Dose-finding and pharmacologic study of chronic oral idarubicin therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Oral idarubicin (IDA) is an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but its role in the management of this tumor is yet not established completely. To investigate a new modality of IDA administration, a dose-finding study was designed with hyperfractionated doses. The purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the pharmacokinetics of this schedule. IDA was administered twice daily as outpatient therapy in cycles of 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Thirty-one patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer and pretreated with chemotherapy (including epirubicin and doxorubicin) were enrolled. DLT was defined as G4 hematological toxicity or any other toxicity G3 or higher (Bloom and Richardson grading). Inter- and intrapatient dose increases were studied. Pharmacokinetics of IDA and its metabolite idarubicinol (IDOL) were evaluated. IDA dose was increased from 2 mg/day to 10 mg/day, by steps of 1 mg/day, with the larger dose given in the evening. MTD was reached at 10 mg/day. Overall, the therapy cycles were 69 (median/patient, 2; range, 1-6). DLTs were G4 neutropenia associated with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in one patient and G3 diarrhea in another of the 5 patients in the 10 mg/day cohort. The two patients developing DLT at the daily dose of 10 mg received a dose normalized for body surface of 6.85 and 5.65 mg/m2/day, respectively. We considered 5.5 mg/m2/day to be the MTD. Other toxicities were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and diarrhea, grades G1 to G2. By univariate analysis, significant correlations were observed between absolute neutrophil count at nadir and IDA area under the curve (P = 0.022; r = -0.33), IDA Cmax (P = 0.0067; r = -0.38), IDOL area under the curve (P = 0.0009; r = -0.43), and IDOL Cmax (P = 0.0016; r = -0.41), respectively. By multivariate analysis, IDA Cmax was the strongest determinant for neutropenia (R2 = 0.14; P = 0.01). Among the 21 patients evaluable for response, 3 (14.3%) had partial response (lasting 3, 6, and 8 months, respectively), and 6 (28.6%) had a complete arrest of disease progression (lasting 2-6 months). In conclusion, the MTD of this schedule is 10 mg/day and the DLTs are neutropenia and diarrhea. Tolerance was good, and the treatment is feasible as home therapy. Some objective measurable responses were documented in this group of anthracycline-pretreated patients. IDOL could have a role for the pharmacological effect. Further evaluation of this schedule is warranted to assess the activity and toxicity of prolonged oral IDA administration.

Pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine in patients with liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The main elimination pathway of vinorelbine is hepatic metabolism, and the clearance of vinorelbine could be reduced in patients with liver metastases. OBJECTIVES: To study the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine in patients who have advanced breast cancer with or without liver metastases and to study the relationship between hepatic function and vinorelbine clearance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 29 patients with advanced breast cancer: 19 with liver metastases and 10 control patients with extrahepatic metastases (mean age, 61 years; age range, 38 to 81 years). The vinorelbine dose was 30 mg/m2 as a short intravenous infusion; the dose was reduced by 50% in patients with bilirubin > 2 mg/dl. Patients were classified by ultrasonographic estimation of the liver volume replaced by tumor (%LVRT). Standard liver function tests and a monoethylglycinexylidide test (a quantitative liver function test based on lidocaine metabolite formation) were performed. Vinorelbine was assayed in plasma by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Vinorelbine determination was impossible in two patients with more than 75% LVRT because of interferences. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a noncompartimental method and compared by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: A lower vinorelbine clearance rate was observed in the five patients with more than 75% LVRT (22.9 L/hr/m2) compared with the 10 patients with no liver metastases (48.0 L/hr/m2) and the 12 patients with 25% to 75% LVRT (45.3 L/hr/m2). Terminal elimination half-life and apparent volume of distribution were not significantly different among groups. The monoethylglycinexylidide test had a significant correlation with vinorelbine clearance. (r2 = 0.70; p = 10(-4). CONCLUSIONS: These results support vinorelbine dose reduction in patients with severe liver failure but not in patients with moderate secondary liver involvement. The monoethylglycinexylidide test may prove to be useful for vinorelbine dose individualization.

Pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Etoposide dosage in patients with liver dysfunction remains controversial. Since etoposide has a hepatic component to its clearance (CL) and shows a high degree of protein binding, hepatic impairment could affect etoposide disposition. However, the empiric recommendation that the dose of etoposide be decreased in such patients may reduce systemic exposure and be detrimental to its antitumor activity. To address these issues we studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) of etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying cirrhosis (n = 17) treated with daily oral etoposide. Unbound etoposide was obtained by ultrafiltration. Etoposide concentrations (total and free drug) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analyzed by noncompartmental equations. The patients had mild or moderate liver dysfunction. Albuminemia was in the normal range for all the patients. Creatininemia was normal in all but two patients. PK results (mean and range) showed that etoposide disposition was unchanged in patients with liver dysfunction. We found slightly high etoposide bioavailability [F, 61% (17-95%)] and clearance [CL, 1.1 (0.7-2.3)l h(-1) m(-2)] resulting in a normal degree of systemic exposure (AUC(oral) 27 microg h ml(-1)). Normal protein binding [PB 93.2% (84.4-98.1%)] contributed to a normal level of exposure to free drug (AUC(f, oral) 1.9 microg h ml(-1)). The distribution volume [V(SS) 8.4 (6.1-13.2) l/m2] and the effective half-life [t1/2eff, 5.1 (3.0-9.6) h] were normal. Median CL and protein binding did not differ in the seven patients with total bilirubin value of > 1.2 mg/dl as compared with the ten patients with total bilirubin levels of < or = 1.2 mg/dl (1.3 versus 1.01 h(-1) m(-2) and 92.5% versus 93.4%, respectively). In agreement with this PK finding, we observed no clinical evidence of increased toxicity in patients with hyperbilirubinemia as compared with patients with normal bilirubinemia (mean WBC decrease 38% versus 47%). The only case of severe (grade 4) hematological toxicity was observed in one patient with reduced glomerular filtration. Since the pharmacological effects of etoposide correlate with the level of systemic exposure to the free drug, our data suggest that no dose reduction is needed in patients with HCC. It is even possible to increase the dose intensity in patients with favorable PK parameters under appropriate hematological and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of 120-hour infusion versus hyperfractionated oral administration of idarubicin.

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of idarubicin (IDA) and its active metabolite idarubicinol (IDOL) after chronic oral and continuous intravenous (i.v.) IDA administration in order to establish the oral doses needed to reach the i.v. equiactive plasma drug exposure. The pharmacokinetic profile of IDA and IDOL was investigated in 23 patients receiving 12 mg/m2 IDA by 120-h i.v. infusion (2.4 mg/m2/day) combined with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and prednisone in comparison to 28 patients receiving oral IDA doses ranging from 2 to 10 mg/day for 21 days in a phase I study. We found that IDA AUC24h/dose/m2 was 4.7-fold greater during i.v. than oral administration, whereas IDOL AUC24h/dose/m2 was only about 2-fold higher after i.v. administration. The metabolic ratio between IDOL AUC24h and IDA AUC24h in plasma was about 3-fold higher after oral administration. Based on these results we were able to estimate that equiactive plasma drug exposure was reached with an approximately 2.5-fold greater oral dose/m2 of IDA than the corresponding i.v. dose.

Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method with fluorescence detection for measurement of vinorelbine plasma concentrations.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection for the determination of vinorelbine in plasma is described. The technique was derived from that published by Debal for an assay of vinorelbine in cell culture medium. The modifications concern the preparation procedure for plasma samples (a two-step liquid-liquid extraction from plasma is described), optimization of the mobile phase composition, and use of a single C18 column. These changes resulted in an improved sensitivity and reproducibility of the assay and led to its feasibility for clinical pharmacokinetic studies. The range of the assay is 2 to 1000 ng/ml.

Determination of unbound etoposide concentration in ultrafiltered plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection.

Etoposide is a highly protein bound drug, and monitoring the concentration of free drug could help individualize dosage in oncological patients. The cost and difficulty of the standard techniques (equilibration dialysis) has hampered the monitoring of free drugs. We describe a simple HPLC method for the measurement of free etoposide concentration in plasma. Sample preparation involves the ultrafiltration of plasma by a Centrifree device for 30 min at 2000 g and extraction with chloroform. The isocratic separation is performed with a mu Bondapak phenyl analytical column. Fluorimetric detection is used (288-328 nm excitation and emission wavelengths). Linearity of the calibration curve is excellent between 0.05 and 1 microgram/ml. Accuracy and precision are reported at the concentrations 0.06 and 0.4 microgram/ml: within-run accuracy is 10% and 6.2%, respectively; between-run accuracy is < or = 1%; within-run coefficients of variation (C.V.) are 10.6 and 5.0%; between-run C.V. are 11.6 and 6.8% respectively. The range of the assay is 0.05 to 1 microgram/ml. The feasibility of the technique has been tested in 7 patients treated with oral etoposide for hepatocarcinoma (mean protein binding 91%). We found no interference from endogenous substances, co-administered drugs (alizapride, furosemide, ranitidine) and other antineoplastic agents (doxorubicine, idarubicine, vinblastine, vinorelbine).

Pharmacokinetic interaction between etoposide and tamoxifen in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The effect of tamoxifen (TAM) on the pharmacokinetics of oral administration of etoposide (VP-16) in patients with nonoperable hepatocellular carcinoma was investigated. The pharmacokinetics of VP-16 was studied by using a validated limited sampling strategy. The pharmacokinetic parameters of VP-16, such as area under curve (AUC), free AUC and protein binding, were determined from drug plasma concentrations at 1 and 4 h after VP-16 administration on the first day (day -1) and at the end of the chemotherapy cycle (day -21) for VP-16 alone and VP-16+TAM, respectively. When VP-16 was administered in association with TAM, the median total systemic exposure was not significantly (p = NS) different from that observed when VP-16 was administered alone [33.74 (range 11.19-56.58) versus 32.97 (range 20.23-119.28) mg/l/h]. Moreover, TAM did not affect significantly (p = NS) the levels of protein binding of VP-16 [median 94.6 (range 87.7-98.2) versus median 94.9 (range 91.6-98.0)% for VP-16+TAM and VP-16 alone, respectively] and the systemic exposure of the free drug (free AUC) [1.86 (range 0.21-4.57) versus median 1.78 (range 0.59-3.73) mg/l/h for VP-16+TAM and VP = 16 alone, respectively]. These results indicate a lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between VP-16 and TAM, and suggest that the increased hematological toxicity observed when TAM is given in combination with VP-16 could be related to pharmacodynamic interactions.

Effect of cyclosporin A on protein binding of teniposide in cancer patients.

We investigated the effect of cyclosporin A (CSA) on protein binding of teniposide (VM26) in 16 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving i.v. VM26 alone over 24 h (total dose, 200 mg/m2) and in association with CSA (5 mg/kg/2 h followed by 30 mg/kg/48 h i.v.). CSA was used in an attempt to overcome multidrug resistance. The unbound fraction (%fu) of VM26 was significantly (p=0.04) higher in the cycles with CSA (median 0.8; range 0.4-1.9) than in the cycles with VM26 alone (median 0.5; range 0.1-1.6). Both total VM26 area under curve concentration (AUC0-infinity) and free VM26 AUC0-infinity increased after treatment with CSA, but the median increase in free AUC0-infinity was higher (2.7-fold) than total AUC0-infinity (1.5-fold) (p = 0.04). Bilirubin was significantly (p<0.01) increased after CSA but no association was observed between bilirubin level and %fu of VM26. Albumin was in the normal range after both VM26 alone and VM26 plus CSA. The nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) after VM26 plus CSA (median 700/microl, range <100-2860/microl) was lower than after VM26 alone (median 1900/microl, range 200-6000/microl) (p = 0.0007). The median percentage of ANC compared to the pretreatment value (ANC nadir/ANC pretreatment x 100) was 39.0% (range 3.1-98.8%) in the cycles with VM26 alone and 16.9% (range 1.4-97.9%) (p = 0.007) after VM26 plus CSA. Percentage change of neutrophils significantly correlated with free AUC0-infinity VM26 in the cycles with VM26 alone and VM26 plus CSA (p = 0.04, r = -0.53 and p = 0.04, r = -0.52, respectively). Only a trend which failed to reach significance was observed between total AUC0-infinity VM26 and percentage change of neutrophils in the cycles with VM26 alone and in association with CSA (p = NS, r = -0.33 and p = 0.055, r = -0.49, respectively). In conclusion, patients treated with CSA had higher systemic exposure to unbound VM26.

Interactions of antineoplastic chemotherapy with zidovudine pharmacokinetics in patients with HIV-related neoplasms.

To evaluate the perturbations in zidovudine (ZDV) pharmacokinetics as a consequence of antineoplastic chemotherapeutic treatments, we performed a prospective crossover study in 13 HIV-infected patients with cancer. The subjects received 2-day regimens of ZDV (250 mg x 2/day). On the first day ZDV was administered alone, whereas on the second day it was combined with antitumor chemotherapies specific for the histological type (ZDV + chemotherapy). Blood sample and urine collections were performed over a 12-hour period following oral administration of the antiretroviral agent. ZDV was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ZDV were calculated by a noncompartmental model. The mean ZDV area under curve (AUC) was not significantly different in the patients treated with ZDV alone and ZDV + chemotherapy. Comparison of plasma elimination half-life (t((1/2))), apparent systemic clearance (CL/F), and apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) of ZDV did not show any significant difference before and after chemotherapy. Conversely, some significant differences were observed for both mean peak concentration (C(max)) of ZDV and the corresponding time (T(max)). There was a 57% reduction in C(max) (p<0.05) and a 66% increase in T(max) (p<0.05) after chemotherapy compared with treatment with ZDV alone. No differences were observed in the urinary excretion of ZDV and ZDV glucuronide and urinary metabolic ratio, as a consequence of antineoplastic treatment. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that some minor perturbations in ZDV pharmacokinetics (i.e. C(max) and T(max)) derived from antineoplastic chemotherapy. Based on the observation that antineoplastic chemotherapy had no significant effect on plasma ZDV concentration expressed as AUC, the observed pharmacokinetic interaction would not warrant by itself a change in the ZDV dosage during chemotherapy.

Pharmacology of chronic oral daily administration of idarubicin.

Idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin) (IDA) is a daunorubicin analogue with substantial activity in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Among several reasons, IDA is of interest because of its main metabolite derivative, the C-13 alcohol analogue, idarubicinol (IDOL). Previous studies have suggested that IDOL, unlike other anthracycline metabolic derivatives, possesses a striking growth-inhibitory activity in tumor cell lines. This suggests that IDOL, like IDA could be useful in circumventing MDR. IDA is bioavailable in an oral dosage form. After oral administration of IDA to the patients, the concentration of IDOL quickly exceeds that of IDA and is retained in the plasma for a longer period. Hence, administration of IDA to cancer patients results ina much greater overall exposure of the tumor to IDOL than to the parent compound. At the Oncology Center (CRO) in Aviano we performed a dose-finding and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of chronic daily oral IDA with intrapatient escalation in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). All the patients were pretreated with anthracyclines (the cumulative dose was 530 mg and 264 mg, respectively, for epirubicin and (DOX) and had at admittance a PS < or = 2 and a left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%. IDA (1 mg capsules) was administered orally twice a day for 21 days every two weeks. Treatment was continued at escalating doses until progression or intolerance. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. MTD has not yet been reached and clinical results are reported in Table 1. Treatment was well-tolerated in all but one patient (300 ANC at day 28). Three patients had tox G3 ANC for more than three weeks after 3, 6, and 7 mg doses, respectively. Two of them stopped chemotherapy after 1 cycle and 1 patient stopped after 2 cycles (6 mg doses). Despite previous treatments with anthracyclines (the mean cumulative dose before entering the study was 530 and 264 mg, respectively, for epirubicin and DOX) no cardiotoxicity due to IDA treatment was observed. This trial demonstrates the feasibility of chronic daily IDA administration. At the dosage reported, treatment was generally well tolerated. The PK findings (high IDOL concentrations) and the unexpected G4 myelotoxicity in patients with the highest IDOL plasma concentrations suggest that IDOL is clinically relevant.