Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 73(5): 236-242, 2023 06 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37312576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neck pain and cervical spine disorders are widespread among military cockpit aircrew pilots and are often recognized as occupational stressors. AIMS: This systematic review aimed to identify significant determinants for military pilot neck pain and cervical spine disorders determined through multivariable logistic regression studies. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations of the Statement of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA]-P). The following databases were searched for literature: Medline and Embase. We included studies that studied neck pain, cervical spine disorders, and/or radiological abnormalities and associated exposures (adjusted odds ratios, ORadj) in military cockpit aircrew. The trustworthiness, relevance and results of the published papers were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical checklist. RESULTS: A total of three studies quantified the strength of the correlations between exposures and outcomes. Significant determinants/risk factors of neck pain, cervical spine disorders and radiological abnormalities were identified as age (ORadj: 1.092 [95% CI 1.054, 1.132]), fighter type (ORadj: 3.9 [95% CI 1.1, 13.9]) and absolute rotation angle of C2-7 (ARA) (ORadj: 0.91 [CI 0.85, 0.98]). The following variables were unable to demonstrate statistical significance: flying hours, body height and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Military cockpit aircrew's frequent neck pain after a flight raises concerns about cervical spine disorders. Age, fighter type and ARA C2-7 are strong predictors of neck pain and cervical spine disorders. More research is needed on occupational determinants and risk factors for neck pain and cervical spine disorders in military cockpit aircrew.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial , Militares , Doenças Profissionais , Pilotos , Humanos , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Vértebras Cervicais
2.
Rofo ; 186(9): 876-80, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24648235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conventional rib series (RS) represent a dedicated radiographic technique to visualize the bony parts of the chest wall. The method is commonly used to evaluate minor thoracic trauma, frequently in combination with chest radiographs (CRs). The aim of this study is to asses the clinical relevance of rib fractures diagnosed by RS in minor thoracic trauma. METHODS: Retrospective study of 669 patients who received RS for the evaluation of minor thoracic trauma. 405 of the 669 patients received an additional CR. Radiological reports were classified into fracture versus no fracture. Patients were divided into four groups depending on the clinical follow-up. The findings of RS and CR were analyzed using the McNemar test. The statistical significance between the results of the radiographic examinations and the clinical follow-up was analyzed by the Chi-Square test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: We included 669 patients (61.4 % men, 38.6 % women, median age: 51 years, range: 13 - 92 years). Analyzing the reports of 669 patients who received RS, 157 (23.5 %) patients were diagnosed with at least one fractured rib while no fracture was found in 512 (76.5 %) patients. Considering the 157 patients with fractured ribs, 73 (46.8 %) had a single fracture, 38 (24.4 %) and two fractures and 45 (28.8 %) had more than two fractures. When assessing the 405 CRs, we detected 69 (17 %) fractures while the corresponding RS of the same patients revealed 87 (21.5 %) fractures (p < 0.05). Concerning all patients with rib fractures, 63.1 % received medical therapy, while 64.5 % of those patients without a radiologically documented fracture also received therapy (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a limited clinical value of detected rib fractures based on RS. Despite being superior compared to CR in diagnosing rib fractures, the results from RS seem to have no significant influence on further clinical management and therapeutic measures. Minor thoracic trauma should be evaluated by CR to exclude fracture-associated complications such as hemo- and pneumothorax.


Assuntos
Radiografia Torácica , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/terapia , Costelas/diagnóstico por imagem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa