Evaluation of a digital learning object (DLO) to support the learning process in radiographic dental diagnosis.

AIMS: Studies have shown that inappropriate therapeutic strategies may be adopted if crown and root changes are misdiagnosed, potentially leading to undesirable consequences. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate a digital learning object, developed to improve skills in diagnosing radiographic dental changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The object was developed using the Visual Basic Application (VBA) software and evaluated by 62 undergraduate students (male: 24 and female: 38) taking an imaging diagnosis course. Participants were divided in two groups: test group, which used the object and control group, which attended conventional classes. After 3 weeks, students answered a 10-question test and took a practice test to diagnose 20 changes in periapical radiographs. RESULTS: The results show that test group performed better that control group in both tests, with statistically significant difference (P = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively). In overall, female students were better than male students. Specific aspects of object usability were assessed using a structured questionnaire based on the System Usability Scale (SUS), with a score of 90.5 and 81.6 by male and female students, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that students who used the DLO performed better than those who used conventional methods. This suggests that the DLO may be a useful teaching tool for dentistry undergraduates, on distance learning courses and as a complementary tool in face-to-face teaching.

CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling.

AIM: To compare detection of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in maxillary molar teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different voxel sizes against conventional radiographic examination when the MB1 was unprepared, prepared and filled. METHODOLOGY: Radiographic examination and 0.2-, 0.25- and 0.3-mm CBCT (n = 89) were performed in 3 stages: S1, no first mesiobuccal (MB1) canal preparation or filling; S2, after MB1 preparation and filling; and S3, after MB1 root canal filling removal and canal repreparation. Images were analysed using the i-Cat software. After RE and CBCT acquisition in S3, all the samples were clarified to directly visualize the presence of the MB2 canal. All images were analysed by a blinded, previously calibrated examiner. Accuracy, specificity and sensitivity were compared using analysis of variance (P < 0.05 level of significance). RESULTS: MB2 root canals were detected in 67% of the samples. Overall, radiographic examination was associated with lower mean accuracy values for detecting MB2 than CBCT regardless of the MB1 condition. The MB1 root canal condition did not influence MB2 detection in 0.2-mm voxel images. The presence of root fillings in the MB1 canals reduced the detection of MB2 canals, especially in the 0.3- and 0.25-mm voxel-size images (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CBCT was associated with higher mean values of specificity and sensibility than radiographic examination for the detection of MB2 canals. When endodontic retreatment is necessary removal of the root filling prior to the CBCT examination eliminates artefacts, thereby permitting the use of the 0.3-mm voxel protocol that has good diagnostic performance and lower radiation dose.

Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in a paediatric population based on panoramic radiographs analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the frequency and distribution of dental anomalies (DA) in a paediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Panoramic digital radiographs of children between 6 and 12 years old performed at a reference centre for radiographic exams were accessed. Two calibrated examiners evaluated the radiographs. The association between variables and outcomes was assessed using non-parametric tests. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Five hundred and twelve individuals were included and 61.3% presented at least one DA. The mean age of patients with DA (9.35±1.60) was significantly higher compared to patients with no anomalies (7.90±1.58). Patients with supernumerary tooth, however, were significantly younger. The most frequent DA were permanent tooth radicular dilacerations (38.1%), permanent tooth agenesis (29.3%), supernumerary tooth (6.4%) and impacted tooth (6.4%). Anterior teeth and female patients were more affected by radicular dilacerations. Dental agenesis was more frequent in the third molars followed by the upper lateral incisor. CONCLUSION: DA are quite frequent in the paediatric population and the most common DA observed herein could only be identified through imaging exams. The most appropriate timing to perform an investigation for the detection of dental anomalies appears to be between 9 and 10 years old.