Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(1): 297-308, 2021 02 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979899

RESUMO

Background/aim: To assess the real-life efficacy, retention rate, and safety data of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Materials and methods: We analyzed all patients registered in the HURBIO database who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib. Patients who received at least one dose were included in retention analysis; patients with at least 1 control visit were included in efficacy and safety analysis. Factors predicting good response at the last follow-up visit were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan­Meier method and predictors of drug retention were determined by Cox proportional hazard model. Adverse events, reasons for switching, and discontinuation were also determined. Results: Two hundred and forty-seven (210, 85.0% female) patients were included in the study. The median duration of tofacitinib treatment was 10.2 (20.2) [med, (IQR)] months. Two hundred and four (82.6%) patients were included in safety and efficacy analysis; 45.6% of patients were in low-disease activity (LDA) state (DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2). Predictors of LDA were being biologic-naïve [aOR 2.53 (1.31­4.88); 95% CI] and RF negativity [aOR 2.14 (1.12­4.07); 95% CI]. At 1 year, the overall tofacitinib retention rate was 63.9% with no relevant predicting factor. Response and retention rates of tofacitinib were similar in patients with and without concomitant csDMARDs. Treatment failure was the most common cause of discontinuation. The most common infectious and laboratory adverse events were herpes zoster infection (3.9 per 100 patient-years) and elevation in ALT (x3UNL: 9.7 per 100 patient-years), respectively. Conclusion: Tofacitinib is effective as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs. It is a well-tolerated treatment option in Turkish RA patients.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Duração da Terapia , Feminino , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidade do Paciente , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Falha de Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 50(1): 31-36, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31655524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) therapies are increasingly being used in Takayasu's arteritis (TA) patients who are unresponsive to corticosteroids ± conventional immunosuppressive agents. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-6 (tocilizumab) therapy in refractory TA patients in real life. METHODS: Fifteen TA patients (86.7% were female) who received at least 3 cycles of tocilizumab therapy were retrospectively assessed by clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations before and after tocilizumab therapy. RESULTS: The median (min-max) age of the patients at evaluation was 35 (20-58) years and the median disease duration from diagnosis was 24 (12-168) months. The median (min.-max.) duration of follow-up after tocilizumab was 15 (3-42) months. There was a significant decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and patient global visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of patients after tocilizumab therapy. The median (min.-max.) ESR was 26 (5-119) vs. 3 (2-49) mm/h, P = 0.02; CRP was 39.8 (2.4-149.0) vs. 7.9 (0-92.9) mg/L, P = 0.017; and patient global VAS was 50 (0-90) vs. 30 (0-60), P = 0.027, respectively. In 8 patients, ESR and CRP levels were in the normal range in the last control. Imaging modality results after tocilizumab were available for 9 patients; 8 patients were radiologically stable and regression was seen in 1 patient. Comparable imaging modality results before and after tocilizumab were available for 5 patients; 4 patients were radiologically stable and regression was seen in 1 patient. Radiological findings were consistent with laboratory responses. Glucocorticoid dosages decreased from a mean dosage of 16.2 (9.1) mg/day at baseline to 7.1 (3.8) mg/day (P = 0.001) at the last follow-up visit. There was no increase in the steroid dosage in any of the patients. All patients tolerated tocilizumab well. DISCUSSION: Based on retrospective real life data, anti-IL-6 (tocilizumab) appears to be an effective and tolerable treatment option in refractory TA patients.

3.
Turk J Med Sci ; 47(5): 1307-1314, 2017 11 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29151297

RESUMO

Background/aim: Since the majority of the IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) patients in the literature are from the Far East and the United States, there is a lack of large series from other parts of the world. We aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and outcome of Turkish IgG4-RD patients from a tertiary center. Materials and methods: Fifty-two patients classified as having definite IgG4-RD according to comprehensive diagnostic criteria were included in the study. Patients not fulfilling the definite criteria due to lack of pathologic specimen and/or serum IgG4 levels were excluded (n = 47). Clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features and treatment approaches were analyzed. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 51.1 years and sex predominance was not observed (male/female: 26/26). Median follow-up duration was 18 (IQR 25­75: 8­35) months. Retroperitoneal fibrosis was the most frequent presentation. Twenty-four (46.1%) patients had localized involvement. Corticosteroids were the mainstay of treatment (92.5%). Rituximab had been used for cases resistant to previous treatment or with relapses in 19 (47.5%) patients. A complete response was achieved in 52.5% and partial response (<50% regression) in 40%. Conclusion: This large and first cohort of IgG4-RD patients from Turkey showed similar clinical features to European cohorts, except for the male predominance in previous cohorts. Corticosteroids and rituximab are effective in IgG4-RD but there is still uncertainty about the usage of corticosteroid-sparing agents.

4.
Turk J Med Sci ; 44(2): 203-7, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25536725

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: To define the frequency of familial Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV) mutations in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and describe different clinical aspects of MEFV mutation carrier and noncarrier AS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 112 AS patients, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) scores were calculated. The frequencies of 12 different MEFV mutations were studied by multiplex polymerase chain reaction/reverse hybridization method and were compared to those of previously studied healthy controls for 5 common MEFV mutations. RESULTS: MEFV mutations were identified in 46 of 224 (20%) alleles and in 39 (35%) of AS patients. The distribution of mutations was: M694V, 30% (14); E148Q, 30% (14); P369S, 17% (8); V726A, 13% (6); A744S, 8% (4); and K695R, 2% (1). There were no significant differences between MEFV mutation carriers and noncarriers with respect to sex, age of symptom onset, disease duration, peripheral joint involvement, acute phase reactant levels, and BASDAI and BASFI scores (P > 0.05 all). MEFV mutation allelic frequency was not different between AS patients and healthy controls after adjusting for mutations studied (34/224 versus 22/200; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although we did not find significant clinical and laboratory differences between MEFV mutation carrier and noncarrier AS patients, further investigations are needed to define the impact of MEFV mutations on AS disease course.


Assuntos
Proteínas do Citoesqueleto/genética , Mutação , Espondilite Anquilosante/genética , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Pirina , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa