Off-Pump to On-Pump Emergency Conversion: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Short- and Long-Term Results.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Emergency conversion to on-pump during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) increases morbidity and mortality. We analyze its risk factors and impact on short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2006 and 2012 were included. Postoperative and midterm mortality and the combined event (death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization) were compared between patients with and without conversion. Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1268 patients were operated off pump and 37 patients required an emergency conversion. Postoperative death and combined event were more frequent among patients who were converted (31.6% vs. 3.31%, p < 0.001 and 43.2% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conversion was an independent predictor of both events (OR = 6.22, 95%CI: 2.01 to 19.3 and OR = 5.06, 95%CI: 2.41 to 10.61, respectively). Mean follow-up was 32.5 months. At four years, survival and freedom from the combined event was poorer for conversion (75% vs. 88%, p < 0.001 and 50% vs. 79%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conversion was an independent predictor for late mortality (HR = 2.4, 95%CI: 1.1 to 5.22) and the risk of combined event (HR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.79 to 4.91). A 3:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed: conversion increased both perioperative and four-year mortality (12.6% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001 and 25% vs. 12%, p = 0.007); and early and late incidence of the combined event (43.2% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001 and 53% vs. 24%, p = 0.001). Preoperative atrial fibrillation and previous percutaneous coronary intervention were independent predictors of conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency conversion from off- to on-pump CABG dramatically worsens early and late outcomes. Previous percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation increase the risk of conversion.

Impact of postoperative acute kidney failure in long-term survival after heart valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of acute kidney failure after a heart valve procedure among patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: All patients who had undergone a surgical valve procedure between 2005 and 2017 at our institution were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had previous history of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) or not. Homogeneous groups were obtained by propensity score matching. Long-term mortality was compared between the 2 groups and according to the occurrence of postoperative acute kidney failure. Level of significance was set at P-value <0.008 for multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: From the 3907 patients included to this study, 1476 (37.78%) had previous history of CKD. After adjusting for propensity score 1:1, patients with preoperative impaired renal function were at a higher risk of acute kidney failure (26.83% vs 10.16%, P < 0.001) and postoperative mortality (8.48% vs 5.17%, P = 0.001). In the follow-up, they had a poorer survival at 1, 5 and 10 years as compared to patients with normal renal function (88% vs 91.95%, 78.29% vs 81.11% and 56.13% vs 66.29%, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients without postoperative kidney failure had similar survival whether they had preoperative CKD or not [hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, 99.2% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.52; P = 0.142]. As compared to patients with postoperative preserved renal function, those with postoperative kidney failure had a higher long-term mortality either if they had previous kidney disease or not [(HR 2.18, 99.2% CI 1.75-2.72; P < 0.001) and (HR 1.48, 99.2% CI 1.33-1.65; P < 0.001), respectively]. Preoperative CKD was the strongest predictor of acute kidney failure (odds ratio 4.45; 95% CI 3.59-5.53; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD are at higher risk of postoperative adverse events and have poorer long-term outcomes. Postoperative acute kidney failure increases long-term mortality.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.

Objectives: The evidence of the benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients of high or intermediate surgical risk is not consistent. We performed a meta-analysis to compare major adverse outcomes after TAVR or SAVR. Methods: We searched propensity score matched studies or randomized clinical trials comparing the risks of mortality, stroke, major bleeding, acute renal injury, pacemaker implantation, vascular complications and prostheses haemodynamic performance between TAVR and SAVR in patients with moderate or high risk. Combined odds ratios (ORs), relative risk or mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Analyses of sensitivity and publication bias were also conducted. Results: We included 5 clinical trials and 37 observational studies, enrolling 20 224 patients (TAVR, n = 9099 and SAVR, n = 11 125). The pooled analysis suggested no differences in early (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.9-1.39, P = 0.355) or late mortality (relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.05, P = 0.194). TAVR was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.69, P < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.71) but with an increase in the incidence of pacemaker implantation (OR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.73-3.08) and vascular complications (OR = 4.88, 95% CI 2.84-8.39). Residual aortic regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR (OR= 6.83, 95% CI 4.87-9.6). SAVR prostheses were associated with poor trans-prosthetic gradients (mean difference: -2.4 mmHg, 95% CI - 3.27 to - 1.53). Conclusions: TAVR and SAVR have similar short and long-term all-cause mortality and risk of stroke among patients of moderate or high surgical risk. TAVR decreases the risk of major bleeding, acute kidney injury and improves haemodynamic performance compared with SAVR but increases the risk of vascular complications, the need for a pacemaker and residual aortic regurgitation.

Mid-term outcomes after off-pump coronary surgery in patients with prior intracoronary stent.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of patients undergoing heart surgery have had a prior coronary stent placement. This study was designed to examine the effect of this situation on the mid-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OP-CABG) surgery. METHODS: A comparative retrospective non-randomized comparison was performed as follows: all patients undergoing OP-CABG from January 2005 to December 2009 at our centre were divided into two groups: those who did or did not have stents at the time of surgery. We compared the incidences of the following events: (i) death and (ii) combined major adverse cardiac events (MACEs): death, myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization. Cox's proportional hazards analysis adjusted by a propensity score (n:m) were performed to determine the effects of prior stent placement on the risks of such events. RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients were included, of which 156 (15.6%) had at least one stent. The median follow-up was 32.32 months (interquartile rank 18.08-48). The overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates were 95, 92 and 91% for the without-stent group vs. 82, 77 and 74% for the with-stent group, respectively. The 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates free from MACEs were: 92, 87 and 76% for patients without stent vs. 77, 66 and 56% for those with stents. Patients with stent showed an increased risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 3.631, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.29-5.756] and MACEs (HR 2.784, 95% CI 1.962-3.951). When adjusted by the propensity score, prior stent placement continued to increase the risks of death (HR 3.795, 95% CI 2.319-6.21) and MACEs (HR 2.89, 95% CI 2.008-4.158). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intracoronary stents have a lower survival rate and a greater risk of death, MI or need for repeat revascularization during the mid-term follow-up after OP-CABG.

SYNTAX Score is associated with worse outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for three-vessel or left main complex coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: The SYNergy between percutaneous intervention with TAXus drug eluting stents and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) Score is a tool for risk stratification of patients according to the complexity of coronary lesions developed during the SYNTAX trial. We examined the influence of the SYNTAX Score on the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. METHODS: All patients with de novo left main or 3-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2005 to December 2008 at our institution (Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain) were retrospectively assessed, and their SYNTAX Score was calculated. The influence of the SYNTAX Score on postprocedural and follow-up mortality and combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization) was identified by multivariate analysis. Balancing score analysis was performed to eliminate the effect of potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 716 patients were enrolled. Mean SYNTAX Score was 34.5 (standard deviation, 6.7; range, 11.5-76). Three groups of patients were identified according to the score terciles: low (≤33), intermediate (33-37), and high (>37). These terciles scores differed greatly from those reported by the SYNTAX trial investigators. The multivariate analysis identified that the SYNTAX Score was associated with follow-up mortality (hazard ratio = 1.046, P = .015) and combined early and follow-up major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (odds ratio = 1.079, P < .001; and hazard ratio = 1.034, P = .026, respectively). Balancing score-adjusted analyses demonstrated that the SYNTAX Score was independently associated with early and late major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (odds ratio = 1.65, P < .001; and hazard ratio = 1.034, P = .027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SYNTAX Score was remarkably high among patients undergoing surgical off-pump myocardial revascularization at our institution. In this subset of patients, a higher SYNTAX Score was associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting, but not with early or late mortality.

Short- and mid-term results for aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.

