Segmentation-Based Analysis of T2- and T1-Weighted Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Images Provides Adequate Observer Agreement in the Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to quantify observer agreement in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification of inflammatory or fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: Our study is a preliminary analysis of a larger prospective cohort. The MRI images of 18 patients with ILD (13 females; mean age, 65 years) were acquired in a 1.5 T scanner and included axial fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2-WI, n = 18) and coronal fat-saturated T1-weighted images before and 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after gadolinium administration (n = 16). The MRI studies were evaluated with 2 different methods: a qualitative evaluation (visual assessment and measurement of few regions of interest; evaluations were performed independently by 5 radiologists and 3 times by 1 radiologist) and a segmentation-based analysis with software extraction of signal intensity values (evaluations were performed independently by 2 radiologists and twice by 1 radiologist). Interstitial lung disease was classified as inflammatory or fibrotic, based on previously described imaging criteria. RESULTS: Regarding the qualitative evaluation, intraobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.92, P < 0.05) for T2-WI and fair (κ = 0.29, P < 0.05) for T1 dynamic study, while interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.56, P < 0.05) and poor (κ = 0.11, P = 0.18), respectively. In contrast, upon segmentation-based analysis, intraobserver and interobserver agreement were excellent for T2-WI (κ = 0.886, P < 0.001; κ = 1.00, P < 0.001; respectively); for T1-WI, intraobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.87, P < 0.05) and interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.75, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentation-based MRI analysis is more reproducible than a qualitative evaluation with visual assessment and measurement of few regions of interest.

Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses.

The detection of a renal mass is a relatively frequent occurrence in the daily practice of any Radiology Department. The diagnostic approaches depend on whether the lesion is cystic or solid. Cystic lesions can be managed using the Bosniak classification, while management of solid lesions depends on whether the lesion is well-defined or infiltrative. The approach to well-defined lesions focuses mainly on the differentiation between renal cancer and benign tumors such as angiomyolipoma (AML) and oncocytoma. Differential diagnosis of infiltrative lesions is wider, including primary and secondary malignancies and inflammatory disease, and knowledge of the patient history is essential. Radiologists may establish a possible differential diagnosis based on the imaging features of the renal masses and the clinical history. The aim of this review is to present the contribution of the different imaging techniques and image guided biopsies in the diagnostic management of cystic and solid renal lesions.

DOEGE-POTTER SYNDROME BY PLEURAL SOLITARY FIBROUS TUMOR.

INTRODUCTION: Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura (SFTP) is a rare neoplasm that accounts for less than 5% of all pleural tumors. We present the case of a 73-year-old man with a history of recurrent episodes of severe hypoglycemia secondary to a large malignant SFTP. This paraneoplastic manifestation of SFTP occurs in less than 5% of cases and is referred to as Doege-Potter syndrome. Although rare, this is an important and reversible cause of hypoglycemia, which is resolved by complete surgical resection of the tumor. We describe the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of Doege-Potter syndrome. Key imaging findings and pathologic correlation are shown.

Susceptibility artifacts and PIRADS 3 lesions in prostatic MRI: how often is the dynamic contrast-enhance sequence necessary?

PURPOSE: To assess the need of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence in addition to T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the presence of artifacts associated with rectal gas (which compromise the diffusion assessment) and/or PIRADS 3 lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. Patients referred consecutively over a period of 5 months for elevated PSA underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). mpMRI was performed using a 3T MRI system without an endorectal coil. The MRI findings were reviewed by two radiologists and were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2). Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. For statistical purposes, lesions were classified as PIRADS 1-2, PIRADS 3, or PIRADS 4-5. First, all studies were reviewed using a biparametric assessment (T2-WI + DWI), and the presence or absence of susceptibility artifacts was assessed for each prostate. Subsequently, all images were analyzed using the standard multiparametric approach (T2-WI + DWI + DCE). RESULTS: The biparametric evaluation (T2-WI + DWI) showed artifacts (due to the presence of rectal gas or other) in 87 patients (43.5%) and no artifacts in 113 patients (56.5%). In the latter group, 15 patients had peripheral zone (PZ) PIRADS 3 lesions. Thus, a total of 102 patients (51%) had artifacts or PZ PIRADS 3 lesions and therefore required DCE. When evaluating the group of prostates without artifacts, 13.3% of prostates required DCE. A total of 17 (23.9%) PIRADS 4-5 prostate lesions would have not been detected without the use of DCE. CONCLUSION: Biparametric evaluation of the prostate revealed some limitation due to the presence of artifacts or PIRADS 3 PZ lesions. Artifacts were present in almost 44% of our patients, but when the DWI was correctly evaluated, only 13.3% of prostates required DCE.