Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 21(1): 31-42, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17213738

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to identify predictors and outcomes of adult medical-surgical patients' perceptions of their readiness for hospital discharge. DESIGN: A correlational, prospective, longitudinal design with path analyses was used to explore relationships among transition theory-related variables. SETTING: Midwestern tertiary medical center. SAMPLE: 147 adult medical-surgical patients. METHODS: Predictor variables included patient characteristics, hospitalization factors, and nursing practices that were measured prior to hospital discharge using a study enrollment form, the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale, and the Care Coordination Scale. Discharge readiness was measured using the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale administered within 4 hours prior to discharge. Outcomes were measured 3 weeks postdischarge with the Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty Scale and self-reported utilization of health services. FINDINGS: Living alone, discharge teaching (amount of content received and nurses' skill in teaching delivery), and care coordination explained 51% of readiness for discharge score variance. Patient age and discharge readiness explained 16% of variance in postdischarge coping difficulty. Greater readiness for discharge was predictive of fewer readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of the delivery of discharge teaching was the strongest predictor of discharge readiness. Study results provided support for Meleis' transitions theory as a useful model for conceptualizing and investigating the discharge transition. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study results have implications for the CNS role in patient and staff education, system building for the postdischarge transition, and measurement of clinical care outcomes.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Alta do Paciente , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Análise Fatorial , Família/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Enfermeiros Clínicos/organização & administração , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Readmissão do Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Teoria Psicológica , Análise de Regressão , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Pediatrics ; 136(6): 1080-6, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26574587

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central venous catheters in the NICU are associated with significant morbidity and mortality because of the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of catheter dwell time on risk of CLABSI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 13,327 infants with 15,567 catheters (93% peripherally inserted central catheters [PICCs], 7% tunneled catheters) and 256,088 catheter days cared for in 141 NICUs. CLABSI was defined using National Health Surveillance Network criteria. We defined dwell time as the number of days from line insertion until either line removal or day of CLABSI. We generated survival curves for each week of dwell time and estimated hazard ratios for CLABSI at each week by using a Cox proportional hazards frailty model. We controlled for postmenstrual age and year, included facility as a random effect, and generated separate models by line type. RESULTS: Median postmenstrual age was 29 weeks (interquartile range 26-33). The overall incidence of CLABSI was 0.93 per 1000 catheter days. Increased dwell time was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI for PICCs. For tunneled catheters, infection incidence was significantly higher in weeks 7 and 9 compared with week 1. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not routinely replace uninfected PICCs for fear of infection but should consider removing tunneled catheters before week 7 if no longer needed. Additional studies are needed to determine what daily maintenance practices may be associated with decreased risk of infection, especially for tunneled catheters.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa