RESUMO
Background: Different techniques have been described for removing a diseased gall bladder; however, cholecystectomy via the laparoscopic approach is currently regarded as the gold standard. Laparoscopic surgery services are not widely available in low- and middle-income countries and mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy may be a suitable alternative in such circumstances. This technique achieves cholecystectomy with a smaller incision and affords the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Objective: We report our experience over a 2-year period of 24 consecutive patients from two hospitals who underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy to highlight our outcomes with the procedure. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from the surgical theatre procedure register and medical records department of the hospital. Results: During the study period, a total of 24 mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies were performed. Fourteen (58.3%) patients had a clinical diagnosis of calculous cholecystitis whereas 10 (41.7%) patients had symptomatic gallstones. There were four males (16.7%) and 20 females (83.3%) giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:5. The ages ranged from 18 to 68 years with a mean of 46.8 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.7 years) and the mean operating time was 56.3 min (SD = 7.5 min) and ranged from 45 to 72 min. There was no conversion to the traditional large incision cholecystectomy. There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications and there was no mortality in the study. All the patients were discharged 48 h post-op. Conclusion: Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy offers the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure such as good cosmesis and short hospital stay. It has a relatively short operative time and a low incidence of complications and can be practised in a low-resource environment, where laparoscopic services are not available.
RESUMO
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now done in a lot more private and public hospital settings presently in low-income countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. Though it is not routinely done in these centres, the percentage of cholecystectomies done laparoscopically has increased over the years. Laparoscopic surgery services were introduced at our hospital in 2011 and this retrospective study reviews our outcomes with the procedure over a 6-year period. A total of 87 cholecystectomies were done in the period under review. Forty-eight (55.2%) were laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 30 (44.8%) were open cholecystectomies, and 9 (10.3%) were mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies. There were 32 (66.7%) women and 16 (33.3%) men who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:2. The mean age of the patients was 41.0 years (SD = 14.3 years). The most common indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was calculous cholecystitis. The most common co-morbidity was hypertension in 23 (47.9%) patients, followed by sickle cell anaemia in 10 (20.8%) patients. The operating time ranged from 70 min to 120 min with a mean of 86.6 (SD = 14.5). There were three conversions and two intra-operative complications. Twenty-five patients (52.1%) were discharged within 24 h, 16 (33.3%) within 48 h and the rest (14.6%) were discharged later. The duration of surgery had a significant association with duration of hospital stay. There was 1 mortality in our study. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers unique advantages over open such as decreased length of hospital stay and reduced wound complications. Most of the cholecystectomies in our setting are now performed laparoscopically with a low conversion rate and low incidence of bile duct injuries. Patients with sickle cell disease constitute a significant percentage of patients requiring this procedure.