Epidemiology, microbiological, clinical characteristics, and outcome of Burkholderia cepacia complex infections in non-cystic fibrosis adult patients from Qatar.

Objectives: Burkholderia species infections are associated with diverse and challenging clinical presentations because of distinct virulence and antimicrobial resistance factors. The study aims to evaluate the epidemiology, microbiological, and clinical outcomes of Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) infections in non-cystic fibrosis (CF) patients from Qatar. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on adult patients across all hospitals at Hamad Medical Corporation between January 2012 and December 2018 to evaluate clinically relevant Bcc in non-CF adult patients. Results: Over 7 years, 72 episodes of Burkholderia species infections were recorded, 64 were secondary to Bcc primarily affecting males (78.12%) with a mean age of 53 years, from the Middle and Southeastern region (92.2%) affected predominantly by diabetes mellitus (34.4%), chronic kidney (23.4%), coronary heart (20.3%), and hypertensive diseases (17.2%) while recent hospitalization and admission to critical care were evident in 45.3% and 93.8% of cases, respectively. Main infection sites were urinary (43.8%) and respiratory (29.7%) with associated bacteremia recorded in 26.6% of cases. Microbiological characteristics demonstrated high-level resistance profiles leading to delayed microbiological clearance in case of bacteremia (61%) and management with multiple therapeutic agents (range 4-6) resulting in disease resolution in 90.6% of cases with observed 30-day mortality of 7.8%. Conclusions: B. cepacia infections are infrequent, recorded mainly in middle-aged males with chronic comorbidities presenting as urinary, respiratory, and bacteremia associated with hospitalization, admission to critical care, and invasive procedures. High-level antimicrobial resistance is observed necessitating multiple therapeutic agents and suboptimal bacteriological clearance.

Evaluation of mortality attributable to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration using national level data from Qatar.

Accurate determination of mortality attributable to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is critical in allaying concerns about their safety. We reviewed every death in Qatar that occurred within 30 days of any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration between January 1, 2021 and June 12, 2022. Probability of association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was determined by four independent trained reviewers using a modified WHO algorithm. Among 6,928,359 doses administered, 138 deaths occurred within 30 days of vaccination; eight had a high probability (1.15/1,000,000 doses), 15 had intermediate probability (2.38/1,000,000 doses), and 112 had low probability or no association with vaccination. The death rate among those with high probability of relationship to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was 0.34/100,000 unique vaccine recipients, while death rate among those with either high or intermediate probability of relationship to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was 0.98/100,000 unique vaccine recipients. In conclusion, deaths attributable to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are extremely rare and lower than the overall crude mortality rate in Qatar.

Effectiveness of the neutralizing antibody sotrovimab among high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 in Qatar.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 in Qatar at a time in which most SARS-CoV-2 incidences occurred due to the BA.2 Omicron subvariant. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study among all individuals eligible for sotrovimab treatment per United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines in the resident population of Qatar. The odds of progression to severe forms of COVID-19 were compared in cases (treatment group) versus controls (eligible patients who opted not to receive the treatment). Subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 3364 individuals were eligible for sotrovimab treatment during the study period, of whom 519 individuals received the treatment, whereas the remaining 2845 constituted the controls. The adjusted odds ratio of disease progression to severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 comparing the treatment group to the control group was 2.67 (95% confidence interval 0.60-11.91). In the analysis including only the subgroup of patients at higher risk of severe forms of COVID-19, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.17-2.48). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence for a protective effect of sotrovimab in reducing COVID-19 severity in a setting dominated by the BA.2 subvariant.

Favipiravir for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia; a propensity score-matched cohort study.

We retrospectively investigated the clinical outcomes of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients who between 23 May 2020 and 18 July 2020 received ≥ 24 h of favipiravir were assigned to the favipiravir group, while those who did not formed the non-favipiravir group. The primary outcome was 28-day clinical improvement, defined as two-category improvement from baseline on an 8-point ordinal scale. Propensity scores (PS) for favipiravir therapy were used for 1:1 matching. The unmatched cohort included 1493 patients, of which 51.7% were in the favipiravir group, and 48.3% were not receiving supplemental oxygen at baseline. Significant baseline differences between the two unmatched groups existed, but not between the PS-matched groups (N = 774). After PS-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the proportion with 28-day clinical improvement (93.3% versus 92.8%, P 0.780), or 28-day all-cause mortality (2.1% versus 3.1%, P 0.360). Favipiravir was associated with more viral clearance by day 28 (79.8% versus 64.1%, P < 0.001). Adverse events were common in both groups, but the 93.9% were Grades 1-3. Favipiravir therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia is well tolerated but is not associated with an increased likelihood of clinical improvement or reduced all-cause mortality by 28 days.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacterial infections.

We reviewed the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR). Data were retrospectively retrieved for all hospitalized patients who received IV fosfomycin for ≥48 h for the treatment of a DTR GNB between September 27, 2017 and January 31, 2020. A total of 30 patients were included, of which 63.3% were males, and the median age was 63.5 years (IQR 46-73). The median Charlson Comorbidity Score was 6 (IQR 3.8-9). The urinary tract (56.7%) was the most frequent site of infection, and the most frequent target organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (56.7%), and Escherichia coli (23.3%). The majority (76.%) received IV fosfomycin in combination with other antibacterial agents. Clinical improvement was observed in 22 (73.3%), eradication of baseline pathogens in 20 (66.7%), 30-day all-cause mortality in 7 (23.3%), and documented emergent resistance to fosfomycin in 5 (16.7%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events were infrequent and generally mild or moderate in severity. In conclusion, IV fosfomycin is a potentially efficacious and safe treatment option for the treatment of DTR GNB infections. Randomized trials are urgently required to confirm the utility of IV fosfomycin as monotherapy and in combination with other agents.