An indirect comparison of acalabrutinib with and without obinutuzumab vs zanubrutinib in treatment-naive CLL.

ABSTRACT: The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib monotherapy vs zanubrutinib in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma without del(17p) were compared using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Individual patient-level data from ELEVATE-TN (acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab, n = 162; acalabrutinib monotherapy, n = 163) were weighted to match published aggregate baseline data from SEQUOIA cohort 1, which excluded patients with del(17p) (zanubrutinib, n = 241), using variables that were prognostic/predictive of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) in an exploratory Cox regression analysis of ELEVATE-TN. After matching, INV-PFS was longer with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.74) and comparable with acalabrutinib monotherapy (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.53-1.56) vs zanubrutinib. Acalabrutinib monotherapy had significantly lower odds of any grade hypertension vs zanubrutinib (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.99), whereas acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab had significantly higher odds of neutropenia (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.33-3.60) and arthralgia (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.96) vs zanubrutinib. No other significant differences in safety were observed. In summary, acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab had longer INV-PFS with increased odds of neutropenia and arthralgia than zanubrutinib, whereas acalabrutinib monotherapy had similar INV-PFS with lower odds of any grade hypertension. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02475681 and #NCT03336333.

Hypertension treatment for patients receiving ibrutinib: a multicenter retrospective study.

ABSTRACT: Although Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are generally well tolerated and less toxic than chemotherapy alternatives used to treat lymphoid malignancies, BTKis like ibrutinib have the potential to cause new or worsening hypertension (HTN). Little is known about the optimal treatment of BTKi-associated HTN. Randomly selected patients with lymphoid malignancies on a BTKi and antihypertensive drug(s) and with at least 3 months of follow-up data were sorted into 2 groups: those diagnosed with HTN before BTKi initiation (prior-HTN), and those diagnosed with HTN after BTKi initiation (de novo HTN). Generalized estimating equations assessed associations between time varying mean arterial pressures (MAPs) and individual anti-HTN drug categories. Of 196 patients included in the study, 118 had prior-HTN, and 78 developed de novo HTN. Statistically significant mean MAP reductions were observed in patients with prior-HTN who took ß blockers (BBs) with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), (-5.05 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to -0.0596; P = .047), and patients diagnosed with de novo HTN who took either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with HCTZ (-5.47 mmHg; 95% CI, 10.9 to -0.001; P = .05). These regimens also correlated with the greatest percentages of normotensive MAPs. Treatment of HTN in patients taking a BTKi is challenging and may require multiple antihypertensives. Patients with prior-HTN appear to benefit from combination regimens with BBs and HCTZ, whereas patients with de novo HTN appear to benefit from ACEi/ARBs with HCTZ. These results should be confirmed in prospective studies.