Real-World Evaluation of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Safety of a Remote, Self-Management Parkinson's Disease Care Pathway: A Healthcare Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: There is significant unmet need for effective and efficiently delivered care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). We undertook a service improvement initiative to co-develop and implement a new care pathway, Home Based Care (HBC), based on supported self-management, remote monitoring and the ability to trigger a healthcare contact when needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and safety of Home Based Care. METHODS: We evaluated data from the first 100 patients on HBC for 6 months. Patient monitoring, performed at baseline and 6-monthly, comprised motor (MDS-UPDRS II and accelerometer), non-motor (NMSQ, PDSS-2, HADS) and quality of life (PDQ) measures. Care quality was audited against Parkinson's UK national audit standards. Process measures captured feasibility. Acceptability was assessed using a mixed-methods approach comprising questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Between October 2019 and January 2021, 108 PwP were enrolled onto HBC, with data from 100 being available at 6 months. Over 90% of all questionnaires were returned, 97% were complete or had < 3 missing items. Reporting and communications occurred within agreed timeframes. Compared with baseline, after 6m on HBC, PD symptoms were stable; more PwP felt listened to (90% vs. 79%) and able to seek help (79% vs. 68%). HBC met 93% of national audit criteria. Key themes from the interviews included autonomy and empowerment. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and safety of our novel remotely delivered Parkinson's care pathway. Ensuring scalability will widen its reach and realize its benefits for underserved communities, enabling formal comparisons with standard care and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Meaningful involvement of children and young people in health technology development.

The anatomical, physiological, and developmental changes which arise as children mature through childhood and adolescence support the need to develop new health technologies that meet the specific requirements of children and young people (CYP). Failing to involve CYP during the development of technology increases the risk that the outcome falls short of their expectations and needs, leading to rejection of novel interventions. Through participation in health technology development, CYP and their families can provide context, insight, personal experience and tacit knowledge to ensure that the end-product is usable, acceptable, and can be integrated into its intended environment. A nuanced, balanced understanding of the methods that can be used to facilitate participation will support researchers in choosing an effective approach to involving CYP in health technology development. Methodological approaches include patient and public involvement and engagement, co-design, and experienced based co-design. These methods can be used in isolation or in combination, to facilitate meaningful involvement of CYP and encourage the development of impactful solutions, in consideration of the context, stakeholders, and objectives of the project. We provide the rationale and justification for involving CYP in health technology design and development, an explanation of the methods supporting meaningful involvement, and case studies exemplifying real world application of these methods with positive outputs.