Total aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated physician-modified endografts, at least 3-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total aortic arch repair with at least 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a pathological aortic arch who underwent aortic arch repair combined with a homemade double-fenestrated stent graft from 2017 to 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS: 74 patients were treated for pathological arch conditions with a double-fenestrated PMEG. Of these, 81% were male, the mean age was 69.9 years, and 59% were classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 3 or 4. Thirty-five percent were treated for a postdissection aneurysm, 36% for a degenerative aneurysm, and 14% for acute type B dissection. Fifteen percent had supra-aortic trunk dissection. Fenestration on the subclavian artery was performed in 96%; if not, a carotid-subclavian bypass was carried out. Technical success was 100%. The proximal landing zone is consistently in zone 0. Early outcomes revealed a 3% occurrence of type 1 endoleak, which was successfully treated by prompt reintervention. One retrograde dissection occurred, and one patient died from hemorrhage on an iliac conduit. A 5% stroke rate was reported. During long-term follow-up (mean time 40.7 months), one type 1 endoleak appeared and was successfully treated; no type 2 or type 3 endoleak requiring intervention occurred. No stent fractures or migrations were reported. Four percent of patients required reintervention, but no surgical conversion to open surgical repair was needed on the aortic arch. No patient died from a cause related to the main procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Total aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated PMEGs is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. It is suitable for the main aortic pathologies. Moreover, it is easily available for emergency situations.

Ex Vivo Comparison of the Elastic Properties of Vascular Substitutes Used for Pulmonary Artery Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Study aims were to evaluate the elastic properties of vascular substitutes frequently used for pulmonary artery (PA) replacement, and then to compare their compliance and stiffness indexes to those of human PA. METHODS: A bench-test pulsatile flow experiment was developed to perfuse human cadaveric vascular substitutes (PA, thoracic aorta, human pericardial conduit), bovine pericardial conduit, and prosthetic vascular substitutes (polytetrafluorethylene and Dacron grafts) at a flow and low pulsed pressure mimicking pulmonary circulation. Intraluminal pressure was measured. An ultrasound system with an echo-tracking function was used to monitor vessel wall movements. The diameter, compliance, and stiffness index were calculated for each vascular substitute and compared to the human PA at mean pressures ranging from 10 to 50 mmHg. RESULTS: The compliance of the PA and the thoracic aorta were similar at mean physiological pressures of 10 mmHg and 20 mmHg. The PA was significantly less compliant than the aorta at mean pressures above 30 mmHg (P = 0.017). However, there was no difference in stiffness index between the two substitutes over the entire pressure range. Compared to the PA, human pericardial conduit was less compliant at 10 mmHg (P = 0.033) and stiffer at 10 mmHg (P = 0.00038) and 20 mmHg (P = 0.026). Bovine pericardial conduit and synthetic prostheses were significantly less compliant and stiffer than the PA for mean pressures of 10, 20, and 30 mmHg. There were no differences at 40 and 50 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Allogenic arterial grafts appear to be the most suitable vascular substitutes in terms of compliance and stiffness for PA replacement.

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is currently a challenge for vascular surgeons, because of the early morbidity and mortality rates and the high risk of late aortic events up to 50% at 5 years. This study presents the initial outcomes of ATBAD treatment using optimal medical therapy alone or combined with proximal entry tear stent-graft coverage. Additionally, it provides an analysis of the evolution of the aortic diameter and its clinical consequences during the chronic phase in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conducted as a retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled all consecutive ATBAD patients (n=130) treated between 2008 and 2020. The primary analysis studies the entire patient cohort based on their initial management approach, namely, medical treatment alone for uncomplicated ATBAD (n=67) or combined with stent-graft entry tear coverage (n=63). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate factors associated with disease progression in the medical management group. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29.5 months. During this time aneurysmal evolution was observed in: 42.4% of cases in the medical group compared with 21.8% in the stent-graft group, primarily affecting the thoracic aorta. The stent-graft group exhibited significant aortic remodeling, with a decrease in false lumen (FL) and thoracic aortic diameters. Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and FL ≥22 mm were independent risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. Five-year survival was consistent at 76.1% in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of stent-graft entry tear coverage for ATBAD. Initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) appears to reduce late aortic events by promoting aortic remodeling. Considering TEVAR's safety and potential to prevent late aortic complications, it may be considered for uncomplicated ATBAD patients with an initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm or an FL ≥22 mm. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study validates the efficacy and safety of using endovascular stent grafts to seal the proximal entry tear in cases of acute type B aortic dissections, compared to optimal medical therapy. Aortic remodelling significantly benefits from endovascular stent graft coverage of the proximal entry tear. Given the heightened risk of late aortic events observed in the medical therapy cohort, there appears to be a necessity for including endovascular interventions in the management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections, particularly when aortic diameter is ≥40 mm and false lumen diameter is ≥22 mm.

