Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Anesth ; 32(2): 219-226, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29468508

RESUMO

PURPOSES: The postoperative analgesic effect of tizanidine has not yet been evaluated sufficiently. The role of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) for postoperative analgesia after thyroidectomy remains questionable. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of combined use of BSCPB and a single-dose oral tizanidine in patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomized into 3 groups. The control group (Group C, n = 20) received BSCPB with 0.9% saline plus oral placebo. The superficial cervical group (Group SC, n = 20) received BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine plus oral placebo. The superficial cervical and tizanidine group (Group SC + T, n = 20) received BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine plus tizanidine 6 mg capsule. Surgical site pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia, posterior neck pain, headache, and opioid-related side effects were assessed for the first 24 h. RESULTS: Compared with Group C, rest and swallowing pain scores in Group SC and Group SC + T were statistically lower at all postoperative time points (p < 0.05). Fentanyl consumption was lower in Group SC and Group SC + T than in Group C at time periods 0-4 and 4-8 h (p < 0.05). Fentanyl consumption was lower in Group SC + T than in Group SC at 0-4 h (p = 0.006). Total fentanyl consumption was higher in Group C than in the other groups (p < 0.001). Postoperative cervical pain and occipital headache were significantly lower in Group SC + T than in the other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided BSCPB with or without preemptive oral tizanidine was effective at reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. Addition of preemptive oral tizanidine to BSCPB reduced the early postoperative opioid consumption, posterior neck pain, and occipital headache. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: The study was registered with a clinical trials registry (ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier NCT02725359).


Assuntos
Clonidina/análogos & derivados , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Tireoidectomia/métodos , Adulto , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Clonidina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propofol/uso terapêutico , Tireoidectomia/efeitos adversos
2.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 68(3): 260-265, 2018.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478705

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. "Syringe-Free" is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and divided into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. RESULTS: Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9±19.1s in Group C and 43.9±15.8s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups (p=0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2(±2.1) in Group C and 2.1(±1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (p=0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6(±0.8) and 1.2(±0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: "Syringe-Free" technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, "Syringe-Free" is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa