Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(5): 2274-2285, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217005

RESUMO

AIMS: This prospective study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model of hydroxyurea (HU) in patients with sickle cell disease. This model can be used to determine the impact of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on HU kinetics. METHODS: We included 30 patients. They underwent HU pharmacokinetics analyses of plasma and urine. Six underwent PK analyses in 2 periods with and without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. HU was assayed with a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-UV method. Noncompartmental PK analysis was conducted and a population PK model built with Monolix. This model was validated externally on another 56 patients. HU PK was simulated as a function of GFR. RESULTS: The HU PK model was constructed as a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The quality criteria were good, including for external validation. We found that estimated GFR (eGFR) and body weight affected HU PK, with lower eGFR or body weight associated with a higher HU area under the curve. We recommend the monitoring of HU through eGFR and body weight, which together account for 47% of its variability. Urinary HU fractions and renal clearance were higher in the glomerular hyperfiltration group and lower in the moderate chronic kidney disease group, respectively. No differences in nonrenal HU clearance were observed. CONCLUSION: Estimated GFR has an impact on the kinetics of hydroxyurea, and HU dose should be adapted accordingly. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor seems to have minor effect on HU PK in adults with sickle cell disease.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Hidroxiureia , Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Antidrepanocíticos , Humanos , Rim/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 227, 2021 05 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with high thromboembolism risk, particularly with contraindications to OAC. The LAA itself could possess proarrhythmogenic properties. As patients undergoing LAA closure could be candidates for cardioversion or ablation, we aimed to evaluate AF disease progression following LAA closure and the outcome of patients undergoing a rhythm control strategy after the procedure. METHODS: The prospective multicenter French Nationwide Observational LAA Closure Registry (FLAAC) comprises 33 French interventional cardiology departments. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: history of non-valvular AF, successful LAA closure and long-term ECG follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients with successful LAA closure were enrolled in the study. Patients mean age was 75.4 ± 0.5 years. The study population was characterized by a high thromboembolic risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.5 ± 0.1) and frequent comorbidities. The median follow-up was 11.9 months. One hundred and nineteen (36.0%) patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) at baseline. Among SR patients, documented AF was observed in 16 (13.4%) patients whereas 15 (7.1%) patients in AF at baseline restored SR, at the end of follow up. Finally, only 13 patients (4%) underwent procedures to restore SR without complications during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients undergoing LAA closure have the same AF status at baseline and one year after the index procedure. During the follow-up, a very small proportion (4%) of our population underwent procedures to restore SR without complications whatever the post-procedural antithrombotic strategy was.


Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Função do Átrio Esquerdo , Frequência Cardíaca , Potenciais de Ação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter , Cardioversão Elétrica , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , França , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Retratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 18(1): 193, 2018 10 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30340532

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that morphine may protect the myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury by activating salvage kinase pathways. The objective of this two-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was to assess potential cardioprotective effects of intra-coronary morphine in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred for primary percutaneous intervention. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with STEMI were randomly assigned to intracoronary morphine (1 mg) or placebo at reperfusion of the culprit coronary artery. The primary endpoint was infarct size/left ventricular mass ratio assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on day 3-5. Secondary endpoints included the areas under the curve (AUC) for troponin T and creatine kinase over three days, left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by echocardiography on days 1 and 6, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Infarct size/left ventricular mass ratio was not significantly reduced by intracoronary morphine compared to placebo (27.2% ± 15.0% vs. 30.5% ± 10.6%, respectively, p = 0.28). Troponin T and creatine kinase AUCs were similar in the two groups. Morphine did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction on day 1 (49.7 ± 10.3% vs. 49.3 ± 9.3% with placebo, p = 0.84) or day 6 (48.5 ± 10.2% vs. 49.0 ± 8.5% with placebo, p = 0.86). The number of major adverse cardiac events, including stent thrombosis, during the one-year follow-up was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary morphine at reperfusion did not significantly reduce infarct size or improve left ventricular systolic function in patients with STEMI. Presence of comorbidities in some patients may contribute to explain these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01186445 (date of registration: August 23, 2010).


Assuntos
Morfina/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Substâncias Protetoras/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , França , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Arteriais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/etiologia , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Miocárdio/patologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Substâncias Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa