Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 2024 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042152

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is a rising trend among women towards nonpharmacological approaches owing to their minimally invasive nature and limited adverse effects. Virtual reality (VR) has recently gained popularity as a new technology for reducing pain and anxiety in medical settings. Our research sought to investigate the impact of VR on pain and anxiety levels while undergoing episiotomy repair. METHODS: A comprehensive search was carried out across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science to find relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) up to January 2024. These trials investigated the use of VR as a treatment during episiotomy repair compared with a control group that did not receive VR intervention. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software to analyze the data collected. Our primary outcomes were pain scores reported during and after episiotomy repair measured by a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes analyzed included anxiety scores during and after the procedure, as well as the duration of episiotomy repair. RESULTS: Seven RCTs, involving 578 patients, met the inclusion criteria. VR resulted in a significant reduction in pain scores both during and after episiotomy repair (p < 0.001). Additionally, anxiety levels during and after the procedure were significantly reduced in the VR group compared with the control group. Moreover, the duration of episiotomy repair was significantly shorter in the VR group. CONCLUSION: Using VR has proven to be an effective technique in reducing pain and anxiety during and after episiotomy repair, as well as potentially speeding up the procedure.

2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(4): 1267-1280, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165441

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) intervention for pain and anxiety relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: Various databases were searched for available clinical trials from inception until June 2023. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared virtual reality intervention versus standard care among women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy. We used Revman software to perform our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the pain score during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were anxiety during the procedure and pain post-procedure. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain and anxiety. RESULTS: Six RCTs were retrieved, involving a total of 457 patients. Virtual reality was associated with a significant reduction in pain score during the procedure in comparison with the control group (MD = - 1.43, 95% CI [- 1.69, - 1.16], p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant decrease in anxiety during the procedure among the virtual reality group compared to the control group (p = 0.01). The pain score post-procedure significantly decreased within the virtual reality group (MD = - 1.52, 95% CI [- 1.78, - 1.26], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality technology is a simple, feasible, and effective intervention for reducing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy. More trials are required to confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Histeroscopia , Manejo da Dor , Dor Processual , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Ansiedade/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Processual/prevenção & controle , Dor Processual/etiologia , Realidade Virtual , Medição da Dor , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Exposição à Realidade Virtual/métodos
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 228(5): 553.e1-553.e8, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block is a contemporary approach to providing postoperative analgesia, and this approach is performed by transperitoneally administering local anesthetic in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles to target the sensory nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall. Although this technique is used in many centers, it has not been studied prospectively in patients undergoing a midline laparotomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative opioid requirements and improves clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with a suspected or proven gynecologic malignancy undergoing surgery through a midline laparotomy at 1 Canadian tertiary academic center were randomized to either the bupivacaine group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) or the placebo group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of normal saline solution) before fascial closure. The primary outcome was the total dose of opioids (in morphine milligram equivalents) received in the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included opioid doses between 24 and 48 hours, pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, incidence of clinical ileus, time to flatus, and hospital length of stay. The exclusion criteria included contraindications to study medication, history of chronic opioid use, significant adhesions on the anterior abdominal wall preventing access to the injection site, concurrent nonabdominal surgical procedure, and the planned use of neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia. To detect a 20% decrease in opioid requirements with a 2-sided type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%, a sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated. RESULTS: From October 2020 to November 2021, 38 patients were randomized to the bupivacaine arm, and 41 patients were randomized to the placebo arm. The mean age was 60 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.3. A supraumbilical incision was used in 30 of 79 cases (38.0%), and bowel resection was performed in 10 of 79 cases (12.7%). Patient and surgical characteristics were evenly distributed. The patients in the bupivacaine group required 98.0±59.2 morphine milligram equivalents in the first 24 hours after surgery, whereas the patients in the placebo group required 100.8±44.0 morphine milligram equivalents (P=.85). The mean pain score at 4 hours after surgery was 3.1±2.4 (0-10 scale) in the intervention group vs 3.1±2.0 in the placebo group (P=.93). Clinically significant nausea or vomiting was reported in 1 of 38 patients (2.6%) in the intervention group vs 1 of 41 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group (P=.95). Time to first flatus, rates of clinical ileus, and length of stay were similar between groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with a body mass index of <25 and patients who received an infraumbilical incision showed similarly comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine was not found to be superior to the placebo intervention in reducing postoperative opioid requirements or improving other postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing a midline laparotomy. These results differed from previous reports evaluating the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block approach. Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block should not be considered standard of care in postoperative multimodal analgesia.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Analgésicos Opioides , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Laparotomia , Flatulência/induzido quimicamente , Flatulência/complicações , Flatulência/tratamento farmacológico , Canadá , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Músculos Abdominais , Método Duplo-Cego , Derivados da Morfina/uso terapêutico , Morfina
4.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 32(12): 1512-1518, 2022 12 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36332935

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Performing inguinofemoral sentinel lymph node biopsy for vulvar cancer following a previous vulvar excision, often referred to as 'scar injection', is debated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy following scar injection and the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with vulvar cancer. We assessed detection rates and outcomes in patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy by scar injection and compared them with patients who had injection around a visible tumor and with patients who had an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy following previous vulvar excision. Sentinel node detection rates are described per patient and per groin and are compared using Χ2 analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association of recurrence and survival with surgical technique and recognized pathological variables. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 173 groins in 97 patients. At least one sentinel lymph node was detected in 162 (94%) groins examined, and detection rate did not differ whether the groin was assessed following tumor injection (n=122, 94%) or scar injection (n=40, 93%; p=0.85). Patients in the scar-injection group had less frequent lymph node metastases (p<0.02), smaller tumors (p<0.001), and more superficial invasion (p<0.02). Median follow-up was 34.7 months (range 0-108). Scar injection was not independently associated with recurrence or death on multivariable analysis, and depth of invasion was the only independent predictor of disease recurrence (hazards ratio (HR)=1.14, p=0.03). Recurrence and survival were also comparable for patients who had a sentinel lymph node biopsy or inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy following previous vulvar excision (log rank p=0.30; p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy by scar injection is feasible and demonstrates similar long-term outcomes in patients having scar or tumor injections, and in patients following previous tumor excision undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy or lymphadenectomy.


Assuntos
Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Vulvares , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cicatriz/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(1): 236-243, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33526258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza vaccination for all patients with solid organ malignancies prior to initiating chemotherapy. Baseline vaccination rates (March 2019) for pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza at our tertiary cancer centre were 8% and 40%, respectively. The aim of this study was to increase the number of gynecologic chemotherapy patients receiving pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations to 80% by March 2020. METHODS: We performed an interrupted time series study using structured quality improvement methodology. Three interventions were introduced to address vaccination barriers: an in-house vaccination program, a staff education campaign, and a patient care bundle (pre-printed prescription, information brochure, vaccine record booklet). Process and outcome data were collected by patient survey and pharmacy audit and analyzed on statistical process control charts. RESULTS: We identified 195 eligible patients. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates rose significantly from 5% to a monthly mean of 61% and from 36% to a monthly mean of 67%, respectively. The 80% target was reached for both vaccines during one or more months of study. The in-house vaccination and staff education programs were major contributors to the improvement, whereas the information brochure and record booklet were minor contributors. CONCLUSIONS: Three interventions to promote pneumococcal and influenza vaccination among chemotherapy patients resulted in significantly improved vaccination rates. Lessons learned about promoting vaccine uptake may be generalizable to different populations and vaccine types. In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, initiatives to expand the program to all chemotherapy patients at our centre are underway.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Influenza Humana/etiologia , Ontário , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/etiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração
6.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(2): 353-361, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000463

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program implemented in a Gynecologic Oncology population undergoing a laparotomy at a Canadian tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data, using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (ACS NSQIP), was used to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients undergoing a laparotomy before and after the 2018 implementation of an ERAS program in a Canadian regional cancer center. Patient demographics, surgical variables and postoperative outcomes of 187 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 were compared with those of 441 patients undergoing surgery between January 2016 and December 2017. Student's t, Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests, as well as multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to evaluate baseline characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: Length of stay was significantly shortened in the study population after introducing the ERAS protocol, from a mean of 4.7 (SD = 3.8) days to a mean of 3.8 (SD = 3.2) days (P = .0001). The overall complication rate decreased from 24.3% to 16% (P = .02). Significant decreases in the rates of postoperative infections (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.99) and cardiovascular complications (adjusted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79) were noted, without a significant increase in readmission rate (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Introducing an ERAS program for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy was effective in shortening length of stay and the overall complication rate without a significant increase in readmission. Advocacy for broader implementation of ERAS among gynecologic oncology services and ongoing discussion on challenges and opportunities in the implementation process are warranted to improve patient outcomes and experiences.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
8.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 283-288, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941743

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically examine the relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: We utilized the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) system to identify relevant codes from the NIS database (2016-2019). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses (adjusted age, race, hospital region, hospital teaching status, income Zip score, smoking, alcohol use, and hormonal replacement therapy) were conducted to evaluate association between PCOS and gynecologic cancers. Results were summarized as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 15,024,965 patients were analyzed, of whom 56,183 and 14,968,782 patients were diagnosed with and without PCOS, respectively. Among the patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancers (n = 91,599), there were 286 with PCOS and 91,313 without PCOS. Univariate analysis revealed that PCOS was significantly associated with higher risk of endometrial cancer (OR = 1.39, 95 % CI [1.18-1.63], p < 0.0001), but lower risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.55, 95 % CI [0.45-0.67], p < 0.0001) and cervical cancer (OR = 0.68, 95 % CI [0.51-0.91], p = 0.009). In contrast, after Bonferroni correction, multivariable analysis depicted that PCOS remained significantly associated with higher risk of endometrial cancer (OR = 3.90, 95 % CI [4.32-4.59], p < 0.0001). There was no significant correlation between PCOS and risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI [0.89-1.34], p = 0.409) and cervical cancer (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI [0.62-1.11], p = 0.218). CONCLUSION: This first-ever NIS analysis showed that patients with PCOS exhibited unique gynecologic cancer risk profiles, with higher risk for endometrial cancer, and no significant risk for ovarian or cervical cancers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem , Bases de Dados Factuais
9.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(5): 102770, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503382

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto Induzido , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/instrumentação , Feminino , Gravidez , Maturidade Cervical , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Cesárea/métodos , Cateterismo Urinário/métodos , Cateterismo Urinário/instrumentação
10.
Sex Med Rev ; 10(1): 155-161, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362710

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction is a sexual pain disorder characterized by involuntary spasm of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) around the vagina that interferes with intercourse or any kind of vaginal penetration, making it impossible or extremely painful. Recently, researchers have shown increased interest in botulinum toxin (BoNTA) as an alternative option for refractory cases of PFM dysfunction, especially those that fail first-line treatments. Questions have been raised about the efficacy of BoNTA for the treatment of PFM dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To provide an updated and comprehensive review on the role of BoNTA in the management of refractory PFM dysfunction. METHODS: We reviewed the literature using a systematic search strategy via PubMed and Google Scholar databases, to identify articles investigating the use of BoNTA in PFM dysfunction. We included studies that explored its indications, mechanism of action, injection dosing and technique, success rate, side effects, and contraindications. RESULTS: We identified 20 relevant articles. Of these, 12 were original studies: 7 clinical trials, 1 retrospective cohort study and 4 case reports or case series. Doses of BoNTA that were used in these studies ranged between 20 and 500 units. The most commonly injected sites were levator ani muscles. Success rates varied between 62 and 100 %. Most studies showed no recurrence within 1 year after treatment. The majority of these studies used BoNTA after conventional first-line treatments have failed. CONCLUSION: PFM dysfunction is a debilitating condition that adversely affects quality of life. There is promising evidence to support the use of BoNTA in cases of refractory PFM dysfunction. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to standardize the use of BoNTA as a treatment option for these cases. Gari R, Alyafi M, Gadi RU, et al. Use of Botulinum Toxin (Botox) in Cases of Refractory Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:155-161.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Diafragma da Pelve , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espasmo/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa