Acute kidney injury in patients undergoing endovascular or open repair of juxtarenal or pararenal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cohort study was to report the proportion of patients who develop periprocedural acute kidney injury (AKI) after endovascular repair (ER) and open surgery (OS) in patients with juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and to assess potential risk factors for AKI. The study also aimed to report the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with and without AKI. METHODS: This was a multicenter cohort study of five European academic high-volume centers (>50 OS or 50 ER infrarenal AAA repairs, plus >15 complex AAA repairs per year). All consecutively treated patients were extracted from a prospective vascular surgical registry and the data were scrutinized retrospectively. The primary end point for this study was the development of AKI. AKI was diagnosed when there is a two-fold increase of serum creatinine or decrease of glomerular filtration rate of >50% within 1 week of AAA repair. Secondary end points included long-term mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). RESULTS: AKI occurred in 16.6% of patients in the ER group vs 30.3% in the OS group (P < .001). The 30-day mortality rate was higher among patients with AKI in both ER (15.4% vs 3.1%; P = .006) and OS (13.2% vs 5.3%; P = .001) groups. Age, chronic kidney disease, presence of significant thrombus burden in the pararenal region, >1000 mL blood loss in ER group were associated with development of AKI. Age, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, presence of significant thrombus burden in the pararenal region, and a proximal clamping time of >30 minutes in the OS group were associated with the development of AKI, whereas renal perfusion during clamping was the protective factor against AKI development. After a median follow-up of 91 months, AKI was associated with higher mortality rates in both the ER group (58.9% vs 29.7%; P < .001) and the OS group (61.5% vs 27.3%; P < .001). After the same follow-up period, AKI was associated with a higher incidence of ESRD in both the ER group (12.8% vs 3.6%; P = .009) and the OS group (9.9% vs 2.9%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified important pre and postoperative factors associated with AKI after juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Patients with postoperative AKI had significantly higher short- and long term mortality and higher incidence of ESRD than patients without AKI.

Cook Zenith Alpha Endograft: A Protocol to Minimise Limb Graft Occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous articles have reported an increased incidence of limb graft occlusion (LGO) with the Cook Zenith Alpha endograft compared with other endografts in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The present study aimed to assess the rate of LGO after EVAR in particular with the Cook Zenith Alpha device when adhering to a standardised protocol designed to prevent limb related complications. METHODS: This was a non-sponsored retrospective study performed in two university vascular surgery centres employing the same protocol for limb complication prevention during EVAR from 2016 to 2019. The protocol encompassed: (1) angioplasty of any common/external iliac artery with > 50% stenosis before endograft navigation; (2) proximal sealing zone of limbs at the same level of the flow divider with minimum overlap, which is more restrictive than the Cook Zenith Alpha instructions for use; (3) semicompliant kissing ballooning of limbs; (4) limb stenting in case of any residual tortuosity/kinking/stenosis; and (5) adjunctive common and external iliac stenting for residual stenosis/dissection after EVAR. Patients enrolled in this study were treated with standard aorto-bis-iliac EVAR. Follow up was performed by clinical visit and duplex ultrasonography at discharge, six months, and yearly thereafter. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the LGO rate with different EVAR devices (Cook Zenith Alpha, Gore C3, and Medtronic Endurant) and to determine potential risk factors for LGO associated with the Zenith Alpha. RESULTS: In the study period, 547 EVARs were considered: 233 (42.6%) Cook Zenith Alpha, 196 (35.8%) Gore Excluder, and 118 (21.6%) Medtronic Endurant. The mean follow up was 44 ± 23 months, and the five year freedom from LGO was 97 ± 3%, without differences between groups (97 ± 2%, 95 ± 3%, and 100% with Cook Zenith Alpha, Medtronic Endurant, and Gore Excluder, respectively; p = .080). In the Zenith Alpha group, intra-operative adjunctive iliac artery angioplasty, iliac artery stenting, or iliac limb stenting was performed in 8%, 3.4%, and 9.7%, respectively. Analysis of potential risk factors for LGO identified external iliac artery distal landing and large main bodies (ZIMB 32 - 36) independently associated with LGO during follow up (hazard ratio [HR] 18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3 - 130, p = .004; and HR 12, 95% CI 1.2 - 130, p = .030, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present experience with a protocol for limb complication prevention allows one to obtain a low rate of LGO at five years with Zenith Alpha endografts similar to other endografts. Specific risk factors for the Cook Zenith Alpha endograft are the external iliac artery distal landing and the use of a large main body (ZIMB 32 - 36).

Midterm results of complicated penetrating abdominal aortic ulcer treated by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is determined by atherosclerotic degeneration of the tunica media with disruption of the intima. Usually it is detected in the thoracic aorta, with few series describing an abdominal location. The aim of the study was to report early and late outcomes of the endovascular repair of complicated infrarenal abdominal PAU (a-PAU) by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization. METHODS: Data from all complicated a-PAU submitted to endovascular repair by aortobi-iliac endograft (Cook-Zenith Alpha) between 2016 and 2021 (February) were analyzed. The a-PAU coil embolization was performed to decrease the risk of persistent type II endoleak whenever possible. Complicated a-PAU were defined according with the presence of symptoms, aortic rupture, or saccular or pseudo-aneurysm. Technical success, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and reinterventions were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, endoleaks, and freedom from reinterventions were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1153 endovascular aortic procedures, 45 cases (4%) of complicated a-PAU were identified. Fourteen cases (31%) were managed in urgent setting (symptoms, n = 10 [22%]; shock, n = 4 [9%]). The median diameter of a-PAU was 49 mm (interquartile range, 14 mm). Thirteen patients (29%) had severe femoral or iliac access (angle >90°, circumferential calcification [>50%], hemodynamic iliac stenosis or obstruction, an external iliac artery diameter of less than 7 mm, or a previous femoral surgical graft). The a-PAU embolization was performed in 30 cases (67%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Postoperative cardiac, pulmonary and renal morbidity occurred in one (2%), two (4%), and eight (18%) patients, respectively. Two patients (4%) required reintervention within 30 days for access related complications. The 30-day mortality was 2%. At a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 18 months), no type I or III endoleaks, iliac leg occlusion, or graft infection occurred and no patient required late reinterventions; the 36-month survival rate was 72%. No a-PAU enlarged or ruptured during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of complicated a-PAU by a low-profile aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization is safe and effective. Excellent technical results are reported even in challenging anatomic features. Midterm clinical results are satisfactory in terms of aortic-related complications or mortality, freedom from reintervention, and survival.

Short Term and Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular versus Open Repair for Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching: Results from Juxta- and pararenal aortic Aneurysm Multicentre European Study (JAMES).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the short and long term clinical outcomes of endovascular (EVAR) vs. open surgical repair (OSR) of juxtarenal (JAAAs) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs) in five high volume European academic centres. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of five high volume European academic centres (> 50 open or 50 endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs annually) including 834 consecutive patients who were operated on and prospectively followed. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each patient who underwent OSR was matched with one patient who underwent EVAR in a 1:1 ratio (145 patients per group). The primary endpoint was long term all cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was freedom from aortic related re-intervention. RESULTS: After a follow up of 87 months, no difference in overall survival between the two groups was observed (38.6% for EVAR vs. 42.1% for OSR; p = .88). Patients undergoing EVAR underwent aortic related re-interventions more frequently (24.1% vs. 6.9%; p < .001). Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred more frequently in patients in the OSR group (40.7% vs. 24.8%; p = .006). However, most patients who suffered from AKI recovered without further progression to renal failure. In hospital (3.4% for EVAR vs. 4.1% for OSR; p = 1.0) and 30 day (4.1% for EVAR vs. 5.5% for OSR; p = .80) mortality rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Both open and endovascular treatment can be performed in high volume aortic centres with low short term mortality and morbidity rates, and good long term outcomes. These data provide useful information to help patients choose between the two procedures when both are feasible.

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), currently the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), has been described also for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) of the infrarenal aorta. However, data on its performance in this particular setting are still sparse in the literature. Aim of this study is to compare patient clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features, and post-operative outcomes between infrarenal PAU and AAA treated by standard EVAR. METHODS: In this retrospective observational case-control multicenter study, the patients treated for infrarenal PAU (G1) with EVAR in 2 high-volume European centers from January 2014 to December 2019 were prospectively entered into a dedicated database and retrospectively analyzed. A 4-fold control group (G2) of infrarenal AAA patients, homogeneous for age and gender, was also considered. Preoperative clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features (rupture, aortic maximum diameter, proximal neck diameter and length, aortic bifurcation diameter, distance between the lowest renal artery and the aortic bifurcation [RA-AoBi], severe aortic calcification), technical success, 30-day (morbidity, reintervention, complications, mortality) and follow-up outcomes (freedom from reintervention [FFR] and survival) were compared in the 2 groups (chi square/Fisher exact test, t-student test, Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (age 78 ± 7 years; male 84.9%) were included in G1 and 299 (age 78.4 ± 6.6 years; male 89.3%) in G2. At the time of diagnosis, G1 patients were more often symptomatic compared with G2 (odds ratio OR 10.21, 95% confidence interval CI 4.17-24.99, P < 0.001). At preoperative computed tomography angiography, G1 patients had more ruptures (OR 8.11, 95% CI 3.50-18.78, P < 0.001), smaller maximum diameter (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, P < 0.001), longer and narrower proximal neck (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = 0.020 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.32-1.64, P < 0.001, respectively) narrower aortic bifurcation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.45, P < 0.001), lower RA-AoBi (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.12, P < 0.001), and more severe aortic calcification (OR 57, 95% CI 16-198, P = 0.001). Technical success (G1 98.6% vs G2 95.7% P = 0.320), 30-day morbidity (G1 2.7% vs G2 8.7% P = 0.133), reintervention (G1 2.7% vs G2 2.3% P = 0.691), complications (G1 6.8% vs G2 8% P = 0.737) and mortality (G1 1.4% vs 2% P = 0.720) were comparable in the 2 groups. The mean follow-up was 17.7 ± 16.4 months in G1 and 18.8 ± 15.1 in G2 (P = 0.576). Late FFR and survival were comparable in the 2 groups (1-year FFR: G1 94.8% vs G2 97.5%, P = 0.995; 1-year survival: G1 91.7% vs G2 92.3%, P = 0.960). CONCLUSIONS: Infrarenal PAU are more often symptomatic with a higher rupture rate compared to infrarenal AAA. Despite some negative anatomical characteristics (narrower aortic bifurcation, lower RA-AoBi, extensive calcification), the results of EVAR are extremely satisfactory in this setting, suggesting that endovascular exclusion could be considered a valid treatment for infrarenal PAU.

