No Difference in Complication or Reoperation Rates Between Arthroscopic and Open Debridement for Lateral Epicondylitis: A National Database Study.

PURPOSE: To compare complication rates and 5-year reoperation rates between open debridement (OD) and arthroscopic debridement (AD) for lateral epicondylitis. METHODS: The PearlDiver MUExtr database (2010-2019) was reviewed for patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis (queried by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes) undergoing OD or AD of the common extensor tendon without repair (queried by Current Procedural Terminology codes). Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those who underwent AD and those who underwent OD. Nonoperative treatment modalities were reported for both groups within 1 year before index procedure. The rates of 90-day postoperative complications were compared, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. The 5-year reoperation rates, using laterality-specific ICD-10 codes, were also compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In total, 19,280 patients (OD = 17,139, AD = 2,141) were analyzed in this study. The most common nonoperative treatments for patients who underwent OD or AD were corticosteroid injections (49.5% vs 43.2%), physical therapy (24.8% vs 25.7%), bracing (2.8% vs 3.2%), and platelet-rich plasma injections (1.3% vs 1.0%). There were no significant differences in radial nerve injuries, hematomas, surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and sepsis events between the 2 procedures (P = .50). The 5-year reoperation rate was not significantly different between the AD (5.0%) and OD (3.9%) cohorts (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: For lateral epicondylitis, both AD and OD of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (without repair) were found to have low rates of 90-day adverse events, with no significant differences between the 2 approaches. Similarly, the 5-year reoperation rate was low and not statistically different for those treated with OD or AD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross-sectional study.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Activity at Mean 6-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and functional outcomes including return to preinjury activity level following arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction (AA-CCR) and to determine associations between return to preinjury activity level, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes following AA-CCR. METHODS: A institutional registry review of all AA-CCR using free tendon grafts from 2007 to 2016 was performed. Clinical assessment included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score and return to preinjury activity level at final follow-up. Treatment failure was defined as (1) revision acromioclavicular stabilization surgery, (2) unable to return to preinjury activity level, or (3) radiographic loss of reduction (RLOR, >25% CC distance compared with contralateral side). SANE scores, return to activity, and RLOR were compared between patients within each category of treatment failure, by grade of injury, and whether concomitant pathology was treated. RESULTS: There were 88 patients (89.8% male) with mean age of 39.6 years and minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean 6.1 years). Most injuries were Rockwood grade V (63.6%). Mean postoperative SANE score was 86.3 ± 17.5. Treatment failure occurred in 17.1%: 8.0% were unable to return to activity, 5.7% had RLOR, and 3.4% underwent revision surgery due to traumatic reinjury. SANE score was lower among patients who were unable to return to activity compared with those with RLOR and compared with nonfailures (P = .0002). There were no differences in revision surgery rates, return to activity, or SANE scores according to Rockwood grade or if concomitant pathology was treated. CONCLUSIONS: AA-CCR with free tendon grafts resulted in good clinical outcomes and a high rate of return to preinjury activity level. RLOR did not correlate with return to preinjury activity level. Concomitant pathology that required treatment did not adversely affect outcomes. Return to preinjury activity level may be a more clinically relevant outcome measure than radiographic maintenance of acromioclavicular joint reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Case Series).

Development and Validation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Postoperative Satisfaction Survey.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a standardized patient satisfaction measurement tool for adult patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A 4-phase iterative process that included item generation and pilot survey development, item reduction, survey readability, and survey validation was used. To develop and validate the Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS), 70 patients were included in the survey development phase and 77 patients were included in the validation phase. The HSS ACL-SS was compared with other currently used ACLR outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner-Lysholm score, Short Form 12 (SF-12) Mental Component Score, and SF-12 Physical Component Score. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and floor and ceiling effects were assessed. RESULTS: The HSS ACL-SS consists of 10 items identified by patients as being important for satisfaction after ACLR. In the validation phase, the mean score on the HSS ACL-SS (of 50) among all patients was 37.9 ± 9.9 (range, 10-50). Statistically significant positive correlations were seen between the HSS ACL-SS score and the International Knee Documentation Committee score (r = 0.351, P = .002) and Tegner-Lysholm score (r = 0.333, P = .003). No statistically significant correlation was found between the satisfaction score and the SF-12 Mental or Physical Component Score. The lowest possible score (10 of 50 points) was achieved in 1 patient (1.3%) and the highest possible score (50 of 50 points) was achieved in 7 patients (9.1%), indicating no significant floor or ceiling effects of the instrument. Internal consistency for all 10 items was strong (Cronbach α, 0.995). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient between test and retest responses was 0.701, indicating moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The HSS ACL-SS is a validated and reliable patient-derived satisfaction measure with excellent psychometric properties for active adults undergoing ACLR. The results of this study show that the HSS ACL-SS may be a useful tool to measure postoperative patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, development of diagnostic or monitoring criteria in consecutive patients.

Electrodiagnostic evidence of suprascapular nerve recovery after decompression.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgical arthroscopic decompression or ultrasound-guided aspiration of a paralabral cyst would result in suprascapular nerve recovery from axonal regeneration based on electrodiagnostic testing. METHODS: Nine patients with preoperative electromyography (EMG) evidence of suprascapular neuropathy due to paralabral cysts at the suprascapular or spinoglenoid notch were prospectively studied. Eight patients underwent arthroscopic surgical decompression, and 1 patient underwent ultrasound-guided aspiration. Postoperative EMG was performed in all patients to evaluate nerve regeneration. RESULTS: Three (33%) patients had cysts at the suprascapular notch, whereas 6 (67%) patients had cysts at the spinoglenoid notch. All patients showed complete electrophysiological recovery after decompression. DISCUSSION: Decompression of paralabral cysts at the suprascapular or spinoglenoid notch resulted in postoperative EMG evidence of nerve recovery. Long-term studies with a greater number of patients are required to elucidate time to recovery. Muscle Nerve 59:247-249, 2019.

The lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow: quantitative anatomic analysis of the lateral ulnar collateral, radial collateral, and annular ligaments.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) complex of the elbow often results in posterolateral rotatory instability. Although surgical reconstruction of the LUCL is often required, gaps in our understanding of the LUCL complex remain. The purpose of this study was to provide a robust and accurate characterization of the lateral elbow ligamentous complex. METHODS: The LUCLs, radial collateral ligaments, and annular ligaments in 10 cadaveric elbows were 3-dimensionally digitized and reconstructed using computed tomography. Surface areas, origin and insertion footprint areas, distances between perceived footprint centers and geometric footprint centroids, distances to key landmarks, and ligament isometry were measured. RESULTS: The mean surface area of the LUCL was 229.3 mm2. The mean origin and insertion footprint areas were 26.0 mm2 and 22.9 mm2, respectively. The mean distance between the apparent centers and the geometric centroids of the footprints was 1 mm. The center of the LUCL origin was 10.7 mm distal to the lateral epicondyle and 8.2 mm from the capitellar articular margin. The center of the LUCL insertion was 3.3 mm distal to the apex of the supinator crest. The LUCL showed anisometric properties as elbow flexion increased (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The LUCL origin center was 10.7 mm from the lateral epicondyle, whereas the insertion center was 3.3 mm from the apex of the supinator crest. The visually estimated footprint centers were generally within 1 mm of the geometric centroid. These geometries and distances to key landmarks will be informative for surgeons seeking to perform anatomic ligament reconstruction procedures.

Arthroscopic treatment successfully treats posterior elbow impingement in an athletic population.

PURPOSE: Posterior elbow impingement can cause disabling pain and limited motion during activities involving elbow extension. Less understood is whether arthroscopic treatment, compared to open surgery, can result in effective management of pain, loss of range of motion, and return athletes to previous levels of activity. This study determined whether arthroscopic debridement is a safe and effective treatment for posterior elbow impingement and whether it enables athletes to return to a previous level of function. METHODS: A retrospective review of 36 consecutive patients that underwent arthroscopic debridement of the posterior elbow was performed. There were 34 male and 2 female patients, with a median age of 32 years (17-54 years). There were 7 professional athletes, 6 college athletes, and 23 high school or recreational athletes. All patients had a positive posterior impingement test for posterior pain with extension and limitations of activity. Arthroscopic debridement and additional surgical procedures were performed, and patients underwent follow-up visits at a median 51 months (range 14-81). RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in pain, motion, and function. No neurovascular complications were seen related to the arthroscopic debridement. The mean Andrews and Timmerman elbow score improved from 159 ± 27 to 193 ± 11 (p < 0.01). Thirty-five of thirty-six (97%) patients returned to their previous level of activity, including all professional athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic management of posterior elbow impingement is safe and effective and can return patients, including professional athletes, to high-level athletic activity. Athletes with symptomatic posterior elbow impingement can be successfully and safely treated with arthroscopic debridement and typically will return to preinjury levels of activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Factors That Increase the Risk of Infection After Elbow Arthroscopy: Analysis of Patient Demographics, Medical Comorbidities, and Steroid Injections in 2,704 Medicare Patients.

PURPOSE: To use a national database to determine (1) the incidence of joint infection after elbow arthroscopy, (2) identify independent patient-related risk factors for infection, and (3) determine the influence of concomitant intra-articular corticosteroid injection on infection risk. METHODS: The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files were queried to identify patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy from 2005 to 2012. Postoperative elbow infections occurring within 6 months of surgery were identified using both International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for postoperative infection and Current Procedural Terminology codes for the surgical treatment of a postoperative infection. Patients were excluded if their initial arthroscopic procedure was performed for infection. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was then used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for postoperative infection. RESULTS: Of the 2,704 elbow arthroscopy cases identified, 42 (1.55%) developed a postoperative infection. The annual incidence of infections did not increase significantly over the course of the study (P = .374). A number of patient demographics and medical comorbidities significantly increased the risk of infection. The most notable factors included age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, P = .006), body mass index > 40 (OR 1.97, P = .024), tobacco usage (OR 1.80, P = .046), alcohol usage (OR 4.01, P < .001), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.10, P = .015), inflammatory arthritis (OR 2.81, P < .001), hypercoagulable disorder (OR 2.51, P = .015), and intra-articular corticosteroid injection at the time of arthroscopy (OR 2.79, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of elbow arthroscopies performed in the United States has increased steadily; however, the postoperative infection rate remained consistently low at 1.55%. There are a number of patient-specific risk factors that increase this risk with OR ranging from 1.97 to 4.01. Similarly, patients who receive an intra-articular corticosteroid injection at the time of surgery are nearly 3 times (OR 2.79) more likely to develop a postoperative infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Decreased Shoulder External Rotation and Flexion Are Greater Predictors of Injury Than Internal Rotation Deficits: Analysis of 132 Pitcher-Seasons in Professional Baseball.

PURPOSE: The primary aims of this work were to (1) describe normal range of motion (ROM) profiles for elite pitchers, (2) describe the characteristics of shoulder and elbow injuries in professional pitchers over a 6-year period in one Major League Baseball organization, and (3) identify ROM measures that were independently associated with a future shoulder or elbow injury. METHODS: Over 6 seasons (2010-2015), a preseason assessment was performed on all pitchers invited to Major League Baseball Spring Training for a single organization. ROM measures included shoulder flexion, horizontal adduction, external rotation (ER), internal rotation, as well as elbow flexion and extension, were measured for both the dominant and nondominant arm, and total range of motion and deficits were calculated. All noncontact shoulder and elbow injuries were identified. Using multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis to control for age, height, weight, and all other ROM measures, the factors associated with an increased risk of subsequent shoulder or elbow injury were identified. RESULTS: A total of 53 shoulder (n = 25) and elbow (n = 28) injuries occurred during 132 pitcher seasons (n = 81 pitchers). The most significant categorical risk factor associated with increased elbow injury rates was the presence of a shoulder flexion deficit >5° (odds ratio [OR] 2.83; P = .042). For continuous variables, the risk of elbow injury increased by 7% for each degree of increased shoulder ER deficit (OR 1.07; P = .030) and 9% for each degree of decreased shoulder flexion (OR 1.09; P = .017). None of the measures significantly correlated with shoulder injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Preseason shoulder ER and flexion deficits are independent risk factors for the development of elbow injuries during the upcoming season. Although prior work has supported the importance of reducing glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in pitchers, this study demonstrates that deficits in shoulder ER and flexion are more significant predictors of subsequent elbow injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparative Influence of Sport Type on Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To investigate differences between sport types for patient-reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Included patients were enrolled as part of a prospective institutional ACL registry. Inclusion criteria were preoperative self-identification as a competitive athlete, maximum score on the preoperative Marx Activity Scale, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were extracted from the registry. Outcome tools administered as part of the registry included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm-Tegner Scales, Marx Activity Scale (MAS), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: A total of 294 patients with a mean age of 25.5 years (standard deviation 12.1) met the study inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Included sports categories were soccer (n = 92; 31.3%), skiing (n = 67; 22.8%), basketball (n = 56; 19.1%), lacrosse (n = 38; 12.9%), football (n = 29; 9.9%), and Tennis (n = 12; 4.1%). At baseline, compared with other sports, lacrosse players have higher outcome scores while skiers had lower scores. At 2-year follow-up, however, across all outcome tools, football players demonstrated significantly higher outcome scores than all other athletes (IKDC, 93.2, P = .001; Lysholm, 93.2, P = .03; MAS, 13.1, P = .03; SF-12 Mental Component Summary, 57.9, P = .0002). Conversely, at 2-year follow-up, soccer players demonstrated a significantly lower Lysholm (86.7, P = .02) and a trend toward lower IKDC (85.6, P = .09) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes after ACLR among active athletes are comparable. Football players demonstrate quantitatively higher outcome scores whereas soccer players have lower scores. However, these outcome score differences may not be clinically significant and may be subject to confounding variables. Continued attention should be paid to understanding sport-specific outcome after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Management of ulnar collateral ligament injury in throwing athletes: a survey of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Amid evidence that the number of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstructions performed annually is on the rise, there continues to be significant variation among surgeons in the management of UCL injuries. The purpose of this paper was to survey the members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) to assess current trends related to the comprehensive treatment of athletes presenting with UCL injury. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to the active members of the ASES. The survey was composed of 3 sections assessing the demographics of the survey-takers, presenting 7 distinct fictional clinical case scenarios of athletes with UCL injury, and posing a series of more general questions about operative and nonoperative management of UCL injuries. RESULTS: There were 159 ASES members who responded to the survey (24% of the active membership); 65 respondents (40.9%) reported >15 years of clinical experience. Of the 7 case scenarios presented, a consensus was reached to indicate the patient for surgery in 4 cases. In all 7 cases, when operative management was the preferred option, a consensus was reached to perform UCL reconstruction. The preferred method of UCL reconstruction among respondents was the docking technique (66.0%); 36.3% of respondents used platelet-rich plasma in their treatment of UCL injuries. CONCLUSION: The survey presented here shows that an overall experienced and well-trained cohort of surgeons tended to agree and often reached consensus opinions on how to approach UCL injury. Professional athletes and those with complete tears were indicated for surgery by consensus, whereas opinion was more divided on how to treat partial tears or nonprofessionals.

Three or more preoperative injections is the most significant risk factor for revision surgery after operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an analysis of 3863 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify the rate of failure of operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis, defined as progression to ipsilateral revision surgery, and associated patient-specific risk factors for failure. METHODS: A national database was used to identify patients undergoing surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis from 2005 to 2012. Patients undergoing concomitant procedures were excluded. Patients who then required subsequent ipsilateral extensor carpi radialis brevis débridement or release within 2 years were identified using similar methods. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for revision surgery. In addition, the number of preoperative injections (1, 2, or ≥3) in the ipsilateral elbow was identified and included in the regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor. RESULTS: Of 3863 patients who underwent operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis, 58 (1.5%) required ipsilateral revision surgery. Risk factors for revision surgery included age <65 years (OR, 2.95; P = .003), male gender (OR, 1.53; P = .017), morbid obesity (OR, 2.13; P = .002), tobacco use (OR, 1.87; P < .001), and inflammatory arthritis (OR, 1.79; P = .009). Having ≥3 ipsilateral preoperative injections was the most significant risk factor (OR, 3.55; P < .001), whereas having 2 (OR, 1.44; P = .135) or 1 (OR, 1.15; P = .495) was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of failure requiring revision surgery for lateral epicondylitis in the studied population is low (1.5%). Risk factors for revision surgery include younger age, male gender, morbid obesity, tobacco use, and inflammatory arthritis. The most significant risk factor for revision surgery is having ≥3 ipsilateral preoperative injections.

Risk factors for revision surgery following isolated ulnar nerve release at the cubital tunnel: a study of 25,977 cases.

BACKGROUND: The literature investigating risk factors for failure after decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (cubital tunnel release [CuTR]) is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of isolated CuTR, defined as progression to subsequent ipsilateral revision surgery. METHODS: The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2005 to 2012 were queried for patients undergoing CuTR. Patients undergoing any concomitant procedures were excluded. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient-related risk factors for ipsilateral revision surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor. RESULTS: A total of 25,977 patients underwent primary CuTR, and 304 (1.4%) of those with ≥2 years of follow-up required revision surgery. Although the rate of primary procedures is on the rise (P = .002), the revision rate remains steady (P = .148). Significant, independent risk factors for revision surgery included age <65 years (OR, 1.5; P < .001), obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .022), morbid obesity (OR, 1.3; P = .044), tobacco use (OR, 2.0; P < .001), diabetes (OR, 1.3; P = .011), hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.2; P = .015), chronic liver disease (OR, 1.6; P = .001), chronic anemia (OR, 1.6; P = .001), and hypercoagulable disorder (OR, 2.1; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of failure requiring ipsilateral revision surgery after CuTR remained steadily low (1.4%) during the study period. There are numerous patient-related risk factors that are independently associated with an increased risk for revision surgery, the most significant of which are tobacco use, younger age, hypercoagulable disorder, liver disease, and anemia.

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adjustable Loop Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fixation Device: The Value of Retensioning and Knot Tying.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of retensioning and knot tying on the biomechanical properties of an adjustable loop anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction device. METHODS: Testing consisted of 3 phases, which used both adjustable loop devices (ALD) and closed loop devices (CLD) tested under cyclic loading to 4,500 cycles. Phase 1 consisted of implant-only testing using cyclic loading from 50 to 250 N. Phase 2 used relatively unloaded cyclic loading of 10 to 250 N. Phase 3 used a tendon/bone/implant model. Subsets of the ALD implants were subjected to isolated retensioning, isolated knot tying, or a combination of both to allow for independent examination of these interventions. RESULTS: In phase 1, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 60% (0.38 v 0.96 mm; P = .00004). In phase 2, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 88% (0.51 v 4.22 mm, P = .014). In phase 3, retensioning and knot tying reduced final ALD elongation by 45% (1.5 v 2.7 mm; P = .001), which was half of the elongation of the CLD (3.0 mm; P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: The ALD did demonstrate an increase in cyclic elongation as compared with the CLD during both extended loading conditions. The phase 1 ALD elongation (0.96 mm), while statistically greater than the CLD (0.52 mm), was likely not of clinical importance. However, the ALD elongation in phase 2 (4.22 mm) could be of clinical concern. Both of these increased elongations were eliminated by retensioning and knot tying. Furthermore, when evaluating in a graft-femur construct, retensioning and knot tying of the ALD reduced final cyclic elongation by 50% when compared with CLD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Retensioning and knot tying after initial reduction of the tendon graft with an adjustable loop ACL fixation device may help to further reduce concerns of loop slippage and displacement with cyclic loading during postoperative rehabilitation.

Double-Row Capsulolabral Repair Increases Load to Failure and Decreases Excessive Motion.

PURPOSE: Using a cadaver shoulder instability model and load-testing device, we compared biomechanical characteristics of double-row and single-row capsulolabral repairs. We hypothesized a greater reduction in glenohumeral motion and translation and a higher load to failure in a mattress double-row capsulolabral repair than in a single-row repair. METHODS: In 6 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders, a capsulolabral injury was created. One shoulder was repaired with a single-row technique, and the other with a double-row mattress technique. Rotational range of motion, anterior-inferior translation, and humeral head kinematics were measured. Load-to-failure testing measured stiffness, yield load, deformation at yield load, energy absorbed at yield load, load to failure, deformation at ultimate load, and energy absorbed at ultimate load. RESULTS: Double-row repair significantly decreased external rotation and total range of motion compared with single-row repair. Both repairs decreased anterior-inferior translation compared with the capsulolabral-injured condition, however, no differences existed between repair types. Yield load in the single-row group was 171.3 ± 110.1 N, and in the double-row group it was 216.1 ± 83.1 N (P = .02). Ultimate load to failure in the single-row group was 224.5 ± 121.0 N, and in the double-row group it was 373.9 ± 172.0 N (P = .05). Energy absorbed at ultimate load in the single-row group was 1,745.4 ± 1,462.9 N-mm, and in the double-row group it was 4,649.8 ± 1,930.8 N-mm (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of capsulolabral disruption, double-row repair techniques may result in decreased shoulder rotational range of motion and improved load-to-failure characteristics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In cases of capsulolabral disruption, repair techniques with double-row mattress repair may provide more secure fixation. Double-row capsulolabral repair decreases shoulder motion and increases load to failure, yield load, and energy absorbed at yield load more than single-row repair.

Outcomes in revision Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers.

BACKGROUND: With the recent rise in the number of Tommy John surgeries, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of Tommy John surgery, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. METHODS: Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position. RESULTS: Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone Tommy John surgeries; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. Twenty-six revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of revision Tommy John surgery is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

Tennis injuries: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment.

Tennis places high loads on the joints of players, with supraphysiologic forces being generated at the shoulder and elbow hundreds of times per match. Acute injuries tend to affect the lower extremity; chronic injuries usually involve the upper extremity. Commonly encountered upper extremity conditions include rotator cuff injury, internal impingement, superior labral tears, and epicondylitis of the elbow. Serving is the most strenuous stroke in tennis, with the highest peak muscle activity in the shoulder and forearm occurring during this stroke. The kinetic chain links upper extremity, lower extremity, and core muscle segments by transmitting coordinated activation and motion; in this regard, any pathologic process that disturbs the groin, hip, and abdominal musculature can further result in an increased risk of injury to the shoulder and upper extremity. Evolution in equipment and in play surfaces has also affected the type and frequency of injuries. Prevention programs that address the muscular imbalances throughout the kinetic chain may help reduce the incidence of both acute and chronic injuries experienced by tennis athletes.

Anterior shoulder capsular tears in professional baseball players.

BACKGROUND: Tearing of the anterior capsule of the shoulder is a rare but debilitating injury for throwing athletes. However, there is very little in the literature to guide its diagnosis and treatment. In this case series, we outline our experience with anterior capsular tears of the shoulder in professional baseball players. METHODS: Five professional baseball players were diagnosed with midsubstance tears of their anterior capsule. A trial of rest and rehabilitation failed in all patients, and they eventually underwent surgery. These patients were retrospectively reviewed. The presenting symptoms and findings were documented, and outcomes were assessed by the player's ability to return to play. RESULTS: The mean age was 33.5 years (range, 31-37 years), and all patients presented with anterior shoulder pain and the inability to throw. No patient had an acute traumatic injury. Magnetic resonance imaging provided the correct diagnosis in 4 patients, and the diagnosis was made with diagnostic arthroscopy in the fifth. Three underwent arthroscopic repair, and 2 underwent open repair of the anterior capsule. Of the 5 players, 4 (80%) returned to their preinjury level by a mean of 13.3 months (range, 8-18 months). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior capsular tears can occur in older throwing athletes. Surgical repair, whether arthroscopic or open, can yield good results in most patients.

Outcomes of ultrasound-guided injections of Bennett lesions of the shoulder.

PURPOSE: To describe our technique and short term follow up of ultrasound-guided injections of symptomatic Bennett lesions. METHODS: We performed 13 ultrasound-guided injections in 10 baseball players from August 2014 to August 2021. The cohort was comprised of 10 males, with a mean age of 25 years and 1 month (age range: 17 years, 10 months-33 years, 1 month). Of the 10 patients, 6 were major league baseball players (including 5 pitchers and a second baseman), 3 were minor league baseball pitchers; and 1 pitched in high school. Symptoms in our patients included posterior shoulder pain at rest, pain with pitching (including in the acceleration phase and with follow-through), glenoid internal reduction deficit, and decreased pitching velocity. The procedure was performed in a similar fashion as a standard posterior approach glenohumeral injection, though with the linear transducer positioned slightly more medially. The needle was inserted from a lateral to medial approach, in plane with the transducer and aimed to the superficial surface of the Bennett lesion, onto which anesthetic and steroid was injected, avoiding injection into the glenohumeral joint. RESULTS: All patients had MRIs that showed Bennett lesions and all but one of the sonograms demonstrated the Bennett lesion. In 8/12 (67%) injections, the patient reported varying degrees of immediate symptom relief. In 4/12 injections, patients were unable to assess for immediate postprocedural change in symptomatology and for one patient post-procedural symptomatology was not documented. No complications occurred. Analytics of the average 4-seam fastball velocity was available for 2 of the major league players who had in-season injections, with minimal change in postprocedural velocity in the year after their ultrasound procedure; for one of the pitchers, his fastball velocity slightly increased in the month after the procedure while the other pitcher had his injection towards the end of the season and he threw no fastballs in his final games of the season. Two of the other professional pitchers went on to surgical intervention and neither returned to pitch professionally. CONCLUSION: Injection of symptomatic Bennett lesions is a safe procedure and can provide symptomatic relief that may be temporary, though equivocally useful clinically.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated With and Without Augmentation: A Network Meta-analysis of Controlled Laboratory Studies.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with suture tape augmentation has gained interest given preliminary reports of favorable biomechanical characteristics. No study to date has quantitatively assessed the biomechanical effects of multiple augmentation techniques relative to the native UCL. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies to assess and comparatively rank biomechanical effects of UCL repair or reconstruction with or without augmentation. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2023. A frequentist network meta-analytic approach was used to perform mixed-treatment comparisons of UCL repair and reconstruction techniques with and without augmentation, with the native UCL as the reference condition. Pooled treatment estimates were quantified under the random-effects assumption. Competing treatments were ranked in the network meta-analysis by using point estimates and standard errors to calculate P scores (greater P score indicates superiority of treatment for given outcome). RESULTS: Ten studies involving 206 elbow specimens in which a distal UCL tear was simulated were included. UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (AugRecon) restored load to failure to a statistically noninferior magnitude (mean difference [MD], -1.99 N·m; 95% CI, -10.2 to 6.2 N·m; P = .63) compared with the native UCL. UCL reconstruction (Recon) (MD, -12.7 N·m; P < .001) and UCL repair with suture tape augmentation (AugRepair) (MD, -14.8 N·m; P < .001) were both statistically inferior to the native UCL. The AugRecon condition conferred greater load to failure compared with Recon (P < .001) and AugRepair (P = .002) conditions. AugRecon conferred greater torsional stiffness relative to all other conditions and was not statistically different from the native UCL (MD, 0.32 N·m/deg; 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.95 N·m/deg; P = .31). Medial ulnohumeral gapping was not statistically different for the AugRepair (MD, 0.30 mm; 95% CI, -1.22 to 1.82 mm; P = .70), AugRecon (MD, 0.57 mm; 95% CI, -0.70 to 1.84 mm; P = .38), or Recon (MD, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, -0.02 to 2.05 mm; P = .055) conditions compared with the native UCL. P-score analysis indicated that AugRecon was the most effective treatment for increasing ultimate load to failure and torsional stiffness, whereas AugRepair was the most effective for minimizing medial gapping. CONCLUSION: AugRecon restored load to failure and torsional stiffness most similar to the parameters of the native UCL, whereas Recon and AugRepair did not restore the same advantageous properties at time zero. Medial ulnohumeral gapping during a valgus load was minimized by all 3 treatments. Based on network interactions, AugRecon was the superior treatment approach for restoring important biomechanical features of the UCL at time zero that are jeopardized during a complete distal tear.

Low Rates of Postoperative Complications and Revision Surgery After Primary Medial Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair.

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of early postoperative complications and revision surgery in patients who underwent primary medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair with minimum of 2-year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of a national insurance database was conducted to identify patients with MUCL injuries who underwent primary MUCL repair between 2015 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients >40 years of age and those who had concomitant elbow fractures or dislocations, lateral UCL injures, medial epicondylitis, elbow arthritis, or a history of previous elbow injury/surgery were excluded. The number of patients who underwent a concomitant ulnar nerve procedure (transposition or decompression) during the primary MUCL repair was recorded. Complications within 90 days of surgery and the incidence and timing of subsequent ipsilateral ulnar nerve surgery or revision MUCL surgery were assessed. Results: A total of 313 patients (63.6% male) were included. The mean age was 20.3 ± 6.9 years, and mean follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.3 years. Concomitant ulnar nerve transposition or decompression was performed in 34.2% (N = 107). The early postoperative complication rate was 7.3% (N = 23). The most common complication was ulnar neuropathy (5.8%, N = 18). Wound complications, elbow stiffness, and medial epicondyle fractures were much less common (N = 5). Sixteen of 18 (88.9%) patients with postoperative ulnar neuropathy underwent transposition or decompression at the time of primary repair. Of these 18 patients, 5 (27.8%) underwent a subsequent ulnar nerve surgery (1 primary and 4 secondary), with the majority occurring within 6 months. The incidence of revision MUCL surgery was low (1.0%, N=3), with all 3 patients undergoing MUCL reconstruction. Conclusion: There was a low incidence of early postoperative complications (7.3%) and 2-year revision MUCL surgery (1.0%) in young patients who underwent primary MUCL repair with no additional ligamentous, fracture, and dislocation-related diagnoses. All 3 (1.0%) MUCL revisions underwent reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.