Population over 80 years who require surgery for degenerative aortic stenosis has largely increased in the past decades. We have compared short- and mid-term results for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) for calcific-degenerative aortic stenosis in older and younger than 80 years operated at our institution between April 2004 and December 2008. Predictors of mortality and major adverse cardio and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) on the postoperative and follow-up period were determined through multivariable analysis. Four hundred and fifty-one patients were included in the study. Ninety-four (20.8%) were >or=80. Previous cardiac surgery [odds ratio (OR)=4.08, P=0.047], renal failure (OR=6.75, P<0.001), concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (OR=2.57, P=0.034), female sex (OR=2.49, P=0.047), and severe pulmonary hypertension (OR=3.68, P=0.024) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In the follow-up, age >or=80 years [Hazard ratio (HR)=2.44, P=0.02], high blood pressure (HBP) (HR=5.2, P=0.025) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (HR=5.1, P<0.001) were independent predictors for late mortality. Only PAD (HR=3.55, P=0.014) and HBP (HR=8.24, P=0.04) were independent predictors for late cardiac mortality. Renal failure (OR=2.57, P=0.005), severe pulmonary hypertension (OR=3.49, P=0.005) and concomitant CABG (OR=2.49, P=0.002) were independent predictors for postoperative MACCEs. Diabetes mellitus (HR=2.03, P=0.033) and PAD (HR=2.3, P=0.041) were independent predictors for MACCEs in the follow-up. According to these data, we can conclude that conventional open AVR for degenerative aortic stenosis grants good early- and mid-term outcomes in octogenarians in our experience.

Medium-term echocardiographic follow-up of systolic and diastolic left ventricular abnormalities after surgical treatment of subacute rupture.

Subacute rupture of the left ventricular free wall is a complication that occurs during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction. The subacute presentation makes surgical management possible. However, it is not known whether either pericardial manipulation or the use of pericardial patches influences left ventricular function over the medium term. Our aim was to monitor changes in left ventricular function and the development of constrictive pericarditis over the medium term in patients who had been treated surgically for subacute rupture of the left ventricle. Eleven patients with subacute rupture underwent surgery, of whom six were followed up over the medium term. A modest improvement in left ventricular systolic function was observed and there was no evidence of constrictive pericarditis. In conclusion, the surgical approach appears to be safe over the medium term and had no influence on left ventricular function. Nor did it lead to the development of constrictive pericarditis.

Short-term and mid-term follow-up of sutureless surgery for postinfarction subacute free wall rupture.

We report our short-term and mid-term results with sutureless repair of postinfarction subacute left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR). For this purpose, we evaluated the short-term and mid-term postoperative results assessed by clinical examination and echocardiography of all patients who underwent surgery for subacute LVFWR between January 2004 and January 2009. Twenty-one patients were operated. Direct suture repair of LVFWR was carried out in only one patient. In all other cases we used a pericardial patch with biological glue. Early mortality was 19% (n=4). The median duration of follow-up was 17.3 months (interquartile range, 5-38.7), with a 13-month survival of 76%. Follow-up echocardiography showed no constriction associated with the rupture zone in any patient. According to our early experience, sutureless LVFWR repair is safe, effective and reproducible, and offers acceptable morbidity and mortality during follow-up.

Clinical outcomes with off-pump coronary surgery after angioplasty with stent.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine whether prior coronary stent implantation affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Between January 2005 and April 2008, a retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of prior coronary stent implantation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary surgery on the incidence of major cardiovascular events in the postoperative period (i.e. at 30 days or during postoperative hospitalization). RESULTS: In total, 796 consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Of these, 116 (14.6%) had a coronary stent at the time of surgery. Patients with and without stents had similar levels of risk (i.e. EuroSCORE). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for the presence of confounding variables (i.e. preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, critical preoperative state, age, history of cerebrovascular accident, recent acute myocardial infarction, number of diseased coronary vessels, incomplete revascularization and on-pump conversion), showed that the presence of a stent was significantly associated with increased risks of postoperative myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR]=3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-5.96), in-hospital cardiac mortality (RR=4.62; 95% CI, 1.76-12.11) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR=3.65; 95% CI, 1.60-8.34). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, coronary artery stent implantation prior to coronary surgery was associated with increased risks of postoperative myocardial infarction, cardiac mortality and all-cause mortality in the postoperative period.

Seguimiento ecocardiográfico a medio plazo de las alteraciones de la función sistólica y diastólica del ventrículo izquierdo tras rotura subaguda tratada quirúrgicamente / Medium-term echocardiographic follow-up of systolic and diastolic left ventricular abnormalities after surgical treatment of subacute rupture

La rotura subaguda de la pared libre del ventrículo izquierdo es una complicación de la fase aguda del infarto de miocardio. La presentación subaguda permite una resolución quirúrgica. No se conoce si la manipulación del pericardio y el empleo de parches pueden tener consecuencias a medio plazo en la función ventricular izquierda. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar la evolución de la función ventricular izquierda y el desarrollo de datos de constricción a medio plazo en pacientes con rotura subaguda del ventrículo izquierdo intervenida quirúrgicamente. Se intervino de rotura subaguda a 11 pacientes, de los que se siguió a medio plazo a 6. Los resultados muestran que a medio plazo hay una mejoría discreta de la función ventricular y no aparecen datos de constricción. Como conclusión, se puede decir que es una técnica segura a medio plazo y que no se acompaña de secuelas en la función ventricular izquierda ni de desarrollo de constricción (AU)

Subacute rupture of the left ventricular free wall is a complication that occurs during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction. The subacute presentation makes surgical management possible. However, it is not known whether either pericardial manipulation or the use of pericardial patches influences left ventricular function over the medium term. Our aim was to monitor changes in left ventricular function and the development of constrictive pericarditis over the medium term in patients who had been treated surgically for subacute rupture of the left ventricle. Eleven patients with subacute rupture underwent surgery, of whom six were followed up over the medium term. A modest improvement in left ventricular systolic function was observed and there was no evidence of constrictive pericarditis. In conclusion, the surgical approach appears to be safe over the medium term and had no influence on left ventricular function. Nor did it lead to the development of constrictive pericarditis (AU)

Resultados de la cirugía coronaria sin circulación extracopórea tras angioplastia con stent / Clinical outcomes with off-pump coronary surgery after angioplasty with stent

Introducción y objetivos. Evaluar el impacto de la implantación de stents coronarios previa a la cirugía de revascularización miocárdica en los resultados postoperatorios de ésta. Métodos. Desde enero de 2005 hasta abril de 2008, se evaluó retrospectivamente el impacto de la implantación de stents coronarios previa a la cirugía coronaria sin circulación extracorpórea en la incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares mayores en el postoperatorio (30 días o ingreso hospitalario postoperatorios). Resultados. Se sometió a 796 pacientes consecutivos a revascularización miocárdica quirúrgica; 116 (14,6%) portaban algún stent coronario en el momento de la cirugía. Los grupos con stent y sin stent tenían un perfil de riesgo similar (EuroSCORE). En el análisis multivariable, ajustando el riesgo por las variables de confusión detectadas (fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo preoperatoria < 40%, estado crítico preoperatorio, edad, antecedentes de accidente cerebrovascular agudo, infarto miocárdico agudo previo reciente, número de vasos coronarios enfermos, revascularización quirúrgica incompleta y conversión a circulación extracorpórea) se detectó que el ser portador de stent se asociaba de forma significativa a un mayor riesgo de infarto miocárdico postoperatorio (RR = 3,13; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,75-5,96), mortalidad cardiaca hospitalaria (RR = 4,62; IC del 95%, 1,76-12,11) y mortalidad hospitalaria por todas las causas (RR = 3,65; IC del 95%, 1,6-8,34). Conclusiones. En nuestra experiencia, la implantación previa de stents coronarios se asocia a un mayor riesgo de infarto miocárdico y mortalidad cardiaca y por todas las causas en el postoperatorio de la cirugía coronaria (AU)

Introduction and Objectives. The aim was to determine whether prior coronary stent implantation affects postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods. Between January 2005 and April 2008, a retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of prior coronary stent implantation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary surgery on the incidence of major cardiovascular events in the postoperative period (ie, at 30 days or during postoperative hospitalization). Results. In total, 796 consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Of these, 116 (14.6%) had a coronary stent at the time of surgery. Patients with and without stents had similar levels of risk (ie, EuroSCORE). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for the presence of confounding variables (ie, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction <40 critical preoperative state age history of cerebrovascular accident recent acute myocardial infarction number diseased coronary vessels incomplete revascularization and on-pump conversion showed that the presence a stent was significantly associated with increased risks postoperative relative risk rr="3.65;" 95 confidence interval ci 1 75-5 96 in-hospital cardiac mortality 76-12 11 all-cause 60-8 34 conclusions in our experience artery implantation prior to surgery period inhospital (AU)

Pericarditis constrictiva crónica secundaria a hematoma traumático torácico / Chronic constrictive pericarditis due to traumatic thoracic haematoma

No disponible