Ascending aorta anastomotic aneurysm exclusion with double-fenestrated PMEG after open repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this case series is to investigate the outcomes of double-fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in patients with distal anastomotic aneurysms following open repair of the ascending aorta or proximal arch replacement. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a distal anastomotic aneurysm following open ascending aorta surgery who underwent aortic arch repair with a homemade double-fenestrated stent-graft from 2017 to 2023 were reviewed. Study endpoints included technical success, 30-day, and long-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and re-interventions. RESULTS: 10 patients were treated with double-fenestrated PMEGs for anastomotic aneurysms following open surgery of the ascending aorta. Of these, nine were male with a mean age of 58 years. Nine patients were initially treated for acute dissection, and two had mechanical aortic valves. The mean time between open surgery and the treatment of the pseudoaneurysm was 4.15 years. Technical success was 100%. The proximal landing zone was consistently in zone 0, and all endografts were deployed via femoral access. Early outcomes revealed one endoleak (type 1a), which was successfully treated by prompt reintervention. No deaths or strokes occurred during the early postoperative period. During long-term follow-up (mean time 35 months), no endoleaks requiring intervention occurred, and there were no reports of stent fractures or migrations. No patient died from an aortic-related cause. CONCLUSION: Aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated PMEGs for distal anastomotic aneurysms after open surgery is feasible and represents a promising alternative in patients ineligible for redo surgery.

Zone 2 Aortic Arch Repair With Single-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts, at Least 3 Years of Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to report the efficiency and safety of single-fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in zone 2 aortic arch pathologies with at least 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: All consecutive patients with a pathological aortic arch who underwent aortic repair combined with homemade single-fenestrated stent-graft from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. The patients with a target vessel different from the left subclavian artery (LSA) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were treated for a pathological arch in zone 2 with a single-fenestrated PMEG. 73% were male, and the mean age was 65 years old. 25% were treated for a degenerative aneurysm, 19% for a post dissection aneurysm and 24% for an acute type B dissection. 52% of the patients were treated as an emergency and half of those for an aortic rupture. The LSA fenestration was stented in 70%. During 30 days of follow-up, 2 strokes (3%) were reported, 6 patients (10%) died with 4 of those treated for aortic rupture and 1 had a retrograde aortic dissection. During at least 3 years of follow-up (median 49 months), no reintervention was needed for endoleaks, there was no stent fracture or stent migration. No patient died from an aortic cause. Subgroup analysis comparing the endovascular treatment for various aortic pathologies did not find significant differences in death rate or comorbidity including stroke. When comparing emergent and elective aortic repair, operating time was similar (64 vs 65 minutes), and the LSA fenestration was less frequently stented (52%) in the emergency group. There was no difference in stroke frequency. There was a higher rate of death in the emergency group at 30 days of follow-up, but no patient died from aortic cause in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic arch repair with single-fenestrated PMEGs for zone 2 pathological arch disease is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. It is suitable for emergency situations. CLINICAL IMPACT: Single-fenestrated PMEG for the left subclavian artery is a safe and efficient option in the short and medium term for the treatment of the aortic arch in zone 2 with 98% technical success. It allows for aortic repair and subclavian artery revascularization in a single step for all patients. It is suitable for a range of main pathologies, including degenerative, dissection-related, isthmus rupture, and embolic pathologies. Additionally, it is always available and easily utilized in emergency cases.

Double Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Graft for Endovascular Treatment of Traumatic Aortic Isthmus Rupture With an Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility of urgent endovascular treatment of a traumatic aortic isthmus rupture in a patient with an aberrant right subclavian artery. CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old man was admitted to a regional trauma center after a motor vehicle collision and found to have cerebral trauma and a large pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch. Trauma computed tomography (CT) identified a blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury with an aortic false aneurysm in the context of an aberrant right subclavian artery. A hybrid repair was performed with bilateral subclavian carotid bypasses and a double fenestrated physician-modified stent graft. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. Postoperative CT scan showed sealing of the aortic arch rupture and patency of all the supra-aortic trunks. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury is considered first-line therapy. Aortic arch anomalies add complexity to treatment. This report demonstrates that a hybrid strategy with bilateral carotid-axillary bypasses and homemade double fenestrated endograft of the aortic arch is a valuable approach for this challenging emergency in the context of an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endovascular Grafts for Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery and/or Kommerell's diverticulum.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series is to report feasibility, efficiency, and safety of fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in aortic arch pathologies with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and/or Kommerell's diverticulum (KD). METHODS: All consecutive patients with ARSA and/or KD who underwent hybrid aortic arch repair combined with homemade fenestrated stent-graft from 2018 to 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Six patients with ARSA and/or KD underwent hybrid surgery for aortic repair, 4 of whom were men, with a mean age of 49 years. Furthermore, 2 of them were symptomatic with dysphagia, 1 was taken in emergency, 1 had a bovine arch and a KD, and 2 had right descending thoracic aortas. The mean operation time was 138 (111-216) minutes. In addition, 83% of the homemade grafts were double fenestrated. All the proximal landings were in zone 0; the mean proximal aortic diameter was 29 (23-34) mm. The range of diameters for the endografts were 24 to 38 mm. There was a 100% technical success, with 0% 30 days mortality, no stroke, and no endoleak. During the follow-up, no aortic-related death or secondary intervention was required and all supra-aortic vessels remain patent. CONCLUSION: Hybrid aortic arch repair, with fenestrated PMEGs for ARSA and/or KD, is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. CLINICAL IMPACT: This retrospective case series analyzed outcomes in 6 patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery and/or Kommerell's diverticulum treated with fenestrated PMEGs during an average 16 month follow-up. The case series suggests that the use of these fenestrated PMEGs for the management of patients with an aberrant right subclavian artery is a safe, effective and durable method in the medium-term.

Physician-Modified Stent Graft for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries: Do the Benefits Worth the Trouble?

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a suitable proximal landing zone in blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI) often necessitates coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) in this indication. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry including all patients who had undergone a thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for BTAI from October 2008 to October 2020. Starting in 2015, patients requiring coverage of the LSA were either treated using a physician-modified proximal scalloped or single-fenestrated stent graft. After an early postoperative computed tomography scan, follow-up was performed at 3 months, 6-months, and yearly. RESULTS: Among 58 patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI, 23 (39.6%) patients required a zone 2 landing zone of which 10 (17.2%) patients were treated with PMEGs. The median age was 48 [31-64.5] years, and 78.2% (n = 18) patients were male. The median Injury Severity Score was 38 [27-55.5]. Coverage of the LSA was performed in 25.8% (n = 15) of the total population in which 5 patients had an LSA transposition. The median modification time was 18 [14-27] minutes. Technical success of PMEGs was 90.0% overall and 100% for fenestrated stent grafts. No stroke, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection was observed. The primary patency of the LSA in the PMEGs group was 90 % at 1 year and 28.8 % in the LSA coverage group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PMEGs is feasible and effective in the management of BTAI with a short proximal landing zone. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes and durability are awaited.

Homemade fenestrated physician-modified stent grafts for arch aortic degenerative aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the early- and medium-term outcomes of single- and double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular degenerative aortic arch aneurysm repair. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 52 patients from August 2013 through January 2021 who had undergone homemade fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative aortic aneurysms. In all cases, a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA) was fashioned and was the only one stented. For a double-fenestrated endograft, a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated both the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery was added. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients with degenerative aortic arch aneurysms were treated. Of the 52 patients, 36 were men, the mean age was 75 ± 8 years, 31% had received a single LSA fenestration, and 69% had undergone double-fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Of the 52 procedures, 5 (10%) were emergent procedures. The technical success was 100%. The median time required for stent graft modification was 22 ± 6 minutes. The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). Five patients (10%) had experienced a cerebrovascular event, including two transient ischemic attacks, one minor stroke with full neurologic recovery, and two with sequelae. Two patients (4%) had experienced perioperative retrograde dissection during follow-up. No patient had developed a type I, II, or III endoleak from the LSA. No patient had required reintervention. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 18 ± 11 months, no patient had required conversion to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, or paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Single or double PMEG is a safe and suitable tool for the treatment of high morbidity pathology such as aortic arch degenerative aneurysm repair. In addition, this device can be used in patients requiring elective or emergency repair.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy After Induction Therapy for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: New Study Results and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become a mainstay of modern thoracic surgery practice and the technique of choice for resection of early-stage lung cancers. However, the benefits of VATS following induction therapy are yet to be clarified. This study aims to assess whether VATS lobectomy achieves similar perioperative and oncologic outcomes compared to thoracotomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer after induction therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 72 patients who underwent lung lobectomy after induction therapy in our institution from January 2017 to January 2020. Subsequently, we carried out a comprehensive literature search and pooled our results with available data from previously published studies to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS: VATS was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.05) and less perioperative complications (P = 0.04) in our local institution. The meta-analysis comprised nine studies. A total of 943 patients underwent VATS and 2827 patients underwent open lobectomy. VATS was associated with significant shorter surgery duration (P < 0.0001), shorter chest-tube drainage duration (P < 0.0001), and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was significantly less perioperative complications (P = 0.006) and less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.036) in the VATS group. However, there were no significant differences in 3-y overall survival and 3-y disease-free survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: In some selected patients undergoing induction therapy, VATS lobectomy could achieve equivalent perioperative outcomes to thoracotomy but evidence is lacking on oncologic outcomes. Further trials with a focus on oncologic outcomes and longer follow-up are required.

Fate of the Dissected Thoraco-Abdominal Aorta Distal to TEVAR (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair) for Complicated Acute and Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection.

PURPOSE: This study assessed morphological changes in the aortic true and false lumens during follow-up of patients undergoing TEVAR (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair) for complicated acute and subacute type B dissection. The study analyzes the effectiveness of TEVAR in preventing distal aneurysmal progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients between 2009 and 2019 undergoing TEVAR for complicated acute and subacute type B dissection at the study institution were retrospectively reviewed. Maximal diameters were measured on the proximal descending aorta right below the left subclavian artery, thoraco-abdominal junction right above the celiac trunk, and infrarenal aortic right above the inferior mesenteric artery, pre-operatively and during follow-up, analyzing either expansion or shrinkage of true and false lumens at these 3 sites. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included. Thirty-day incidence of death, stroke, paraplegia, and visceral ischemia was, respectively, 8% (n = 4), 6% (n = 3), 2% (n = 1), and 2% (n = 1). Three patients (6%) died from intervention-related cause. Mortality was 17% (n = 8) during a mean follow-up of 54 months. One patient had aneurysmal dilation of the descending aorta needing additional coverage and only 2 (4%) developed thoraco-abdominal aneurysms requiring re-intervention. In the remaining patients, both significant expansion of the true lumen and shrinkage of false lumen were observed at all 3 sites. CONCLUSION: Proximal coverage of the main entry tear appears to prevent aneurysmal progression in most patients (96%). With such promising results, TEVAR should be considered as a first-line treatment in acute and subacute type B dissection.

Total Arch Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Double Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts: 100 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate early and medium-term outcomes of double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts for total endovascular aortic arch repair. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected data included 100 patients, from January 2017 to December 2021, undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 0. The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brach2iocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented. RESULTS: The median duration for stent-graft modification was 23±6 minutes. Of the 100 patients, 70 were men. The mean patient age was 70±10.5 years. Indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n=32), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissections (n=23) and (n=19) after type B dissections, acute complicated type B dissection (n=16), and other pathologies (n=10). Technical success rate was 97%. The 30 day mortality was 2% (n=2). Four patients (4%) had minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (1%) had a type IA endoleak, 1 patient (1%) had a type IB endoleak, and 2 patients (2%) have a type II endoleak from the LSA. Eight patients (8%) required reintervention: 1 type IA endoleak, 1 type IB endoleak, 1 retrograde type A dissection, and 5 because of access-related complications. During a mean follow-up of 24±7.2 months, there were no aortic rupture, paraplegia, and all supra-aortic trunks were patent. CONCLUSIONS: Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT: Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair avoiding the need for anatomical and extra-anatomical surgical revascularization. The standout feature of this double fenestrated device is its simple handling during operation with the proximal fenestrations being directed to the orifices of the BT and LCCA automatically when the LSA fenestration is catheterized and secured by covered stent placement. The deployment algorithm actively steers the operator away from superfluous manipulations of the device within the arch and avoids guidewire manipulation in carotid arteries. The long-term durability will need to be assessed in studies with long-term follow-up.

Late Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Radiation Therapy-Induced Carotid Stenosis.

PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) appears as a promising alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy for radiation therapy (RT)-induced carotid stenosis. However, this is based on a poor level of evidence studies (small sample size, primarily single institution reports, few long-term data). The purpose of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of a multicentric series of CAS for RT-induced stenosis. METHODS: All CAS for RT-induced stenosis performed in 11 French academic institutions from 2005 to 2017 were collected in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, clinical risk factors, elapsed time from RT, clinical presentation and imaging parameters of carotid stenosis were preoperatively gathered. Long-term outcomes were determined by clinical follow-up and duplex ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of cerebrovascular events during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included perioperative morbidity and mortality rate, long-term mortality rate, primary patency, and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one CAS procedures were performed in 112 patients. The mean interval between irradiation and CAS was 15 ± 12 years. In 31.4% of cases, the lesion was symptomatic. Mean follow-up was 42.5 ± 32.6 months (range 1-141 months). The mortality rate at 5 years was 23%. The neurologic event-free survival and the in-stent restenosis rates at 5 years were 87.8% and 38.9%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (p=0.02) and single postoperative antiplatelet therapy (p=0.001) were found to be significant predictors of in-stent restenosis. Freedom from target lesion revascularization was 91.9% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: This study showed that CAS is an effective option for RT-induced stenosis in patients not favorable to carotid endarterectomy. The CAS was associated with a low rate of neurological events and reinterventions at long-term follow-up.

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (Modified Appleby Procedure) and Arterial Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Resectability of pancreatic carcinoma (PC) is directly linked to vascular extension (Tempero MA et al. in J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15(8):1028-1061, 2017. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131 ; Isaji S et al. in Pancreatology 18(1):2-11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.011 ). Involvement of the celiac axis (CA) is typically a contraindication to surgery. High postoperative morbidity and subsequent poor prognosis have been observed in this case, especially for contact > 180° requiring arterial resection (Tempero MA et al. 2017). Recent medical advances in PC treatment, such as FOLFIRINOX-based chemotherapy eventually followed by chemoradiation therapy, offer the potential to select tumour for surgery and to obtain a negative-margin resection even in case of unresectable PC at diagnosis (Suker M et al. in Lancet Oncol 17(6):801-10, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00172-8 ; Pietrasz D et al. in Ann Surg Oncol 26(1):109-117, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6931-6 ). A major pathologic response has been observed in more than 20% of patients after this treatment and is associated with an improved survival (Suker M et al. 2016; Pietrasz D et al. 2019). This evolution allows aggressive surgical strategies with the possibility of long-term disease control for patients showing a good response to induction treatment. PATIENT: This video presents the case of a 66-year-old man diagnosed with a locally advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body with a 360° involvement of the CA and the hepatic artery. After eight courses of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and a capecitabin-based chemoradiation, a surgical exploration was planned for potential resection. TECHNIQUE: The key steps of the procedure are presented, i.e. surgical exposition, assessment of resectability with frozen sections of peri-arterial tissues, en bloc resection (Strasberg SM et al. in Surgery 133(5):521-527, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.146 ), and primary end-to-end arterial reconstruction. CONCLUSION: A modified Appleby operation for locally advanced PC is a technically challenging but feasible procedure in experienced teams. It offers the possibility of en bloc R0 resection of a locally advanced PC with the potential of long-term disease local control. This video may help surgeons to perform this complex intervention.

Early outcomes of native and graft-related abdominal aortic infection managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of infected aortic cases has shifted from extra-anatomic to in situ. This study reports the surgical strategy and early outcomes of abdominal aortic reconstruction in both native and graft-related aortic infection with in situ xenopericardial grafts. METHODS: Included in the analysis are 21 consecutive patients (mean age, 69 years; 20 male) who underwent abdominal xenopericardial in situ reconstruction of native aortic infection (4) and endovascular (4) or open (13) graft aortic infection between July 2017 and September 2019. All repairs were performed on an urgent basis, but none were ruptured. All patients were followed up with clinical and biologic evaluation, ultrasound at 3 months, and computed tomography scan at 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%; 8 patients were treated with xenopericardial tubes and 13 with bifurcated grafts. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7% (one death due to pneumonia with respiratory hypoxic failure in critical care.). Six patients (28%) developed acute kidney injury, four (19%) requiring temporary dialysis; five fully recovered and one died. Four patients (19%) required a return to the operating room. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-26 months), overall mortality was 19% (n = 4). Two patients presented with recurrent sepsis after reconstruction, leading to death due to multiorgan failure. Other patients (17/21) have discontinued antibiotics with no evidence of recurrence of infection clinically, radiologically, or on blood tests. Computed tomography scans at 1 year demonstrated no stenosis or graft dilation and one asymptomatic left graft branch thrombosis. Primary patency is 95%. CONCLUSIONS: In situ xenopericardial aortic reconstruction is a safe and effective management strategy for both native and graft-related abdominal aortic infection with good short-term results. The graft demonstrates appropriate resistance to infection such that reliable eradication of infection in this vascular bed is possible. Longer follow-up is required in future studies to determine the durability of the reconstruction and need for reinterventions.

Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the early- and medium-term outcomes of using double fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total endovascular aortic arch repair. METHODS: The present single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 50 patients from January 2017 through October 2019, who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The fenestrations were a proximal larger fenestration that incorporated the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal smaller fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Only the LSA fenestration was stented. RESULTS: The median duration for stent graft modification was 26 ± 6 minutes. Of the 50 patients, 41 were men. The mean patient age was 68 ± 11.5 years. The indications for treatment included degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n = 17), dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after type A dissection (n = 13), type B dissection (n = 13), aortic ulcer (n = 3), and other pathologies (n = 4). The technical success rate was 94% (47 of 50) overall, and 100% (28 of 28) after a technical modification incorporating a preloaded guide wire for the LSA fenestration (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1). Two patients (4%) had a minor stroke with full recovery. One patient (2%) had a type IB and two patients (4%) had a type II endoleak from the LSA. Four patients (8%) required reintervention: one because of a type IB endoleak and three because of access-related complications. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 8.3 months, no conversions to open surgical repair were required and no aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Using double fenestrated PMEGs for TEVAR is both feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair, avoiding the need for anatomic and extra-anatomic surgical revascularization. The absence of brachiocephalic trunk stenting was not associated with endoleaks or treatment failure and resulted in a lower stroke risk than alternative strategies. The midterm results suggest that stenting of the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery might not be necessary for a large proportion of patients undergoing total endovascular aortic arch repair. The persistence of the seal and ongoing durability require assessment in studies with long-term follow-up data available.

Elective late open conversion after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with comparable outcomes to primary open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Three of four patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm are now treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The incidence of secondary procedures and surgical conversions is increasing for a population theoretically unfit for open surgery. The indications and outcomes of late open surgical conversions after EVAR in a high-volume tertiary vascular unit are reported. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study includes all patients who underwent a late open conversion between January 1996 and July 2018. Data were collected from records on patient demographics, operative indications, surgical strategy, perioperative outcomes, and medium-term survival. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients (88.7% male) with a mean age of 77.5 years are included. The median duration since index EVAR was 38.5 months; 65% of stent grafts requiring late open conversion had suprarenal fixation. Indications included 22.6% type IA, 16.1% type IB, and 45.2% type II endoleaks; 12.9% graft thrombosis; and 14.5% endoprosthesis infection. Complete endograft explantation was performed in 37.1% of patients and a partial explantation in 54.8%, whereas 8.1% of stent grafts were wholly preserved in situ. Overall 30-day mortality was 12.9% (n = 8) in the cohort and 2.7% for elective patients. The all-cause morbidity rate was 40.1%, and the median length of hospital stay was 9 days. After follow-up of 28.4 months (range, 1.8-187.3 months), all-cause survival was 58.8%. Avoidance of aortic clamping (P = .006) and elective procedures (P = .019) were associated with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay. Moreover, the 30-day mortality (P = .002), occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction (P = .004), and intestinal ischemia (P = .017) were increased in the emergency setting. Excluding cases with rupture or infection, survival estimates were 97%, 97%, and 71% at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Technically more complex than primary open surgery, late open conversion is a procedure that generates an acceptable perioperative risk when it is performed in a high-volume aortic surgical center. Elective open conversion is associated with excellent early and late outcomes. Endograft preservation strategies decrease perioperative morbidity.

Prevention of Retrograde Ascending Aortic Dissection by Cardiac Pacing During Hybrid Surgery for Zone 0 Aortic Arch Repair.

BACKGROUND: Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after zone 0 hybrid aortic arch repair is highly lethal and not infrequent complication. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of rapid cardiac pacing as an adjunctive tool to prevent RTAD during or after hybrid procedures for zone 0 disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 42 consecutive patients with zone 0 hybrid aortic arch repair between November 2004 and January 2018. Right ventricular pacing was carried out through unipolar electrodes attached to the epicardium of the right ventricle through the sternotomy (the indifferent electrode was in the subcutaneous tissue). Pacing was utilised during the clamping of the ascending aorta, release of the aortic clamp, and stent-graft deployment. RESULTS: Operative indications were aortic arch aneurysm 45% (n = 19), aortic arch dissection 45% (n = 19), traumatic rupture of isthmus 7% (n = 3), and type IA endoleak 2% (n = 1). Urgent procedures 48% (n = 20). The mean proximal aortic diameter was 34.14 ± 2.9 mm. Mean stent-graft oversizing was 12.97 ± 3.4%. The 30-day mortality rate was 14% (n = 6). RTAD was observed in 7% (n = 3). The actuarial survival rate was 74% over a mean follow-up of 50 ± 30.2 months. Since January 2013, rapid right ventricular pacing (overdrive pacing at a rate of 200 beats/min) was systematically used (n = 24). No RTAD was observed in this group of patients. Rapid right ventricular pacing reduced significatively the risk of RTAD (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid right ventricular pacing is an effective method of inducing hypotension and appears to decrease the risk of retrograde type A dissection after zone 0 hybrid aortic arch repair.

Asymptomatic Internal Carotid Aneurysm: An Uncommon Disease of the Carotid Arteries.

Despite a low-incidence extracranial carotid artery aneurysm (ECAA) disease has important clinical repercussion that obliges understanding and knowledge of correct treatment. The 2 dominant etiologies are atherosclerotic degeneration and pseudoaneurysm. The natural history of ECAAs is understood. Neck pain, a pulsatile mass and central or peripheral neurological manifestations are the most common symptoms. Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment are not uniform and still under discussion, representing a challenge for clinicians. We discuss a case of 2.5 cm asymptomatic saccular atherosclerotic ECAA treated surgically in light of the most recent literature.

Midterm Follow-up of Fenestrated and Scalloped Physician-Modified Endovascular Grafts for Zone 2 TEVAR.

Purpose: To investigate the midterm outcomes of scalloped or fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: Between November 2013 and May 2019, 54 consecutive patients (mean age 63 years; 41 men) were treated with thoracic PMEGs modified with 7 scallops or 47 fenestrations for the left subclavian artery (LSA). Indications for aortic repair were acute complicated type B aortic dissection (17, 31%), degenerative aneurysm (13, 24%), acute traumatic rupture of the aortic isthmus (9, 16%), post chronic dissection aneurysmal evolution (8, 15%), penetrating aortic ulcer (3, 6%), intramural hematoma (2, 4%), and floating thrombus (2, 4%). Results: Technical success was 94%; 3 (6%) LSAs were unintentionally covered. An intraoperative type Ia endoleak was treated during the index procedure. One (2%) patient suffered spinal cord ischemia, with irreversible bilateral paraplegia. Three (6%) patients experience postoperative minor strokes with full neurological recovery. Four (7%) patients died in the perioperative period; 2 (2%) were due to aneurysm rupture. Mean follow-up was 26±16 months; 15 (28%) patients had at least 3 years of follow-up. Two (4%) type II endoleaks were identified and successfully treated (4% reintervention rate); no other endoleaks were identified. All the LSAs remained clinically and radiologically patent. There were no conversions to open repair, ruptures, retrograde dissection, stent fracture, migrations, or other aortic complications. Conclusion: Scalloped or single-fenestrated PMEGs for the LSA appear to be durable and safe in the midterm. Combined with low periprocedural morbidity and mortality, these results suggest that this approach can be considered as an off-label alternative to extend proximal seal to zone 2 for TEVAR. Further studies with a larger number of patients and long-term outcomes are needed to fully validate this approach.