Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 146(4): 721-767, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707227

RESUMO

This comprehensive practice parameter for allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) provides updated guidance on diagnosis, assessment, selection of monotherapy and combination pharmacologic options, and allergen immunotherapy for AR. Newer information about local AR is reviewed. Cough is emphasized as a common symptom in both AR and NAR. Food allergy testing is not recommended in the routine evaluation of rhinitis. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) remain the preferred monotherapy for persistent AR, but additional studies support the additive benefit of combination treatment with INCS and intranasal antihistamines in both AR and NAR. Either intranasal antihistamines or INCS may be offered as first-line monotherapy for NAR. Montelukast should only be used for AR if there has been an inadequate response or intolerance to alternative therapies. Depot parenteral corticosteroids are not recommended for treatment of AR due to potential risks. While intranasal decongestants generally should be limited to short-term use to prevent rebound congestion, in limited circumstances, patients receiving regimens that include an INCS may be offered, in addition, an intranasal decongestant for up to 4 weeks. Neither acupuncture nor herbal products have adequate studies to support their use for AR. Oral decongestants should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy. Recommendations for use of subcutaneous and sublingual tablet allergen immunotherapy in AR are provided. Algorithms based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion are provided to guide in the selection of pharmacologic options for intermittent and persistent AR and NAR.


Assuntos
Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Fenótipo , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite/epidemiologia , Rinite/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Avaliação de Sintomas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Lung ; 192(1): 47-54, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24153452

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting beta agonists and inhaled corticosteroids combination products (LABA-ICS) are widely used in the treatment of asthma. However, there appears to be little data on their cardiovascular safety. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the available studies and trials on the cardiovascular safety of LABA-ICS in adults with asthma. METHODS: Two independent reviewers screened citations from PubMed and National Clinical Trials registry to identify studies and trials on the cardiovascular effects of LABA-ICS in patients with asthma. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies (with 17 cohorts on LABA-ICS to compare with a comparator or placebo) with 5,440 total study participants met the inclusion criteria. Two studies on budesonide-formoterol and one on fluticasone-salmeterol reported treatment emergent cardiovascular adverse events, all of which were dysrhythmias. For comparison, the pooled estimate of the Peto odds ratio (0.72; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.17-3; p = 0.65) and the summary risk ratio (0.77; 95 % CI 0.26-2.3; p = 0.64) indicated a nonsignificant difference between LABA-ICS and comparator/placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that few studies and trials reported treatment emergent cardiovascular adverse events with LABA-ICS. However, the Peto odds ratio and risk ratio for these outcomes was statistically nonsignificant. This suggests that LABA-ICS products may have a safe cardiovascular profile in asthma patients.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Asma/diagnóstico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Incidência , Razão de Chances , Segurança do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(2): 492-499, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30468878

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a significant public health concern in the United States, especially in the pediatric population. It places substantial clinical and economic burdens on the health care system. Exposure to antibiotics in early childhood is thought to increase the risk of subsequent food allergy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of exposure to antibiotics early in life on time to development of food allergy. METHODS: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study using Medicaid data from 28 states. Antibiotic nonusers were matched 1:1 to antibiotic users on date of birth, sex, race, and state. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the effect of antibiotic exposure on time to development of food allergy. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of study findings. RESULTS: We matched 500,647 antibiotic nonusers to 500,647 antibiotic users in the Medicaid pediatric population. In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, antibiotic exposure was significantly associated with faster development of food allergy (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.34-1.45). The magnitude and significance of the association between antibiotic exposure and food allergy did not change in the sensitivity analyses. A significant association between antibiotic exposure and faster development of food allergy was found in 17 of 28 states. CONCLUSION: Compared with antibiotic nonusers, children with antibiotic prescription had an increased risk of food allergy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Medicaid , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536320

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess the relationship between any systemic antibiotic prescription within the first year of life and the presence of an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for food allergy (FA). METHODS: This was a matched case-control study conducted using South Carolina Medicaid administrative data. FA cases born between 2007 and 2009 were matched to controls without FA on birth month/year, sex, race/ethnicity. Conditional logistic regression was used to model the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of FA diagnosis. All models were adjusted for presence of asthma, wheeze, or atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: A total of 1504 cases and 5995 controls were identified. Receipt of an antibiotic prescription within the initial 12 months of life was associated with FA diagnosis in unadjusted and adjusted models (aOR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.06-1.39). Compared to children with no antibiotic prescriptions, a linear increase in the aOR was seen with increasing antibiotic prescriptions. Children receiving five or more (aOR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.31-2.05) antibiotic prescriptions were significantly associated with FA diagnosis. The strongest association was noted among recipients of cephalosporin and sulfonamide antibiotics in both unadjusted and adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of antibiotic prescription in the first year of life is associated with FA diagnosis code in young children after controlling for common covariates. Multiple antibiotic prescriptions are more strongly associated with increases in the odds of FA diagnosis.

6.
J Asthma ; 42(1): 73-6, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15801332

RESUMO

Two postulated intrinsic anti-inflammatory mechanisms in asthma include the low affinity IgE receptor, or CD23, and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). We investigated the role these mediators play in the asthmatic response by measuring local levels in human asthmatics before and after segmental allergen challenge and examined the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on soluble CD23 and IL-1ra levels. Ten subjects underwent bronchoscopy at baseline and 24 hours after antigen challenge. Prior to challenge and every 12 hours afterward subjects received beclomethasone 252 microg or placebo. Fluid was analyzed for sCD23 and IL-1ra using ELISA immunoassays. Eosinophil percentages significantly increased at 24 hours following antigen challenge. sCD23 levels were generally undetectable at baseline and increased significantly following antigen challenge. IL-1ra levels increased 28-fold in the late-phase response. Beclomethasone significantly reduced the late-phase eosinophil percentage at 24 hours compared with placebo but did not attenuate late-phase sCD23 or IL-1ra levels. Our data showed a significant rise in the levels of two mediators thought to play an important role in the attenuation of the asthmatic response. The finding that steroid treatment did not enhance these levels suggests that this may be an independent approach to asthma therapy that should be investigated.


Assuntos
Asma/imunologia , Receptores de IgE/biossíntese , Receptores de Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Beclometasona/farmacologia , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Eosinófilos/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores de Interleucina-1/biossíntese
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa