RESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the admission chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) findings of patients who presented to the emergency department with complaints of abdominal pain, fever, and shortness of breath and who had RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection. Seventy-five patients with RT-PCR-confirmed (in laboratory) COVID-19 infection who underwent chest and abdominal CT were included in the study. The radiological scales [the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and severity score] of the chest and abdominal findings were examined on CT images. Forty-one (54.7%) patients were male and 34 (45.3%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 63.03 (range 24-89) years. The most frequently calculated CO-RADS score was found to be 5 (n = 53, 70.7%). Bilateral (72.0%) and multibolar (74.7%) involvement, peripheral (72.0%) and posterior (60.0%) distribution, and ground-glass opacity (66.7%) pattern were the most common pulmonary findings. A positive correlation was observed between CO-RADS and total severty score (p < 0.001). All patients were hospitalized. One (1.3%) patient was surgically treated because of acute appendicitis. Nine (12.0%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. Six (8.0%) patients died in the intensive care unit. Patients presenting to the emergency department with both abdominal and respiratory complaints during the pandemic should be evaluated for COVID-19. Patients can be diagnosed early with the data collected from CT without waiting for the PCR result. Hospital staff can take the necessary protective measures against virus transmission early, minimizing the in-hospital transmission of the virus.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the clinical features and treatment strategies applied to the patients with ectopic pregnancy admitted to our tertiary care center before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Women aged 18-45 years, who were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the pre- and postpandemic periods, were included in this case-control study. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients, 116 patients before the pandemic and 57 patients during the pandemic, were included in the study. The rate of admissions from the emergency department was higher during the pandemic than before the pandemic (P = 0.003). The rupture was detected significantly higher during the outbreak (13/116 [11.2%]) than before the pandemic (16/57 [28.1%]) (P = 0.009). While conservative treatment was applied more frequently in the prepandemic period, it was observed that patients were treated surgically more frequently during the pandemic period (P = 0.003). While laparoscopic surgery was preferred before the pandemic, laparotomy was applied to all patients during the pandemic (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the first wave of the outbreak, there were delays in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancies, and these patients presented with ruptures more frequently than before the pandemic. Furthermore, surgical treatment methods were used more than conservative therapies during the outbreak.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Health-care workers (HCWs) are often seen as the most reliable source of vaccine-related information for their patients; nevertheless, various studies show that HCWs experience vaccine hesitation. In this study, the aim was to determine the reasons for vaccine hesitation among HCWs working in a large public hospital and its affiliated units in Istanbul. METHODS: A descriptive method for collecting qualitative data was designed for this study. The data of the HCWs were analyzed in line with the vaccine hesitancy factors put forward by the World Health Organization (WHO). RESULTS: The most important vaccine hesitancy theme that emerged was the fear and lack of confidence in the vaccines, which was expressed at a higher rate than any other theme in all HCWs. The most cited reason for fear/lack of confidence in the vaccine was the fear of its side effects. It was observed that the HCWs who reported hesitation about vaccination due to pregnancy and breastfeeding consisted of women. The second most common theme for vaccine hesitation was reported as an inconvenience in accessing the vaccines. Although HCWs have priority, they stated that their reason for vaccine hesitancy was due to heavy personal issues or workloads. The final theme was about complacency, or thinking they do not need the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitation is a challenge that can be overcome with detailed monitoring and policy-making. Although the vaccine seems to be more significant, we do not want to see vaccine hesitancy grow more than the vaccine itself.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Humanos , Feminino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hesitação Vacinal , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), although relatively rare, is an emergency condition with high mortality rates (60-80%) attributed to lack of early diagnosis. The aim of this experimental study was to observe the changes in serum intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) levels over time in the AMI model by ligating superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in rats and to compare with the serum I-FABP levels of the rats in the control group. METHODS: Twenty rats were randomly allocated into two groups as control and ischemia group. The basal serum I-FABP levels were determined. SMA was isolated by laparotomy in all animals. In the ischemia group, SMA was ligated and intestinal ischemia was formed. Blood was taken from each rat in both groups at 30th, 60th, and 90th min to determine the serum I-FABP levels. The blood results were compared between two groups and were also compared by time in each group. RESULTS: In the ischemia group, serum I-FABP levels were significantly higher than the control group at post-operative 30th, 60th, and 90th min (p<0.01). In comparison with pre-operative serum I-FABP levels, remarkable increases were observed statistically at post-operative 30th, 60th, and 90th min in the ischemia group (p<0.01). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference within the serum I-FABP levels over time in the control group. The increases of serum I-FABP levels in the ischemia group were directly correlated with the time of ischemia. CONCLUSION: Serum I-FABP levels have increased significantly in the intestinal ischemia and these values have risen progressively over time. Serum I-FABP may be a useful and promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of AMI.