RESUMO
PURPOSE: Prescription errors are a common cause of adverse drug events (ADEs). Recognizing ADEs can significantly contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to investigate the type and prevalence of errors in prescription writing, directed toward a needs assessment for developing educational interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in Jeddah community pharmacies (January-February 2016). A random sample of 117 prescriptions were reviewed and analyzed by community pharmacists for legibility and omission of the information in the prescription. RESULTS: Results revealed that 51% of the prescriptions included diagnosis, in which 62% included the recommended drug dosage. Only 7% of drug interactions were reported between the prescribed drugs, 17% of the physicians prescribed drugs that prevented the adverse effects used for diagnosis. Prescriptions for chronic conditions were scrutinized to be 18%. It was noteworthy that 29% of the pharmacists reported difficulty in reading the handwriting of prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of prescription writing is deficient in some elements and strategies for improvement are needed. These findings underscore a crucial requirement to upgrade the quality of prescription writing by encouraging continuous medical education programs to facilitate delivery of excellent therapeutic outcomes.