Laparoscopic Reversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Normal Anatomy: Case Series and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Revisional bariatric surgeries to other restrictive or malabsorptive procedures are considered for inadequate weight reduction, weight regains, or complications. Literature on the application of reversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to normal anatomy is limited. We aimed to report our experiences with 5 OAGB reversion surgeries to normal anatomy that were conducted for different reasons. CASE REPORT Case 1: A 40-year-old woman underwent OAGB. She had peripheral neuropathy, lower limb edema, food intolerance, and biliary reflux. For those reasons, we performed revisional surgery. Case 2: A 30-year-old woman underwent OAGB. She had tiredness, dizziness, multiple fainting, and lower limb edema. Laboratory results showed hypoglycemia, mild hypoproteinemia, and proteinuria. Dietary instructions were unsuccessful. Therefore, we performed revisional surgery. Case 3: A 40-year-old woman underwent OAGB. She had reached a body mass index (BMI) of 19, which was not appreciated by her social contacts and caused her to experience depression. After a psychiatric assessment, she insisted on revisional surgery. Case 4: A 28-year-old woman underwent OAGB. Her BMI was 18, which was not accepted by her spouse, who criticized her body image. For that, we did revisional surgery. Case 5: A 52-year-old woman with hypothyroidism underwent OAGB. She had poor compliance with dietary instructions, complicated by liver failure, which was conservatively managed. She underwent revisional surgery after optimizing her condition. She was discharged in stable condition. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary team should evaluate patients, and the decision to revise should come only after the failure of all conservative management methods.

Characteristics of Medico-Legal Cases and Errors in Medico-Legal Reports at a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: A medico-legal case (MLC) involves any injury or medical condition in which law enforcement agencies investigate and fix the responsibility regarding of an injury or medical condition. Incorrect or incomplete medico-legal reports (MLRs) may trigger a pause or delay in legal proceedings and patients' rights could be violated. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of MLCs and to identify errors in the MLRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive study was conducted in a teaching hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. In total, 418 MLRs furnished during a 6-month period and reviewed for characteristics of MLCs and identification of errors. RESULTS: A total of 418 MLRs were included in the present study. Fights or physical assault and battery formed the major proportion of MLCs amounting to 83% of MLCs. Blunt injury was the dominant type of injury in most of the cases (81.8%). In relation to errors in MLRs, no MLR in the present study were without errors. CONCLUSION: Fights or physical assault and battery formed the major proportion of MLCs. Multiple errors were identified in the MLRs furnished by the physicians. Writing MLRs must follow standardized guidelines as it has a bearing on legal proceedings and patients' rights. We recommend training for physicians in writing MLRs in the interest of proper administration of justice.

Successful Management of Teeth with Different Types of Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions.

Endodontic-periodontal diseases often present great challenges to the clinician in their diagnosis, management, and prognosis. Understanding the disease process through cause-and-effect relationships between the pulp and supporting periodontal tissues with the aid of rational classifications leads to successful treatment outcomes. In this report, we present several treatment modalities in patients with different endodontic-periodontal lesions. A modification to the new endodontic-periodontic classification, Al-Fouzan's classification, was also added. The first case was classified as retrograde periodontal disease (i.e., primary endodontic lesion with drainage through the periodontal ligament). The second case was diagnosed as an iatrogenic periodontal lesion caused by root perforation. The third case was diagnosed as an iatrogenic periodontal lesion caused by tooth trauma due to orthodontic treatment. The first two cases were managed with a nonsurgical approach, whereas the third case was managed with nonsurgical and surgical approaches. All patients showed complete healing of soft and hard tissue lesions. A thorough understanding of the disease history and the patient's signs and symptoms, complete examination with full investigation, and the use of a systematic step-by-step approach in the management of such challenging endodontic-periodontal lesions with regular recall visits were very useful and successful.