Individuals vary in their overt attention preference for positive images consistently across time and stimulus types.

What humans look at strongly determines what they see. We show that individual differences in the tendency to look at positive stimuli are stable across time and across contents, establishing gaze positivity preference as a perceptual trait that determines the amount of positively valence stimuli individuals select for visual processing. Furthermore, we show that patients with major depressive disorder exhibit consistently low positivity preference before treatment. In a subset of patients, we also assessed the positivity preference after two months of treatment in which positivity gaze preference increased to levels similar to healthy individuals. We discuss the possible practical diagnostic applications of these findings, as well as how this general gaze-related trait may influence other behavioral and psychological aspects.

Distinct homotopic functional connectivity patterns of the amygdalar sub-regions as biomarkers in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects multiple functional neural networks. Neuroimaging studies using resting-state functional connectivity (FC) have focused on the amygdala but did not assess changes in connectivity between the left and right amygdala. The current study aimed to examine the inter-hemispheric functional connectivity (homotopic FC, HoFC) between different amygdalar sub-regions in patients with MDD compared to healthy controls, and to examine whether amygdalar sub-regions' HoFC also predicts response to Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). METHOD: Sixty-seven patients with MDD and 64 matched healthy controls were recruited. An MRI scan focusing on resting state fMRI and clinical and cognitive evaluations were performed. An atlas seed-based approach was used to identify the lateral and medial sub-regions of the amygdala. HoFC of these sub-regions was compared between groups and correlated with severity of depression, and emotional processing performance. Baseline HoFC levels were used to predict response to SSRIs after 2 months of treatment. RESULTS: Patients with MDD demonstrated decreased inter-hemispheric FC in the medial (F3,120 = 4.11, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.096) but not in the lateral (F3,119 = 0.29, p = 0.82, η2 = 0.008) amygdala compared with healthy controls. The inter-hemispheric FC of the medial sub-region correlated with symptoms severity (r = -0.33, p < 0.001) and emotional processing performance (r = 0.38, p < 0.001). Moreover, it predicted treatment response to SSRIs 65.4 % of the cases. LIMITATIONS: The current study did not address FC changes in MDD biotypes. In addition, structural connectivity was not examined. CONCLUSIONS: Using a unique perspective of the amygdalar distinct areas elucidated differential inter-hemispheric FC patterns in MDD patients, emphasizing the role of interhemispheric communication in depression.

An evaluation of treatment response and remission definitions in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Expert consensus operationalized treatment response and remission in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) reduction ≥35% and score ≤12 with ≤2 on Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S) scales, respectively. However, there has been scant empirical evidence supporting these definitions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with OCD to determine optimal Y-BOCS thresholds for response and remission. We estimated pooled sensitivity/specificity for each percent reduction threshold (response) or posttreatment score (remission) to determine response and remission defined by a CGI-I and CGI-S ≤ 2, respectively. RESULTS: Individual participant data from 25 of 94 eligible RCTs (1235 participants) were included. The optimal threshold for response was ≥30% Y-BOCS reduction and for remission was ≤15 posttreatment Y-BOCS. However, differences in sensitivity and specificity between the optimal and nearby thresholds for response and remission were small with some uncertainty demonstrated by the confidence ellipses. CONCLUSION: While the empirically derived Y-BOCS thresholds in our meta-analysis differ from expert consensus, given the predominance of data from more recent trials of OCD, which involved more refractory participants and novel treatment modalities as opposed to first-line therapies, we recommend the continued use of the consensus definitions.