Blood DCs activated with R848 and poly(I:C) induce antigen-specific immune responses against viral and tumor-associated antigens.

Monocyte-derived Dendritic cells (DCs) have successfully been employed to induce immune responses against tumor-associated antigens in patients with various cancer entities. However, objective clinical responses have only been achieved in a minority of patients. Additionally, generation of GMP-compliant DCs requires time- and labor-intensive cell differentiation. In contrast, Blood DCs (BDCs) require only minimal ex vivo handling, as differentiation occurs in vivo resulting in potentially better functional capacities and survival. We aimed to identify a protocol for optimal in vitro activation of BDCs including the three subsets pDCs, cDC1s, and cDC2s. We evaluated several TLR ligand combinations and demonstrated that polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] and R848, ligands for TLR3 and TLR7/8, respectively, constituted the optimal combination for inducing a positive co-stimulatory profile in all BDC subsets. In addition, TLR3 and TLR7/8 activation led to high secretion of IFN-α and IL-12p70. Simultaneous as opposed to separate tailored activation of pDCs and cDCs increased immunostimulatory capacities, suggesting that BDC subsets engage in synergistic cross-talk during activation. Stimulation of BDCs with this protocol resulted in enhanced migration, high NK-cell activation, and potent antigen-specific T-cell induction.We conclude that simultaneous activation of all BDC subsets with a combination of R848 + poly(I:C) generates highly immunostimulatory DCs. These results support further investigation and clinical testing, as standalone or in conjunction with other immunotherapeutic strategies including adoptive T-cell transfer and checkpoint inhibition.

Fully closed and automated enrichment of primary blood dendritic cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccination is a promising approach to induce tumor-specific immune responses in cancer patients. Until recently, most DC vaccines were based on in vitro-differentiated monocyte-derived DCs. However, through development of efficient isolation techniques, the use of primary blood dendritic cell subsets has come within reach. Manufacturing of blood-derived DCs has multiple advances over monocytes-derived DCs, including more standardized isolation and culture protocols and shorter production processes. In peripheral blood, multiple DC subsets can be distinguished based on their phenotype and function. Plasmacytoid DC (pDC) and myeloid/conventional DCs (cDC) are the two main DC populations, moreover cDC can be further subdivided into CD141/BDCA3+ DC (cDC1) and CD1c/BDCA1+ DC (cDC2). In three separate clinical DC vaccination studies in melanoma and prostate cancer patients, we manufactured DC vaccines consisting of pDCs only, cDC2s only, or a combination of pDC and cDC2s, which we called natural DCs (nDC). Here, we describe a fully closed and automated GMP-compliant method to enrich naturally circulating DCs and present the results of enrichment of primary blood DCs from aphaeresis products of 8 healthy donors, 21 castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients, and 112 stage III melanoma patients. Although primary blood DCs are relatively scarce in aphaeresis material, our results show that it is feasible to isolate highly pure pDC, cDC2, or nDC with sufficient yield to manufacture DC vaccines for natural DC-based immunotherapy.

Adjuvant dendritic cell therapy in stage IIIB/C melanoma: the MIND-DC randomized phase III trial.

Autologous natural dendritic cells (nDCs) treatment can induce tumor-specific immune responses and clinical responses in cancer patients. In this phase III clinical trial (NCT02993315), 148 patients with resected stage IIIB/C melanoma were randomized to adjuvant treatment with nDCs (n = 99) or placebo (n = 49). Active treatment consisted of intranodally injected autologous CD1c+ conventional and plasmacytoid DCs loaded with tumor antigens. The primary endpoint was the 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, whereas the secondary endpoints included median RFS, 2-year and median overall survival, adverse event profile, and immunological response The 2-year RFS rate was 36.8% in the nDC treatment group and 46.9% in the control group (p = 0.31). Median RFS was 12.7 months vs 19.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio 1.25; 90% CI: 0.88-1.79; p = 0.29). Median overall survival was not reached in both treatment groups (hazard ratio 1.32; 90% CI: 0.73-2.38; p = 0.44). Grade 3-4 study-related adverse events occurred in 5% and 6% of patients. Functional antigen-specific T cell responses could be detected in 67.1% of patients tested in the nDC treatment group vs 3.8% of patients tested in the control group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, while adjuvant nDC treatment in stage IIIB/C melanoma patients generated specific immune responses and was well tolerated, no benefit in RFS was observed.