NEURO-COVAX: An Italian Population-Based Study of Neurological Complications after COVID-19 Vaccinations.

OBJECTIVE: In this Italian population-based study, we aimed to evaluate the neurological complications after the first and/or second dose of COVID-19 vaccines and factors potentially associated with these adverse effects. METHODS: Our study included adults aged 18 years and older who received two vaccine doses in the vaccination hub of Novegro (Milan, Lombardy) between 7 and 16 July 2021. The NEURO-COVAX questionnaire was able to capture the neurological events, onset and duration. That data that were digitized centrally by the Lombardy region were used to match the demographic/clinical characteristics and identify a vulnerability profile. Associations between vaccine lines and the development of complications were assessed. Digital healthcare system matching was also performed to evaluate severe neurological complications (Guillain-Barrè syndrome, Bell's palsy, transverse myelitis, encephalitis) and the incidence of hospital admissions and/or the mortality rate after two doses of the vaccines. RESULTS: The NEURO-COVAX-cohort included 19.108 vaccinated people: 15.368 with BNT162b2, 2077 with mRNA-1273, 1651 with ChAdOx1nCov-19, and 12 with Ad26.COV2.S who were subsequently excluded. Approximately 31.2% of our sample developed post-vaccination neurological complications, particularly with ChAdOx1nCov-19. A vulnerable clinical profile emerged, where over 40% of the symptomatic people showed comorbidities in their clinical histories. Defining the neurological risk profile, we found an increased risk for ChAdOx1nCov-19 of tremors (vs. BNT162b2, OR: 5.12, 95% CI: 3.51-7.48); insomnia (vs. mRNA-1273, OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.02-3.39); muscle spasms (vs. BNT162b2, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08-2.46); and headaches (vs. BNT162b2, OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.96-1.57). For mRNA-1273, there were increased risks of parethesia (vs. ChAdOx1nCov-19, OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.48-3.79); vertigo (vs. ChAdOx1nCov-19, OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.20-2.35); diplopia (vs. ChAdOx1nCov-19, OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.67-3.57); and sleepiness (vs. ChAdOx1nCov-19, OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.98-1.67). In the period that ranged from March to August 2021, no one was hospitalized and/or died of severe complications related to COVID-19 vaccinations. DISCUSSION: This study estimates the prevalence and risk for neurological complications potentially associated with COVID-19 vaccines, thus improving the vaccination guidelines and loading in future personalized preventive medicine.

Immediate adverse events following COVID-19 immunization. A cross-sectional study of 314,664 Italian subjects.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The urgency of having rapidly safe and efficient COVID-19 vaccines called for the need to shorten trial phases, reduce sample sizes, and speed-up the approval process by the regulatory Agencies. In light of this, monitoring adverse effects (AEFI) (both immediate and at medium-long term) become of great importance. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore the associations between several factors and risk of immediate AEFI. METHODS: Data come from the electronic dataset developed ad hoc to record demographic data, anamnesis and data related to immunization, set-up in the mass vaccination site in Novegro (Milan). Novegro mass vaccination site was one of the mass vaccinations sites with the highest flow in Lombardy Region, with a maximum capacity of 5,000 vaccinations/day. The center opened in April 2021 and closed the 1st of August 2021. A multivariable logistic regression model was used. Odds ratios adjusted (aOR) for age and sex are presented. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Analyses were conducting using STATA. RESULTS: Among the total of 314,671 subjects vaccinated, 0.5% developed an immediate AEFI, on average 17.0 ± 0.43 minutes after the administration. The three most frequent AEFI recorded were vagal response (30%), anxiety reaction (24%) and dizziness (21%). AEFI were more frequently observed among women [aOR= 2.24 (95%CI= 2.00 - 2.50)], and those with at least one previous disease [aOR= 1.47 (95%CI= 1.22-1.76)]. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, AEFI were less likely to occur for increasing age and after the second dose. Results from this large, complete and representative sample population regarding enrich the interesting scientific debate on potential adverse events following COVID-19 immunization.

Effect of oral vitamin D2 yearly bolus on hip fracture risk in elderly women: a community primary prevention study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vitamin D deficiency is a well-known risk for hip fracture, and vitamin D insufficiency is so frequent in the elderly that population-wide preventive intervention would be useful. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D bolus on hip fracture incidence in elderly women. METHODS: All women aged > 65 years registered at Health District 20 of the Regione Veneto, Italy, were eligible for this quasi-experimental, prospective community intervention study. A vial containing 400,000 IU vitamin D2 (Ostelin 800, Teofarma, Italy) was offered for oral administration to all women in the winters of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. The only exclusion criteria for treatment were age and gender, and the control group included women who did not participate in the Health District initiative. Analysis of hip fracture incidence was carried out for 4 years, from 1999 to 2002. Patients with incident hip fracture were identified as soon as they were admitted to one of the 3 hospitals of the health district and interviewed regarding their participation in the vitamin D preventive intervention program. In 120 of the women (age range 68-90 years), serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D were measured from October to June, both before and 1 and 4 months after vitamin D administration. RESULTS: 23,325 and 24,747 women received the vitamin D bolus during winters 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 respectively, i.e. 45-47% of eligible women. The proportion of women who accepted the bolus declined with advancing age, from 50-55% in women aged 60-70 years to 22-26% in those aged > 90 years. The two-year intervention on the community decreased the incidence of fracture by 10% (p = 0.050) in comparison with the previous two years. The age-adjusted risk reduction (RR) of hip fracture during 2001 and 2002 in women who had received vitamin D, with respect to women who had not, decreased by 17% (p = 0.056) and 25% (p = 0.005) respectively. The RR was considerably greater and statistically significant over both 2001 and 2002 in the cohort aged > 75 years. 25-OH vitamin D concentrations, in the subset of women in whom it was measured, rose significantly (p < 0.0001) by 9 ng/ml over 4 months after administration. CONCLUSION: Despite several obvious limitations due to its nature, this study sufficiently documents that yearly vitamin D bolus supplements, given as primary prevention to elderly Caucasian women, may decrease the incidence of hip fracture. For its probable safety and excellent feasibility and cost-effectiveness, this primary intervention has a great potential for generalisability.