Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Thromb Res ; 240: 109059, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are typically referred to the emergency department for immediate evaluation. To enhance efficiency, our hospital implemented a regional, general practitioner (GP)-driven DVT care pathway, deferring diagnostic evaluation to a scheduled outpatient DVT clinic appointment the following day. Patients receive a single dose anticoagulant from their GP to prevent thrombosis progression while awaiting diagnostic workup. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient preferences regarding the DVT care pathway and the type of single dose anticoagulant (low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs. direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the DVT care pathway between June 2021 and July 2023 were eligible. Until July 2022, LMWH was administered, and thereafter, the protocol recommended DOAC as the single dose anticoagulant. Patients completed questionnaires, incorporating patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs), during their DVT clinic visit and after five days. The primary endpoint was bleeding events within 72 h of receiving the single dose anticoagulant. RESULTS: Of 460 included patients, 229 received LMWH and 231 received DOAC as the single dose anticoagulant. DVT was confirmed in 24.8 % of patients. No major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were reported. LMWH was associated with more minor bleedings (22.3 % vs. DOAC 13.4 %), primarily attributed to injection site hematomas. Patients reported high satisfaction with the DVT care pathway (96.5 %) and generally preferred DOAC over LMWH. CONCLUSION: Deferring diagnostic evaluation for DVT using a single dose of either LMWH or DOAC in a real-world population is deemed safe. Considering practical advantages, patient preferences, and fewer skin hematomas, we favor DOACs as the single dose anticoagulant in this care pathway.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Feminino , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Administração Oral , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto
3.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(4): 2704-2706, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738259
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa