Role of Student Nurse in the Prehospital Medical Teams Responding to the Scene of A Terrorist Attack in France.

BACKGROUND: The terrorist attacks in Paris and in Saint-Denis in November 2015 were unprecedented events involving various human and material resources. These events question the role of nurse students in prehospital teams. PURPOSE: To investigate nursing students' preference about whether they wished to participate in the prehospital care during a terrorist attack. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted with student nurses, from two nursing schools in the Greater Paris area. They completed an anonymous survey assessing the desire to be called to help the mobile intensive care units (MICU) or another ward; whether their presence should be mandatory, and the feelings associated with their experience. The responses were collected with a visual analogue scale and could range from 1 (yes, very much) to 10 (no, not at all). A Chi-square test was performed for qualitative variables and a Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. FINDINGS: Among 225 students, 205 (91%) responded, 133 (65%) were women. When on duty, 169 (82%) would have preferred to accompany the MICU team, compared with 31 (15%) who would have preferred not to go. Overall, 146 students (71%) considered that this presence should be optional. Only gender was significantly associated with the choice to accompany the MICU team (W = 87% vs. M = 13%; p = .002). Students expressed a moderate feeling of frustration and fear. DISCUSSION: Students would prefer to assist the MICU team responding to the scene of a terrorist attack but feel this choice should be optional. A discussion in nursing schools and universities should be considered for the implementation of a "systematic" procedure to ensure the student's willingness to participate in such interventions.

[Impact of extreme temperatures on primary care requirement in France: the CHAUFOS Study (2010-2018).] / Impact des températures extrêmes sur la demande de soins primaires en France : l'étude CHAFO (2010-2018).

INTRODUCTION: The health impact of cold and hot waves is major. Nevertheless, the respective impact of extreme high and low temperatures remains controversial. METHOD: The daily number of (1) patients managed by SAMU 93 dispatching centre – primary care requirement indicator, (2) Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU) interventions – patient severity indicator and (3) number of deaths have been recorded. Daily minimum and maximum temperatures were recorded from 2010 to 2018. The analysis covered the 10 warmest and coldest days of each year (2 × 70 days), and the 30 warmest and coldest days of the total period (2 × 30 days). RESULTS: Over 2,702 days, 1,513,070 patients, 89,478 MICU interventions and 7,350 deaths were analysed. Median temperature: 16.0[10.4-21.6]°C.The coldest days were associated with a significant increase in patients managed (665[609-764] vs 538[474-619]; P < 0.001), MICU interventions (35[32-39] vs 33 [28-38]; P = 0.006) and deaths (3[2-5] vs 2[1-4]; P = 0.0008) considering the 10 days of extreme temperatures in each year and a significant increase in patients managed 615[580-698] vs 542[475-627]; P < 0.001) considering the 30-day extreme of the period.The hottest days were associated with a significant decrease in patients managed (484[443-549] vs 538[474-619]; P < 0.001), MICU interventions (31[25-37] vs 33[28-38]; P = 0.006) and deaths (2[1-3] vs 2[1-4]; P = 0.0008) considering the 10 extreme days of each year and a significant decrease in patients managed (536[479-576] vs 542[475-627]; P < 0.001) considering the 30 extreme days of the period. CONCLUSION: Primary care requirement, number of severe patients and mortality increased significantly with extreme low of temperature.

[Diabetic patients, knowledge respectives complications and severity]. / Connaissance des patients diabétiques sur leur maladie et son traitement, leurs complications et leurs gravités.

Education is at the cornerstone of management of insulin-treated diabetic patient. Previous studies reported that the education of diabetic patients and their entourage was failing, hypothesizing that this lack of education was explained by a lack of knowledge on the disease and its complications and the underestimation of their respective severity. The "Educated Why" suggests that diabetic patients treated with insulin know that hypoglycemia and to a lesser extent diabetes itself are serious or very serious diseases.

Impact of a general practitioners' strike and of terrorist attacks on a call centre.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of the same-day GPs' strike and terrorist attacks on a call centre's activity. METHODS: We compared the number of calls received, the number of patient's medical files (PMFs) created and the number of mobile ICU (MICU) dispatched per hour on Friday, 13 November, to the repository established on the five previous Fridays. As previously published, the variation criterion was set to an activity variation above 20% for more than 2 h. RESULTS: On Friday, 13 November, 1745 calls were received compared with 1455 calls, on average, for the five previous Fridays. The number of calls received increased after the terrorist attacks (≤90%) and remained above the threshold for 3 h. The number of PMFs exceeded the threshold from 10:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m., but was not affected by the attacks. The number of MICUs dispatched exceeded the threshold (>500%) in the first hour after the attacks. CONCLUSION: The GPs' strike and the terrorist attacks did not impact our call centre's activity in the same manner. The strike increased the number of PMFs without increasing the number of calls received. The attacks increased the number of calls received and MICU dispatched without increasing the number of PMFs. Many markers are at the disposal of call centres to evaluate the impact of healthcare events.