Characterizing the Immune Environment in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Insights for Novel Immunotherapy Strategies.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: Carcinomatosis, a distinct pattern of metastatic cancer in the peritoneal cavity, poses challenges for treatment and has limited therapeutic options. Understanding the immune environment of peritoneal surface malignancies is crucial for developing effective immunotherapeutic approaches. This study characterizes soluble immune mediators in the peritoneal fluid of patients with and without carcinomatosis to identify targets for novel treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum and peritoneal fluid samples were collected from surgical patients, and a multianalyte analysis was performed using the Luminex platform. Patient characteristics, tumor sites, and sample collection details were recorded. Soluble immune mediator levels were measured and compared between peritoneal fluid and serum samples and among clinical subgroups. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess differences in analyte concentrations and correlations between samples. RESULTS: There were 39 patients included in the study, with varying surgical indications. Significant differences were observed in soluble immune mediator levels between peritoneal fluid and serum, with peritoneal fluid exhibiting lower concentrations. Carcinomatosis was associated with elevated levels of proinflammatory mediators, including IL-6 and IL-8, while adaptive immune response markers were low in peritoneal fluid. CONCLUSIONS: The peritoneal immune microenvironment in carcinomatosis favors innate immunity, presenting a challenging environment for effective antitumor response. High levels of proinflammatory mediators suggest potential targets for intervention, such as the IL-6 axis, FGF2, IL-8, and CCL2; these could be explored as potential mitigators of malignant ascites and enhance anti-tumor immune responses. These findings provide valuable insights for developing immunotherapy strategies and improving outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Assessing the long-term priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) and priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) survivors. METHODS: Survivors were surveyed via internet-based support groups. The relative importance of longevity, experience, costs, and QOL were assessed. RESULTS: The PD cohort (n = 247, 35%) was 60 ± 12 years, 71% female, and 93% white. With moderate agreement, patients ranked survival most important, followed by functional and emotional well-being; costs and experience were least important (W = 35.7%, p < 0.001). Well-being improved throughout survivorship (P-QOL: 39 ± 12 at ≤3 mo vs 43 ± 12 at >10 y, p = 0.170; M-QOL: 38 ± 13 at ≤3 mo vs 44 ± 16 at >10 y; p = 0.015) but remained below the general population (p < 0.001). PD patients with benign diagnoses ranked functional independence as most important (2.00 ± 1.13 vs 2.63 ± 1.19, p < 0.001, W = 41.1%); PD patients with malignant diagnoses regarded overall survival most important (2.10 ± 1.20 vs 1.82 ± 1.22, p < 0.16, W = 35.1%). The mean rank order of priorities remained concordant between short-term (<1 year) and long-term (>5 years) survivors. CONCLUSION: PD survivors experience long-term mental and physical health impairments, underscoring the importance of functional and emotional support. Survivors place paramount importance on overall survival, functional independence, and emotional well-being. Cancer survivors prioritize longevity, while survivors of chronic benign conditions prioritize functional independence.

Defining the Values and Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An International Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies including cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS±HIPEC) have led to long-term survivorship, yet the subsequent quality of life (QOL) and values of these patients are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Survivors were offered surveys via online support groups. Novel items assessed how patients prioritized experience, costs, longevity, and wellbeing. RESULTS: Of the 453 gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary (GI/HPB) surgical patients that responded, 74 underwent CRS±HIPEC and were 54±12 years old, 87% female, and 93% white. Respondents averaged 29 months from diagnosis, with a maximum survival of 20 years. With a moderate level of agreement (W = 39%), rankings of value metrics among respondents were predictable (p < 0.001). Longevity and functional independence were ranked highest; treatment experience and cost of treatment were ranked lowest (p < 0.001). Those who underwent CRS±HIPEC or other GI/HPB surgeries reported the same rank order. QOL in CRS±HIPEC survivors, both mental (M-QOL) (44±13) and physical (P-QOL) (41±11) were lower than in the general population (50±10); p < 0.001. Impairments persisted throughout survivorship, but M-QOL improved over time (p < 0.05). When comparing CRS±HIPEC with other GI/HPB cancer surgery survivors, M-QOL (43±13 versus 43±14, p = 0.85) and P-QOL (40±11 versus 42±12, p = 0.41) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Although CRS±HIPEC survivors experience long-term mental and physical health impairments, they were similar to those experienced by survivors of other GI/HPB cancer surgeries, and their QOL improved significantly throughout survivorship. As CRS±HIPEC survivors prioritize longevity above all other metrics, survival benefit may outweigh a temporary reduction in QOL.

What is "Value"? Results of a Survey of Cancer Patients and Providers.

BACKGROUND: We measured the importance patients with gastrointestinal cancer and health care providers place on treatment outcomes, quality of life, and costs. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted between June 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. We identified surviving patients who had been treated or were anticipating treatment for pancreatic or gastric cancer at our single institution from January 1, 2000 through January 31, 2020. Surveys assessed the importance patients and providers placed on outcomes, well-being, costs, and experiences. Surveys measured how these values had changed over time. We compared the importance patients and providers place on each of the attributes of value. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients and 164 providers responded. Providers felt experience, emotional well-being, and costs were more important than patients themselves did (all p < 0.05). Patients more commonly reported that survival had become more important to them over time, while providers believed that emotional well-being, experience, and costs had become more important to patients (all p < 0.05). Postoperative patients ranked functional well-being as more important than preoperative patients did (p = 0.031). Patients of lower income and education levels more reported concerns of costs over the course of their care (both p < 0.05). Younger age was associated with concern for direct (r = -0.167, p = 0.004) and indirect costs (r = -0.318, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are consistencies amongst the views of cancer patients and providers, there remain discordances in the perception of value. Patients' values differed across their treatment and survivorship course. These data demonstrate the importance of accounting for multistakeholder perspectives in assessments of value in health care.

Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal neoadjuvant therapy regimen for resectable GA is not defined. METHODS: Utilizing data from 2 high-volume cancer centers, we analyzed patients who underwent surgery for localized GA from 1/1/2000-12/31/2017. Standard CT regimens were used according to treatment period. We compared propensity matched cohorts based on age, sex, race, histology, and clinical stage. RESULTS: Four-hundred five patients (age 62 ± 12 year, 58% male, 56% White) were analyzed. 231 (57%) received CRT and 174 (43%) received CT. Groups differed based on histopathologic characteristics including preoperative stage (p = 0.013). To control for these differences, propensity matched cohorts of 113 CT and 113 CRT patients were compared. CRT had similar frequencies of microscopically negative resections to CT (93% vs 91%, p = 0.81), but higher rates of complete pathologic response (15% vs 4%, p = 0.003) and lower pathologic stage (p = 0.002). Completion of intended perioperative therapy occurred in 63% of CT and 91% of CRT patients (p < 0.001). Median DFS was 45mo (95%CI: 20-70) in the CT group and 113mo (95%CI: 75-151) in the CRT group (p = 0.018). Median OS was 53mo (95%CI: 30-77) versus 120mo (95%CI: 101-138); p = 0.015. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional comparison of neoadjuvant CT and CRT for resectable GA, CRT is associated with higher rates of completed perioperative therapy, higher rates of complete pathologic response, lower pathologic stage, and improved survival.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation as Preoperative Therapy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large, Single-Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: We compared oncologic outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with those of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiation (CRT) for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We compared oncologic and survival outcomes of patients who received CT or CRT for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between July 1995 and July 2018. We analyzed propensity score-matched cohorts based on age, sex, race, tumor histologic characteristics, and clinical stage. RESULTS: We identified 440 patients (mean age 61 ± 12 years, 62% male, 55% white); 345 (78%) received CRT, and 95 (22%) received CT. The propensity score-matched cohorts included 65 patients who received CT and 65 who received CRT. The CRT group had similar frequencies of R1 resection margins to the CT group (7.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.75) but significantly higher frequency of pathologic complete response (27.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). The CRT group had lower pathologic stages (p = 0.002). Median disease-free survival was 50.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7-97.2) in the CT group and 122.1 months (95% CI: 69.0-175.1) in the CRT group (p = 0.07). Median overall survival was 70.7 months (95% CI: 23.9-117.5) in the CT group and 122.1 months (95% CI: 68.7-175.4) in the CRT group (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CT, CRT for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response and subsequent lower final pathologic stage, but survival differences are not significant. Ongoing investigation is necessary to better determine the optimal neoadjuvant therapy and identify patients who receive optimal benefit from CRT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Developing a Value Framework: Utilizing Administrative Data to Assess an Enhanced Care Initiative.

BACKGROUND: There remains no tool to quantify the total value of comparative processes in health care. Hospital administrative data sets are emerging as valuable sources to evaluate performance. Thus, we use a framework to simultaneously assess multiple domains of value associated with an enhanced recovery initiative using national administrative data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Risk-stratified clinical pathways for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery were implemented in 2016 at our institution. We used a national administrative database to characterize changes in value associated with this initiative. Value metrics assessed included in-hospital mortality, complication rates, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and institutional costs. We compared our performance with other hospitals both before and after implementation of the pathways. Metrics were graphed on radar charts to assess overall value. RESULTS: 22,660 cases were assessed. Comparing 75 cases at our institution and 5520 cases at all other hospitals before pathway implementation, mean in-hospital LOS was 9.6 versus 10.8 d, in-hospital mortality was 0.0% versus 1.9%, mean costs were $23,585 versus $21,387, 30-day readmission rates were 1.3% versus 7.4%, and complication rates were 8.0% versus 11.2%, respectively. Comparing 334 cases at our institution and 16,731 cases at all other hospitals after pathway implementation, mean in-hospital LOS was 7.7 versus 10.3 d, in-hospital mortality was 0.3% versus 1.6%, mean costs were $19,428 versus $22,032, 30-day readmission rates were 6.6% versus 7.5%, and complication rates were 6.3% versus 10.3%, respectively. Notably, LOS and institutional costs were reduced at our institution after implementation of the enhanced clinical care pathways. Our costs were higher than comparators before implementation, but lower than comparators after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we used an analytic framework and used national administrative data to assess the value of an enhanced care initiative as benchmarked with data from other hospitals. We thus illustrate how to identify and measure opportunities for targeted improvements in health care delivery. We also recognize the limitations of the use of administrative data in a comprehensive assessment of value in health care.

Laparoscopic HIPEC for Low-Volume Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We seek to determine whether laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (LS-HIPEC) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and low-volume peritoneal metastasis compared with standard of care treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed data from a prospectively maintained database of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to identify patients with radiologically occult carcinomatosis or positive peritoneal cytology, no evidence of distant metastasis, and without disease progression during initial chemotherapy or observation. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of LS-HIPEC on OS. RESULTS: We identified 25 patients who underwent LS-HIPEC and 27 treated with a standard of care approach due to patient (33.3%) or provider (51.9%) preference or financial limitations/lack of insurance coverage (14.8%). Resection was ultimately performed in 28% of LS-HIPEC patients and no standard care patients. At a median follow-up of 18.9 months, median OS was 24.7 (IQR 20.8-34.2) months in LS-HIPEC patients and 21.3 (IQR 12.3-23.1) months in standard care patients (p = 0.08). Three-year OS in the LS-HIPEC group was 19.1%, compared with 9.6% (p = 0.08). Patients who underwent resection had a median OS of 25.3 (IQR 22.6-47.1) months compared with 21.3 months in standard care patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant LS-HIPEC for the treatment of low-volume peritoneal disease in gastric and gastroesophageal cancer patients did not significantly improve OS compared with standard care. Multiinstitutional studies are necessary to further elucidate the benefit of LS-HIPEC for this patient population.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Optimal lymphadenectomy (LAD) for gastric cancer (GC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACXRT) is not defined. This study assessed the prognostic value of LAD extent after modern preoperative therapy for GC. METHODS: The study analyzed patients who underwent resection after NACXRT for GC at the authors' institution. Survival of the patients was compared between D1 and D2 resections and between lymph node (LN) yields (LNY) of fewer than 15 LNs and 15 or more LNs. The patients with early clinical nodal disease (cN0-1) were separately analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Resection of GC was performed for 345 patients after NACXRT. Of these patients, 269 (78%) received a D2 resection, and 277 (80%) had an LNY of 15 LNs or more. There were no differences in length of stay (12[10-16] days vs. 12[10-15] days, p = 0.917) or in any major complication including leak rates, intraabdominal infections, and bleeding (all p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in DFS (p = 0.050) and an OS trend (p = 0.085) based on D1 versus D2. Those who had 15 LNs removed showed a trend toward improved survival (DFS, p = 0.082; OS, p = 0.096). Among the patients with early clinical N stage disease (cN0-1), those who underwent D2 resections had better survival (DFS, p = 0.040; OS, p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GC who underwent resection after NACXRT showed evidence of improved survival after an extended LAD, particularly those with early N stage disease. Perioperative morbidity did not differ based on extent of LAD. Despite the potential effects of tumor downstaging with preoperative therapy, a thorough locoregional lymphatic resection is recommended.

Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with an Increased Risk of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, the influence of operative technique on VTE risk after DP is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the MIS technique versus the open technique and the development of postoperative VTE after DP. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP from 2014 to 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pancreas-specific database. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify independent associations with the development of postoperative VTE after DP. RESULTS: A total of 3558 patients underwent DP during this time period. Of these cases, 47.8% (n = 1702) were performed via the MIS approach. After adjusting for significant covariates, the MIS approach was independently associated with the development of any VTE (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.40; p = 0.025), as well as increasing the risk of developing a postdischarge VTE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.08; p = 0.033) when compared with the open approach. There was an association between VTE and the development of numerous postoperative complications, including pneumonia, unplanned intubation, need for prolonged mechanical ventilation, and cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: Compared with the open approach, the MIS approach is associated with higher rates of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing DP. The majority of these events are diagnosed after hospital discharge.

Staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in patients with early stage gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology can detect occult metastatic disease prior to treatment of gastric cancer. The yield of peritoneal staging in patients with early stage disease is lacking. We assess the yield of peritoneal staging in early stage gastric cancer and its impact on survival. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective database of patients who underwent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology for gastric cancer at our institution between July 1995 and July 2018. Clinical stage was determined by endoscopic ultrasound, and early stage was defined as cT1-2 and cN0. Rates of positive cytology and carcinomatosis at time of laparoscopy were obtained. Univariate analyses were used to compare groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess survival outcomes. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-seven patients underwent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology; 56 were defined as early stage. Age was 61 ± 12 years, 66.4% were male, and 62.3% were white. Of the patients with early stage disease, 17.9% had either gross carcinomatosis (10.7%) and/or positive peritoneal cytology (10.9%). All cases of peritoneal disease were in patients with cT2 disease. There were no differences in age, gender, or race based on peritoneal disease (all p > 0.05). The presence of carcinomatosis or positive cytology significantly affected overall survival (p < 0.001), regardless of clinical T or N stage. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal staging identifies metastatic disease in a significant number of patients with early stage disease. Given its poor prognosis and alternate therapy options, independent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology should be considered in patients with early stage gastric adenocarcinoma.

Yield of peritoneal cytology in staging patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) cancer recommend staging laparoscopy (SL) with peritoneal cytology (PC). However, the reliability of PC is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of PC. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SL and PC for gastric and GE cancer. Test sensitivity of PC for detecting peritoneal disease was assessed. Survival analyses were used to examine the implication of PC. RESULTS: There were 1186 patients that underwent SL and PC; 282 (24%) were found with carcinomatosis. PC was analyzed in 214 (76%) of these patients and 77 (36%) were found to have no malignant cells. In this setting, PC had a sensitivity of 64% for confirming peritoneal disease. Those with peritoneal disease had a poorer 5-year overall survival (5.8% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Those with positive PC without carcinomatosis had a similar survival to those with gross disease with and without cytological confirmation (both P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: PC has limited sensitivity for detecting peritoneal disease. Positive PC alone carries a similar poor survival as in patients with gross carcinomatosis. Improvements in the identification of microscopic disease in peritoneal washings are needed.

Long-term Quality of Life and Gastrointestinal Functional Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a comprehensive assessment of long-term quality of life (QOL) and gastrointestinal (GI) function in patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Survival after PD has greatly improved and thus has resulted in a larger population of survivors, yet long-term QOL and GI function after PD is largely unknown. METHODS: Patients were identified from a global online support group. QOL was measured using the Short Form-36, while GI function was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. QOL and GI function were analyzed across subgroups based on time after PD. QOL was compared with preoperative measurements and with established values of a general healthy population (GHP). Multivariate linear regression was used to identify predictors of QOL. RESULTS: Of the 7605 members of the online support group, 1102 responded to the questionnaire with 927 responders meeting inclusion criteria. Seven hundred seventeen (77.3%) of these responders underwent PD for malignancy. Mean age was 57 ±â€Š12 years and 327 (35%) were male. At the time of survey, patients were 2.0 (0.7, 4.3) years out from surgery, with a maximum 30.7-year response following PD. Emotional and physical domains of QOL improved with time and surpassed preoperative levels between 6 months and 1 year after PD (both P < 0.001). Each GI symptom worsened over time (all P < 0.001). Independent predictors of general QOL in long-term survivors (> 5 years) included total GSRS score [ß = -1.70 (-1.91, -1.50)], female sex [ß = 3.58 (0.67, 6.46)], and being a cancer survivor [ß = 3.93 (0.60, 7.25)]. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term QOL following PD improves over time, however never approaches that of a GHP. GI dysfunction persists in long-term survivors and is an independent predictor of poor QOL. Long-term physical, psychosocial, and GI functional support after PD is encouraged.

Global Gene Expression Change Induced by Major Thoracoabdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that major thoracoabdominal surgery induces gene expression changes associated with adverse outcomes. BACKGROUND: Widely different traumatic injuries evoke surprisingly similar gene expression profiles, but there is limited information on whether the iatrogenic injury caused by major surgery is associated with similar patterns. METHODS: With informed consent, blood samples were obtained from 50 patients before and after open transhiatal esophagectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy. Twelve cases with complicated recoveries (death, infection, venous thromboembolism) were matched with 12 cases with uneventful recoveries. Global gene expression was assayed using human microarray chips. A 2-fold change with a corrected P < 0.05 was considered differentially expressed. RESULTS: In these 24 patients, 522 genes were differentially expressed after surgery; 248 (48%) were upregulated (innate immunity and inflammation) and 274 (52%) were downregulated [adaptive immunity (antigen presentation, T-cell function)]. Hierarchical clustering of the profile reliably predicted pre- and postoperative status. The within-patient change was 3.08 ±â€Š0.91-fold. There was no measurable association with age, malignancy, procedure, surgery length, operative blood loss, or transfusion requirements, but was positively associated with postoperative infection (3.81 ±â€Š0.97 vs 2.79 ±â€Š0.73; P = 0.009) and hospital length of stay (r = 0.583, P = 0.003). Venous thromboembolism and mortality each occurred in one patient, thus no associations were possible. CONCLUSIONS: Major surgery induces a quantifiable pattern of gene expression change that is associated with adverse outcome. This could reflect early impaired adaptive immunity and suggests potential therapeutic targets to improve postoperative recovery.