Balance Control during Stance and Gait after Cochlear Implant Surgery.

BACKGROUND: After cochlear implant (CI) surgery, some patients experience vertigo, dizziness and/or deficits in vestibulo-ocular reflexes. However, little is known about the effect of CI surgery on balance control. Therefore, we examined differences in stance and gait balance control before versus after CI surgery. METHODS: Balance control of 30 CI patients (mean age 59, SD 15.4 years), receiving a first unilateral CI surgery, was measured preoperatively and postoperatively 1 month after the initial implant stimulation (2 months after surgery). Trunk sway was measured during 14 stance and gait tests using an angular-velocity system mounted at lumbar vertebrae 1-3. RESULTS: For pre- versus postoperative comparisons across all 30 patients, a nonsignificant worsening in balance control was observed. Significant changes were, however, found within subgroups. Patients younger than 60 years of age had a significant worsening of an overall balance control index (BCI) after CI surgery (p = 0.008), as did patients with a normal BCI preoperatively (p = 0.005). Gait task measures comprising the BCI followed a similar pattern, but stance control was unchanged. In contrast, patients over 60 years or with a pathological BCI preoperatively showed improved tandem walking postoperatively (p = 0.0235). CONCLUSION: Across all CI patients, CI surgery has a minor effect on balance control 2 months postoperatively. However, for patients younger than 60 years and those with normal balance control preoperatively, balance control worsened for gait indicating the need for preoperative counseling.

Measurements of Trunk Sway for Stance and Gait Tasks 2 Years after Vestibular Neurectomy.

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in balance control for stance and gait tasks in patients 2 years before and after vestibular neurectomy (VN) performed to alleviate intractable Meniere's disease. Amplitudes of trunk sway in roll and pitch directions were measured for stance and gait tasks in 19 patients using gyroscopes mounted at the lower-back. Measurements before VN and 2 years later were compared to those of healthy age-matched controls (HC). We also examined if changes in trunk sway amplitudes were correlated with patients' subjective assessment of disability using the AAO-HNS scale. For patients with low AAO-HNS scores 0-2 (n = 14), trunk roll and pitch sway velocities, standing eyes closed on foam, increased 2 years post VN compared to HC values (p < 0.01). Trunk sway amplitudes remained at levels of HC for simple gait tasks, but task durations were longer and therefore gait slower. For complex gait tasks (stairs), balance control remained impaired at 2 years. In patients with AAO-HNS high scores level 6 (n = 5), balance control remained abnormal, compared to HC, 2 years postoperatively for all stance, several simple and all complex gait tasks. Trunk sway in the pitch and roll directions for stance tasks was correlated with clinical (AAO-HNS) scores (p ≤ 0.05). These results indicate that VN leads to chronic balance problems for stance and complex gait tasks. The problems are greater for patients with high compared to low AAO-HNS scores, thereby explaining the different symptoms reported by these patients. The lack of balance recovery in VN patients to levels of HCs after 2 years contrasts with the 3 months average recovery period for acute vestibular neuritis patients and is indicative of the effects of neurectomy on central compensation processes.

Trunk Instability in the Pitch, Yaw, and Roll Planes during Clinical Balance Tests: Axis Differences and Correlations to vHIT Asymmetries Following Acute Unilateral Vestibular Loss.

BACKGROUND: Clinical dynamic posturography concentrates on the pitch and roll but not on the yaw plane instability measures. This emphasis may not represent the axis instability observed in clinical stance and gait tasks for patients with balance deficits in comparison to healthy control (HC) subjects, nor the expected instability based on correlations with vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) deficits. To examine the axis stability changes with vestibular loss, we measured trunk sway in all three directions (pitch, roll, and yaw) during the stance and gait tasks of patients with acute unilateral vestibular neuritis (aUVN) and compared the results with those of HC. Concurrent changes in VORs were also examined and correlated with trunk balance deficits. METHODS: The results of 11 patients (mean age of 61 years) recorded within 6 days of aUVN onset were compared within those of 8 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). All subjects performed a two-legged stance task-standing with eyes closed on foam (s2ecf), a semi-gait task-walking eight tandem steps (tan8), and four gait tasks-walking 3 m with head rotating laterally, pitching, or eyes closed (w3hr, w3hp, w3ec), and walking over four barriers 24 cm high, spaced 1 m apart (barr). The tasks' peak-to-peak yaw, pitch and roll angles, and angular velocities were measured with a gyroscope system (SwayStarTM) mounted at L1-3 and combined into three, axis-specific, balance control indexes (BCI), using angles (a) for the tandem gait and barriers task, and angular velocities (v) for all other tasks, as follows: axis BCI = (2 × 2ecf)v + 1.5 × (w3hr + w3hp + w3ec)v + (tan8 + 12 × barr)a. RESULTS: Yaw and pitch BCIs were significantly (p ≤ 0.004) greater (88 and 30%, respectively) than roll BCIs for aUVN patients. For HCs, only yaw but not pitch BCIs were greater (p = 0.002) than those of roll (72%). The order of BCI aUVN vs. HC differences was pitch, yaw, and roll at 55, 44, and 31%, respectively (p ≤ 0.002). This difference with respect to roll corresponded to the known greater yaw plane than roll plane asymmetry (40 vs. 22%) following aUVN based on VOR responses. However, the lower pitch plane asymmetry (3.5%) in VOR responses did not correspond with the pitch plane instability observed in the balance control tests. The increases in pitch plane instability in UVL subjects were, however, highly correlated with those of roll and yaw. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that greater yaw than pitch and roll trunk motion during clinical balance tasks is common for aUVN patients and HCs. However, aUVN leads to a larger increase in pitch than yaw plane instability and a smaller increase in roll plane instability. This difference with respect to roll corresponds to the known greater yaw plane than roll plane asymmetry (40 vs. 22%) following aUVN observed in VOR responses. However, the lower pitch plane asymmetry (3.5%) in VOR responses does not correspond with the enhanced movements in the pitch plane, observed in balance control tasks. Whether asymmetries in vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (Vemps) are better correlated with the deficits in pitch plane balance control remains to be investigated. The current results provide a strong rationale for the clinical testing of directional specific balance responses, especially yaw and pitch, and the linking of balance results for yaw and roll to VOR asymmetries.

The effect of prosthetic feedback on the strategies and synergies used by vestibular loss subjects to control stance.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated changes in stance movement strategies and muscle synergies when bilateral peripheral vestibular loss (BVL) subjects are provided feedback of pelvis sway angle. METHODS: Six BVL (all male) and 7 age-matched male healthy control (HC) subjects performed 3 stance tasks: standing feet hip width apart, eyes closed, on a firm and foam surface, and eyes open on foam. Pelvis and upper trunk movements were recorded in the roll and pitch planes. Surface EMG was recorded from pairs of antagonistic muscles at the lower leg, trunk and upper arm. Subjects were first assessed without feedback. Then, they received training with vibrotactile, auditory, and fall-warning visual feedback during stance tasks before being reassessed with feedback. RESULTS: Feedback reduced pelvis sway angle displacements to values of HCs for all tasks. Movement strategies were reduced in amplitude but not otherwise changed by feedback. These strategies were not different from those of HCs before or after use of feedback. Low frequency motion was in-phase and high frequency motion anti-phasic. Feedback reduced amplitudes of EMG, activity ratios (synergies) of antagonistic muscle pairs and slightly reduced baseline muscle activity. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating how vestibular loss subjects achieve a reduction of sway during stance with prosthetic feedback. Unchanged movement strategies with reduced amplitudes are achieved with improved antagonistic muscle synergies. This study suggests that both body movement and muscle measures could be explored when choosing feedback variables, feedback location, and patient groups for prosthetic devices which reduce sway of those with a tendency to fall.

The Effects of Vibro-Tactile Biofeedback Balance Training on Balance Control and Dizziness in Patients with Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD).

BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) frequently report having problems with balance control. Artificial systems providing vibro-tactile feedback (VTfb) of trunk sway to the patient could aid recalibration of "falsely" programmed natural sensory signal gains underlying unstable balance control and dizziness. Thus, the question we examine, retrospectively, is whether such artificial systems improve balance control in PPPD patients and simultaneously reduce the effects of dizziness on their living circumstances. Therefore, we assessed in PPPD patients the effects of VTfb of trunk sway on balance control during stance and gait tests, and on their perceived dizziness. METHODS: Balance control was assessed in 23 PPPD patients (11 of primary PPPD origin) using peak-to-peak amplitudes of trunk sway measured in the pitch and roll planes with a gyroscope system (SwayStar™) during 14 stance and gait tests. The tests included standing eyes closed on foam, walking tandem steps, and walking over low barriers. The measures of trunk sway were combined into a Balance Control Index (BCI) and used to determine whether the patient had a quantified balance deficit (QBD) or dizziness only (DO). The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was used to assess perceived dizziness. The subjects first underwent a standard balance assessment from which the VTfb thresholds in eight directions, separated by 45 deg, were calculated for each assessment test based on the 90% range of the trunk sway angles in the pitch and roll directions for the test. A headband-mounted VTfb system, connected to the SwayStar™, was active in one of the eight directions when the threshold for that direction was exceeded. The subjects trained for 11 of the 14 balance tests with VTfb twice per week for 30 min over a total of 2 consecutive weeks. The BCI and DHI were reassessed each week and the thresholds were reset after the first week of training. RESULTS: On average, the patients showed an improved balance control in the BCI values after 2 weeks of VTfb training (24% p = 0.0001). The improvement was greater for the QBD patients than for the DO patients (26 vs. 21%), and greater for the gait tests than the stance tests. After 2 weeks, the mean BCI values of the DO patients, but not the QBD patients, were significantly less (p = 0.0008) than the upper 95% limit of normal age-matched reference values. A subjective benefit in balance control was spontaneously reported by 11 patients. Lower (36%), but less significant DHI values were also achieved after VTfb training (p = 0.006). The DHI changes were identical for the QBD and DO patients and approximately equal to the minimum clinical important difference. CONCLUSIONS: These initial results show, as far as we are aware for the first time, that providing VTfb of trunk sway to PPPD subjects yields a significant improvement in balance control, but a far less significant change in DHI-assessed dizziness. The intervention benefitted the gait trials more than the stance trials and benefited the QBD group of PPPD patients more than the DO group. This study increases our understanding of the pathophysiologic processes underlying PPPD and provides a basis for future interventions.

The Effect of Roll Circular Vection on Roll Tilt Postural Responses and Roll Subjective Postural Horizontal of Healthy Normal Subjects.

Background: Falls and related injuries are critical issues in several disease states, as well as aging, especially when interactions between vestibular and visual sensory inputs are involved. Slow support surface tilt (0.6 deg/s) followed by subjective postural horizontal (SPH) assessments have been proposed as a viable method for assessing otolith contributions to balance control. Previous assessments of perceived body alignment to vertical, including subjective visual vertical, have suggested that visual inputs are weighted more when vestibular information is near the threshold and less reliable during slow body tilt. To date, no studies have examined the influence of visual stimuli on slow roll-tilt postural responses and the SPH. Therefore, this study investigated how dynamic visual cues, in the form of circular vection (CV), influence postural responses and the perception of the horizontal during and after support surface tilt. Methods: Ten healthy young adults (6 female, mean age 23) wore a head-mounted display while standing on a tilting platform. Participants were asked to remain upright for 30 s, during which (1) the visual scene rotated, inducing roll CV clockwise (CW) or counter-clockwise (CCW) at 60°/s; (2) the platform only (PO) rotated in roll to test SPH (0.6°/s, 2°, CW or CCW); (3) a combination of both; or (4) neither occurred. During SPH trials, participants used a hand-held device to reset the position of the platform to 0.8°/s to their perceived SPH. The angular motion of body segments was measured using pairs of light-emitting diodes mounted on the head, trunk and pelvis. Segment motion, prior to platform motion, was compared to that at peak body motion induced by platform motion and when SPH had been set. Results: When the support surface was tilted 2°, peak upper body tilt significantly increased for congruent CV and platform tilt and decreased at the pelvis for incongruent CV when compared to PO, leading to significant differences across body segments for congruent and incongruent conditions (p ≤ 0.008). During PO, participants' mean SPH deviated from horizontal by 0.2°. The pelvis deviated 0.2°, the trunk 0.3°, and the head 0.5° in the direction of initial platform rotation. When platform tilt and CV directions were congruent or incongruent, only head tilt at SPH reset under congruent conditions was significantly different from the PO condition (1.7° vs. 0.5°). Conclusions: Roll CV has a significant effect on phasic body responses and a less significant effect on tonic body responses to lateral tilt. The SPH of the support surface was not altered by CV. Responses during tilt demonstrated enhanced reactions for congruent and reduced reactions for incongruent CV, both different from responses to CV alone. Tonic body displacements associated with SPH were changed less than those during tilt and were only slightly larger than displacements for CV alone. This study supports the hypothesis of weighted multisensory integration during dynamic postural tasks being highly dependent on the direction of visual cues during tilt and less dependent on tonic SPH offsets. These techniques could be used to examine vestibular and visual interactions within clinical populations, particularly those with visual vertigo and dizziness.

Tinnitus before and 6 months after cochlear implantation.

In this prospective multicenter study, tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress were investigated in 174 cochlear implant (CI) candidates who underwent CI surgery at a Swiss cochlear implant center. All subjects participated in two session, one preoperatively and one 6 months after device activation. In both sessions, tinnitus loudness was assessed using a visual analogue scale and tinnitus distress using a standardized tinnitus questionnaire. The data were compared with unaided pre- and postoperative pure tone thresholds, and postoperative speech reception scores. 71.8% of the subjects reported tinnitus preoperatively. Six months after CI surgery 20.0% of these reported abolition of their tinnitus, 51.2% a subjective improvement, 21.6% no change and 7.2% a deterioration. Of the 49 (28.2%) subjects with no tinnitus preoperatively, 5 developed tinnitus 6 months after CI. These 5 had poorer speech understanding after CI surgery with their device than the group who remained tinnitus free. We found no correlation between tinnitus improvement, age, duration of tinnitus, or change in unaided hearing thresholds between the two sessions.

Acute unilateral vestibular neuritis contributes to alterations in vestibular function modulating circumvention around obstacles: A pilot study suggesting a role for vestibular signals in the spatial perception of orientation during circumvention.

Background: Walking among crowds avoiding colliding with people is described by patients with vestibular disorders as vertigo-inducing. Accurate body motion while circumventing an impeding obstacle in the gait pathway is dependent on an integration of multimodal sensory cues. However, a direct role of vestibular signals in spatial perception of distance or orientation during obstacle circumvention has not been investigated to date. Materials and methods: We examined trunk yaw motion during circumvention in patients with acute unilateral vestibular loss (aUVL) and compared their results with age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Subjects performed five gait tasks with eyes open two times: walk 6 m in total, but after 3 m, circumvent to the left or right, as closely as possible, a cylindrical obstacle representing a person, and then veer back to the original path; walk 6 m, but after left and right circumvention at 3 m, veer, respectively, to the right, and left 45 deg; and walk 6 m without circumvention. Trunk yaw angular velocities (YAVs) were measured using a gyroscope system. Results: Yaw angular velocity peak amplitudes approaching to, and departing from, the circumvented object were always greater for patients with aUVL compared to HCs, regardless of whether passing was to the aUVLs' deficit or normal side. The departing peak YAV was always greater, circa 52 and 87%, than the approaching YAV for HCs when going straight and veering 45 deg (p ≤ 0.0006), respectively. For patients with aUVL, departing velocities were marginally greater (12%) than approaching YAVs when going straight (p < 0.05) and were only 40% greater when veering 45 deg (p = 0.05). The differences in departing YAVs resulted in significantly lower trajectory-end yaw angles for veering trials to the deficit side in patients with aUVL (34 vs. 43 degs in HCs). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the effects of vestibular loss on yaw velocity control during the three phases of circumvention. First, approaching an obstacle, a greater YAV is found in patients with aUVL. Second, the departing YAV is found to be less than in HCs with respect to the approaching velocity, resulting in larger deficit side passing yaw angles. Third, patients with UVLs show yaw errors returning to the desired trajectory. These results could provide a basis for rehabilitation protocols helping to avoid collisions while walking in crowded spaces.

Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain improvements at peak head acceleration and velocity following onset of unilateral vestibular neuritis: Insights into neural compensation mechanisms.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit (aUPVD) due to vestibular neuritis causes deficient yaw axis vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) gains. Using video head impulse tests (vHITs), we examined phasic and tonic velocity gains of the VOR over time to determine if these differed at onset and during subsequent improvement. METHODS: The VOR responses of 61 patients were examined within 5 days of aUPVD onset, and 3 and 7 weeks later using vHIT with mean peak yaw angular velocities of 177°/s (sd 45°/s) and mean peak accelerations of 3660°/s2 (sd 1300°/s2). The phasic velocity or acceleration gain (aG) was computed as the ratio of eye to head velocity around peak head acceleration, and the tonic velocity gain (vG) was calculated as the same ratio around peak head velocity. RESULTS: aG increased ipsi-deficit from 0.45 at onset to 0.67 at 3 weeks and 7 weeks later, and vG increased ipsi-deficit from 0.29 to 0.51 and 0.53, respectively, yielding a significant time effect (p < 0.001). Deficit side aG was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than vG at all time points. Deficit side gain improvements in aG and vG were similar. Contra-deficit aG increased from 0.86 to 0.95 and 0.94 at 3 weeks and 7 weeks, and vG contra-deficit increased from 0.84, to 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, also yielding a significant time effect (p = 0.004). Contra-deficit aG and vG were normal at 3 weeks. Mean canal paresis values improved from 91% to 67% over the 7 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Acceleration and velocity VOR gains on the deficit side are reduced by aUPVD and improve most in the first 3 weeks after aUPVD onset. Deficit side aG is consistently higher than deficit side vG following an aUPVD, suggesting that acceleration rather than velocity sensitive compensatory neural mechanisms are predominant during the compensation process for aUPVD.

A link between frontal white matter integrity and dizziness in cerebral small vessel disease.

One in three older people (>60 years) complain of dizziness which often remains unexplained despite specialist assessment. We investigated if dizziness was associated with vascular injury to white matter tracts relevant to balance or vestibular self-motion perception in sporadic cerebral small vessel disease (age-related microangiopathy). We prospectively recruited 38 vestibular clinic patients with idiopathic (unexplained) dizziness and 36 age-matched asymptomatic controls who underwent clinical, cognitive, balance, gait and vestibular assessments, and structural and diffusion brain MRI. Patients had more vascular risk factors, worse balance, worse executive cognitive function, and worse ankle vibration thresholds in association with greater white matter hyperintensity in frontal deep white matter, and lower fractional anisotropy in the genu of the corpus callosum and the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus. A large bihemispheric white matter network had less structural connectivity in patients. Reflex and perceptual vestibular function was similar in patients and controls. Our results suggest cerebral small vessel disease is involved in the genesis of dizziness through its effect on balance.

Trunk sway in mildly disabled multiple sclerosis patients with and without balance impairment.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes a broad range of neurological symptoms. Most common is poor balance control. However, knowledge of deficient balance control in mildly affected MS patients who are complaining of balance impairment but have normal clinical balance tests (CBT) is limited. This knowledge might provide insights into the normal and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying stance and gait. We analysed differences in trunk sway between mildly disabled MS patients with and without subjective balance impairment (SBI), all with normal CBT. The sway was measured for a battery of stance and gait balance tests (static and dynamic posturography) and compared to that of age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. Eight of 21 patients (38%) with an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 1.0-3.0 complained of SBI during daily activities. For standing on both legs with eyes closed on a normal and on a foam surface, patients in the no SBI group showed significant differences in the range of trunk roll (lateral) sway angle and velocity, compared to normal persons. Patients in the SBI group had significantly greater lateral sway than the no SBI group, and sway was also greater than normal in the pitch (anterior-posterior) direction. Sway for one-legged stance on foam was also greater in the SBI group compared to the no SBI and normal groups. We found a specific laterally directed impairment of balance in all patients, consistent with a deficit in proprioceptive processing, which was greater in the SBI group than in the no SBI group. This finding most likely explains the subjective symptoms of imbalance in patients with MS with normal CBT.

First trial postural reactions to unexpected balance disturbances: a comparison with the acoustic startle reaction.

Unexpected support-surface movements delivered during stance elicit "first trial" postural reactions, which are larger and cause greater instability compared with habituated responses. The nature of this first trial reaction remains unknown. We hypothesized that first trial postural reactions consist of a generalized startle reaction, with a similar muscle synergy as the acoustic startle response, combined with an automatic postural reaction. Therefore we compared acoustic startle responses to first trial postural reactions. Eight healthy subjects stood on a support surface that unexpectedly rotated backwards 10 times, followed by 10 startling acoustic stimuli, or vice versa. Outcome measures included full body kinematics and surface EMG from muscles involved in startle reactions or postural control. Postural perturbations and startling acoustic stimuli both elicited a clear first trial reaction, as reflected by larger kinematic and EMG responses. The ensuing habituation rate to repeated identical stimuli was comparable for neck and trunk muscles in both conditions. Onset latencies in neck muscles occurred significantly later for first trial perturbations compared with startle responses, but earlier in trunk muscles. Our results show that platform tilting initially induces reactions larger than needed to maintain equilibrium. For neck and trunk muscles, these first trial postural reactions resembled acoustic startle reflexes. First trial postural reactions may be triggered by interaction of afferent volleys formed by somatosensory and vestibular inputs. Acoustic startle reactions may also be partially triggered by vestibular inputs. Similar muscle activation driven by vestibular inputs may be the common element of first trial postural responses and acoustic startle reactions.

Differentiating malingering balance disorder patients from healthy controls, compensated unilateral vestibular loss, and whiplash patients using stance and gait posturography.

Differentiating balance disorder patients who are malingering from those with organic balance disorders is difficult and costly. We used trunk sway measured during several stance and gait tasks in 18 patients suspected of malingering in order to differentiate these from 20 patients who had suffered unilateral vestibular loss 3 months earlier, 20 patients with documented whiplash injuries, and 34 healthy controls. Classification results ranged from 72 to 96% and were equally accurate for task or criteria variables based on 90% sway values. The tasks yielding the best discrimination were: standing with eyes closed on a foam and firm surface; standing with eyes open on a firm surface; standing on 1 leg; and walking tandem steps. The criteria yielding the best discrimination were: standing with eyes open on a firm surface; the difference between standing with eyes closed on foam and firm surfaces; the difference between walking tandem steps and standing on 1 leg with eyes open; and the difference between roll and pitch velocity when walking 8 tandem steps. We conclude that discriminating suspected malingering balance disorder patients is possible using variables or criteria based on objective measures of trunk sway during several stance and gait tasks.

Magnet displacement: a rare complication following cochlear implantation.

The purpose of this paper is to describe cases which reported complication after cochlear implantation in children: displacement of magnet from the receiver pocket, possibly aided by the use of magnetic toys. We observed magnet displacement in two female children from the same family and in one male child. Age at implantation was 23, 51, and 24 months, respectively. Magnet displacement occurred at 37, 16, and 32 months, respectively after the initial surgery. The magnets were replaced under general anaesthesia and we did not observe recurrent magnet dislodgement. Measurements indicated that forces required to remove the magnet from its pocket were not greater than those exerted by magnetic toys or the magnet used in the external sender coil. Although magnet displacement is not common after cochlear implantation, it is a major complication in children where subsequent general anaesthesia and surgery are necessary to replace the magnet. Therefore, we propose that pockets for removable magnets of cochlear implants used in children should be redesigned to increase forces to remove the magnet or that removable magnets not be used at all.

Improvement of Asymmetric Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Responses Following Onset of Vestibular Neuritis Is Similar Across Canal Planes.

Background: We examined whether, after onset of acute unilateral vestibular neuritis (aUVN), initial disease effects, subsequent peripheral recovery and central compensation cause similar changes in vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) gains in all 3 semi-circular canal planes. Methods: 20 patients, mean age 56.5 years, with pathological lateral canal video head impulse test (vHIT) VOR gains due to aUVN, were subsequently examined with vHIT in all 3 canal planes on average 4.3 and 36.7 days ("5 weeks") after aUVN onset. Results: Lateral and anterior deficit side (DS) average gains equaled 0.41 at aUVN onset. Non-deficit, normal, side (NS) gains were 0.88 and 0.81, respectively. Mean posterior DS gain was similar at onset, 0.43, provided only gains lower than 0.6 (lower limit of healthy controls) were considered. NS posterior mean gain at onset (0.68) was less (p ≤ 0.0006) than lateral and anterior NS gains. After 5 weeks, DS lateral, anterior and posterior canal gains increased (p ≤ 0.05), on average, to 0.65, 0.59, and 0.58, respectively. NS gains increased to 0.91, 0.87, and 0.76 (p = 0.007), respectively. At 5 weeks deficit-lateral/normal-lateral canal plane gain asymmetries were significantly (p < 0.0008) reduced from 36.9 to 19.4%, deficit-anterior/normal-posterior asymmetry decreased from 28.6 to 18.1%, while deficit-posterior/normal-anterior asymmetry changed from 29.7 to 21.4%, all to circa 20%. Roll plane asymmetries decreased slightly over 5 weeks (28.6-18.1%) but pitch plane asymmetries remained significantly less (p = 0.001), not different from 0% regardless of initial DS posterior canal vHIT gain. Yaw plane asymmetry changes are identical to those of the lateral canals (36.7-19.4%). Conclusions: These results indicate that, at onset, aUVN of the superior vestibular nerve has a similar effect on lateral and anterior deficit DS VOR gains, and on posterior DS canal VOR gains if the inferior nerve was also affected at onset. The significant improvements to equal 5 week levels of DS gains and slightly greater posterior NS gain improvements, compared to lateral and anterior NS gains, yielding a common canal plane gain asymmetry of 20% at 5 weeks, suggest similar neural compensation mechanisms were active along VOR pathways. Unexpectantly, canal plane improvement was not replicated in pitch plane asymmetries.

Correlations Between Multi-plane vHIT Responses and Balance Control After Onset of an Acute Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Deficit.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies reported that balance deficits in pitch (sagittal) and roll (lateral) planes during stance and gait after onset of an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit (aUPVD) due to vestibular neuritis are weakly correlated with deficits in commonly explored lateral canal vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) responses. Theoretically, stronger correlations with roll and pitch balance deficits could be expected for vertical canal VOR responses. Therefore, we investigated these correlations. SETTING: University Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. PATIENTS: Thirty three patients examined on average 5 days following onset of aUPVD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Video head impulse test (vHIT) VOR gains in each vertical canal plane were converted to roll and pitch response asymmetries and correlated with patients' roll and pitch balance control measured during stance and gait with body-worn gyroscopes mounted at lumbar 1 to 3. RESULTS: Mean caloric canal paresis was 92 ±â€Š12%. Deficit side lateral vHIT mean gain was 0.4 ±â€Š0.12, anterior gain 0.44 ±â€Š0.18, and posterior gain, greater, 0.69 ±â€Š0.15. Lateral VOR response gain asymmetries (37.2 ±â€Š11.0%) were greater than roll VOR asymmetries calculated from all four vertical canal vHIT gains (16.2 ±â€Š10.2%, p < 0.0001) and correlated (R = 0.56, p = 0.002). Pitch gain VOR asymmetries were less (4.9 ±â€Š9.9%, p < 0.0001). All gait, but no stance, trunk roll angular velocity measures were correlated (p ≤ 0.03) with VOR roll asymmetries. CONCLUSIONS: This report links roll balance control deficits during gait with roll VOR deficits and emphasises the need to perform anterior canal vHIT to judge effects of an aUPVD on balance control. Pitch VOR asymmetries were weakly affected by vestibular neuritis.

The Effect of Unilateral Vestibular Loss on Standing Balance During Postural Threat.

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular deficit patients have an increased fall risk and fear of falling. Postural threat, known to increase balance-related fear and anxiety, influences vestibular gains during quiet standing in young healthy adults. The current study examined whether there is a similar relationship for peripheral unilateral vestibular loss (UVL) patients in comparison to age-matched healthy controls (HC). SETTING: University laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective laboratory study. PATIENTS AND CONTROLS: Eleven UVL patients, nine with vestibular neurectomy. Eleven aged-matched HCs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects stood on a hydraulic lift placed at two heights: low (0.8 m, away from the edge) and high (3.2 m, at the edge). Amplitude (root mean square), mean power frequency (MPF), and mean position were analyzed for center of foot pressure (COP) and 90% ranges for angle amplitude and velocity for trunk sway. RESULTS: Group interactions were strongest for anterior-posterior (AP) COP and trunk pitch angle. AP lean away from the edge was greater in HCs than UVLs. HCs, but not UVLs had a decrease in root mean square AP COP with height. Trunk pitch sway was changed similarly. Both groups had increased trunk pitch velocity at height. Changes with height were less for roll: MPF of lateral COP increased with height for UVLs with no changes for HCs, and trunk roll amplitude decreased for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides evidence for a differential effect of height induced postural threat on balance control between UVLs and HCs presumably due to the reduced vestibular-spinal gain in UVL subjects.

Influence of virtual reality on postural stability during movements of quiet stance.

INTRODUCTION: Balance problems during virtual reality (VR) have been mentioned in the literature but seldom investigated despite the increased use of VR systems as a training or rehabilitation tool. We examined the influence of VR on body sway under different stance conditions. METHODS: Seventeen young subjects performed four tasks (standing with feet close together or tandem stance on firm and foam surfaces for 60s) under three visual conditions: eyes open without VR, eyes closed, or while viewing a virtual reality scene which moved with body movements. Angular velocity transducers mounted on the shoulder provided measures of body sway in the roll and pitch plane. RESULTS: VR caused increased pitch and roll angles and angular velocities compared to EO. The effects of VR were, for the most part, indistinguishable from eyes closed conditions. Use of a foam surface increased sway compared to a firm surface under eyes closed and VR conditions. CONCLUSION: During the movements of quiet stance, VR causes an increase in postural sway in amplitude similar to that caused by closing the eyes. This increased sway was present irrespective of stance surface, but was greatest on foam.

Functional Testing of Vestibulo-Spinal Contributions to Balance Control: Insights From Tracking Improvement Following Acute Bilateral Peripheral Vestibular Loss.

Background: A battery of stance and gait tasks can be used to quantify functional deficits and track improvement in balance control following peripheral vestibular loss. An improvement could be due to at least 3 processes: partial peripheral recovery of sensory responses eliciting canal or otolith driven vestibular reflexes; central compensation of vestibular reflex gains, including substitution of intact otolith responses for pathological canal responses; or sensory substitution of visual and proprioceptive inputs for vestibular contributions to balance control. Results: We describe the presumed action of all 3 processes observed for a case of sudden incapacitating acute bilateral peripheral loss probably due to vestibular neuritis. Otolith responses were largely unaffected. However, pathological decreases in all canal-driven vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) gains were observed. After 3 months of vestibular rehabilitation, balance control was normal but VOR gains remained low. Conclusions: This case illustrates the difficulty in predicting balance control improvements from tests of the 10 vestibular end organs and emphasizes the need to test balance control function directly in order to determine if balance control has improved and is normal again despite remaining vestibular sensory deficits. This case also illustrates that the presence of residual otolithic function may be crucial for balance control improvement in cases of bilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Comparison of a Low-Cost Miniature Inertial Sensor Module and a Fiber-Optic Gyroscope for Clinical Balance and Gait Assessments.

Objective: To investigate whether a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) inertial sensor module is as accurate as fiber-optic gyroscopes when classifying subjects as normal for clinical stance and gait balance tasks. Methods: Data of ten healthy subjects were recorded simultaneously with a fiber-optic gyroscope (FOG) system of SwayStar™ and a MEMS sensor system incorporated in the Valedo® system. Data from a sequence of clinical balance tasks with different angle and angular velocity ranges were assessed. Paired t-tests were performed to determine significant differences between measurement systems. Cohen's kappa test was used to determine the classification of normal balance control between the two sensor systems when comparing the results to a reference database recorded with the FOG system. Potential cross-talk errors in roll and pitch angles when neglecting yaw axis rotations were evaluated by comparing 2D FOG and 3D MEMS recordings. Results: Statistically significant (α=0.05) differences were found in some balance tasks, for example, "walking eight tandem steps" and various angular measures (p < 0.03). However, these differences were within a few percent (<2.7%) of the reference values. Tasks with high dynamic velocity ranges showed significant differences (p=0.002) between 2D FOG and 3D MEMS roll angles but no difference between 2D FOG and 2D MEMS roll angles. An almost perfect agreement could be obtained for both 2D FOG and 2D MEMS (κ=0.97) and 2D FOG and 3D MEMS measures (κ=0.87) when comparing measurements of all subjects and tasks. Conclusion: MEMS motion sensors can be used for assessing balance during clinical stance and gait tasks. MEMS provides measurements comparable to values obtained with a highly accurate FOG. When assessing pitch and roll trunk sway measures without accounting for the effect of yaw, it is recommended to use angle and angular velocity measures for stance, and only angular velocity measures for gait because roll and pitch velocity measurements are not influenced by yaw rotations, and angle errors are low for stance.