RESUMO
The aim of this study is to evaluate the peripheral nerves in diabetes mellitus with or without peripheral facial paralysis (PFP). A total of 49 diabetic patients with PFP within the last year (23 females, mean age 60.3 +/- 9.3), and 83 diabetic patients without PFP (41 females, mean age 59.5 +/- 9.9) were enrolled. The neurological examination, eye-blinking response, needle EMG and electrophysiological parameters of peripheral nerves were evaluated. The neuropathic pain, other positive and negative sensory symptoms were statistically more frequent in controls than the PFP group, while no difference was noted in total neuropathy score. Sural sensorial nerve action potential amplitudes were same in both groups, but median nerve amplitudes were significantly lower in the PFP group. It is suggested that PFP is not a part of multifocal neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. However, at least some parts of the nerve conduction studies were involved, focal neuropathies were more frequent while sensory neuropathies with small nerve fiber involvement were less frequent in diabetes patients with PFP.
Assuntos
Paralisia de Bell/fisiopatologia , Complicações do Diabetes/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Diabetic foot lesions develop predominantly in male patients and sensory neuropathy is the most frequent type of neuropathy associated with these lesions. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and electrophysiological features in a cohort of patients with diabetic foot. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The recordings of 318 consecutive diabetic patients (127 women and 191 men) with an ongoing or healed foot ulcer who had been referred for electrophysiological consultation were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: 60.1% of our cohort were male. Loss of deep sensation and deep tendon reflex abnormalities were the most common neurological findings. Negative sensory symptoms (63.7% vs 40.8%, p<0.01) and neuropathic pain (38.5% vs 18.3%, p<0.01) were more frequent in females, whereas atrophy was more frequent in male patients (22.8% vs 46%, p<0.01). Motor nerve conduction abnormalities and ulnar nerve involvement was more frequent and severe in males. Abnormal electrophysiological findings were mild in 70 patients (female 42, 60%). In this group, hemiplegia, peripheral arterial disease, multiple bone fractures, end stage renal failure, recent pulmonary tuberculosis and dementia accompanied mild polyneuropathy. Thirty patients had shown prominent decrease in nerve conduction velocity which indicated severe demyelination. Among these 30 patients, 6 male subjects had clinical features similar to that of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that male gender, motor neuropathy and mononeuropathies, especially ulnar neuropathy is associated with the development of DF among our patients with DF. Patients with diabetes mellitus have a predisposition to develop chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and this may also facilitate formation of diabetic foot. History of hemiplegia, dementia and trauma are permissive risk factors for diabetic foot in the presence of mild polyneuropathy.