A nutritional screening threshold for optimal outcomes after Hartmann's reversal.

PURPOSE: Determining is nutritionally replete enough for Hartmann's reversal (HR) can be controversial and multifactorial. While there are many preoperative nutritional screening tools, the impact of malnourishment on HR has not been evaluated. The study aims to clarify how often patients undergoing HR are high risk for malnourishment at the time of surgery and how this impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: From 2012-2019, all elective HRs were identified in ACS-NSQIP. Patients were categorized in a malnourished group if they met one of the following criteria: (1) BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, (2) albumin < 3.5 g/dL, or (3) > 10% body weight loss in the last 6 months. Bivariate associations of preoperative demographics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors for 30-day mortality and organ space wound infection. RESULTS: 8878 procedures were evaluated (well-nourished = 7116 and malnourished = 1762). The malnourished group had higher mortality (p < 0.001), shorter operating time (p < .001), longer length of stay (p = 0.016), and higher rates of infection (p = 0.011), reintubation (p = 0.002), bleeding (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.001), and reoperation (p = 0.018). In multivariate regression models, malnourishment was an independent predictor for mortality (OR = 2.72, p < 0.001) and wound infection (OR = 1.19, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: A large percentage of patients undergoing HR were classified as being high-risk for malnutrition. Malnourishment was associated with some worse postoperative compilations including death and wound infection. Surgeons should routinely use preoperative screening for malnutrition to identify and attempt to optimize nutritional status prior to undergoing Hartmann's Reversal.

Risk factors for cerebrovascular accident after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Veterans.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a devastating complication. Patient comorbidities and intraoperative elements contribute to the risk of CVA. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for CVA in Veterans undergoing CABG. METHODS: Veterans undergoing isolated CABG from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively identified using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were observed. Univariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for postoperative CVA. Receiver operating characteristic diagnostics identified optimal inflection points between continuous risk factors and odds of CVA. RESULTS: Twenty-eight thousand seven hundred fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Incidence of CVA was 1.1% (310 cases). In multivariate analysis, preoperative cerebrovascular disease had the strongest association with postoperative CVA (adjusted odds ratio = 2.29; p < .001). There was an inverse relationship between CVA incidence and ejection fraction (EF), with EF of 35%-39% conferring a 2.11 times higher risk compared to EF >55% (p < .001). CVA incidence was not different in on-pump versus off-pump cases; however, after 104 min or more on bypass patients had a 55% greater adjusted odds of CVA (p < .001). Other risk factors included poor kidney function, prior myocardial infarction, and intra-aortic balloon pump use. CONCLUSION: The risk of CVA after CABG is multifactorial and involves multiple organ systems, including cardiac disease, poor renal function, and cerebrovascular disease, which was the strongest contributing risk factor. Optimization of these comorbidities and time on bypass may help improve clinical outcomes and lower the risk of this devastating complication.

Lymphovascular Invasion and Perineural Invasion Negatively Impact Overall Survival for Stage II Adenocarcinoma of the Colon.

BACKGROUND: Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion are histopathological features associated with higher-risk colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion on overall survival after diagnosis and to determine the protective effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma with high-risk factors. DESIGN: This was a retrospective database review of the 2010-2014 National Cancer Database for colon cancer. SETTINGS: Individuals diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma of the colon (histology code 8140) with primary surgical resection with >12 nodes harvested and no positive nodes on pathological examination were included. PATIENTS: A total of 32,493 patients underwent surgical resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. INTERVENTIONS: The study involved multivariate Cox regression analysis of the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon was measured. RESULTS: Five-year survival after diagnosis and surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy was lower for patients with lymphovascular (60.0%), perineural (56.9%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (55.8%) compared with double-negative disease (66.1%). Log-rank testing confirmed that adjuvant chemotherapy improved 5-year survival after diagnosis for lymphovascular (85.5%), perineural (83.6%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (74.3%). After controlling for differences in cohorts, Cox regression analysis showed an increased HR for mortality of 14.0% for lymphovascular (HR = 1.141 (95% CI, 1.060-1.228)), 32.1% for perineural (HR = 1.321 (95% CI, 1.176-1.483)), and 41.0% for lymphovascular and perineural invasion (HR = 1.409 (95% CI, 1.231-1.612)) compared with having neither. Chemotherapy showed a 43% reduction in hazard for mortality (HR = 0.570 (95% CI, 0.513-0.633)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective review and observational bias. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphovascular and perineural invasion have a detrimental effect on survival after diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. Chemotherapy may be protective specifically when lymphovascular and perineural invasion are present. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A786.

Safety of robotic surgical management of non-elective colectomies for diverticulitis compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Non-elective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) remains controversial, with minimal focus on robotics. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes for non-elective robotic colectomies for diverticulitis. All colectomies for diverticulitis in ACS-NSQIP between 2012 and 2019 were identified by CPT and diagnosis codes. Open and elective cases were excluded. Patients with disseminated cancer, ascites, and ventilator-dependence were excluded. Procedures were grouped by approach (laparoscopic and robotic). Demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Covariates with p < .1 were entered into multivariable logistic regression models for 30 day mortality, postoperative septic shock and reoperation. 6880 colectomies were evaluated (Laparoscopic = 6583, Robotic = 297). The laparoscopic group included more preoperative sepsis (31.6% vs. 10.8%), emergency cases (32.3% vs. 6.7%), and grade 3/4 wound classifications (53.3% vs. 42.8%). There was no difference in mortality, anastomotic leak, SSI, reoperation, readmission, or length of stay. The laparoscopic group had more postoperative sepsis (p = 0.001) and the robotic group showed increased bleeding (p = 0.011). In a multivariate regression model, increased age (OR = 1.083, p < 0.001), COPD (OR = 2.667, p = 0.007), dependent functional status (OR = 2.657, p = 0.021), dialysis (OR = 4.074, p = 0.016), preoperative transfusions (OR = 3.182, p = 0.019), emergency status (OR = 2.241, p = 0.010), higher ASA classification (OR = 3.170, p = 0.035), abnormal WBC (OR = 1.883, p = 0.046) were independent predictors for mortality. When controlling for confounders, robotic approach was not statistically significantly associated with septic shock or reoperation. When controlling for confounders, robotic approach was not a predictor for mortality, reoperation or septic shock. Robotic surgery is a feasible option for the acute management of diverticulitis.