Intraluminal Suture Placement for Management of Hypotony After Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery.

PRCIS: Intraluminal 3-0 Supramid stent placement can be an effective long-term solution for hypotony after glaucoma drainage device surgery. This procedure may obviate the need for conjunctival dissection. In some cases, additional procedures are required. PURPOSE: To describe the utility of implantation of a multifilament polyamide suture (Supramid) in the tube lumen to reverse hypotony after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent tube revision with intraluminal placement of a 3-0 Supramid stent, with or without external ligature, to manage hypotony following GDD surgery between January 2010 and October 2020. METHODS: Resolution of hypotony was defined as IOP >5 mm Hg and the absence of hypotony-related structural abnormalities. Overall success was the absence of failure criteria (IOP ≤5 mm Hg, >21 mm Hg, or <20% reduction below baseline IOP after 3 months for 2 consecutive study visits; additional glaucoma surgery; or loss of light perception), with or without adjunctive ocular hypotensive therapy. RESULTS: Nine eyes of 9 patients underwent placement of a 3-0 Supramid stent with a resolution of hypotony in all eyes with a mean follow-up duration of 33.3 ±24.0 months. Overall success was achieved in 7 of 9 eyes. Four eyes required intervention after stent placement: 1 eye required selective laser trabeculoplasty followed by replacement of the original stent with a shorter 3-0 Supramid suture and external ligature; 1 eye underwent revision for tube exposure; and 2 eyes underwent laser suture lysis to release an external suture ligature. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of hypotony after GDD, particularly when it is desirable to reduce the extent of additional conjunctival dissection, intraluminal placement of a 3-0 Supramid stent via an intracameral approach can be an effective long-term solution. Postoperative adjustments were required in many cases.

Suprachoroidal hemorrhage after micropulse cyclophotocoagulation diode therapy.

PURPOSE: To describe the diagnosis and management of a patient with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) who developed suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH) after micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MPCPC) therapy. OBSERVATIONS: A 77 year-old Caucasian man with end-stage POAG and multiple medical comorbidities including coronary artery disease on anticoagulation presented with 2 days of episodic, severe left eye pain 2 weeks after undergoing MPCPC diode in the left eye. His visual acuity was count fingers at 2 feet and his intraocular pressure (IOP) was 44. He had a shallow anterior chamber that was open to trabecular meshwork on gonioscopy. His dilated fundus exam showed large, dome-shaped hemorrhagic choroidals, which were confirmed on ultrasound. He was medically managed with analgesics, cycloplegics, topical steroids and IOP lowering medications. He was closely followed with serial b-scans and the SCH decreased in size without surgical intervention, however, his visual acuity did not improve from presentation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: MPCPC diode has been increasingly used in refractory glaucoma and is considered to be a relatively safe procedure. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage has not yet been reported after MPCPC diode. This case demonstrates how devastating complications such as SCH can still occur with lower energy CPC therapy especially in the setting of post-procedural hypotony, and emphasizes the importance of prevention especially in high-risk patients.

Parafoveal vessel changes in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma using optical coherence tomography angiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate parafoveal and peripapillary perfusion in healthy, glaucoma suspect, normal-tension glaucoma, and primary open-angle glaucoma subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study with optical coherence tomography angiography imaging with RTVue XR Avanti (Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA) of 56 eyes (14 healthy, 14 glaucoma suspect, 16 normal-tension glaucoma, and 12 primary open-angle glaucoma) at a tertiary academic referral center. Parafoveal and peripapillary superficial vessel density and parafoveal superficial retinal thickness were the main parameters of interest. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. RESULTS: There were significant decreases in parafoveal superficial vessel density in primary open-angle (40.06±4.54%, P<0.001) and normal-tension glaucoma (42.82±5.16%, P=0.010) but not suspect eyes (45.72±4.37%, P=0.916) compared to healthy eyes (48.10±2.82%). Similarly, decreases were observed in parafoveal inner retinal thickness in primary open-angle (83.19±14.29 µm, P<0.001) and normal-tension glaucoma eyes (94.97±12.44 µm, P=0.035), but not suspect eyes (99.93±9.00 µm, P=0.648), compared to healthy controls (107.00±9.55 µm). Only primary open-angle glaucoma eyes displayed significant changes in peripapillary vessel density (37.63±7.19%) compared to healthy controls (49.12±2.80%, P<0.001). Further statistical adjustment for sex and age revealed a significant decrease in parafoveal vessel density in suspects relative to controls (P=0.039). Diagnostic accuracy of parafoveal vessel density was high with an area under the curve of 0.833±0.073 for normal-tension glaucoma and 0.946±0.049 for primary open-angle glaucoma. CONCLUSION: Parafoveal vessel density was significantly reduced in glaucomatous eyes, with good diagnostic accuracy. These findings provide further evidence that these changes may be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease in glaucoma patients.