Parallel Graft to Preserve a Reimplanted Inferior Mesenteric Artery During Thoracoabdominal Multibranched Endografting.

INTRODUCTION: Preserving pelvic circulation is crucial to minimize the risk of spinal cord and colonic ischemia, especially during the endovascular treatment of extended thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (TAAA) after previous open repair (OR). CASE REPORT: A 78-years-old patient, previously treated for AAA with OR and reimplantation of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), has presented with 9 cm type-III TAAA and underwent to a multi-stage endovascular procedure. Two thoracic endografts, t-Branch and a straight endograft by Cook Zenith platform were deployed. Renal and superior mesenteric arteries were cannulated and revascularized. Through the left axillary access, a 5F-vertebral catheter was delivered over a 0.035 inch guidewire to selectively catheterize IMA. A post-anastomotic stenosis was stented to advance the sheath and the parallel-graft (Viabahn 7 × 150 mm, Gore) into the artery. Thus, a bifurcated endograft was deployed inside the previous OR. According to the Sandwich-Technique, the stentgraft was deployed parallel and outside the bifurcated device, inside the straight one and 2 cm into the IMA and then reinforced by a bare-metal-stent (Protégé EverFlex™ 7 × 120 mm, Medtronic). Finally, a kissing ballooning of iliac endografts and parallel-graft was performed. The procedure was completed five days later, by stenting the celiac trunk. Post-operative course was uneventful. The 36-months CTA showed the patency of the IMA with no complications. CONCLUSION: The combination of t-Branch and Sandwich-Technique for IMA could be employed to treat extended TAAA with previous OR and reimplanted IMA thus minimizing the risk of colonic and spinal cord ischemia.

Platelet Depletion after Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair is Associated with Clinically Relevant Hemorrhagic Complications.

BACKGROUND: Thoraco-abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TA-EVAR) can be associated with platelet depletion (PD); the present study aims to evaluate PD incidence after TA-EVAR and to investigate its possible predictors and its influence on hemorrhagic complications and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all TA-EVAR from 2010 to 2021 was performed to identify patients with PD, (reduction > 60%). Spontaneous hemorrhages considered were: intracranial or any hemorrhages requiring surgery. Risk factors for PD, correlation with hemorrhagic complications and 30-day mortality were investigated by uni/multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 158 TA-EVAR were considered, 35(22%) female, 86(54%) extended thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) (Crawford type I, II, III), 79(50%) staged procedure, 31(20%) urgent treatment (symptomatic/ruptured). PD was identified in 42 (27%) patients and correlated to female sex, thrombus-free aortic lumen > 50mm, urgent treatment, extensive TAAA, blood transfusion >3 units and staged procedure at the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis confirmed a significant correlation between PD and thrombus-free aortic lumen > 50mm, urgent treatment, blood transfusion > 3 units and staged procedure (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-7.0), P = 0.04, OR 3.2 (95% CI 1.01-8.6), P= 0.03, OR 3.16 (95% CI 1.23-7.7), P = 0.03 and OR 2.71 (95% CI 1.2-6.2), P= 0.04, respectively). Overall, 13 hemorrhagic complications occurred (8 intracranial and 5 peripheral); PD was associated with higher risk of hemorrhagic complications (9/42 - 21% vs. 4/116 - 3%, OR: 7.6 [95% CI: 2.2-26.3], P= 0.001) and a higher risk of 30-day mortality in elective cases 4/25 - 16% vs. 3/101 - 3%, OR: 6.2 (95% CI: 1.3-29.8), P= 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: PD is a relatively common event after TA-EVAR and is associated with thrombus-free aortic lumen > 50mm, urgent treatment, blood transfusion > 3 units and staged procedure. Hemorrhagic complications and mortality are increased under these circumstances.

Editor's Choice - Effect of Carotid Interventions on Cognitive Function in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on early (baseline vs. maximum three months) and late (baseline vs. at least five months) cognitive function in patients with exclusively asymptomatic carotid stenoses (ACS). METHOD: Searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library. This systematic review includes 31 non-randomised studies. RESULTS: Early post-operative period: In 24 CEA/CAS/CEA+CAS cohorts (n = 2 059), two cohorts (representing 91/2 059, 4.4% of the overall study population) reported significant improvement in cognitive function, while one (28/2 059, 1%) reported significant decline. Three cohorts (250/2 059, 12.5% reported "mixed findings" where some cognitive scores significantly improved, and a similar proportion declined. The majority (nine cohorts; 1 086/2 059, 53%) reported no change. Seven cohorts (250/2 059, 12.1%) were mostly unchanged but one to two individual test scores improved, while two cohorts (347/2 059, 16.8%) were mostly unchanged with one to two individual test scores worse. Late post-operative period: In 21 cohorts (n = 1 554), one (28/1 554, 1.8%) reported significantly worse cognitive function, one reported significant improvement (24/1 554, 1.5%), while a third (19/1 554, 1.2%) reported "mixed findings". The majority were unchanged (six cohorts; 1 073/1 554, 69%) or mostly unchanged, but with one to two cognitive tests showing significant improvement (11 cohorts; 386/1 554, 24.8%). Overall, there was a similar distribution of findings in small, medium, and large studies, in studies with controls vs. no controls, in studies comparing CEA vs. CAS, and in studies with shorter/longer late follow up. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding accepted limitations regarding heterogeneity within non-randomised studies, CEA/CAS rarely improved overall late cognitive function in ACS patients (< 2%) and the risk of significant cognitive decline was equally low (< 2%). In the long term, the majority were either unchanged (69%) or mostly unchanged with one to two test scores improved (24.8%). Until new research identifies vulnerable ACS subgroups (e.g., impaired cerebral vascular reserve) or provides evidence that silent embolisation from ACS causes cognitive impairment, evidence supporting intervention in ACS patients to prevent/reverse cognitive decline is lacking.

Editor's Choice - Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the relationship between asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) of any severity and cognitive impairment and to determine whether there is evidence supporting an aetiological role for ACS in the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library. REVIEW METHODS: This was a systematic review (35 cross sectional or longitudinal studies) RESULTS: Study heterogeneity confounded data interpretation, largely because of no standardisation regarding cognitive testing. In the 30 cross sectional and six longitudinal studies (one included both), 33/35 (94%) reported an association between any degree of ACS and one or more tests of impaired cognitive function (20 reported one to three tests with poorer cognition; 11 reported four to six tests with poorer cognition, while three studies reported seven or more tests with poorer cognition). There was no evidence that ACS caused cognitive impairment via silent cortical infarction, or via involvement in the pathophysiology of lacunar infarction or white matter hyperintensities. However, nine of 10 studies evaluating cerebral vascular reserve (CVR) reported that ACS patients with impaired CVR were significantly more likely to have cognitive impairment and that impaired CVR was associated with worsening cognition over time. Patients with severe ACS but normal CVR had cognitive scores similar to controls. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding significant heterogeneity within the constituent studies, which compromised overall interpretation, 94% of studies reported an association between ACS and one or more tests of cognitive impairment. However, "significant association" does not automatically imply an aetiological relationship. At present, there is no clear evidence that ACS causes cognitive impairment via silent cortical infarction (but very few studies have addressed this question) and no evidence of ACS involvement in the pathophysiology of white matter hyperintensities or lacunar infarction. There is, however, better evidence that patients with severe ACS and impaired CVR are more likely to have cognitive impairment and to suffer further cognitive decline with time.

Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The EL-COVID Survey.

BACKGROUND: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2-4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.

The different effect of branches and fenestrations on early and long-term visceral vessel patency in complex aortic endovascular repair.

BACKGROUND: Aortic endovascular treatment with fenestrated or branched devices (f/bEVAR) requires a connection between the aortic graft and the visceral vessel (VV). However, data on the perioperative and long-term fate of the VVs remain scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate the VV loss (VVL) according to the type of revascularization performed (fenestrations vs branched) and the necessity for adjunctive visceral procedures (AVPs). METHODS: From 2012 to 2017, all f/bEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs), and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) were considered. The perioperative VVL, AVPs, and graft configuration were considered and evaluated during the follow-up period. RESULTS: In 158 patients, 523 VVs were considered, 140 (26%) in JAAAs, 165 (32%) in PAAAs, and 218 (42%) in TAAAs. Branches were used for 114 vessels (52%) in TAAAs, 8 (5%) in PAAAs, and 0 (0%) in JAAAs. The overall perioperative VVL was 20 (3.8%) and was significantly greater in TAAAs than in PAAAs or JAAAs (6.4% vs 2.4% vs 1.4%; P = .03). The branches resulted in greater perioperative VVL compared with fenestration (9% [11 of 122] vs 2% [9 of 401]; P = .0001). A significant VVL difference between the branches and fenestrations was identified selectively only for the renal arteries: 11 of 52 (21%) vs 6 of 224 (2.5%; P = .001). The results of the multivariate analysis confirmed the independent greater risk of VVL for branches and renal arteries (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 12.5-1.7; P = .04; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 52.6-1.05; P = .05, respectively). AVPs were performed in 43 VVs (8.2%) because of dissection (n = 2; 0.4%), stenosis (m = 3; 0.6%), bleeding (n = 3; 0.6%), or kinking between the bridging stent graft and the VV (n = 35; 7%). A significant difference between the branches and fenestrations was seen only for kinking between the bridging stent graft and VV (12% [15 of 112] vs 5% [20 of 401]; P = .005). At 5 years, the incidence of VVL was 2% ± 1%. The fenestrations had significantly greater freedom from VVL compared with the branches (100% vs 87% ± 6%; P = .04), which was confirmed selectively for TAAAs (100% vs 87% ± 6%; P = .04). The use of AVPs did not affect long-term visceral patency. CONCLUSIONS: Early and late VVL was infrequent in complex aortic procedures but seemed to occur more frequently in branches than in fenestration, especially for renal arteries. AVPs were often required to correct artery kinking but this did not affect the long-term patency.

The risk of aneurysm rupture and target visceral vessel occlusion during the lead period of custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse events occurring during the lead period of custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft for juxtarenal/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (j/p-AAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2017, patients enrolled for custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft repair were prospectively collected. Anatomic, procedural, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. Lead period was defined as the time between the endograft order to the manufacturer and implantation. Aneurysm diameter, target visceral vessel (TVV) severe stenosis (>75% of ostial lumen), and number of planned TVVs were evaluated at preoperative computed tomography angiography. Patency of TVVs was evaluated intraoperatively. Aneurysm rupture and TVV occlusion during the lead period were assessed. RESULTS: There were 141 custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft repairs planned. Of these, 133 patients (male, 87%; age, 73 ± 6 years) with complete available data were considered for the study. There were 75 (56%) j/p-AAAs and 58 (44%) TAAAs. The mean aneurysm diameter was 58 ± 6 mm (j/p-AAA, 56 ± 6 mm; TAAA, 67 ± 8 mm); 15 cases (11%) had >70-mm diameter. Planned TVVs were 431 (mean, 3 ± 1 TVVs/patient). The mean lead period was 89 ± 25 days, with five (3.8%) aneurysm ruptures (j/p-AAA, one; TAAA, four) occurring, two (1.5%) during manufacture and three (2.3%) with endograft available in the hospital (all three procedures were postponed because of cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities). In one TAAA rupture, the endograft was successfully implanted and the patient survived. Four of five ruptures had >70-mm diameter. On univariate analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .01; odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.2) and aneurysm diameter >70 mm (P = .001; OR, 42; 95% CI, 4-411) were risk factors for aneurysm rupture during the lead period, with aneurysm diameter >70 mm being confirmed as an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis (P = .005; OR, 29.3; 95% CI, 2.8-308). Overall, eight endografts (6%) were not implanted (refusal, two; aneurysm rupture, four; death not related to aneurysm, two). In the remaining 125 patients (94%), 405 TVVs were planned. Of them, 46 (11%) had severe stenosis at preoperative computed tomography angiography. Twelve (3%) TVVs occluded in the lead period (renal arteries, five; celiac trunks, seven); six were recanalized and six were abandoned. Severe preoperative stenosis was a risk factor for TVV occlusion during the lead period (P = .000; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, custom-made design required a mean lead period of 89 days, which was determined by both manufacturing time and clinical reasons. During this delay, there is a high risk of both rupture in aneurysms >70 mm and TVV occlusion in severely stenosed vessels. These factors should be considered in the indication for custom-made fenestrated/branched endograft repair.

Endovascular Repair of a Common Carotid Artery Perforation during Pacemaker Insertion.

BACKGROUND: We report the percutaneous endovascular management of an iatrogenic perforation of the left common carotid artery (LCCA) during an attempted trans-subclavian pacemaker (PM) placement. METHODS: An 87-year-old woman was urgently transferred after an attempted left subclavian vein PM implantation. Computed tomography angiography scan showed the accidental cannulation of LCCA in its most proximal segment. Owing to the significant surgical risks, the mortality rate, and the distal position of the vessel from the skin, we opted for an endovascular strategy with a balloon-expandable stent graft. The Advanta 8 × 38 mm V12 was inserted via a 7 French Flexor Introducer sheath through the right common femoral artery. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2 without complications. A 6-month follow-up computed tomography angiography demonstrated stent graft and LCCA patency and the patient was in a good stable condition. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the effectiveness of a minimal invasive endovascular approach to treat this uncommon but potentially lethal injury.

Cystic Adventitial Disease of the Popliteal Artery: Radical Surgical Treatment After Several Failed Approaches. A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Adventitial cystic disease is a rare nonatheromatous cause of popliteal artery disease. We report the case of a 49-year-old male patient who presented with left calf claudication caused by adventitial cystic disease. Popliteal artery resection followed by autologous vein graft interposition and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) stenting led to recurrence. The patient was finally successfully treated by bypass with autologous vein. No postoperative complications occurred, and patency was preserved at 33-month follow-up. Several different treatment options are possible; however, a primary radical surgical treatment with extra-anatomical medial bypass with autologous vein seems preferable.

Endovascular Treatment of a Ruptured Superficial Femoral Artery Aneurysm in Behcet's Disease: Case Report and Literature Review.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to report the endovascular repair of a ruptured superficial femoral artery (SFA) aneurysm in a young patient with Behcet's disease and review the literature. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man with a known history of vasculo-Behcet's disease (v-BD) under daily immunosuppressive therapy presented with a ruptured aneurysm of the left SFA. The patient underwent urgent endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm using a self-expanding covered stent. Surgical cut-down followed by direct puncture of the SFA was preferred to percutaneous approach to reduce the risk of postoperative pseudoaneurysm formation. The procedure and postoperative recovery were successful. Doppler ultrasound performed at 3 months and computed tomography angiography performed at 6 months after the procedure confirmed aneurysm exclusion, the endograft patency, and the absence of aneurysm degeneration both at the level of surgical access and endograft landing zone. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular treatment of ruptured lower limb aneurysms has been scarcely reported in the literature despite representing the less invasive option. A rare case of ruptured aneurysm SFA in a patient with v-BD was successfully treated with endovascular therapy (ET) and led to satisfactory midterm outcomes. ET offers encouraging results in terms of reduced vessel trauma and reduced postoperative complication rates.

The Combined Use of a Distal Self-Expandable and Proximal Balloon-Expandable Stent Graft in Bridging Hostile Renal Arteries in Thoracoabdominal Branched Endografting.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate early/midterm outcomes of a specific configuration of a bridging stent graft-that is a distal self-expandable (SE) stent graft combined with proximal balloon-expandable (BE) one-in hostile renal artery (RA) anatomy in branched thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA) repair. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2019, all TAAAs undergoing fenestrated and branched endografting (FB-EVAR) were prospectively collected. Preoperative, procedural, and postoperative data of RAs accommodated by branch design and patent at the completion angiography were retrospectively analyzed. Hostile RA anatomy included upward (type B) and downward + upward (type D) orientations. Type B and D RAs treated by the combination of an SE + BE stent graft as a bridging stent (BE + SE group) were compared with RAs treated by a BE stent graft only (BE group). RA occlusion, reinterventions, and branch instability were assessed. RESULTS: Over a total of 112 TAAAs undergoing FB-EVAR, 189 RAs were treated by fenestrations (113-60%) and branches (76-40%). Among the 66 (86%) RAs accommodated by branch and patent at completion angiography, 55 had a type B/D orientation. BE stent grafts were used in 15/55 (27%) RAs and SE + BE in 40/55 (73%). At a median follow-up of 12 (8) months, 5/55 (9%) RAs occluded: 4/15 (27%) in the BE group and 1/40(2.5%) in the SE + BE group (P: 0.017). RA patency was 83 ± 5% at 24 months. The SE + BE group had higher patency than the BE group (90 ± 5% vs. 68 ± 5% at 12 months; P: 0.039). Overall freedom from RA-related reinterventions was 87 ± 5% at 24 months. Six (9%) RAs required reinterventions: 4/15 (27%) in the BE group and 2/40 (5%) in the BE + SE group (P: 0.041). RAs managed by an SE + BE stent graft had lower reinterventions than RAs treated by a BE stent graft only (93 ± 5% vs. 76 ± 5% at 12 months; P: 0.01). Freedom from branch instability was 78 ± 5% at 24 months, with 8 overall cases (12%) occurring-5/15 (33.3%) in the BE group versus 3/40 (7.5%) in the SE + BE group (P: 0.02). RAs managed by an SE + BE stent graft had lower branch instability than RAs treated only by a BE stent graft (BE: 68 ± 5% vs. SE + BE: 80 ± 5% at 12 months; P: 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In hostile renal anatomy, the combination of a distal SE and proximal BE stent graft as a bridging stent in branched endografting is safe and effective with lower rates of occlusion, reinterventions, and branch instability at midterm follow-up compared with a BE stent graft alone.

Early and Mid-term Efficacy of Fenestrated Endograft in the Treatment of Juxta-Renal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report early and mid-term outcomes of fenestrated endografting (FEVAR) for juxtarenal aneurysm (J-AAAs). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2017, all consecutive J-AAAs treated by FEVAR were prospectively collected. Early endpoints were technical success, renal function worsening, and 30-day mortality. Follow-up endpoints were survival, freedom from reinterventions (FFRs), target visceral vessels (TVVs) patency, J-AAAs shrinkage, and renal function worsening. RESULTS: Among 181 cases who underwent FB-EVAR, 66 (36%) were J-AAAs. Endograft with 1, 2, 3, and 4 fenestrations were planned in 2 (3%), 22 (33%), 27 (41%) and 15 (23%) cases, respectively. Overall, 236 TVVs were treated by fenestrations and scallops. Technical success was achieved in 65 (99%) cases. The only failure occurred for a type III endoleak requiring renal artery relining. No TVVs were lost. Renal function worsening occurred in 7 (10%) cases: 4 returned to baseline within 30-day, 1 required hemodialysis and died within 30 days (1.5%). This was the only case of 30-day mortality. The mean follow-up was 46 ± 32 months. Aneurysm sac shrinkage or stability was observed in 42 (64%) and 22 (33%) cases, respectively. Two patients (3%) with persistent type II endoleak had sac enlargement and required reinterventions. Freedom from reinterventions at 5 years was 88%. An asymptomatic celiac trunk occlusion (accommodated by a scallop) occurred at 24 months in a case with a severe preoperative stenosis. No late renal arteries occlusions or type I-III endoleaks occurred. Overall, renal function worsening was reported in 5 (8%) patients during follow-up. Survival at 5 years was 67%, with no j-AAA-related mortality. COPD was the only independent predictor for mortality at the multivariate analysis (P: 0.021; OR: 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3-21.9). CONCLUSIONS: FEVAR for J-AAAs is safe and effective at early and mid-term follow-up. According to these results, it could be proposed as the first-line treatment in high-risk patients if anatomically fit. Long-term survival is reduced in the presence of preoperative COPD.

The Clinical Impact of Splanchnic Ischemia on Patients Affected by Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Treated with Fenestrated and Branched Endografts.

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated/branched endografts for aortic repair (FB-EVAR) are valid options to treat thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Successful repair requires manipulation of target visceral vessels (TVVs) with possible splanchnic ischemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical impact of splanchnic ischemia occurring in FB-EVAR for TAAA. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, patients with TAAAs undergoing FB-EVAR were prospectively enrolled. Clinical, morphological, procedural, and 30-day data were evaluated. Splanchnic ischemia was defined as the presence of splanchnic ischemic lesions (SILs) visible at perioperative computed tomography angiography. Preoperative, postoperative, and 30-day hepatic/pancreatic/renal laboratory functions were analyzed. End points were incidence of SILs, laboratory splanchnic functions worsening (≥25% of baseline), and presence of related clinical/morphological and procedural risk factors. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (male: 78%; age: 73 ± 7 years) with 27 (75%) type I-III and 9 (25%) type IV TAAA who underwent FB-EVAR for a total of 127 TVV (branches: 47-60%; fenestrations: 53-67%). Fourteen SILs occurred in 12 (33%) patients: 4 (29%) in pancreas, 3 (21%) in spleen, 2 (14%) in bowel, 5 (36%) in kidney. The cause was embolic in 79% and thrombotic in 21%. No preoperative clinical/morphological data or procedural data were correlated with SIL. Pancreatic, hepatic, or renal function worsening occurred at 24 hr in 16 (44%), 16 (44%), and 9 (25%) cases, respectively. Overall, SILs were associated with increased values of C-reactive protein (CRP) (17.9 ± 0.4 vs. 9.9 ± 9.0 mg/dL; P = 0.03) and bilirubin (1.2 ± 2.3 vs. 1.0 ± 0.5 mg/dL; P = 0.02) at 24 hr. Specifically, SIL of the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric and renal arteries' parenchyma were associated with the significant laboratory function changes 24 hr. SIL of the superior mesenteric artery was associated with increased 30-day mortality (50% vs. 7 %; P = 0.002). Pancreatic, hepatic, or renal function worsening occurred at 30 days in 2 (6%), 0 (0%), and 4 (12%) cases, with similar laboratory tests in patients with and without SIL. CONCLUSIONS: SIL can be frequently detected after FB-EVAR for TAAA and appears mainly of embolic origin. No clinical, morphological, or procedural predictors could be identified in our series. Postoperative laboratory changes of CRP, bilirubin, activated partial thromboplastin time, and amylases are associated with SIL but disappear without clinical consequences within 30 days. However, SIL occurring in the superior mesenteric artery are associated with an increased 30-day mortality.

Total Endovascular Repair of Contained Ruptured Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: To report perioperative and 1-year results of total endovascular repair of contained ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, preoperative, procedural, and postoperative data of patients with radiographic evidence of contained ruptured TAAAs treated by endovascular repair were prospectively collected. Only patients with stable hemodynamic parameters were enclosed. Primary endpoints were 30-day/in-hospital mortality, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications, and new onset of hemodialysis. Secondary endpoints were endoleaks, reinterventions, and overall follow-up survival. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent endovascular repair for contained ruptured TAAAs. According with the Crawford/Safi's classification, 6 type II (50%), 3 type III (25%), 1 type IV (8%), and 2 type V (17%) TAAAs were treated. All patients were symptomatic. Overall, 34 target visceral vessels were planned to be revascularized. The mean time from admission to treatment was 48 hours (range 4-96), with 4 patients operated within 24 hours. Five patients (42%) were treated by T-branch, 3 (25%) by custom-made fenestrated/branched endografts, 3 (25%) by parallel graft technique, and 1 (8%) by standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair covering a stenotic celiac trunk. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality was 17% and 25%, respectively. Two patients (17%) developed SCI. Cardiac and pulmonary complications were reported in 1 (8%) and 3 (25%) cases, respectively. One patient (8%) needed permanent hemodialysis. Two endoleaks (17%) were detected at the postoperative computed tomography angiography (1 low-flow gutter endoleak and 1 type III endoleak). Four patients (33%) required re-interventions within 30 postoperative days. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 1-22). No late target visceral vessels occlusion, endoleak, or reintervention occurred in this series. Overall, 7/12 (59%) patients were alive, and no cases of TAAA-related mortality occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, endovascular repair of contained ruptured TAAAs is feasible by a flexible approach in selected patients with anatomical suitability and stable hemodynamic conditions. Although early mortality and morbidity are significant, with frequent reintervention necessity, subsequent follow-up is free from reinterventions and TAAA-related mortality.

Impact of previous open aortic repair on the outcome of thoracoabdominal fenestrated and branched endografts.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) after previous aortic open surgical repair (OSR) are challenging clinical scenarios. Redo-OSR is technically demanding, and standard endovascular repair is unavailable due to visceral vessel involvement. Fenestrated and branched endografts (FB-EVAR) are effective options to treat TAAAs in high surgical risk patients but dedicated studies on the FB-EVAR outcomes in patients with TAAAs with previous OSR are not available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of previous OSR on TAAAs FB-EVAR outcomes. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, all TAAAs undergoing FB-EVAR were prospectively evaluated, retrospectively categorized in two groups, and then compared: group A-primary TAAAs and group B-TAAAs after previous OSR (abdominal, thoracic, or thoracoabdominal aneurysm). Early end points were technical success (absence of type I-III endoleak, target visceral vessel loss, conversion to OSR, intraoperative mortality), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 30-day mortality. Follow-up end points were survival, target visceral vessel patency, and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (male: 74%; age: 72 ± 7 years) with 1 (1%) extent I, 14 (23%) extent II, 24 (39%) extent III, and 23 (37%) extent IV TAAA underwent FB-EVAR. The mean TAAA diameter and total target visceral vessels were 65 ± 13 mm and 226, respectively. Ninety branches and 136 fenestrations were planned. Thirty cases (48%) were clustered in group A and 32 (52%) in group B. Patients in group A and group B had similar preoperative clinical and morphologic characteristics, except for female sex (group A: 40% vs group B: 13%; P = .02). Technical success was 92% (group A: 90% vs group B: 94%; P = .6), SCI 5% (group A: 10% vs group B: 0%; P = .1) and 30-day mortality 5% (group A: 10% vs group B: 0%; P = .1). The mean follow-up was 17 ± 11 months with a total survival of 86%, 80%, and 60% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively and no differences in the two groups (group A: 83%, 83%, and 67% vs group B: 88%, 78%, and 55% respectively; P = .96). There was no late TAAA-related mortality. Target visceral vessel patency was 91%, 91%, and 91% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (group A: 87%, 87%, and 87% vs group B: 95%, 95%, and 95%; P = .25). Freedom from reinterventions was 90%, 87%, and 87%, at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and it was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (group A: 83%, 76%, and 76% vs group B: 96%, 96%, and 96% respectively; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Previous open surgery repair does not significantly affect the early outcomes of FB-EVAR in TAAA, with encouraging results in terms of technical success, SCI, mortality, and lower reinterventions rate at midterm follow-up.