Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Top Med Chem ; 23(9): 816-832, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37102485

RESUMO

Nitroaromatic compounds have been used for treating parasitic diseases since the 1960s. Pharmacological alternatives to treat them are under observation. However, for the most neglected diseases, such as those caused by worms and less known protozoans, nitro compounds are still among the drugs of choice, despite their well-known collateral effects. In this review, we describe the chemistry and the uses of the still most employed nitroaromatic compounds for treating parasitosis caused by worms or lesser-known protozoans. We also describe their application as veterinary drugs. The most accepted mechanism of action seems to be the same, leading to collateral effects. For this reason, a special session was dedicated to discussing toxicity, carcinogenicity, and mutagenesis, as well as the most acceptable aspects of the known structure-activity/toxicity relationships involving nitroaromatic compounds. It employed the SciFindern search tool from the American Chemical Society in the search for the most relevant bibliography within the field, exploring keyword expressions such as "NITRO COMPOUNDS" and "BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY" (within Abstracts or Keywords) and concepts related to parasites, pharmacology and toxicology. The results were classified according to the chemical classes of nitro compounds, being the most relevant studies regarding journal impact and interest of the described results chosen to be discussed. From the found literature, it is easy to notice that nitro compounds, especially the nitroaromatic ones, are still widely used in antiparasitic therapy, despite their toxicity. They also are the best starting point in the search for new active compounds.


Assuntos
Doenças Parasitárias , Humanos , Doenças Negligenciadas , Nitrocompostos/química , Doenças Parasitárias/tratamento farmacológico , Relação Estrutura-Atividade
2.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 690432, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34220515

RESUMO

Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease that affects people living in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. There are few therapeutic options for treating this infectious disease, and available drugs induce severe side effects in patients. Different communities have limited access to hospital facilities, as well as classical treatment of leishmaniasis; therefore, they use local natural products as alternative medicines to treat this infectious disease. The present work performed a bibliographic survey worldwide to record plants used by traditional communities to treat leishmaniasis, as well as the uses and peculiarities associated with each plant, which can guide future studies regarding the characterization of new drugs to treat leishmaniasis. A bibliographic survey performed in the PubMed and Scopus databases retrieved 294 articles related to traditional knowledge, medicinal plants and leishmaniasis; however, only 20 were selected based on the traditional use of plants to treat leishmaniasis. Considering such studies, 378 quotes referring to 292 plants (216 species and 76 genera) that have been used to treat leishmaniasis were recorded, which could be grouped into 89 different families. A broad discussion has been presented regarding the most frequent families, including Fabaceae (27 quotes), Araceae (23), Solanaceae and Asteraceae (22 each). Among the available data in the 378 quotes, it was observed that the parts of the plants most frequently used in local medicine were leaves (42.3% of recipes), applied topically (74.6%) and fresh poultices (17.2%). The contribution of Latin America to studies enrolling ethnopharmacological indications to treat leishmaniasis was evident. Of the 292 plants registered, 79 were tested against Leishmania sp. Future studies on leishmanicidal activity could be guided by the 292 plants presented in this study, mainly the five species Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae), Cedrela odorata L. (Meliaceae), Copaifera paupera (Herzog) Dwyer (Fabaceae), Musa × paradisiaca L. (Musaceae), and Nicotiana tabacum L. (Solanaceae), since they are the most frequently cited in articles and by traditional communities.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa