Anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies induce subclass-related complement activation and nodo-paranodal damage.

Autoimmune neuropathy associated with antibodies against pan-neurofascin is a new subtype of nodo-paranodopathy. It is relevant because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Affected patients often require intensive care unit treatment for several months, and data on the reversibility and long-term prognosis are limited. The pathogenicity including IgG subclass-associated mechanisms has not been unravelled, nor directly compared to anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4-related pathology. Understanding the underlying pathology might have a direct impact on treatment of these severely affected patients. By a multicentre combined prospective and retrospective approach, we provide clinical data of a large cohort of patients with anti-neurofascin-associated neuropathy (n = 18) including longitudinal titre and neurofilament light chain assessment via Ella® and relate clinical data to in vitro pathogenicity studies of anti-neurofascin antibodies. We assessed antibody binding characteristics and the pathogenic effects of anti-pan-neurofascin versus neurofascin-155 antibodies on living myelinating dorsal root ganglia co-cultures. Additionally, we analysed the IgG subclass profile and the complement binding capacity and effector functions considering the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin preparations via enzyme-linked immunosorbent and cell-based assays. In contrast to chronic neurofascin-155 IgG4-associated neuropathy, anti-pan-neurofascin-associated disease presented with a high morbidity and mortality, but as a monophasic and potentially reversible disorder. During follow-up, antibodies were no longer detectable in 8 of 11 patients. Anti-pan-neurofascin had direct access to the nodes of Ranvier in myelinating cultures titre-dependently, most probably inducing this severe phenotype. Antibody preincubation led to impaired paranode formation, destruction of paranodal architecture and alterations on paranodal myelin and sensory neurons in the cultures, with more severe effects than neurofascin-155 antibodies. Besides IgG4, subclass IgG3 was detected and associated with complement binding and cytotoxic effects in vitro. As a possible correlate of axonal damage in vivo, we detected highly increased serum neurofilament light chain levels (sNF-L), correlating to serum C3a. Still, sNF-L was not identified as a marker for poor prognosis, but rather as an intra- and interindividual marker for acuteness, severity and course, with a strong decrease during recovery. Our data provide evidence that anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies directly attack the node and induce severe and acute, but potentially reversible, nodo-paranodal pathology, possibly involving complement-mediated mechanisms. Screening for autoantibodies thus is crucial to identify this subset of patients who benefit from early antibody-depleting therapy. Titre and sNF-L might serve as valuable follow-up parameters. The prospect of a favourable outcome has high relevance for physicians, patients and relatives during months of critical care.

Super-resolution imaging pinpoints the periodic ultrastructure at the human node of Ranvier and its disruption in patients with polyneuropathy.

The node of Ranvier is the key element in saltatory conduction along myelinated axons, but its specific protein organization remains elusive in the human species. To shed light on nanoscale anatomy of the human node of Ranvier in health and disease, we assessed human nerve biopsies of patients with polyneuropathy by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. We applied direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) and supported our data by high-content confocal imaging combined with deep learning-based analysis. As a result, we revealed a âˆ¼ 190 nm periodic protein arrangement of cytoskeletal proteins and axoglial cell adhesion molecules in human peripheral nerves. In patients with polyneuropathy, periodic distances increased at the paranodal region of the node of Ranvier, both at the axonal cytoskeleton and at the axoglial junction. In-depth image analysis revealed a partial loss of proteins of the axoglial complex (Caspr-1, neurofascin-155) in combination with detachment from the cytoskeletal anchor protein ß2-spectrin. High content analysis showed that such paranodal disorganization occurred especially in acute and severe axonal neuropathy with ongoing Wallerian degeneration and related cytoskeletal damage. We provide nanoscale and protein-specific evidence for the prominent, but vulnerable role of the node of Ranvier for axonal integrity. Furthermore, we show that super-resolution imaging can identify, quantify and map elongated periodic protein distances and protein interaction in histopathological tissue samples. We thus introduce a promising tool for further translational applications of super resolution microscopy.

Pan-Neurofascin autoimmune nodopathy - a life-threatening, but reversible neuropathy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Autoimmune nodopathies are immune-mediated neuropathies associated with antibodies targeting the peripheral node of Ranvier. Recently, antibodies against all neurofascin-isoforms (pan-neurofascin) have been linked to a clinical phenotype distinct from previously described autoimmune nodopathies. Here, we aim at highlighting the molecular background and the red flags for diagnostic assessment and provide treatment and surveillance approaches for this new disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Neurofascin-isoforms are located at different compartments of the node of Ranvier: Neurofascin-186 at the axonal nodal gap, and Neurofascin-155 at the terminal Schwann cell loops at the paranode. Pan-neurofascin antibodies recognize a common epitope on both isoforms and can access the node of Ranvier directly. Depending on their subclass profile, antibodies can induce direct structural disorganization and complement activation. Affected patients present with acute and immobilizing sensorimotor neuropathy, with cranial nerve involvement and long-term respiratory insufficiency. Early antibody-depleting therapy is crucial to avoid axonal damage, and remission is possible despite extended disease and high mortality. The antibody titer and serum neurofilament light chain levels can serve as biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. SUMMARY: Pan-neurofascin-associated autoimmune nodopathies has unique molecular and clinical features. Testing should be considered in severe and prolonged Guillain-Barré-like phenotype.

Guillain-Barré syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an international prospective cohort study.

In the wake of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, an increasing number of patients with neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported following this infection. It remains unclear, however, if these cases are coincidental or not, as most publications were case reports or small regional retrospective cohort studies. The International GBS Outcome Study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with GBS within 2 weeks from onset of weakness. Data from patients included in this study, between 30 January 2020 and 30 May 2020, were used to investigate clinical and laboratory signs of a preceding or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe the associated clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients were classified according to the SARS-CoV-2 case definitions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and laboratory recommendations of the World Health Organization. Forty-nine patients with GBS were included, of whom eight (16%) had a confirmed and three (6%) a probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nine of these 11 patients had no serological evidence of other recent preceding infections associated with GBS, whereas two had serological evidence of a recent Campylobacter jejuni infection. Patients with a confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently had a sensorimotor variant 8/11 (73%) and facial palsy 7/11 (64%). The eight patients who underwent electrophysiological examination all had a demyelinating subtype, which was more prevalent than the other patients included in the same time window [14/30 (47%), P = 0.012] as well as historical region and age-matched control subjects included in the International GBS Outcome Study before the pandemic [23/44 (52%), P = 0.016]. The median time from the onset of infection to neurological symptoms was 16 days (interquartile range 12-22). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection shared uniform neurological features, similar to those previously described in other post-viral GBS patients. The frequency (22%) of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population was higher than estimates of the contemporaneous background prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, which may be a result of recruitment bias during the pandemic, but could also indicate that GBS may rarely follow a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous studies, we found no increase in patient recruitment during the pandemic for our ongoing International GBS Outcome Study compared to previous years, making a strong relationship of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 unlikely. A case-control study is required to determine if there is a causative link or not.

Report of a fulminant anti-pan-neurofascin-associated neuropathy responsive to rituximab and bortezomib.

Inflammatory neuropathies with pathogenic involvement of the nodes of Ranvier through autoantibodies have been increasingly characterized in the past years. The so-called anti-pan-NF-associated neuropathies caused by the simultaneous existence of anti-Neurofascin-186/-140 and -155-antibodies are extremely rare and cause life-threatening symptoms. Therapeutic strategies are needed as symptoms may be life-threatening and may not respond to standard first-line CIDP treatment. We report a case of a 52-year-old male with a rare anti-pan-neurofascin (NF) (-155, -186/-140)-associated neuropathy. The initial presentation was subacute with mild paresthesia leading to a fulminant "locked-in"-like syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation within the first eight weeks despite treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins. Nerve conduction studies revealed non-excitable nerves with acute spontaneous activity in electromyography. High titers of anti-Neurofascin-155, -186/-140-antibodies were detected in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. A combination of aggressive immunotherapy consisting of intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, rituximab and bortezomib resulted in clinical improvement with ambulation and non-detectable anti-neurofascin-antibodies within the following 3 months. The follow-up nerve conduction studies showed normalized amplitudes of the peripheral nerves with signs of reinnervation in electromyography. We conclude that an early aggressive immunotherapy consisting of a combination of rituximab and bortezomib could be considered as a therapeutic option for anti-pan-NF-associated neuropathies.

Anti-CNTN1 IgG3 induces acute conduction block and motor deficits in a passive transfer rat model.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies against the paranodal protein contactin-1 have recently been described in patients with severe acute-onset autoimmune neuropathies and mainly belong to the IgG4 subclass that does not activate complement. IgG3 anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies are rare, but have been detected during the acute onset of disease in some cases. There is evidence that anti-contactin-1 prevents adhesive interaction, and chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1 IgG4 leads to structural changes at the nodes accompanied by neuropathic symptoms. However, the pathomechanism of acute onset of disease and the pathogenic role of IgG3 anti-contactin-1 is largely unknown. METHODS: In the present study, we aimed to model acute autoantibody exposure by intraneural injection of IgG of patients with anti-contacin-1 autoantibodies to Lewis rats. Patient IgG obtained during acute onset of disease (IgG3 predominant) and IgG from the chronic phase of disease (IgG4 predominant) were studied in comparison. RESULTS: Conduction blocks were measured in rats injected with the "acute" IgG more often than after injection of "chronic" IgG (83.3% versus 35%) and proved to be reversible within a week after injection. Impaired nerve conduction was accompanied by motor deficits in rats after injection of the "acute" IgG but only minor structural changes of the nodes. Paranodal complement deposition was detected after injection of the "acute IgG". We did not detect any inflammatory infiltrates, arguing against an inflammatory cascade as cause of damage to the nerve. We also did not observe dispersion of paranodal proteins or sodium channels to the juxtaparanodes as seen in patients after chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that anti-contactin-1 IgG3 induces an acute conduction block that is most probably mediated by autoantibody binding and subsequent complement deposition and may account for acute onset of disease in these patients. This supports the notion of anti-contactin-1-associated neuropathy as a paranodopathy with the nodes of Ranvier as the site of pathogenesis.

Neurofascin-155 IgM autoantibodies in patients with inflammatory neuropathies.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, IgG autoantibodies against different paranodal proteins have been detected and this has led to important advances in the management of inflammatory neuropathies. In contrast, not much is known on IgM autoantibodies against paranodal proteins. METHODS: In the present study, we screened a large cohort of patients (n=140) with inflammatory neuropathies for IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155, neurofascin-186 or contactin-1. RESULTS: IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155 were detected by ELISA in five patients, four with inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and one with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and were confirmed by ELISA-based preabsorption experiments and Western blot. Titres ranged from 1:100 to 1:400. We did not detect IgM anti-neurofascin-186 or anti-contactin-1 antibodies in this cohort. All patients presented with distally accentuated tetraparesis and hypesthesia. Remarkably, tremor was present in three of the patients with CIDP and occurred in the patients with GBS after the acute phase of disease. Nerve conduction studies revealed prolonged distal motor latencies and F wave latencies. Nerve biopsies showed signs of secondary axonal damage in three of the patients, demyelinating features in one patient. Teased fibre preparations did not demonstrate paranodal damage. CONCLUSION: In summary, IgM neurofascin-155 autoantibodies may be worth testing in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Their pathogenic role needs to be determined in future experiments.

Auto-antibodies to contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr) in two patients with painful inflammatory neuropathy.

Auto-antibodies against the paranodal proteins neurofascin-155 and contactin-1 have recently been described in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and are associated with a distinct clinical phenotype and response to treatment. Contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr, encoded by CNTNAP1) is a paranodal protein that is attached to neurofascin-155 and contactin-1 (CNTN1) but has not yet been identified as a sole antigen in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. In the present study, we screened a cohort of 35 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (age range 20-80, 10 female, 25 male) and 22 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (age range 17-86, eight female, 14 male) for autoantibodies against paranodal antigens. We identified two patients, one with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and one with Guillain-Barré syndrome, with autoantibodies against Caspr by binding assays using Caspr transfected human embryonic kidney cells and murine teased fibres. IgG3 was the predominant autoantibody subclass in the patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome, IgG4 was predominant in the patient with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Accordingly, complement deposition after binding to HEK293 cells was detectable in the patient with IgG3 autoantibodies only, not in the patient with IgG4. Severe disruption of the paranodal and nodal architecture was detectable in teased fibres of the sural nerve biopsy and in dermal myelinated fibres, supporting the notion of the paranodes being the site of pathology. Deposition of IgG at the paranodes was detected in teased fibre preparations of the sural nerve, further supporting the pathogenicity of anti-Caspr autoantibodies. Pain was one of the predominant findings in both patients, possibly reflected by binding of patients' IgG to TRPV1 immunoreactive dorsal root ganglia neurons. Our results demonstrate that the paranodal protein Caspr constitutes a new antigen that leads to autoantibody generation as part of the novel entity of neuropathies associated with autoantibodies against paranodal proteins.

Destruction of paranodal architecture in inflammatory neuropathy with anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies against paranodal proteins have been described in patients with inflammatory neuropathies, but their association with pathology of nodes of Ranvier is unclear. We describe the clinical phenotype and histopathological changes of paranodal architecture of patients with autoantibodies against contactin-1, identified from a cohort with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (n=53) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (n=21). METHODS: We used ELISA to detect autoantibodies against contactin-1. Specificity of the autoantibodies was confirmed by immunoblot assay, binding to contactin-1-transfected human embryonic kidney cells, binding to paranodes of murine teased fibres and preabsorption experiments. Paranodal pathology was investigated by immunofluorescence labelling of dermal myelinated fibres. RESULTS: High reactivity to contactin-1 by ELISA was found in four patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and in none of the patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, which was confirmed by cell binding assays in all four patients. The four patients presented with a typical clinical picture, namely acute onset of disease and severe motor symptoms, with three patients manifesting action tremor. Immunofluorescence-labelling of paranodal proteins of dermal myelinated fibres revealed disruption of paranodal architecture. Semithin sections showed axonal damage but no classical signs of demyelination. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that anti-contactin-1-related neuropathy constitutes a presumably autoantibody-mediated form of inflammatory neuropathy with distinct clinical symptoms and disruption of paranodal architecture as a pathological correlate. Anti-contactin-1-associated neuropathy does not meet morphological criteria of demyelinating neuropathy and therefore, might rather be termed a 'paranodopathy' rather than a subtype of demyelinating inflammatory neuropathy.

Low-dose rituximab treatment in a patient with anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4 autoimmune nodopathy.

Autoimmune nodopathy is a new entity of immune-mediated neuropathies associated with antibodies against nodal-paranodal epitopes. We present a detailed clinical and serological work-up of a patient with autoimmune nodopathy with anti-neurofascin-155 (anti-NF-155) IgG4 antibodies who was treated with low-dose (500 mg) rituximab, which led to a decrease of anti-NF-155 antibody titer, depletion of B cells, normalization of the levels of neurofilament light chain in serum, and significant clinical improvement. This case suggests that a low-dose rituximab could be as effective as previously reported much higher doses, and presumably with a lower risk of adverse effects and infections.

Case report: target antigen and subclass switch in a patient with autoimmune nodopathy.

Introduction: Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a new entity in the field of peripheral neuropathies and is defined by the presence of auto-antibodies against structures of the node of Ranvier combined with specific clinico-pathophysiological features and therapy response in affected patients. The target-specific antibodies do not only serve as diagnostic biomarkers but also for treatment evaluation during follow-up. Case report: We report a 66-year-old female patient with various autoimmune diseases, including a history of membranous glomerulonephritis which presented with acute-onset, sensorimotor tetraparesis, cranial nerve involvement, and mild respiratory insufficiency. Under the suspicion of Guillain-Barré syndrome, she received intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and achieved remission. At 8 months later, she relapsed with now a poor response to IVIg and developed additional features such as severe sensory ataxia, tremor, and neuropathic pain. Anti-contactin-1 IgG2 antibodies were detected, and the diagnosis was reverted to AN. Plasma exchange and rituximab treatment led to a serological remission and corresponding significant clinical improvement, and the therapy was paused. At 2 years after symptom onset, her condition worsened again with sensorimotor symptoms and severe neuropathic pain despite seronegativity for contactin-1. However, serum binding assays to teased nerve fiber staining showed recurring antibody reactivity against paranodal structures. Caspr-1 was identified as a new target antigen via cell-based assay, and high-titer antibodies of the IgG4 subclass were confirmed via ELISA. Hence, a new cycle of plasma exchange and regular rituximab treatment was initiated, with subsequent clinical improvement and serological remission. The serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels were assessed retrospectively and rose and fell together with the antibody titer. Discussion: This case demonstrates that autoimmunity to (para)nodal structures can reoccur especially in patients prone to autoimmune disorders and can switch its target antigen and subclass in the course of disease. The presence of auto-antibodies against different targets at the node of Ranvier has direct implications for therapeutic management. We suggest a close follow-up of patients with AN after successful therapy. In case of deterioration despite seronegativity, non-specific tests such as teased fiber assays and repeated screening for different target antigens should be considered.

Different Patterns of Autoantibody Secretion by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Autoimmune Nodopathies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune nodopathies with antibodies against the paranodal proteins show a distinct phenotype of a severe sensorimotor neuropathy. In some patients, complete remission can be achieved after treatment with rituximab whereas others show a chronic course. For optimal planning of treatment, predicting the course of disease and therapeutic response is crucial. METHODS: We stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro to find out whether secretion of specific autoantibodies may be a predictor of the course of disease and response to rituximab. RESULTS: Three patterns could be identified: In most patients with anti-Neurofascin-155-, anti-Contactin-1-, and anti-Caspr1-IgG4 autoantibodies, in vitro production of autoantibodies was detected, indicating autoantigen-specific memory B cells and short-lived plasma cells/plasmablasts as the major source of autoantibodies. These patients generally showed a good response to rituximab. In a subgroup of patients with anti-Neurofascin-155-IgG4 autoantibodies and insufficient response to rituximab, no in vitro autoantibody production was found despite high serum titers, indicating autoantibody secretion by long-lived plasma cells outside the peripheral blood. In the patients with anti-pan-Neurofascin autoantibodies-all with a monophasic course of disease-no in vitro autoantibody production could be measured, suggesting a lack of autoantigen-specific memory B cells. In some of them, autoantibody production by unstimulated cells was detectable, presumably corresponding to high amounts of autoantigen-specific plasmablasts-well in line with a severe but monophasic course of disease. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that different B-cell responses may occur in autoimmune nodopathies and may serve as markers of courses of disease and response to rituximab.

Different binding and pathogenic effect of neurofascin and contactin-1 autoantibodies in autoimmune nodopathies.

Introduction: IgG4 autoantibodies against paranodal proteins are known to induce acute-onset and often severe sensorimotor autoimmune neuropathies. How autoantibodies reach their antigens at the paranode in spite of the myelin barrier is still unclear. Methods: We performed in vitro incubation experiments with patient sera on unfixed and unpermeabilized nerve fibers and in vivo intraneural and intrathecal passive transfer of patient IgG to rats, to explore the access of IgG autoantibodies directed against neurofascin-155 and contactin-1 to the paranodes and their pathogenic effect. Results: We found that in vitro incubation resulted in weak paranodal binding of anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies whereas anti-neurofascin-155 autoantibodies bound to the nodes more than to the paranodes. After short-term intraneural injection, no nodal or paranodal binding was detectable when using anti-neurofascin-155 antibodies. After repeated intrathecal injections, nodal more than paranodal binding could be detected in animals treated with anti-neurofascin-155, accompanied by sensorimotor neuropathy. In contrast, no paranodal binding was visible in rats intrathecally injected with anti-contactin-1 antibodies, and animals remained unaffected. Conclusion: These data support the notion of different pathogenic mechanisms of anti-neurofascin-155 and anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies and different accessibility of paranodal and nodal structures.

Diabetes Mellitus Is a Possible Risk Factor for Nodo-paranodopathy With Antiparanodal Autoantibodies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nodo-paranodopathies are peripheral neuropathies with dysfunction of the node of Ranvier. Affected patients who are seropositive for antibodies against adhesion molecules like contactin-1 and neurofascin show distinct clinical features and a disruption of the paranodal complex. An axoglial dysjunction is also a characteristic finding of diabetic neuropathy. Here, we aim to investigate a possible association of antibody-mediated nodo-paranodopathy and diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 227 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and Guillain-Barré syndrome from multiple centers in Germany who had undergone diagnostic testing for antiparanodal antibodies targeting neurofascin-155, pan-neurofascin, contactin-1-associated protein 1, and contactin-1. To study possible direct pathogenic effects of antiparanodal antibodies, we performed immunofluorescence binding assays on human pancreatic tissue sections. RESULTS: The frequency of DM was 33.3% in seropositive patients and thus higher compared with seronegative patients (14.1%, OR = 3.04, 95% CI = 1.31-6.80). The relative risk of DM in seropositive patients was 3.4-fold higher compared with the general German population. Seropositive patients with DM most frequently harbored anti-contactin-1 antibodies and had higher antibody titers than seropositive patients without DM. The diagnosis of DM preceded the onset of neuropathy in seropositive patients. No immunoreactivity of antiparanodal antibodies against pancreatic tissue was detected. DISCUSSION: We report an association of nodo-paranodopathy and DM. Our results suggest that DM may be a potential risk factor for predisposing to developing nodo-paranodopathy and argue against DM being induced by the autoantibodies. Our findings set the basis for further research investigating underlying immunopathogenetic connections.

Anti-contactin-1 Antibodies Affect Surface Expression and Sodium Currents in Dorsal Root Ganglia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As autoantibodies to contactin-1 from patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy not only bind to the paranodes where they are supposed to cause conduction failure but also bind to other neuronal cell types, we aimed to investigate the effect of anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies on contactin-1 surface expression in cerebellar granule neurons, dorsal root ganglion neurons, and contactin-1-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. METHODS: Immunocytochemistry including structured illumination microscopy and immunoblotting was used to determine expression levels of contactin-1 and/or sodium channels after long-term exposure to autoantibodies from 3 seropositive patients. For functional analysis of sodium channels, whole-cell recordings of sodium currents were performed on dorsal root ganglion neurons incubated with anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies. RESULTS: We found a reduction in contactin-1 expression levels on dorsal root ganglion neurons, cerebellar granule neurons, and contactin-1-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and decreased dorsal root ganglion sodium currents after long-term exposure to anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies. Sodium channel density did not decrease. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate a direct effect of anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies on the surface expression of contactin-1 and sodium currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons. This may be the pathophysiologic correlate of sensory ataxia reported in these patients.

Antiparanodal antibodies and IgG subclasses in acute autoimmune neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether IgG subclasses of antiparanodal autoantibodies are related to disease course and treatment response in acute- to subacute-onset neuropathies, we retrospectively screened 161 baseline serum/CSF samples and 66 follow-up serum/CSF samples. METHODS: We used ELISA and immunofluorescence assays to detect antiparanodal IgG and their subclasses and titers in serum/CSF of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), recurrent GBS (R-GBS), Miller-Fisher syndrome, and acute- to subacute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP). We evaluated clinical data retrospectively. RESULTS: We detected antiparanodal autoantibodies with a prevalence of 4.3% (7/161), more often in A-CIDP (4/23, 17.4%) compared with GBS (3/114, 2.6%). Longitudinal subclass analysis in the patients with GBS revealed IgG2/3 autoantibodies against Caspr-1 and against anti-contactin-1/Caspr-1, which disappeared at remission. At disease onset, patients with A-CIDP had IgG2/3 anti-Caspr-1 and anti-contactin-1/Caspr-1 or IgG4 anti-contactin-1 antibodies, IgG3 being associated with good response to IV immunoglobulins (IVIg). In the chronic phase of disease, IgG subclass of one patient with A-CIDP switched from IgG3 to IgG4. CONCLUSION: Our data (1) confirm and extend previous observations that antiparanodal IgG2/3 but not IgG4 antibodies can occur in acute-onset neuropathies manifesting as monophasic GBS, (2) suggest association of IgG3 to a favorable response to IVIg, and (3) lend support to the hypothesis that in some patients, an IgG subclass switch from IgG3 to IgG4 may be the correlate of a secondary progressive or relapsing course following a GBS-like onset.

Anti-pan-neurofascin IgG3 as a marker of fulminant autoimmune neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize patients with autoantibodies against different neurofascin (NF) isoforms. METHODS: Screening of a large cohort of patient sera for anti-NF autoantibodies by ELISA and further characterization by cell-based assays, epitope mapping, and complement binding assays. RESULTS: Two different clinical phenotypes became apparent in this study: The well-known clinical picture of subacute-onset severe sensorimotor neuropathy with tremor that is known to be associated with IgG4 autoantibodies against the paranodal isoform NF-155 was found in 2 patients. The second phenotype with a dramatic course of disease with tetraplegia and almost locked-in syndrome was associated with IgG3 autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal isoforms of NF in 3 patients. The epitope against which these autoantibodies were directed in this second phenotype was the common Ig domain found in all 3 NF isoforms. In contrast, anti-NF-155 IgG4 were directed against the NF-155-specific Fn3Fn4 domain. The description of a second phenotype of anti-NF-associated neuropathy is in line with some case reports of similar patients that were published in the last year. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that anti-pan-NF-associated neuropathy differs from anti-NF-155-associated neuropathy, and epitope and subclass play a major role in the pathogenesis and severity of anti-NF-associated neuropathy and should be determined to correctly classify patients, also in respect to possible differences in therapeutic response.

Complement deposition induced by binding of anti-contactin-1 auto-antibodies is modified by immunoglobulins.

Inflammatory neuropathies associated with auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins like contactin-1 are reported to respond poorly to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). A reason might be that IVIG interacts with the complement pathway and these auto-antibodies often belong to the IgG4 subclass that does not activate complement. However, some patients do show a response to IVIG, especially at the beginning of the disease. This corresponds with the finding of coexisting IgG subclasses IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3. We therefore aimed to investigate complement deposition and activation by samples of three patients with anti-contactin-1 IgG auto-antibodies of different subclasses as a potential predictor for response to IVIG. Complement deposition and activation was measured by cell binding and ELISA based assays, and the effect of IVIG on complement deposition was assessed by addition of different concentrations of IVIG. Binding of anti-contactin-1 auto-antibodies of all three patients induced complement deposition and activation with the strongest effect shown by the serum of a patient with predominance of IgG3 auto-antibodies. IVIG led to a reduction of complement deposition in a dose-dependent manner, but did not reduce binding of auto-antibodies to contactin-1. We conclude that complement deposition may contribute to the pathophysiology of anti-contactin-1 associated neuropathy, particularly in patients with predominance of the IgG3 subclass. The proportion of different auto-antibody subclasses may be a predictor for the response to IVIG in patients with auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins.

Contactin-1 and Neurofascin-155/-186 Are Not Targets of Auto-Antibodies in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy is an immune mediated disease presenting with multifocal muscle weakness and conduction block. IgM auto-antibodies against the ganglioside GM1 are detectable in about 50% of the patients. Auto-antibodies against the paranodal proteins contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 and the nodal protein neurofascin-186 have been detected in subgroups of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Recently, auto-antibodies against neurofascin-186 and gliomedin were described in more than 60% of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. In the current study, we aimed to validate this finding, using a combination of different assays for auto-antibody detection. In addition we intended to detect further auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins, specifically contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 in multifocal motor neuropathy patients' sera. We analyzed sera of 33 patients with well-characterized multifocal motor neuropathy for IgM or IgG anti-contactin-1, anti-neurofascin-155 or -186 antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, binding assays with transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and murine teased fibers. We did not detect any IgM or IgG auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 or -186 in any of our multifocal motor neuropathy patients. We conclude that auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 and -186 do not play a relevant role in the pathogenesis in this cohort with multifocal motor neuropathy.