Efficacy of A-line AEP Monitor as a tool for predicting acceptable tracheal intubation conditions during sevoflurane anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: It is essential for the clinical anaesthetist to know whether patients are sufficiently anaesthetized to tolerate direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Because of the lack of an accurate objective method to determine the level of general anaesthesia, under- or overdosing of anaesthetics may occur. Auditory evoked potential (AEP) is one of several physiological parameters under investigation. We aimed to determine the clinically required depth of anaesthesia, measured by the A-line AEP Monitor and expressed as A-Line ARX Index (AAI) for 90% probability of acceptable conditions for endotracheal intubation. METHODS: We studied 108 patients anaesthetized by mask with increasing concentration of sevoflurane in 30% oxygen and 70% nitrous oxide. Fentanyl 1.5 microg kg(-1) and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg were administered intravenously immediately before starting induction of anaesthesia. The monitor was programmed to give an alarm at AAI 10, 15, 20, 25 or 30 according to randomization. When the alarm sounded, the end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was registered and endotracheal intubation was attempted. Intubation conditions were assessed by an observer blinded to the AAI. RESULTS: At AAI 10 we found acceptable conditions in 91% (confidence interval [CI 72-99%]) of patients. The prediction probability value P(K) of AAI was 0.69 (CI 0.59-0.79) and the P(K) of end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was 0.93 (CI 0.87-0.99). ED(90) (the AAI with a 90% probability of acceptable intubation conditions) was calculated as 8.5 (CI 0-17.5). CONCLUSIONS: AAI indicates the depth of anaesthesia necessary for acceptable endotracheal intubation conditions. Under the conditions of the present study, end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was a better predictor and may turn out to be more useful in the clinical setting.

Effect of sevoflurane on the mid-latency auditory evoked potentials measured by a new fast extracting monitor.

BACKGROUND: Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) are widely suppressed during general anesthesia and may therefore be useful for assessment of the depth of anesthesia. However, interpretation of amplitudes and latencies in the AEP signal is time consuming. A new monitor (A-line) that quantifies the MLAEP into an index has therefore been developed. The present study aimed to assess the precision of a prototype of the new monitor and to test the hypothesis that the depth of anesthesia index shows a graded response with changing steady-state end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane. METHODS: We studied 10 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing elective hysterectomy under combined epidural and general anesthesia by sevoflurane. Baseline auditory evoked potentials were recorded in the conscious patient immediately before induction of general anesthesia. Depth of anesthesia indices were recorded before anesthesia and at decreasing end-expiratory steady-state sevoflurane concentrations of 2.0%, 1.5%, 1.0% and 0.5%. All indices were recorded in duplicate 6 s apart. By use of an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX-model), the monitor extracted the AEP within 6 s. The depth of anesthesia AEP index calculated in this way was defined as the A-line ARX index (AAI). RESULTS: Approximately 95% of the differences between repeated recordings were 5 AAI-units or less. A wide interindividual variation was observed at each observation point. AAI at 1%, 1.5% and 2% end-expiratory concentration was significantly less than the baseline AAI obtained before induction of anesthesia (P < 0.001). AAI did not change significantly in the 1-2% concentration range. CONCLUSION: The new monitor was precise. Attenuation of the A-line ARX-index (AAI) for mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) during general anesthesia was profound. However, the monitor did not show a graded response with changing end-expiratory steady-state concentrations of sevoflurane.

Efficacy of the A-line AEP monitor as a tool for predicting successful insertion of a laryngeal mask during sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical signs for assessing depth of anesthesia is unreliable during periods with little noxious stimulation. A patient may appear adequately anesthetized at one moment at a given level of stimulation, but may later, when facing other more intense stimuli, show signs of insufficient anesthesia. In order to prevent under- or overdosing of anesthetics, an anesthesia depth monitor that is able to predict responses to noxious stimulation would therefore be useful. Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) is one of several physiological parameters under investigation. The method has been improved by rapid extraction and conversion of the AEP curve into an index (A-Line ARX Index = AAI). We aimed to determine the clinically required depth of anesthesia, measured by the A-line AEP Monitor, for at least 90% probability of acceptable insertion conditions for a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). METHODS: We studied 112 patients anesthetized by mask with increasing concentration of sevoflurane in oxygen. The monitor was programmed to give an alarm at AAI between 15 and 40 according to randomization. When the alarm sounded, the end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was recorded and the LMA inserted. Insertion conditions were assessed by an observer blinded to the AAI. RESULTS: The ED(95) and prediction probability (P(K)) for AAI were 14.5 (CI 7.4-21.6) and 0.76 (0.66-0.86), respectively, while the ED(95) and P(K) for expiratory sevoflurane concentration were 4.36% (CI 3.73-4.98) and 0.95 (0.91-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: AAI indicates the level of depth of anesthesia necessary for acceptable laryngeal mask insertion conditions. End-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was the better predictor.