs 92 LSG patients for 3-year period. The average %EWL for MGB-OAGB vs LSG was 66.48 vs 61.15% at the end of 3 years respectively, which was statistically insignificant. Diabetes remission was seen in 89.13% of MGB-OAGB patients and 81.82% of LSG patients. Remission of hypertension was seen in 74% of MGB-OAGB patients and 72.22% of LSG patients. Bariatric analysis reporting and outcome system (BAROS) with comorbidity in LSG patients and MGB-OAGB patients was 6.03 and 6.96 respectively, whereas in patients without comorbidity, BAROS score was 3.86 in LSG group and 4.34 in MGB-OAGB group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, at 36 months follow up, there was no significant difference between LSG and MGB-OAGB in %EWL and remission of HTN. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rates were higher after MGB-OAGB as compared to LSG but the difference was statistically insignificant. MGB-OAGB patients with comorbidities have a better quality of life and BAROS score compared to LSG patients.

Predicting remission of diabetes post metabolic surgery: a comparison of ABCD, diarem, and DRS scores.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the major causes for development of T2DM. Metabolic surgery has been proved to be a successful and cost-effective treatment modality for managing the patients with obesity and T2DM. Many scoring systems and models have been described in literature to predict the outcome of T2DM after metabolic surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Diarem, DRS, and ABCD score in predicting the T2DM remission. METHODS: A total number of 102 diabetic patients, who underwent LMGB/LOAGB, were selected for this study. A retrospective analysis of the three scoring systems when applied to these patients and their predictive abilities were analyzed. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery, 72 (70.59%) patients achieved remission of T2DM. Though the pairwise comparisons between AUC on ROC analysis of ABCD, Diarem, and DRS scores does not show statistically significant difference between them, Diarem score has the maximum relative area under ROC curves. By multivariate analysis, it was found that factors significantly associated with T2DM remission were duration of T2DM, C-peptide, and Pre-Op HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Among the three scoring systems, though DiaRem score has the best sensitivity and specificity and maximum AUC, no statistically significant difference was found in their diabetes remission predicting abilities. A shorter duration of T2DM, a lower HbA1C, and higher levels of C-peptide were significantly associated with a higher chance of T2DM remission.

LSG vs OAGB-1 Year Follow-up Data-a Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most popular bariatric procedure. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rapidly emerging as a safe and effective metabolic procedure. This study aims at comparing the 1-year follow-up results of OAGB and LSG in terms of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life. METHODS: A prospective randomized study of results between 100 LSG and 101 OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life (BAROS score). RESULTS: The mean BMI for the OAGB and LSG group was 44.31 and 43.75 kg/m2, respectively. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) for OAGB vs LSG was 66.87 ± 10.87 vs 63.97 ± 13.24 at 1 year (p > 0.05), respectively. Diabetes remission was 83.63 % in OAGB patients and 76.58 % in LSG patients. Remission of hypertension is 64.15 % in OAGB patients and 66.07 % in LSG patients. Bariatric Analysis Reporting and Outcome System (BAROS) was 3.71 in LSG and 3.96 in OAGB. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, there was no significant difference between LSG and OAGB in outcome at 1 year follow-up in % excess weight loss, remission of HTN, and quality of life. OAGB has marginally better outcome in T2 DM remission. However, a longer follow-up is required to establish a correct comparative result.